He's running as a "R"... the party of so-called morals and values. Just a twist of irony since people in that party probably tried to censor him (or any music) at some point
Also, don't confuse "Conservative" Right with "Christian" Right - I'm sure you already know my feelings about that.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
He's running as a "R"... the party of so-called morals and values. Just a twist of irony since people in that party probably tried to censor him (or any music) at some point
He's running as a "R"... the party of so-called morals and values. Just a twist of irony since people in that party probably tried to censor him (or any music) at some point
I, for one, would like to see the Republican Party become more Kid Rock'it up and down ya block and less Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Parties can change, Bdub. Maybe that's what the Democratic party is missing the boat on. Nominating a woman doesn't constitute change. Nominating Bernie Sanders would have constituted change. And what does the party brass do? Collude to make sure he doesn't have a chance, there by alienating a large chunk of the party's base. The democratic party is falling out of touch. For example, they really think Donald Trump's connection, or lack there of, to Russians really matters to anyone other than a handful of ultra liberal Hillary Clinton supporters. They think Hillary Clinton lost because of Russian interference when actually she lost because people just don't like her. I'm said a million times in this these threads, I know several ultra liberal caucasian women, some that are borderline feminist, who refused to vote for Clinton. I've had conversations with some real "girl power" lesbians who were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. The democratic party alienated all of these people. Meanwhile the Republican party is saying, "We'll put Donald Trump in office! We'll elect Kid Rock! Whether you're a liberal Republican, moderate Republican, conservative right-winged vs. christian right-winged, as Gimme alluded to, a Tea-party Republican, more of a Libertarian...THIS IS THE PARTY FOR YOU!" Meanwhile the Democrats are saying, "If, and only if, you're between the ages of 55-75 and went to a liberal arts college, or was a hippie, this is the party for you." In 10 years we're going to look up and realize that the Republican party has become the party of the youth.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
He's running as a "R"... the party of so-called morals and values. Just a twist of irony since people in that party probably tried to censor him (or any music) at some point
I, for one, would like to see the Republican Party become more Kid Rock'it up and down ya block and less Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Parties can change, Bdub. Maybe that's what the Democratic party is missing the boat on. Nominating a woman doesn't constitute change. Nominating Bernie Sanders would have constituted change. And what does the party brass do? Collude to make sure he doesn't have a chance, there by alienating a large chunk of the party's base. The democratic party is falling out of touch. For example, they really think Donald Trump's connection, or lack there of, to Russians really matters to anyone other than a handful of ultra liberal Hillary Clinton supporters. They think Hillary Clinton lost because of Russian interference when actually she lost because people just don't like her. I'm said a million times in this these threads, I know several ultra liberal caucasian women, some that are borderline feminist, who refused to vote for Clinton. I've had conversations with some real "girl power" lesbians who were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. The democratic party alienated all of these people. Meanwhile the Republican party is saying, "We'll put Donald Trump in office! We'll elect Kid Rock! Whether you're a liberal Republican, moderate Republican, conservative right-winged vs. christian right-winged, as Gimme alluded to, a Tea-party Republican, more of a Libertarian...THIS IS THE PARTY FOR YOU!" Meanwhile the Democrats are saying, "If, and only if, you're between the ages of 55-75 and went to a liberal arts college, or was a hippie, this is the party for you." In 10 years we're going to look up and realize that the Republican party has become the party of the youth.
I, for one, would like to see the Republican Party become more Kid Rock'it up and down ya block and less Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Parties can change, Bdub. Maybe that's what the Democratic party is missing the boat on. Nominating a woman doesn't constitute change. Nominating Bernie Sanders would have constituted change. And what does the party brass do? Collude to make sure he doesn't have a chance, there by alienating a large chunk of the party's base. The democratic party is falling out of touch. For example, they really think Donald Trump's connection, or lack there of, to Russians really matters to anyone other than a handful of ultra liberal Hillary Clinton supporters. They think Hillary Clinton lost because of Russian interference when actually she lost because people just don't like her. I'm said a million times in this these threads, I know several ultra liberal caucasian women, some that are borderline feminist, who refused to vote for Clinton. I've had conversations with some real "girl power" lesbians who were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. The democratic party alienated all of these people. Meanwhile the Republican party is saying, "We'll put Donald Trump in office! We'll elect Kid Rock! Whether you're a liberal Republican, moderate Republican, conservative right-winged vs. christian right-winged, as Gimme alluded to, a Tea-party Republican, more of a Libertarian...THIS IS THE PARTY FOR YOU!" Meanwhile the Democrats are saying, "If, and only if, you're between the ages of 55-75 and went to a liberal arts college, or was a hippie, this is the party for you." In 10 years we're going to look up and realize that the Republican party has become the party of the youth.
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
I, for one, would like to see the Republican Party become more Kid Rock'it up and down ya block and less Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. Parties can change, Bdub. Maybe that's what the Democratic party is missing the boat on. Nominating a woman doesn't constitute change. Nominating Bernie Sanders would have constituted change. And what does the party brass do? Collude to make sure he doesn't have a chance, there by alienating a large chunk of the party's base. The democratic party is falling out of touch. For example, they really think Donald Trump's connection, or lack there of, to Russians really matters to anyone other than a handful of ultra liberal Hillary Clinton supporters. They think Hillary Clinton lost because of Russian interference when actually she lost because people just don't like her. I'm said a million times in this these threads, I know several ultra liberal caucasian women, some that are borderline feminist, who refused to vote for Clinton. I've had conversations with some real "girl power" lesbians who were staunch Bernie Sanders supporters. The democratic party alienated all of these people. Meanwhile the Republican party is saying, "We'll put Donald Trump in office! We'll elect Kid Rock! Whether you're a liberal Republican, moderate Republican, conservative right-winged vs. christian right-winged, as Gimme alluded to, a Tea-party Republican, more of a Libertarian...THIS IS THE PARTY FOR YOU!" Meanwhile the Democrats are saying, "If, and only if, you're between the ages of 55-75 and went to a liberal arts college, or was a hippie, this is the party for you." In 10 years we're going to look up and realize that the Republican party has become the party of the youth.
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
Which numbers? Galup polls? The numbers said Hillary Clinton would be president as well.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by sicknesscity:
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
Which numbers? Galup polls? The numbers said Hillary Clinton would be president as well.
Yeah! And while we're at it, let's hire some plumbers to do open heart surgery... and maybe some housewives to wrench on some cars.
One of your worst posts ever. You know why we have gridlock in Congress because everybody is a fucing lawyer. Their existence is if you argue better you will win. Ever notice that nearly everybody is a lawyer! I guarantee if you had plumbers or engineers or musicians or any field other than lawyers whose job it is to argue we would have much more progress towards reaching our goals as Americans.
Go back to bed BWS your're tired.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Yeah! And while we're at it, let's hire some plumbers to do open heart surgery... and maybe some housewives to wrench on some cars.
One of your worst posts ever. You know why we have gridlock in Congress because everybody is a fucing lawyer. Their existence is if you argue better you will win. Ever notice that nearly everybody is a lawyer! I guarantee if you had plumbers or engineers or musicians or any field other than lawyers whose job it is to argue we would have much more progress towards reaching our goals as Americans.
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
You're assessment is correct, you didn't pull anything out of your azz, you extracted it all from the rectum of Farred Zakaria, a staunch Democrat for years on end, who admittedly on his CNN broadcast stated he was a HRC supporter, and cast his vote in her direction...repeatedly bashing Trump for two years on Hilary's behalf. to use consistently, CNN's 'fake-news- poll -analysis' has no merit whatsoever. As does the 'sheep' he ask to sit in on his prearranged panel of so called experts, who by the way, are always democrats, or other media members of CNN, who despise the ground President Trump walks upon, and refuse to shake loose the fact that their girl simply 'blew it' and traumatized the Democratic party to the lowest level of participation in American political history...They're done, and can't recover, with no relieve in sight; hell, in four years can you name one, just one, democrat capable of challenging DJT for the presidency??? think about it, and get use 7.5 more years of Trumpism, and the controversy it thrives on...
0
Quote Originally Posted by sicknesscity:
The math doesn't suggest it, though. That is, the numbers do not support the Republican party trending younger. Republicans have gerrymandered so much that if you actually start evaluating the results in recent elections, even if they have a slight edge of say 1% or the Democrats barely won or perhaps a bit more, the actual number of seats does not end up being proportional because these districts are being drawn up to cheat. It is that simple and the Supreme Court is about to review what Wisconsin did recently that will likely impact voting for decades.
For anyone who thinks I pulled all of that out of my behind, you're free to watch Fareed Zakaria's show that covered it. I happened to be watching while at the gym on Sunday. I suspect that Gorsuch (perhaps the deciding vote) will rule in favor of cheating and that true democracy will never exist in America but hey, I've always said democracy is doomed to fail because people aren't informed enough to vote and the voter participation rate is too low.
You're assessment is correct, you didn't pull anything out of your azz, you extracted it all from the rectum of Farred Zakaria, a staunch Democrat for years on end, who admittedly on his CNN broadcast stated he was a HRC supporter, and cast his vote in her direction...repeatedly bashing Trump for two years on Hilary's behalf. to use consistently, CNN's 'fake-news- poll -analysis' has no merit whatsoever. As does the 'sheep' he ask to sit in on his prearranged panel of so called experts, who by the way, are always democrats, or other media members of CNN, who despise the ground President Trump walks upon, and refuse to shake loose the fact that their girl simply 'blew it' and traumatized the Democratic party to the lowest level of participation in American political history...They're done, and can't recover, with no relieve in sight; hell, in four years can you name one, just one, democrat capable of challenging DJT for the presidency??? think about it, and get use 7.5 more years of Trumpism, and the controversy it thrives on...
One of your worst posts ever. You know why we have gridlock in Congress because everybody is a fucing lawyer. Their existence is if you argue better you will win. Ever notice that nearly everybody is a lawyer! I guarantee if you had plumbers or engineers or musicians or any field other than lawyers whose job it is to argue we would have much more progress towards reaching our goals as Americans.
Go back to bed BWS your're tired.
You're right... how silly to have people who study, know and practice law to make the laws.
Why stop at Kid Rock for Senate? Let's go Kid Rock for President! Meth and hookers for everyone!
0
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:
One of your worst posts ever. You know why we have gridlock in Congress because everybody is a fucing lawyer. Their existence is if you argue better you will win. Ever notice that nearly everybody is a lawyer! I guarantee if you had plumbers or engineers or musicians or any field other than lawyers whose job it is to argue we would have much more progress towards reaching our goals as Americans.
Go back to bed BWS your're tired.
You're right... how silly to have people who study, know and practice law to make the laws.
Why stop at Kid Rock for Senate? Let's go Kid Rock for President! Meth and hookers for everyone!
Which numbers? Galup polls? The numbers said Hillary Clinton would be president as well.
It's called registered voters belonging to demographics. There's plenty of data that Republicans and Democrats have already analyzed. They know what age categories their voters typically fall into. I wouldn't need a fing poll to figure out what the age groups are, but your answer was a standard Republican response since I've seen that line about probably 100,000 times on articles and other places. Technically, the polls for Hillary were correct because they were predicting popular vote, not electoral college. Please point me to the electoral college polls that were conducted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Which numbers? Galup polls? The numbers said Hillary Clinton would be president as well.
It's called registered voters belonging to demographics. There's plenty of data that Republicans and Democrats have already analyzed. They know what age categories their voters typically fall into. I wouldn't need a fing poll to figure out what the age groups are, but your answer was a standard Republican response since I've seen that line about probably 100,000 times on articles and other places. Technically, the polls for Hillary were correct because they were predicting popular vote, not electoral college. Please point me to the electoral college polls that were conducted.
You're assessment is correct, you didn't pull anything out of your azz, you extracted it all from the rectum of Farred Zakaria, a staunch Democrat for years on end, who admittedly on his CNN broadcast stated he was a HRC supporter, and cast his vote in her direction...repeatedly bashing Trump for two years on Hilary's behalf. to use consistently, CNN's 'fake-news- poll -analysis' has no merit whatsoever. As does the 'sheep' he ask to sit in on his prearranged panel of so called experts, who by the way, are always democrats, or other media members of CNN, who despise the ground President Trump walks upon, and refuse to shake loose the fact that their girl simply 'blew it' and traumatized the Democratic party to the lowest level of participation in American political history...They're done, and can't recover, with no relieve in sight; hell, in four years can you name one, just one, democrat capable of challenging DJT for the presidency??? think about it, and get use 7.5 more years of Trumpism, and the controversy it thrives on...
You posted a lot of gibberish that didn't address gerrymandering, other than suggesting he's so biased the information can't be correct, which unfortunately it is. He provided a few examples from recent elections and showed the difference in seats. You may be right that he's a staunch Democrat, hates Trump and so on. However, the math wasn't fake and wasn't taken from polls. It was election results.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
You're assessment is correct, you didn't pull anything out of your azz, you extracted it all from the rectum of Farred Zakaria, a staunch Democrat for years on end, who admittedly on his CNN broadcast stated he was a HRC supporter, and cast his vote in her direction...repeatedly bashing Trump for two years on Hilary's behalf. to use consistently, CNN's 'fake-news- poll -analysis' has no merit whatsoever. As does the 'sheep' he ask to sit in on his prearranged panel of so called experts, who by the way, are always democrats, or other media members of CNN, who despise the ground President Trump walks upon, and refuse to shake loose the fact that their girl simply 'blew it' and traumatized the Democratic party to the lowest level of participation in American political history...They're done, and can't recover, with no relieve in sight; hell, in four years can you name one, just one, democrat capable of challenging DJT for the presidency??? think about it, and get use 7.5 more years of Trumpism, and the controversy it thrives on...
You posted a lot of gibberish that didn't address gerrymandering, other than suggesting he's so biased the information can't be correct, which unfortunately it is. He provided a few examples from recent elections and showed the difference in seats. You may be right that he's a staunch Democrat, hates Trump and so on. However, the math wasn't fake and wasn't taken from polls. It was election results.
Oh, I probably wouldn't be a huge fan of Kid Rock's policies but I'd be interested to see him make a run. If he can do it and win, good for him. I don't want to totally derail the point of this thread.
0
Oh, I probably wouldn't be a huge fan of Kid Rock's policies but I'd be interested to see him make a run. If he can do it and win, good for him. I don't want to totally derail the point of this thread.
It's called registered voters belonging to demographics. There's plenty of data that Republicans and Democrats have already analyzed. They know what age categories their voters typically fall into. I wouldn't need a fing poll to figure out what the age groups are, but your answer was a standard Republican response since I've seen that line about probably 100,000 times on articles and other places. Technically, the polls for Hillary were correct because they were predicting popular vote, not electoral college. Please point me to the electoral college polls that were conducted.
I'm not a Republican. I don't let a political party do my thinking for me. You should try it. I am ultra conservative on many issues but i'm liberal on some others. And I stand by my statement. In the next 10 years you will see the Republican party's demographics get younger and younger while the Democratic party gets older and older. Who do you think is watching that crap on CNN all day, every day? It certainly isn't the youth of America. The Democrats scoff at Trump and his tweets but do you know who follows twitter? Here's a hint: They're not baby boomers. Mark my words, the Republican party will more and more start to resemble the Kid Rocks and the Milo Yiannanopoulos' of the world and the Democratic part will start to resemble, well, Hillary Clinton.
Keep thinking she lost because of the Evil Soviets though. The messed up part is Soviets hackers should be feared. As should Chinese hackers, ect. The energy we're using to chase ghost would be better utilized figuring out what their next move will be and fixing flaws in our own security.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by sicknesscity:
It's called registered voters belonging to demographics. There's plenty of data that Republicans and Democrats have already analyzed. They know what age categories their voters typically fall into. I wouldn't need a fing poll to figure out what the age groups are, but your answer was a standard Republican response since I've seen that line about probably 100,000 times on articles and other places. Technically, the polls for Hillary were correct because they were predicting popular vote, not electoral college. Please point me to the electoral college polls that were conducted.
I'm not a Republican. I don't let a political party do my thinking for me. You should try it. I am ultra conservative on many issues but i'm liberal on some others. And I stand by my statement. In the next 10 years you will see the Republican party's demographics get younger and younger while the Democratic party gets older and older. Who do you think is watching that crap on CNN all day, every day? It certainly isn't the youth of America. The Democrats scoff at Trump and his tweets but do you know who follows twitter? Here's a hint: They're not baby boomers. Mark my words, the Republican party will more and more start to resemble the Kid Rocks and the Milo Yiannanopoulos' of the world and the Democratic part will start to resemble, well, Hillary Clinton.
Keep thinking she lost because of the Evil Soviets though. The messed up part is Soviets hackers should be feared. As should Chinese hackers, ect. The energy we're using to chase ghost would be better utilized figuring out what their next move will be and fixing flaws in our own security.
You're right... how silly to have people who study, know and practice law to make the laws.
Why stop at Kid Rock for Senate? Let's go Kid Rock for President! Meth and hookers for everyone!
Have to disagree with you some on this. Being a lawyer and studying law doesn't mean a lot. I work with one heck of lawyers, some of who I know have drug problems and are complete POS. These worthless fuccks in Washington are concerned with what goes in their pockets and little else
This is America, if someone like Kid Rock wants to run, more power to him. It'd be better to have a more diverse group of people versus the status quo which in my opinion as a voter, completely sucks. Look at our last election
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
You're right... how silly to have people who study, know and practice law to make the laws.
Why stop at Kid Rock for Senate? Let's go Kid Rock for President! Meth and hookers for everyone!
Have to disagree with you some on this. Being a lawyer and studying law doesn't mean a lot. I work with one heck of lawyers, some of who I know have drug problems and are complete POS. These worthless fuccks in Washington are concerned with what goes in their pockets and little else
This is America, if someone like Kid Rock wants to run, more power to him. It'd be better to have a more diverse group of people versus the status quo which in my opinion as a voter, completely sucks. Look at our last election
Elections bureau would decide whether Robert Ritchie can use stage name...............
"Kid Rock", may not be allowed to appear on the ballot.
If Ritchie were to submit enough valid signatures to make the ballot
and indicate that he wanted to be listed as “Kid Rock,” the Michigan
Bureau of Elections staff would have to research the question of whether
that name would be allowed. At an initial glance, Ritchie’s stage name
isn’t an obviously acceptable one under the state’s criteria.
According to Michigan law via the “Affidavit of Identity and Receipt of Filing,” there are five stipulations regarding the manner in which a candidate can have his or her name printed on the ballot.
For example, a candidate “may specify that both his or her given name
and middle name, or only a middle name, shall appear on the ballot,” or
“may specify a name that constitutes a common law name in accordance
with the Michigan Department of State Guidelines.” But according to the
rules, candidates may not use a “nickname that is not a recognized
diminutive of the candidate’s given name.”
Ritchie could run and might win. Though Ritchie may have to do it all without the "Kid Rock" name.
0
Elections bureau would decide whether Robert Ritchie can use stage name...............
"Kid Rock", may not be allowed to appear on the ballot.
If Ritchie were to submit enough valid signatures to make the ballot
and indicate that he wanted to be listed as “Kid Rock,” the Michigan
Bureau of Elections staff would have to research the question of whether
that name would be allowed. At an initial glance, Ritchie’s stage name
isn’t an obviously acceptable one under the state’s criteria.
According to Michigan law via the “Affidavit of Identity and Receipt of Filing,” there are five stipulations regarding the manner in which a candidate can have his or her name printed on the ballot.
For example, a candidate “may specify that both his or her given name
and middle name, or only a middle name, shall appear on the ballot,” or
“may specify a name that constitutes a common law name in accordance
with the Michigan Department of State Guidelines.” But according to the
rules, candidates may not use a “nickname that is not a recognized
diminutive of the candidate’s given name.”
Ritchie could run and might win. Though Ritchie may have to do it all without the "Kid Rock" name.
Kid Rock led a hypothetical GOP primary with 50%.... .........against
former Trump campaign state co-chairwoman Lena Epstein (9%),
former Army Ranger/businessman John James (7 %), and retired state
Supreme Court Justice Bob Young Jr. (6 %). Kid Rock’s name ID
advantage certainly factored into his early advantage.
Sen.Stabenow should consider him a serious threat.
0
Kid Rock led a hypothetical GOP primary with 50%.... .........against
former Trump campaign state co-chairwoman Lena Epstein (9%),
former Army Ranger/businessman John James (7 %), and retired state
Supreme Court Justice Bob Young Jr. (6 %). Kid Rock’s name ID
advantage certainly factored into his early advantage.
Sen.Stabenow should consider him a serious threat.
Kid Rock—has fired back at watchdog groups suggesting that his near-constant comments about running for office might actually make him subject to the U.S.A.’s electioneering laws. Faced with accusations that selling signs with slogans like “Kid Rock For Senate ’18" makes
him a candidate—and thus beholden to the Federal Election Campaign Act,
which requires candidates to track and report donations and campaign
contribution........
0
Kid Rock—has fired back at watchdog groups suggesting that his near-constant comments about running for office might actually make him subject to the U.S.A.’s electioneering laws. Faced with accusations that selling signs with slogans like “Kid Rock For Senate ’18" makes
him a candidate—and thus beholden to the Federal Election Campaign Act,
which requires candidates to track and report donations and campaign
contribution........
Ritchie dismissed the allegations, issuing the following statement, "I
am starting to see reports from the misinformed press and the fake news
on how I am in violation of breaking campaign law.
#1: I have still not
officially announced my candidacy.
#2: See #1 and go f--- yourselves."
0
Ritchie dismissed the allegations, issuing the following statement, "I
am starting to see reports from the misinformed press and the fake news
on how I am in violation of breaking campaign law.
#1: I have still not
officially announced my candidacy.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
