Bolts / S.F. thing is they have spent the last few days hearing how they are gonna lay down like dogs.I think they might have enough pride to beat a one dimentional Bolts team.Besides someone has to bet them
0
Bolts / S.F. thing is they have spent the last few days hearing how they are gonna lay down like dogs.I think they might have enough pride to beat a one dimentional Bolts team.Besides someone has to bet them
SD v SF -1.5 not sure why SF is favored here. they are in free fall mode. they've gone from a top tier organization to a circus. and today ray mcdonald was released, not for committing crimes, but for committing crimes and SF now being out of playoff contention. nice statement by the 49er organization. anyway, SF is injured at RB among other places, has nothing to play for, and has all sorts of internal issues. SD still has a shot at the playoffs and gets an easier opponent after facing probably the two best teams in the conference. i don't know why anyone would take SF in their current state. plus, SF has one less day to prepare for a team that probably just wants to end the season. possible play on SD.
9ers coming off their "super bowl" last week vs Seattle.
SF has nothing to play for, and they are accustomed to playing championship games.
Teams do not fare well the week after playing Seattle.
SF knows it is playing for a lame duck coach.
9ers in complete disarray.
Unfortunately, the Chargers almost look too easy here.
Either way, I'm on the SD ml
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
back to saturday football as well
SD v SF -1.5 not sure why SF is favored here. they are in free fall mode. they've gone from a top tier organization to a circus. and today ray mcdonald was released, not for committing crimes, but for committing crimes and SF now being out of playoff contention. nice statement by the 49er organization. anyway, SF is injured at RB among other places, has nothing to play for, and has all sorts of internal issues. SD still has a shot at the playoffs and gets an easier opponent after facing probably the two best teams in the conference. i don't know why anyone would take SF in their current state. plus, SF has one less day to prepare for a team that probably just wants to end the season. possible play on SD.
9ers coming off their "super bowl" last week vs Seattle.
SF has nothing to play for, and they are accustomed to playing championship games.
Teams do not fare well the week after playing Seattle.
SF knows it is playing for a lame duck coach.
9ers in complete disarray.
Unfortunately, the Chargers almost look too easy here.
Philly v. Wash +7.5 washington disappointed us last week being unable to stay close with another bad team. while the idea of taking a 7.5 home dog against sanchez is intriguing, i'm not sure how much more washington has in them. philly needs to bounce back after last week. there's going to be one team with a good recod in the NFC that isn't going to the playoffs. that looks like philly for now. they should take care of business against a bad team that has all sorts of problems and hasn't played a respectable game since covering in SF a month ago.
If the Redskins have not yet quit on the season, they appear to be the right side here.
There's no way I can lay over a TD on the road in a divisional game with Sanchez under center, just no friggin way
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
Philly v. Wash +7.5 washington disappointed us last week being unable to stay close with another bad team. while the idea of taking a 7.5 home dog against sanchez is intriguing, i'm not sure how much more washington has in them. philly needs to bounce back after last week. there's going to be one team with a good recod in the NFC that isn't going to the playoffs. that looks like philly for now. they should take care of business against a bad team that has all sorts of problems and hasn't played a respectable game since covering in SF a month ago.
If the Redskins have not yet quit on the season, they appear to be the right side here.
There's no way I can lay over a TD on the road in a divisional game with Sanchez under center, just no friggin way
GB v. TB -10.5 wow, huge line. subscribers know we've done well going against GB as road favorites. a little surprised to see this one above 10. like we said two weeks ago when GB was huge favorites over atlanta, this defense isn't so good where i'd feel comfortable giving a lot of points regularly, certainly not on the road. of course, rodgers can blow teams out of the water any time, but if the offense stumbles a little or the defense is just garbage, covering these spreads will be tough. TB sucks, we all know that, but they are better with martin at RB. he did have 6.9 yards/carry last week. if he can help them hold onto the ball for a while, TB might be able to stay within 10.
This line is up to 12 now ... i will be on the Bucco's, as the Pack defense should keep TB within striking distance
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
GB v. TB -10.5 wow, huge line. subscribers know we've done well going against GB as road favorites. a little surprised to see this one above 10. like we said two weeks ago when GB was huge favorites over atlanta, this defense isn't so good where i'd feel comfortable giving a lot of points regularly, certainly not on the road. of course, rodgers can blow teams out of the water any time, but if the offense stumbles a little or the defense is just garbage, covering these spreads will be tough. TB sucks, we all know that, but they are better with martin at RB. he did have 6.9 yards/carry last week. if he can help them hold onto the ball for a while, TB might be able to stay within 10.
This line is up to 12 now ... i will be on the Bucco's, as the Pack defense should keep TB within striking distance
Detroit @ Chicago +7 what an embarrassment for chicago to be 7 point home dogs to detroit in december. this team is as fucked u as any team in the league. unbettable at this point. fortunately, unlike other unbettable teams that we seem to be a lot, we saw this one coming and have avoided them as big underdogs. slight chance of a play on detroit. we like them this season as subscribers know. we especially like a strong defense that needs to win against a team that has quit on offense. if chicago can't do anything against rob ryan's shitty defense, how will they look against detroit. cutler might not even come out of the locker room.
This line is up to 8.5 now ... wish I would have pulled the trigger at 7.
Jimmy fuckin Clausen ... need i say more?
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
Detroit @ Chicago +7 what an embarrassment for chicago to be 7 point home dogs to detroit in december. this team is as fucked u as any team in the league. unbettable at this point. fortunately, unlike other unbettable teams that we seem to be a lot, we saw this one coming and have avoided them as big underdogs. slight chance of a play on detroit. we like them this season as subscribers know. we especially like a strong defense that needs to win against a team that has quit on offense. if chicago can't do anything against rob ryan's shitty defense, how will they look against detroit. cutler might not even come out of the locker room.
This line is up to 8.5 now ... wish I would have pulled the trigger at 7.
steeler fan, i start with a premise you probably don't agree with. i don't think the steelers are that good. i look at certain stats and their schedule and how they've done and i just don't think they are as good as the chiefs so i like getting what i consider to be the better team at +3.
specifically, i think it's pretty clear their pass defense isn't very good so i'm not as worried about how limited smith and the KC passing game might be. KC's strength, of course, is charles and pitt's rushing defense is not very good giving up 4.5 yards/carry which is near the bottom of the league.
of course, KC's defense hasn't been great either and their yards/rushing attempt is even worse and bell is great but i think KC has done better this season with a tougher schedule.
basically, i don't think pitt is a bad matchup for KC. i think a team that makes KC rely on smith is a bad matchup. i like KC's pass defense against roethlisberger and figure the charles vs. bell matchup could be about even./ considering their schedules so far, i have KC is slightly better and like getting the 3.
0
steeler fan, i start with a premise you probably don't agree with. i don't think the steelers are that good. i look at certain stats and their schedule and how they've done and i just don't think they are as good as the chiefs so i like getting what i consider to be the better team at +3.
specifically, i think it's pretty clear their pass defense isn't very good so i'm not as worried about how limited smith and the KC passing game might be. KC's strength, of course, is charles and pitt's rushing defense is not very good giving up 4.5 yards/carry which is near the bottom of the league.
of course, KC's defense hasn't been great either and their yards/rushing attempt is even worse and bell is great but i think KC has done better this season with a tougher schedule.
basically, i don't think pitt is a bad matchup for KC. i think a team that makes KC rely on smith is a bad matchup. i like KC's pass defense against roethlisberger and figure the charles vs. bell matchup could be about even./ considering their schedules so far, i have KC is slightly better and like getting the 3.
STL -6 Rams still haven't allowed a TD in over 3 games and today they basically play 11 on 2, needing only to stop Eli and Odell to cripple the Giant offense. I think the Rams score at least once on defense and Tre Mason goes off for 100+ yds.
CLV +4 The pendulum swings as everybody who bet Johnny Football last week fades him today. Cleveland's defense which has forced an NFL 3rd best 27 turnovers is the real difference here. I thought the Panthers were about to get on a mini roll down the stretch but last week's ugly win vs. Tampa changed my mind.
Good Luck to all.
0
STL -6 Rams still haven't allowed a TD in over 3 games and today they basically play 11 on 2, needing only to stop Eli and Odell to cripple the Giant offense. I think the Rams score at least once on defense and Tre Mason goes off for 100+ yds.
CLV +4 The pendulum swings as everybody who bet Johnny Football last week fades him today. Cleveland's defense which has forced an NFL 3rd best 27 turnovers is the real difference here. I thought the Panthers were about to get on a mini roll down the stretch but last week's ugly win vs. Tampa changed my mind.
Minnesota v. Miami -7 somewhat of a misguided bet going against NE last week. minnesota covered easily for us though. miami isn't completely out of it so they should play hard in one of the easier games they've had in a while. i'm just not sure they are 7 points better at this point. minnesota has effectively been eliminated for a while but they are well coached and playing better and certainly aren't quitting. not sure about this one for now.
This line is down to 4 with reduced juice.
I will bite ...
Miami -4
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
Minnesota v. Miami -7 somewhat of a misguided bet going against NE last week. minnesota covered easily for us though. miami isn't completely out of it so they should play hard in one of the easier games they've had in a while. i'm just not sure they are 7 points better at this point. minnesota has effectively been eliminated for a while but they are well coached and playing better and certainly aren't quitting. not sure about this one for now.
STL -6 Rams still haven't allowed a TD in over 3 games and today they basically play 11 on 2, needing only to stop Eli and Odell to cripple the Giant offense. I think the Rams score at least once on defense and Tre Mason goes off for 100+ yds.
CLV +4 The pendulum swings as everybody who bet Johnny Football last week fades him today. Cleveland's defense which has forced an NFL 3rd best 27 turnovers is the real difference here. I thought the Panthers were about to get on a mini roll down the stretch but last week's ugly win vs. Tampa changed my mind.
Good Luck to all.
Browns without Joe Hadden.GLUCK today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:
STL -6 Rams still haven't allowed a TD in over 3 games and today they basically play 11 on 2, needing only to stop Eli and Odell to cripple the Giant offense. I think the Rams score at least once on defense and Tre Mason goes off for 100+ yds.
CLV +4 The pendulum swings as everybody who bet Johnny Football last week fades him today. Cleveland's defense which has forced an NFL 3rd best 27 turnovers is the real difference here. I thought the Panthers were about to get on a mini roll down the stretch but last week's ugly win vs. Tampa changed my mind.
That's not good because I was hoping for him to take Benjamin out of the equation. I can still hope that Fig Newton is suffering from the lingering effects of whiplash.
I'm joining Hugh on Miami -4 for my 3rd and final bet of the day. I noticed the Vikings are a very popular play amongst the tout kingdom. If the Dolphins can get to 21, it should insure at least a push at that number. I believe Miami is just a little bit better all over than Minnesota.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Browns without Joe Hadden.GLUCK today.
That's not good because I was hoping for him to take Benjamin out of the equation. I can still hope that Fig Newton is suffering from the lingering effects of whiplash.
I'm joining Hugh on Miami -4 for my 3rd and final bet of the day. I noticed the Vikings are a very popular play amongst the tout kingdom. If the Dolphins can get to 21, it should insure at least a push at that number. I believe Miami is just a little bit better all over than Minnesota.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
