All Forums | Penalty Box

NCAA FOOTBALL Week 2 (13-5-1 YTD 72.222%)

...

Participants:

Search

Posts: 367

SqueaksUofA

Rookie

Joined: Sep, 2011

Posts: 551

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:00 AM ET #126

Quote Originally Posted by donnie33:

The funny thing is I ask if I could get it at 20 he said yea if you buy 8 1/2 points like TRAIN69 did.

0

buddygurt

Veteran

Joined: Feb, 2004

Posts: 4715

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:07 AM ET #127

The whining by others on here is unreal, every number JDN put up was on BOL Sunday afternoon, the Wyoming game actually opened at 21.5 and went down to 20 before getting hammered, I don't have a BOL account but I like to see their early lines to gage what's going to be out there

0

djayy

Prospect

Joined: Nov, 2011

Posts: 23

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:11 AM ET #128

Jdnmoney, would you still play Wyoming -27 or pass? What line would you take Wyoming up till?

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:27 AM ET #129

Week 2 Card *Updated*

Wake +4.5

Buffalo vs Baylor over 64

Temple vs Houston under 67.5

San Jose state +25.5

Wyoming -20

Navy vs Indiana over 65 MONSTER PLAY 4units

OK St vs UTSA over 60 2u

Toledo +17.5

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:28 AM ET #130

Quote Originally Posted by djayy:

Jdnmoney, would you still play Wyoming -27 or pass? What line would you take Wyoming up till?

i would, but it crosses a few key numbers...crossing 21, 24 and 27 is not good. i think this will be a beatdown, but i would hate to have wyo win 50-28 and have my wager win and yours lose.

with that said, i think we will see 50-17 type of score.

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:35 AM ET #131

Quote Originally Posted by BamaTaxMan:

MoneyMan! It looks like you had a pretty successful Week 1! Congrats! I love counting money as well! I went 4-1 with a bad call on SMU. I thought the Home Field might help them out!

I wish I could have gotten Wyoming at -20 but my book has it at -28 now and I played it at that. Wyoming is going to come out on a vengeance Saturday after a very close, hard fought loss. I feel sorry for Idaho. Wyoming -28 (2 Units)

These are a couple plays I made but I don't know if you're interested.

USA vs Tulane -6 (4 Units) - I plan on fading USA every week. They have WKy next week. This game will be beyond brutal. Trust me, I live in Mobile, AL. Tulane looks very improved and USA lost to a sub-division team....

Western Kentucky +13.5 vs Tennesse (2 Units) - I'm kind of iffy on this one but I think Petrino can expose any team when given the chance.

Tenative: Under 48.5 on Friday Nights WF vs BC game!

I really want to play Texas -7 and Miami +3 but I hope I can hold off the demons.

Also, you don't have to explain anything to these cats who follow you then hate you! They submitted the picks. You didn't make them. I wouldn't explain anything to anyone if I were you! JUST KEEP WINNING!! Winning shuts everyone up!

A saying I heard a long time ago is, "Don't argue with ignorance, because people make mistake you for the ignorant one!"

Let's Tax These Bookies!! RTR

RTR brother...9/14 cannot come soon enough...

ill look at that tulane play. i know they are improved...but i am so very concerned that they only completed SEVEN passes vs. jackson state, and in addition, only avg'd 3.7 yards per rush.

they were outgained by jackson state, putrid on 3rd down, couldnt throw the ball, couldnt run the ball,

i clearly didnt watch the game vs. jackson state, but how much poorer could they have played on offense. OR, did they not have to have as much success b.c. jackson state committed 6 turnovers?

maybe the UNDER in the tulane game?

as far as the wake game, i have wake +4.5 and will roll with that...hope for a 20-17 final either way...

keep doin your thing buddy...tax those books.

0

Quote Originally Posted by BamaTaxMan:

MoneyMan! It looks like you had a pretty successful Week 1! Congrats! I love counting money as well! I went 4-1 with a bad call on SMU. I thought the Home Field might help them out!

I wish I could have gotten Wyoming at -20 but my book has it at -28 now and I played it at that. Wyoming is going to come out on a vengeance Saturday after a very close, hard fought loss. I feel sorry for Idaho. Wyoming -28 (2 Units)

These are a couple plays I made but I don't know if you're interested.

USA vs Tulane -6 (4 Units) - I plan on fading USA every week. They have WKy next week. This game will be beyond brutal. Trust me, I live in Mobile, AL. Tulane looks very improved and USA lost to a sub-division team....

Western Kentucky +13.5 vs Tennesse (2 Units) - I'm kind of iffy on this one but I think Petrino can expose any team when given the chance.

Tenative: Under 48.5 on Friday Nights WF vs BC game!

I really want to play Texas -7 and Miami +3 but I hope I can hold off the demons.

Also, you don't have to explain anything to these cats who follow you then hate you! They submitted the picks. You didn't make them. I wouldn't explain anything to anyone if I were you! JUST KEEP WINNING!! Winning shuts everyone up!

A saying I heard a long time ago is, "Don't argue with ignorance, because people make mistake you for the ignorant one!"

Let's Tax These Bookies!! RTR

RTR brother...9/14 cannot come soon enough...

ill look at that tulane play. i know they are improved...but i am so very concerned that they only completed SEVEN passes vs. jackson state, and in addition, only avg'd 3.7 yards per rush.

they were outgained by jackson state, putrid on 3rd down, couldnt throw the ball, couldnt run the ball,

i clearly didnt watch the game vs. jackson state, but how much poorer could they have played on offense. OR, did they not have to have as much success b.c. jackson state committed 6 turnovers?

maybe the UNDER in the tulane game?

as far as the wake game, i have wake +4.5 and will roll with that...hope for a 20-17 final either way...

keep doin your thing buddy...tax those books.

MoonBoy

Prospect

Joined: Jul, 2012

Posts: 166

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:36 AM ET #132

Yeah if it somehow swung back down a bit I might lock it in, otherwise I learned a valuable lesson about betting before lines move (like many others here who aren't pulling bs out their behind just to troll, I have friggin eyes and saw it dancing between -20 and -21.5, but didn't sit down to put all my bets on til the night).. but I think the value left after it shot past those two key numbers...oh well...I'm locked and loaded on every other play. Let's get it, JD

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:37 AM ET #133

Quote Originally Posted by rLp:

JD.

For what it's worth, and to back ur play;

I read a couple articles on Navy over fall camp. I'm not sure the triple option is all you will see come game day. Navy is going to take advantage of Reynolds arm, and by all accounts, will be playing out of the shotgun (passing formation) a bit more this year. One could only guess, playing a high powered offense like IU, that in this game, their pass game could come more into play than other games.

Their head coach, Niumatalolo, was qouted as saying that he believes Reynolds is just too good of a passer and has to add more of a passing element to their offense. He was also qouted on multiple occasions that they will indeed be throwing the ball more, making their offense harder to defend, therefore, added a lot of shot gun, spread attack in fall camp.

FYI.

absolutely exquisite feedback...thanks for the info. i like this over now even more...BOL this year guy.

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:38 AM ET #134

Quote Originally Posted by RetainLane:

JD:

Seeing that you're leaning under 14.5 for Hawaii's TT, do you see the Beaver's offense doing well again this week and covering the line?

hey buddy!

i think that oregon state will be a completely different team this week.

and hawaii is historically bad away from the isle.

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:39 AM ET #135

Quote Originally Posted by DAVIDN:

JD- Did you read my thread first?

you are right...my bad...BOL guy

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:40 AM ET #136

Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

I called betonline and they said you're full of sh!t and dont even have an account there!

You and these fake lines....its ridiculous!!!!

is this a joke?

0

jdnmoney

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2009

Posts: 9120

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:42 AM ET #137

Quote Originally Posted by radmanrules:

Sorry if I missed it, but are these lines originally from 5Dimes (which is what I use) or Betonline? I saw your other post, that is why I am asking.

On a side note, I don't know why people are hating at all. You help people out with picks who have no clue otherwise, people don't have to read your threads, tail you or anything of the sort. Thought you had to be a grown behind man (or woman) to bet, so why are there so many cry babies (pardon my obscene vernacular) on here?

Thanks for posting. And if you decide to pull a Gilmo, and go to Twitter, I will follow.

Best of luck buddy...i use 5dimes and betonline...both provide great CS and also pay out promptly...

betonline releases lines early and i need that for being able to take advantage of mistakes.

0

DAVIDN

Hall of Fame

Joined: May, 2008

Posts: 22444

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:49 AM ET #138

It's all good. Best of luck.

0

composite

Veteran

Joined: Oct, 2008

Posts: 4418

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 12:57 AM ET #139

Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:

is this a joke?

He quoted Wyoming -20 as one of *HIS* picks this week. I think it's safe to say that's a joke.

0

LonghornHoosier

All-Star

Joined: Sep, 2007

Posts: 11665

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 1:28 AM ET #140

JDS - with you on Indiana/Navy over 65!

I also like the Wake play at BC. BC is garbage with a new coach. Wake is not great, but I like them straight up as a 4 point dog.

GL my friend!

LonghornHoosier

0

LonghornHoosier

All-Star

Joined: Sep, 2007

Posts: 11665

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 1:28 AM ET #141

JDS - with you on Indiana/Navy over 65!

I also like the Wake play at BC. BC is garbage with a new coach. Wake is not great, but I like them straight up as a 4 point dog.

GL my friend!

LonghornHoosier

0

ticojoe

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2007

Posts: 2674

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 6:46 AM ET #142

Thanks JD.... Betonline was easy to get setup and already took advantage of my Free Play. Just posted this ticket on a 7.5 Point Teaser mixed with some NFL Football:

Ticket Accepted

241875021 - 1 Sep 04, 2013 06:17 AM

fp $50.00 $265.00

Football - 458 New Orleans Saints +4½ for Game

Football - 459 Tampa Bay Buccaneers +4½ for Game

Football - 463 Cincinnati Bengals +10½ for Game

Football - 467 Seattle Seahawks +4 for Game

Football - 377 Arizona -2½ for Game

Football - 326 Georgia +4½ for Game

Football - 329 Utah State -2½ for Game

Pura Vida

0

Michfan15

All-Star

Joined: Oct, 2008

Posts: 11310

Posted: Sep. 4, 2013 - 8:58 AM ET #143

Quote Originally Posted by jdnmoney:

wyoming vs idaho.

_____________________________________________________

idaho is going to continue to be historically bad this year, and playing an independent schedule this year, they dont get get any favors.

2nd week in a row playing on the road for idaho. lets look at the idaho performance vs UNT.

Idaho only converted 5/14 3rd downs vs the mean green, but allowed 8/14 to UNT. Idaho allowed 594 total yards vs NT and 404 passing yards. NT QBs were 28/34 unreal. idaho is so bad on pass defense and wyomings pass offense is and should be much more explosive than UNT.

UNT scored all 6 points on offense (no cheap scores) and ran 80 plays, but also turned the ball over 3 times.

Idaho had two pass plays of 50 and 59 but other than that only mustered up 120 pass yds vs a UNT team that allowed 415 ypg last year, and 63% completion % and 3000 pass yds allowed ly.

idaho avg. 3.9 ypc rushing but only mustered up 139, one of the rushes was 47, so if you factor that out, they had 35 carries for 92.

their qbs played actually pretty mediocrely, completing 68% with no picks. but they did lose three fumbles

idaho is breaking in a new FG kicker that was 0/1 last week. they should not attempt to kick FG;s in wyoming. esp. if they are down early.

their punter did avg. 47.3 on 6 punts. very efficient changing Field position.

wyo caught UNT sleeping as they scored 1st, on a 4 play 75yd drive, and then recovered an onside kick. they were forced to punt, and never threatened again.

wyo only was 1/8 on third down vs nebraska, but it was remarkable that they only had 8 3rd down opps. they ran 75 plays. they racked up 602 yds vs neb. (not a great D, but a B10 defense) and were very effective running, clipping 219 yds and avg. 7.3 ypc...unreal

brett smith threw for 383 and ran for 92. the dual threat should really give idaho threats.

nebraska was supposed to work on pass offense and efficiency this year and it did not show vs. wyo. wyo only allowed 155 pass yds. and did a good job getting nebraska in third down situations, as nebraska had to attempt 17 different 3rd down plays. converted 9.

wyo should have no problems this week vs a very inefficient idaho team.

i expect wyo to score 45 points or higher this week. i doubt idaho scores more than 20. idaho should score a few times, but they might have to settle for FG's as i dont expect them to convert on 3rd down, or sustain any continuity on offense.

idaho games can be sketchy...

https://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=323150252