Trump was shunned by the left/media/even the Pfizer CEO when he said the vaccine was weeks away. The CEO knew these results far before they went public.
That's contrary to what the CEO is saying
and YOU have no proof otherwise......other than inuendo and whacko right-wing-extremist conspiracy theories.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Trump was shunned by the left/media/even the Pfizer CEO when he said the vaccine was weeks away. The CEO knew these results far before they went public.
That's contrary to what the CEO is saying
and YOU have no proof otherwise......other than inuendo and whacko right-wing-extremist conspiracy theories.
Trump always said the vaccine was close. Releasing the “cure” Monday morning after the election results are in was on purpose. These statements don’t contradict one another. I know this is complicated. It isn’t easy for everyone to keep up.
And the iron-clad "irrefutable evidence" to back up your contradictory statements that this OBVIOUS conspiracy theory is supposedly FACTUAL and not just YOUR opinion ....???
Note the word "irreftuable" in front of evidence...
Try and keep up
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Trump always said the vaccine was close. Releasing the “cure” Monday morning after the election results are in was on purpose. These statements don’t contradict one another. I know this is complicated. It isn’t easy for everyone to keep up.
And the iron-clad "irrefutable evidence" to back up your contradictory statements that this OBVIOUS conspiracy theory is supposedly FACTUAL and not just YOUR opinion ....???
Note the word "irreftuable" in front of evidence...
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Of course Fat Donnie was shunned. He kind of lost credibility on the issue months ago no?? Why would anyone trust his updates? Cases are 15 and will soon be down to 0. COVID will be gone by Easter, and I want churches fully open. As soon as the weather heats up, it will be like a miracle the virus will go away. Children are virtually immune to COVID. We have defeated COVID-19. (all statements are paraphrased, not exact quotes). Why would anyone in their right mind trust his words when it came to vaccine updates?
he a year late and a billion short....
At least!
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Of course Fat Donnie was shunned. He kind of lost credibility on the issue months ago no?? Why would anyone trust his updates? Cases are 15 and will soon be down to 0. COVID will be gone by Easter, and I want churches fully open. As soon as the weather heats up, it will be like a miracle the virus will go away. Children are virtually immune to COVID. We have defeated COVID-19. (all statements are paraphrased, not exact quotes). Why would anyone in their right mind trust his words when it came to vaccine updates?
Children are virtually immune to Covid. Children under the age of 14 make up 80 of the 238,000 corona deaths in the US.
Do you know what immune means?
It means "resistant to a particular infection."
Your statistic proves that children under the age of 14 are not immune, since according to you 80 have died.
The fact that children can acquire COVID-19 shows they are certainly NOT immune. Sure the death rates may be much lower, but they can still contract and spread the virus, further proving they are not immune.
5
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Children are virtually immune to Covid. Children under the age of 14 make up 80 of the 238,000 corona deaths in the US.
Do you know what immune means?
It means "resistant to a particular infection."
Your statistic proves that children under the age of 14 are not immune, since according to you 80 have died.
The fact that children can acquire COVID-19 shows they are certainly NOT immune. Sure the death rates may be much lower, but they can still contract and spread the virus, further proving they are not immune.
By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote.
That from the guy who declared:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Trump +135 is the best bet of the century
6
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote.
By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote.
You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points.
Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one.
Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication.
I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself.
5
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote.
You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points.
Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one.
Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication.
I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself.
Funny how people stopped liking posts after my comment Weak minded pukes Ok, now you can start liking posts again
You're here talking about post likes, which are literally a tool created by social media companies to drive the engagement of their weak minded users, and in the same quote accusing people being weak minded. You're all over the place. When the fork did we even get a "like" button?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Funny how people stopped liking posts after my comment Weak minded pukes Ok, now you can start liking posts again
You're here talking about post likes, which are literally a tool created by social media companies to drive the engagement of their weak minded users, and in the same quote accusing people being weak minded. You're all over the place. When the fork did we even get a "like" button?
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself.
This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself.
This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything.
Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything.
Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word.
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything. Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word.
I was referring to Tox's use rather than Trump's. For Trump, given his position, the use of such a phrase can be misleading and dangerous. For Tox, in a covers chat forum... Like I said, resistant is probably better used but his point isn't lost by him using "virtually immune." What was that point is the question. We were talking about the timing of vaccination press releases. He came out of left field with that. Why? To say kids should be in school? It's valid. Many kids ARE in school already but it's neither here nor there. We were talking about vaccination, or specifically, the timing of release.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything. Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word.
I was referring to Tox's use rather than Trump's. For Trump, given his position, the use of such a phrase can be misleading and dangerous. For Tox, in a covers chat forum... Like I said, resistant is probably better used but his point isn't lost by him using "virtually immune." What was that point is the question. We were talking about the timing of vaccination press releases. He came out of left field with that. Why? To say kids should be in school? It's valid. Many kids ARE in school already but it's neither here nor there. We were talking about vaccination, or specifically, the timing of release.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything. Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word. I was referring to Tox's use rather than Trump's. For Trump, given his position, the use of such a phrase can be misleading and dangerous. For Tox, in a covers chat forum... Like I said, resistant is probably better used but his point isn't lost by him using "virtually immune." What was that point is the question. We were talking about the timing of vaccination press releases. He came out of left field with that. Why? To say kids should be in school? It's valid. Many kids ARE in school already but it's neither here nor there. We were talking about vaccination, or specifically, the timing of release.
Preach.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: By saying “virtually immune” it was very clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature what was being implied. I can see why you would be struggling with the quote. You just argue to hear yourself talk because you know you have no strong points. Dying is not being "virtually immune", braindead one. Immune is clearly not the correct word for the implication. I can see why Fat Donnie used the inaccurate and incorrect terminology through, because it connects with bricks for brains followers like yourself. This is what I mean. We argue over nothing. "Virtually immune" is a perfectly fine phrase to use. Resistant would probably have been slightly better. I think we should wait to see how children react to in person schooling before branding them immune but there was nothing wrong with this particular point. It's not really what we were talking about but that's another point. Arguing the semantics of the statement doesn't accomplish anything. Respectfully, I disagree. The phrase was used by Trump to be intentionally misleading, which it is. Children are not "resistant" or "immune" if they are catching the virus, and dying (although at a much lower rate). He used it to downplay the severity of the virus as we all know to meet his political agenda goal of fully re-opening all schools. Like you said we do not have enough facts to making such blanket statements, but again "immune" is not the right word. I was referring to Tox's use rather than Trump's. For Trump, given his position, the use of such a phrase can be misleading and dangerous. For Tox, in a covers chat forum... Like I said, resistant is probably better used but his point isn't lost by him using "virtually immune." What was that point is the question. We were talking about the timing of vaccination press releases. He came out of left field with that. Why? To say kids should be in school? It's valid. Many kids ARE in school already but it's neither here nor there. We were talking about vaccination, or specifically, the timing of release.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
