• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Penalty Box

    ClubDirtSports Playoff Newsletter

    123 ... 678 Next Last»
    ClubDirt
    Getty3
    Biscuiteater1
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Lowme
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2169
    Posts: 176
    123 ... 678 Next Last»
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 4:21 PM ET #1

    2015 Regular Season:  44 - 45

    tough season for ClubDirtSports.  winning seasons are not guaranteed but hopefully we'll be back next season and do better.  at a minimum there were a lot of solid picks by everyone, some good discussion and some insight into how we view nfl betting that has produced a lot more wins than losses over the years.

    anyway, early subscribers know we put out the first newsletter in the summer and at some point, throw out some future we think are interesting.  at the end of the season, we like to see how they did.  i never bet these mainly because, for the team totals, by the time i feel good about making a call on a team, the odds usually don't make it worthwhile anymore.  as for the other futures, i just don't like to have bets tied up that long.  anyway, here's what we posted in august:


    i can see going half a unit each on KC to win the AFC West at +315 and SD at +425

    - definitely a good bet on KC at that number but didn't quite get there. 

    Carolina winning the NFC South at +225

    - damn, great number for an easy win if anyone took it. 

    Seattle not winning the NFC West at +255

    - another great number for a bet that was essentially won early

    Detroit making the playoffs at +160

    - not a great number but if johnson didn't fumble at the goalline vs. seattle and the ref didn't fuck up the call plus the hail mary against GB< this would have won.  then again, if my aunt had balls . . .

    Half a unit each on AZ (+150) and Stl (+200) to make the playoffs

    - pretty good number for AZ for what turned out to be an easy winner.  Stl, on the other hand, 


    as for over/unders:

    Atl under 9 but it's already up to -185, can't pay that.  anyone get this at a reasonable price?

    - i remember really liking this one, but then again, so did most people, hence the -185 that i would never pay for a bet like this. 

    Shrimps under 9.5 -136 

    -     Shrimps at 9.5  

    Detroit over 8 -130

    - tough break for anyone who took this one

    Pitt under 9 -121

    - not a good call and at -121

    SF under is too expensive, as expected

    - i don't remember what this was but it was obviously out of range, despite hoe easy it may have been

    Seattle under 11.5 -133

    - if i recall, some people actually jumped on this one.  tough to hit 12+ year after year in a division like that

    Stl over 7.5 -131

    - close but a tough bet to make at -131


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    2015 Regular Season:  44 - 45

    tough season for ClubDirtSports.  winning seasons are not guaranteed but hopefully we'll be back next season and do better.  at a minimum there were a lot of solid picks by everyone, some good discussion and some insight into how we view nfl betting that has produced a lot more wins than losses over the years.

    anyway, early subscribers know we put out the first newsletter in the summer and at some point, throw out some future we think are interesting.  at the end of the season, we like to see how they did.  i never bet these mainly because, for the team totals, by the time i feel good about making a call on a team, the odds usually don't make it worthwhile anymore.  as for the other futures, i just don't like to have bets tied up that long.  anyway, here's what we posted in august:


    i can see going half a unit each on KC to win the AFC West at +315 and SD at +425

    - definitely a good bet on KC at that number but didn't quite get there. 

    Carolina winning the NFC South at +225

    - damn, great number for an easy win if anyone took it. 

    Seattle not winning the NFC West at +255

    - another great number for a bet that was essentially won early

    Detroit making the playoffs at +160

    - not a great number but if johnson didn't fumble at the goalline vs. seattle and the ref didn't fuck up the call plus the hail mary against GB< this would have won.  then again, if my aunt had balls . . .

    Half a unit each on AZ (+150) and Stl (+200) to make the playoffs

    - pretty good number for AZ for what turned out to be an easy winner.  Stl, on the other hand, 


    as for over/unders:

    Atl under 9 but it's already up to -185, can't pay that.  anyone get this at a reasonable price?

    - i remember really liking this one, but then again, so did most people, hence the -185 that i would never pay for a bet like this. 

    Shrimps under 9.5 -136 

    -     Shrimps at 9.5  

    Detroit over 8 -130

    - tough break for anyone who took this one

    Pitt under 9 -121

    - not a good call and at -121

    SF under is too expensive, as expected

    - i don't remember what this was but it was obviously out of range, despite hoe easy it may have been

    Seattle under 11.5 -133

    - if i recall, some people actually jumped on this one.  tough to hit 12+ year after year in a division like that

    Stl over 7.5 -131

    - close but a tough bet to make at -131


     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 4:45 PM ET #2

    ok, back to the playoffs.  no need to wait until wednesday as it's impossible to get away from the matchups during playoff time.

    let's see what the lines are:

    KC @ Houston.  KC -3/-130 or -3.5 -105.  first, be very wary going against home dogs in the playoffs.  second, houston's defense is in top form and they've won 3 straight.  but, looking at their wins, those last three were against the three garbage teams in their division.  however, they are 2-3 against playoff quality teams (i include the jets here) so that's pretty good.  i'd be very careful going against the better defensive team at home at 3+ when they've beaten 2 playoff level teams already. 

    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division. 

    Pitt @ Cincy.  Pitt is -2.5 -110.  Looks like mccarron will be playing but something to keep an eye on.  with mccarron, they lost to denver but no shame in losing @ Denver by 3.  i won't include the Pitt game since mccarron had to play with no preparation.  otherwise, they were 3-4 against playoff teams but their last win was against Pitt in week 7. 

    Pitt probably lost another RB so that could be a problem against a good defense on the road.  Roethlisberger has been throwing a lot of picks against much worse defenses lately.  Pitt is also 3-4 against playoff teams.  however, keep in mind, other than the game where the bengals had to throw mccaron into the mix, Pitt has a total of zero good road wins. 

    Seattle @ Minnesota  Seattle is -5.5 -110.  not sure why minnesota wanted to beat GB last night to play seattle but here we are.  minnesota got blown up by seattle a few weeks ago because i think this is a bad matchup for them.  they are 2-4 against playoff teams and i'm not sure how much we should count last night as it appeared that rodgers and GB had no interest in winning that one. 

    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Gb @ Wash  Wash is -1.5.  people are writing GB off, which is odd given they have the best QB in the playoffs. sure they looked terrible last night but i'm going to disregard that game.  of course they got lit up by AZ the week before and you can't disregard that.  but Wash is no AZ.  before that, they won 3 straight against decent competition.  3 - 4 against playoff teams but only one win in the second half.

    people are high on wash but i'm not that impressed.  they played in a horrible division, played only three playoff quality teams and went 0-3 and lost all three by double digits. granted, all three were on the road.  i think they have one good win, which was buffalo three weeks ago, possibly philly in week 4.


    so, we have three home dogs and Wash is close.  home teams are going at least 2-2 this week.  which ones are going to win?


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ok, back to the playoffs.  no need to wait until wednesday as it's impossible to get away from the matchups during playoff time.

    let's see what the lines are:

    KC @ Houston.  KC -3/-130 or -3.5 -105.  first, be very wary going against home dogs in the playoffs.  second, houston's defense is in top form and they've won 3 straight.  but, looking at their wins, those last three were against the three garbage teams in their division.  however, they are 2-3 against playoff quality teams (i include the jets here) so that's pretty good.  i'd be very careful going against the better defensive team at home at 3+ when they've beaten 2 playoff level teams already. 

    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division. 

    Pitt @ Cincy.  Pitt is -2.5 -110.  Looks like mccarron will be playing but something to keep an eye on.  with mccarron, they lost to denver but no shame in losing @ Denver by 3.  i won't include the Pitt game since mccarron had to play with no preparation.  otherwise, they were 3-4 against playoff teams but their last win was against Pitt in week 7. 

    Pitt probably lost another RB so that could be a problem against a good defense on the road.  Roethlisberger has been throwing a lot of picks against much worse defenses lately.  Pitt is also 3-4 against playoff teams.  however, keep in mind, other than the game where the bengals had to throw mccaron into the mix, Pitt has a total of zero good road wins. 

    Seattle @ Minnesota  Seattle is -5.5 -110.  not sure why minnesota wanted to beat GB last night to play seattle but here we are.  minnesota got blown up by seattle a few weeks ago because i think this is a bad matchup for them.  they are 2-4 against playoff teams and i'm not sure how much we should count last night as it appeared that rodgers and GB had no interest in winning that one. 

    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Gb @ Wash  Wash is -1.5.  people are writing GB off, which is odd given they have the best QB in the playoffs. sure they looked terrible last night but i'm going to disregard that game.  of course they got lit up by AZ the week before and you can't disregard that.  but Wash is no AZ.  before that, they won 3 straight against decent competition.  3 - 4 against playoff teams but only one win in the second half.

    people are high on wash but i'm not that impressed.  they played in a horrible division, played only three playoff quality teams and went 0-3 and lost all three by double digits. granted, all three were on the road.  i think they have one good win, which was buffalo three weeks ago, possibly philly in week 4.


    so, we have three home dogs and Wash is close.  home teams are going at least 2-2 this week.  which ones are going to win?


     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 7:42 PM ET #3

    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division.  

    True, but KC's last 7 season ending wins all came against non-playoff teams. In fact none of them even had a winning record. 

    Houston has held 5 of their last 9 opponents to less than 7 points. I'm not sure I'm seeing how KC scores in this game. Just keep running the ball? The Texans are a very respectable #10 in rush defense(#3 overall).  Over those last 9 games, only New England outgained the Texans in total yards. This is the one game where I didn't see the road team being favored, but the populus seems to still be on the Chiefs.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division.  

    True, but KC's last 7 season ending wins all came against non-playoff teams. In fact none of them even had a winning record. 

    Houston has held 5 of their last 9 opponents to less than 7 points. I'm not sure I'm seeing how KC scores in this game. Just keep running the ball? The Texans are a very respectable #10 in rush defense(#3 overall).  Over those last 9 games, only New England outgained the Texans in total yards. This is the one game where I didn't see the road team being favored, but the populus seems to still be on the Chiefs.
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 7:52 PM ET #4

    people are high on wash but i'm not that impressed.  they played in a horrible division, played only three playoff quality teams and went 0-3 and lost all three by double digits. granted, all three were on the road.  i think they have one good win, which was buffalo three weeks ago, possibly philly in week 4.

    Can you even imagine what a GB/Wash game line would have been at the mid point of the season? GB by 12 at home, 6 on the road is what I get. Anyways, a lot of talking heads are overvaluing the Skins and underestimating the Packers. This is one where you just take the more consistent, playoff savvy  team playing on an even keel and disregard the hype of the Cousins and crew.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    people are high on wash but i'm not that impressed.  they played in a horrible division, played only three playoff quality teams and went 0-3 and lost all three by double digits. granted, all three were on the road.  i think they have one good win, which was buffalo three weeks ago, possibly philly in week 4.

    Can you even imagine what a GB/Wash game line would have been at the mid point of the season? GB by 12 at home, 6 on the road is what I get. Anyways, a lot of talking heads are overvaluing the Skins and underestimating the Packers. This is one where you just take the more consistent, playoff savvy  team playing on an even keel and disregard the hype of the Cousins and crew.
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 7:57 PM ET #5

    Pitt @ Cincy.  Pitt is -2.5 -110.  Looks like mccarron will be playing but something to keep an eye on.  with mccarron, they lost to denver but no shame in losing @ Denver by 3.  i won't include the Pitt game since mccarron had to play with no preparation.  otherwise, they were 3-4 against playoff teams but their last win was against Pitt in week 7.  

    It's a bad number. You know it and I know it. Yes, we have to go back to dipping into the dry well of Marvin Lewis, but he's been rather fruitful this year. Dalton or McCarron, I don't care. Cincinnati is the right side and the better team and are long overdue. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Pitt @ Cincy.  Pitt is -2.5 -110.  Looks like mccarron will be playing but something to keep an eye on.  with mccarron, they lost to denver but no shame in losing @ Denver by 3.  i won't include the Pitt game since mccarron had to play with no preparation.  otherwise, they were 3-4 against playoff teams but their last win was against Pitt in week 7.  

    It's a bad number. You know it and I know it. Yes, we have to go back to dipping into the dry well of Marvin Lewis, but he's been rather fruitful this year. Dalton or McCarron, I don't care. Cincinnati is the right side and the better team and are long overdue. 
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 8:01 PM ET #6

    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Only reason I hesitate on Seattle is because of Lynch. The offense thrived without him. If he plays, they must continue to just be who they've been for the last 8 weeks and not succumb to a ground and pound attempt to outdo Peterson. I think Pete Carroll is smarter than that. Minnesota is not ready for this moment. Lest getting stupid, Seattle is the right play.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Only reason I hesitate on Seattle is because of Lynch. The offense thrived without him. If he plays, they must continue to just be who they've been for the last 8 weeks and not succumb to a ground and pound attempt to outdo Peterson. I think Pete Carroll is smarter than that. Minnesota is not ready for this moment. Lest getting stupid, Seattle is the right play.
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 11:26 PM ET #7

    I'm of the belief that Alex Smith will have to have an above average Alex Smith type game to insure a victory.Waiting and hoping +4
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm of the belief that Alex Smith will have to have an above average Alex Smith type game to insure a victory.Waiting and hoping +4
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 4, 2016 - 11:36 PM ET #8

    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 12:49 AM ET #9

    I see the Pitt/Cincy being similar Cincy's battle with the FIGHTING Shrimps with the difference being Pitt having a better qb and much better receivers.Cincy was likely to stop Pitts running game and now they are probably sure to.The key to Pitts winning will be their ability to stop Cincy's ground game and their run D. has been pretty effective.I just dont like backing on dimensional teams but if i have too this would be the one.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I see the Pitt/Cincy being similar Cincy's battle with the FIGHTING Shrimps with the difference being Pitt having a better qb and much better receivers.Cincy was likely to stop Pitts running game and now they are probably sure to.The key to Pitts winning will be their ability to stop Cincy's ground game and their run D. has been pretty effective.I just dont like backing on dimensional teams but if i have too this would be the one.
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 12:51 AM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.
    I starting to get the U feeling here.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.
    I starting to get the U feeling here.
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 9:43 AM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    2015 Regular Season:  44 - 45

    tough season for ClubDirtSports.  winning seasons are not guaranteed but hopefully we'll be back next season and do better.  at a minimum there were a lot of solid picks by everyone, some good discussion and some insight into how we view nfl betting that has produced a lot more wins than losses over the years.

    anyway, early subscribers know we put out the first newsletter in the summer and at some point, throw out some future we think are interesting.  at the end of the season, we like to see how they did.  i never bet these mainly because, for the team totals, by the time i feel good about making a call on a team, the odds usually don't make it worthwhile anymore.  as for the other futures, i just don't like to have bets tied up that long.  anyway, here's what we posted in august:


    i can see going half a unit each on KC to win the AFC West at +315 and SD at +425

    - definitely a good bet on KC at that number but didn't quite get there. 

    Carolina winning the NFC South at +225

    - damn, great number for an easy win if anyone took it. 

    Seattle not winning the NFC West at +255

    - another great number for a bet that was essentially won early

    Detroit making the playoffs at +160

    - not a great number but if johnson didn't fumble at the goalline vs. seattle and the ref didn't darn up the call plus the hail mary against GB< this would have won.  then again, if my aunt had balls . . .

    Half a unit each on AZ (+150) and Stl (+200) to make the playoffs

    - pretty good number for AZ for what turned out to be an easy winner.  Stl, on the other hand, 


    as for over/unders:

    Atl under 9 but it's already up to -185, can't pay that.  anyone get this at a reasonable price?

    - i remember really liking this one, but then again, so did most people, hence the -185 that i would never pay for a bet like this. 

    Shrimps under 9.5 -136 

    -     Shrimps at 9.5  

    Detroit over 8 -130

    - tough break for anyone who took this one

    Pitt under 9 -121

    - not a good call and at -121

    SF under is too expensive, as expected

    - i don't remember what this was but it was obviously out of range, despite hoe easy it may have been

    Seattle under 11.5 -133

    - if i recall, some people actually jumped on this one.  tough to hit 12+ year after year in a division like that

    Stl over 7.5 -131

    - close but a tough bet to make at -131


     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

    2015 Regular Season:  44 - 45

    tough season for ClubDirtSports.  winning seasons are not guaranteed but hopefully we'll be back next season and do better.  at a minimum there were a lot of solid picks by everyone, some good discussion and some insight into how we view nfl betting that has produced a lot more wins than losses over the years.

    anyway, early subscribers know we put out the first newsletter in the summer and at some point, throw out some future we think are interesting.  at the end of the season, we like to see how they did.  i never bet these mainly because, for the team totals, by the time i feel good about making a call on a team, the odds usually don't make it worthwhile anymore.  as for the other futures, i just don't like to have bets tied up that long.  anyway, here's what we posted in august:


    i can see going half a unit each on KC to win the AFC West at +315 and SD at +425

    - definitely a good bet on KC at that number but didn't quite get there. 

    Carolina winning the NFC South at +225

    - damn, great number for an easy win if anyone took it. 

    Seattle not winning the NFC West at +255

    - another great number for a bet that was essentially won early

    Detroit making the playoffs at +160

    - not a great number but if johnson didn't fumble at the goalline vs. seattle and the ref didn't darn up the call plus the hail mary against GB< this would have won.  then again, if my aunt had balls . . .

    Half a unit each on AZ (+150) and Stl (+200) to make the playoffs

    - pretty good number for AZ for what turned out to be an easy winner.  Stl, on the other hand, 


    as for over/unders:

    Atl under 9 but it's already up to -185, can't pay that.  anyone get this at a reasonable price?

    - i remember really liking this one, but then again, so did most people, hence the -185 that i would never pay for a bet like this. 

    Shrimps under 9.5 -136 

    -     Shrimps at 9.5  

    Detroit over 8 -130

    - tough break for anyone who took this one

    Pitt under 9 -121

    - not a good call and at -121

    SF under is too expensive, as expected

    - i don't remember what this was but it was obviously out of range, despite hoe easy it may have been

    Seattle under 11.5 -133

    - if i recall, some people actually jumped on this one.  tough to hit 12+ year after year in a division like that

    Stl over 7.5 -131

    - close but a tough bet to make at -131


     
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 11:29 AM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Only reason I hesitate on Seattle is because of Lynch. The offense thrived without him. If he plays, they must continue to just be who they've been for the last 8 weeks and not succumb to a ground and pound attempt to outdo Peterson. I think Pete Carroll is smarter than that. Minnesota is not ready for this moment. Lest getting stupid, Seattle is the right play.



    minnesota is well coached but carroll has a great playoff track record.  i assume he'll be able to deal with lynch coming back. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

    seattle might be in top form.  i say might because people assume they are yet they lost to the rams two weeks ago.  anyway, they are 3-4 against playoffs teams but they have won 3 straight and covered all three.  lynch should be back.  if they can stop peterson, and i suspect they can, it'll be tough for minnesota.

    Only reason I hesitate on Seattle is because of Lynch. The offense thrived without him. If he plays, they must continue to just be who they've been for the last 8 weeks and not succumb to a ground and pound attempt to outdo Peterson. I think Pete Carroll is smarter than that. Minnesota is not ready for this moment. Lest getting stupid, Seattle is the right play.



    minnesota is well coached but carroll has a great playoff track record.  i assume he'll be able to deal with lynch coming back. 
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 11:31 AM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division.  

    True, but KC's last 7 season ending wins all came against non-playoff teams. In fact none of them even had a winning record. 

    Houston has held 5 of their last 9 opponents to less than 7 points. I'm not sure I'm seeing how KC scores in this game. Just keep running the ball? The Texans are a very respectable #10 in rush defense(#3 overall).  Over those last 9 games, only New England outgained the Texans in total yards. This is the one game where I didn't see the road team being favored, but the populus seems to still be on the Chiefs.


    since it's almost a certainty that a couple of these home teams are going to win, i'm trying to make a case for them.  smith can be questionable but i'd take him over hoyer any day.  of course, KC doesn't have anything watt or clowney (if healthy). 

    i'd like to see a reliable source tell me where the bets are this weekend.  i usually don't pay attention but i'm interested to see what the percentages are on washington and KC.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

    of course, everyone knows KC is arguably the hottest team in the league.  they are 3-4 against playoff teams but all 4 losses came by week 6 and they played in a much tougher division.  

    True, but KC's last 7 season ending wins all came against non-playoff teams. In fact none of them even had a winning record. 

    Houston has held 5 of their last 9 opponents to less than 7 points. I'm not sure I'm seeing how KC scores in this game. Just keep running the ball? The Texans are a very respectable #10 in rush defense(#3 overall).  Over those last 9 games, only New England outgained the Texans in total yards. This is the one game where I didn't see the road team being favored, but the populus seems to still be on the Chiefs.


    since it's almost a certainty that a couple of these home teams are going to win, i'm trying to make a case for them.  smith can be questionable but i'd take him over hoyer any day.  of course, KC doesn't have anything watt or clowney (if healthy). 

    i'd like to see a reliable source tell me where the bets are this weekend.  i usually don't pay attention but i'm interested to see what the percentages are on washington and KC.
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 11:34 AM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.



    i haven't watched washington much this season.  i didn't bet their games as often as others.  but, i think an argument can be made that this is the worst defense rodgers will have played since the raiders and then before that, a long time.  if you look at GB's schedule, they faced some quality defenses this season.  so, i am scared of the way GB's offense has looked, but if they can get it together, they should be able to get it together here.  also, should rodgers ever be a underdog to cousins?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    My 1st thoughts about the Packers were along the same line as yours,but my brain keeps reminding me that no matter how you spread the mustard the Senators are playing good ball and the Pack, not so much.So if the Senators play like they have the Packers are going to have to play MUCH! better on offense.



    i haven't watched washington much this season.  i didn't bet their games as often as others.  but, i think an argument can be made that this is the worst defense rodgers will have played since the raiders and then before that, a long time.  if you look at GB's schedule, they faced some quality defenses this season.  so, i am scared of the way GB's offense has looked, but if they can get it together, they should be able to get it together here.  also, should rodgers ever be a underdog to cousins?
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 5, 2016 - 5:01 PM ET #15

    Ist instinct > Packers
    Defense > Packers
    > Rodgers
            
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Ist instinct > Packers
    Defense > Packers
    > Rodgers
            
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 2:01 PM ET #16

    was going to look at that under in Sea/Minn but it's already down a couple of points so probably no play.

    however, another way to pay it could be the Minn TT under 17.5.  it probably opened at 18.5, maybe 19, and since so few games end on 19 or 18, you don't lose much value at 17.5  might do it. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    was going to look at that under in Sea/Minn but it's already down a couple of points so probably no play.

    however, another way to pay it could be the Minn TT under 17.5.  it probably opened at 18.5, maybe 19, and since so few games end on 19 or 18, you don't lose much value at 17.5  might do it. 
     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 4:40 PM ET #17

    KC -3
    Cinci +3 ML
    Sea -5
    Wash +1 ML

    GL, fella's 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    KC -3
    Cinci +3 ML
    Sea -5
    Wash +1 ML

    GL, fella's 
     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 7, 2016 - 5:27 PM ET #18

    HJS 


    just saw a couple of stats that probably don't mean much but might be of interest to someone.

    Marvin Lewis:  0-6 su and ats in the playaoffs.  he's due. 

    Tomlin: 8-1 to the over


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    HJS 


    just saw a couple of stats that probably don't mean much but might be of interest to someone.

    Marvin Lewis:  0-6 su and ats in the playaoffs.  he's due. 

    Tomlin: 8-1 to the over


     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jan. 8, 2016 - 6:44 PM ET #19

    i don't really love anything this weekend, which is odd for the first round of the playoffs.  i think i'll play around with a couple of things to keep it interesting.

    here's what i'm thinking so far

    Cincy +3  i wanted to wait for dalton to be officially declared out to see if it got cheaper,  i doubt it goes to 3.5.  i'll get this at -110 or so.

    Seattle ml/Alabama ml - seattle is my favorite at more than 4 side of the week but i'm hesitant to bet a road favorite with a low total that is dropping and the weather is going to be terrible.  i haven't followed alabama much although we did go 2-0 in the bowls, but the sec is good and the acc sucks so how's that for some strong analysis.  i bet no one thought of that.  anyway, you can get this parlay at even right now.

    GB +7.5 with Pitt/Cincy over 38.5 



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    i don't really love anything this weekend, which is odd for the first round of the playoffs.  i think i'll play around with a couple of things to keep it interesting.

    here's what i'm thinking so far

    Cincy +3  i wanted to wait for dalton to be officially declared out to see if it got cheaper,  i doubt it goes to 3.5.  i'll get this at -110 or so.

    Seattle ml/Alabama ml - seattle is my favorite at more than 4 side of the week but i'm hesitant to bet a road favorite with a low total that is dropping and the weather is going to be terrible.  i haven't followed alabama much although we did go 2-0 in the bowls, but the sec is good and the acc sucks so how's that for some strong analysis.  i bet no one thought of that.  anyway, you can get this parlay at even right now.

    GB +7.5 with Pitt/Cincy over 38.5 



     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 6:56 AM ET #20

    Got to go with Cincy, with the exception of the 2nd half against Cleveland who at that point might have thrown in the towel Pitt did not look the same their last 2 games.I look for Bengals to control clock, hit a few key passes and win comfortably.
    Only caveat is and i'm working off memory here is that Ben has played well at P.B.() stadium and has a stellar record there. Gonna look at joining Hugh on the ml or add another big unit () to this game.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Got to go with Cincy, with the exception of the 2nd half against Cleveland who at that point might have thrown in the towel Pitt did not look the same their last 2 games.I look for Bengals to control clock, hit a few key passes and win comfortably.
    Only caveat is and i'm working off memory here is that Ben has played well at P.B.() stadium and has a stellar record there. Gonna look at joining Hugh on the ml or add another big unit () to this game.
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 7:03 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    Ist instinct > Packers
    Defense > Packers
    > Rodgers
            
    If the Senators win it will be their 1st victory over a team that finished the season with a wining record.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    Ist instinct > Packers
    Defense > Packers
    > Rodgers
            
    If the Senators win it will be their 1st victory over a team that finished the season with a wining record.
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 4:05 PM ET #22

    Final regular season tally is +55. Yup, not 5500, or even 550, but $55. I suppose I'm grateful for having so much fun for nothing.

    HOU +3  110/100   I liked this one early, and I'll stand by it.

    HOU/KC  Over 5.5 Sacks  105/100   Seems like a logical bet, although I'm surprised the under 5.5 is juiced higher. 

    CINCI  ML  100/115   All or nothing on the Bungles.

    PITT  TT Under 23.5  105/100  Full faith in Cinci's defense. With everyone expecting Pitt to light it up, I thought this number was suspiciously low. It's a good thing I'm not one who thinks the Steelers will light up the scoreboard.

    Rothlisberger INT prop:  Over 1  120/100  Could have played the over 0.5 @ (195), but this feels safer. I still think he's throwing 2-3 picks today.

    5 plays risking 540/515

    Wild Card Weekend 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Final regular season tally is +55. Yup, not 5500, or even 550, but $55. I suppose I'm grateful for having so much fun for nothing.

    HOU +3  110/100   I liked this one early, and I'll stand by it.

    HOU/KC  Over 5.5 Sacks  105/100   Seems like a logical bet, although I'm surprised the under 5.5 is juiced higher. 

    CINCI  ML  100/115   All or nothing on the Bungles.

    PITT  TT Under 23.5  105/100  Full faith in Cinci's defense. With everyone expecting Pitt to light it up, I thought this number was suspiciously low. It's a good thing I'm not one who thinks the Steelers will light up the scoreboard.

    Rothlisberger INT prop:  Over 1  120/100  Could have played the over 0.5 @ (195), but this feels safer. I still think he's throwing 2-3 picks today.

    5 plays risking 540/515

    Wild Card Weekend 

     
    Lowme
    Lowme
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 1678
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 4:17 PM ET #23

    Texans 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Texans 
     
    Biscuiteater1
    Biscuiteater1
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2011
    Posts: 33031
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 4:21 PM ET #24

    I think K.C. will get their sacks but unsure id Texicans will do the same with Shifty Alex.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I think K.C. will get their sacks but unsure id Texicans will do the same with Shifty Alex.
     
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Jan. 9, 2016 - 4:30 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    I think K.C. will get their sacks but unsure id Texicans will do the same with Shifty Alex.

    KC's OL allowed 46 sacks, 6th worst in NFL. That's a lot for a team which doesn't pass much. Watt and Mercilus were merciless against Jax last week. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

    I think K.C. will get their sacks but unsure id Texicans will do the same with Shifty Alex.

    KC's OL allowed 46 sacks, 6th worst in NFL. That's a lot for a team which doesn't pass much. Watt and Mercilus were merciless against Jax last week. 
    All Forums | Penalty Box
    123 ... 678 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,200 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 652 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,158 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,177 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 5,361 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,518 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 10,686 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 13,763 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 186 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 22,872 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.