Regarding your past success on Fridays; Since 95% ( rough estimate) of games on Friday mark the beginning of a series, maybe there is some connection with your betting patterns and the first game of a series? For the most part, you're a dog player. Are dogs most profitable the first game of a any given series? Like Friday, Tuesday is another " series starting day." What is you record of Tuesdays? Usually, if you dig deep enough into something, you can find a logical answer. Chances are, this theory is not that " logical answer, " but it was the first thing that came to mind when I read the opening line to your thread.
Regarding your past success on Fridays; Since 95% ( rough estimate) of games on Friday mark the beginning of a series, maybe there is some connection with your betting patterns and the first game of a series? For the most part, you're a dog player. Are dogs most profitable the first game of a any given series? Like Friday, Tuesday is another " series starting day." What is you record of Tuesdays? Usually, if you dig deep enough into something, you can find a logical answer. Chances are, this theory is not that " logical answer, " but it was the first thing that came to mind when I read the opening line to your thread.
Can you read???
Brendanb438 said, "I WAS OFFERING VERY EARLY THIS MORNING LAD AT +105 SO I COULD GET SAN DIEGO AT -105 WHICH WAS THE BEST MATCHBOOK LINE AT THE TIME!!!!"
Sine you have a hard time comprehending, BrendanB438 is stating that he was offering the Dodgers at +105. You if you have a Matchbook account you could've gotten +105 from Brendan.
Understand?
Can you read???
Brendanb438 said, "I WAS OFFERING VERY EARLY THIS MORNING LAD AT +105 SO I COULD GET SAN DIEGO AT -105 WHICH WAS THE BEST MATCHBOOK LINE AT THE TIME!!!!"
Sine you have a hard time comprehending, BrendanB438 is stating that he was offering the Dodgers at +105. You if you have a Matchbook account you could've gotten +105 from Brendan.
Understand?
Actually, off by 10-15 cents on avg.
He could easily stop the criticism by posting the current lines and the name of the book but refuses to do so. He is such a scammer that he wants to squeeze every last cent out of each line just so he can maximize wins and minimize losses.
I guess his followers are so naive that they actually believe he knows when to lock in opening lines but wait on others and bet over next 14 hours on others. Yeah, and Im Santa Claus.
He even makes up a bogus story about being the only American who still bets at Pinnacle. He even has cockslobber brenda vouching for his lies. Nevermind that it's not so easy to open Canadian bank accounts (requires documents & referrals), not to mention they report to the IRS, and we all know Touthunter didn't pay taxes on the $140,000 he supposedly won last season.
Even if it were possible to bet at Pinnacle, the costs (bank fees, PO box fees, proxy programs, etc) would certainly outweight the 10-15 cent advantage. So let's not kid ourselves with his bogus lies.
Actually, off by 10-15 cents on avg.
He could easily stop the criticism by posting the current lines and the name of the book but refuses to do so. He is such a scammer that he wants to squeeze every last cent out of each line just so he can maximize wins and minimize losses.
I guess his followers are so naive that they actually believe he knows when to lock in opening lines but wait on others and bet over next 14 hours on others. Yeah, and Im Santa Claus.
He even makes up a bogus story about being the only American who still bets at Pinnacle. He even has cockslobber brenda vouching for his lies. Nevermind that it's not so easy to open Canadian bank accounts (requires documents & referrals), not to mention they report to the IRS, and we all know Touthunter didn't pay taxes on the $140,000 he supposedly won last season.
Even if it were possible to bet at Pinnacle, the costs (bank fees, PO box fees, proxy programs, etc) would certainly outweight the 10-15 cent advantage. So let's not kid ourselves with his bogus lies.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.