And the reason you have 1000 views tonight is obvious. There's no rocket science calculation required there, no 'take it how you want' like it's cos you got fans
You wanna know the reason you got so many views?
Because of the way you conduct yourself on this forum, any thread you start with 'lock' in the title has everyone waiting to see whether you crash and burn or not. That's what comes with being a big-mouth dicc-flashing troll.
'Lock of the Night'?
More like C.o.c.k. of the Night
0
And the reason you have 1000 views tonight is obvious. There's no rocket science calculation required there, no 'take it how you want' like it's cos you got fans
You wanna know the reason you got so many views?
Because of the way you conduct yourself on this forum, any thread you start with 'lock' in the title has everyone waiting to see whether you crash and burn or not. That's what comes with being a big-mouth dicc-flashing troll.
because i like to fade teams that are 10-24 in 1 run games with an inferior lineup, bullpen, and defense. starting pitching is important but it's not everything.
0
because i like to fade teams that are 10-24 in 1 run games with an inferior lineup, bullpen, and defense. starting pitching is important but it's not everything.
big difference between posting at 8-11 pm and during the day when normal people are working.
Most people do their capping at that time, so you have no excuse.
We know why you don't have YTD on here, and it's the same reason your pals like Scorpio don't. He didn't like having 39% documented plays because it made trolling other people a little less convenient.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
big difference between posting at 8-11 pm and during the day when normal people are working.
Most people do their capping at that time, so you have no excuse.
We know why you don't have YTD on here, and it's the same reason your pals like Scorpio don't. He didn't like having 39% documented plays because it made trolling other people a little less convenient.
because i like to fade teams that are 10-24 in 1 run games with an inferior lineup, bullpen, and defense. starting pitching is important but it's not everything.
Trend betting You need to learn the difference between useful statistics and those statistics that sound important but are completely useless in projecting specific matchups.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
because i like to fade teams that are 10-24 in 1 run games with an inferior lineup, bullpen, and defense. starting pitching is important but it's not everything.
Trend betting You need to learn the difference between useful statistics and those statistics that sound important but are completely useless in projecting specific matchups.
Lastly, for your interest -- I've never seen a single great handicapper who uses the word 'lock', 'fade', or win-loss trends.
I've seen plenty of blowhards that do, though.
It's okay. Maybe the dog buys you out of bad bets when you're not looking. You'd never know, because you live in the vaguer-y of 'I Win Lots Land', as opposed to 'Documented Plays Land'.
0
Lastly, for your interest -- I've never seen a single great handicapper who uses the word 'lock', 'fade', or win-loss trends.
I've seen plenty of blowhards that do, though.
It's okay. Maybe the dog buys you out of bad bets when you're not looking. You'd never know, because you live in the vaguer-y of 'I Win Lots Land', as opposed to 'Documented Plays Land'.
what's your documented record? i must have missed that too. for somebody who says i'm being critical, you sure do make a lot of critiques. yet i don't see any threads you've started
0
what's your documented record? i must have missed that too. for somebody who says i'm being critical, you sure do make a lot of critiques. yet i don't see any threads you've started
what's your documented record? i must have missed that too. for somebody who says i'm being critical, you sure do make a lot of critiques. yet i don't see any threads you've started
There you go again, deliberately missing facts.
I never said I post plays. Everyone on this forum knows I only tail in bases. I tail KeyElement, BettyMcWager and BirdsOnBat.
I critiqued you because in my daily stop by threads of skilled cappers who share picks and analysis for free, yours is one of several names I see trolling for absolutely no reason at all. Arguing for argument's sake. Tag-teaming with known bullies.
And when someone trolls people then makes a thread called LOCK OF THE NIGHT, with a stupid pick... just as you said... it's a public forum... you open your mouth, you invite this feedback.
I don't have to prove a thing to you because I haven't claimed I know more than someone who has a proven record. I've said you're a blowhard troll who can't match the records of the people you're insulting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
what's your documented record? i must have missed that too. for somebody who says i'm being critical, you sure do make a lot of critiques. yet i don't see any threads you've started
There you go again, deliberately missing facts.
I never said I post plays. Everyone on this forum knows I only tail in bases. I tail KeyElement, BettyMcWager and BirdsOnBat.
I critiqued you because in my daily stop by threads of skilled cappers who share picks and analysis for free, yours is one of several names I see trolling for absolutely no reason at all. Arguing for argument's sake. Tag-teaming with known bullies.
And when someone trolls people then makes a thread called LOCK OF THE NIGHT, with a stupid pick... just as you said... it's a public forum... you open your mouth, you invite this feedback.
I don't have to prove a thing to you because I haven't claimed I know more than someone who has a proven record. I've said you're a blowhard troll who can't match the records of the people you're insulting.
i don't recall claiming to know more than anyone. i disagreed with some of his picks and reasoning for them, made my own thread with my pick and my statistical analysis, and posted it. go back and reread and feel free to quote when i said i was a "better handicapper" or "knew more than somebody". Whether this game is a win or a loss for me, it's one game today out of plenty of games that will be played this week.
0
i don't recall claiming to know more than anyone. i disagreed with some of his picks and reasoning for them, made my own thread with my pick and my statistical analysis, and posted it. go back and reread and feel free to quote when i said i was a "better handicapper" or "knew more than somebody". Whether this game is a win or a loss for me, it's one game today out of plenty of games that will be played this week.
i don't recall claiming to know more than anyone. i disagreed with some of his picks and reasoning for them, made my own thread with my pick and my statistical analysis, and posted it. go back and reread and feel free to quote when i said i was a "better handicapper" or "knew more than somebody". Whether this game is a win or a loss for me, it's one game today out of plenty of games that will be played this week.
Read your own threads, fella.
'IF YOU WANT REAL PICKS WITH NO BS AND REAL ANALYTICS, COME FOLLOW MY THREAD. if you want to follow a thread that claims they're analytic based yet provides no real analytics, you know where to go. '
Who the fucc were you talking about there, then??
Playing dumb doesn't work this time, because that one hasn't since been deleted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
i don't recall claiming to know more than anyone. i disagreed with some of his picks and reasoning for them, made my own thread with my pick and my statistical analysis, and posted it. go back and reread and feel free to quote when i said i was a "better handicapper" or "knew more than somebody". Whether this game is a win or a loss for me, it's one game today out of plenty of games that will be played this week.
Read your own threads, fella.
'IF YOU WANT REAL PICKS WITH NO BS AND REAL ANALYTICS, COME FOLLOW MY THREAD. if you want to follow a thread that claims they're analytic based yet provides no real analytics, you know where to go. '
Who the fucc were you talking about there, then??
Playing dumb doesn't work this time, because that one hasn't since been deleted.
you guys may not like this play if you're a devout minion of Key Element, but the Dodgers are the lock of the night.
IF YOU WANT REAL PICKS WITH NO BS AND REAL ANALYTICS, COME FOLLOW MY THREAD. if you want to follow a thread that claims they're analytic based yet provides no real analytics, you know where to go.
It's the attitude that really made this And the cannons
You sure showed all of Key's 'minions' tonight
Nice 'lock'. Personally, I prefer a much more study padlock.
Covers. I love it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mabber:
you guys may not like this play if you're a devout minion of Key Element, but the Dodgers are the lock of the night.
IF YOU WANT REAL PICKS WITH NO BS AND REAL ANALYTICS, COME FOLLOW MY THREAD. if you want to follow a thread that claims they're analytic based yet provides no real analytics, you know where to go.
It's the attitude that really made this And the cannons
You sure showed all of Key's 'minions' tonight
Nice 'lock'. Personally, I prefer a much more study padlock.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
You need to learn the difference between useful statistics and those statistics that sound important but are completely useless in projecting specific matchups.
Hot Forum Topics
