Posing a friendly challenge to SoulGlo, if he accepts

SoulGlo, I have never conversed with you, but I am sure you are a good guy.  I mean no disrespect in any way, but CalBear posted a thread stated that you were the best handicapper on Covers

https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=27&sub=102153496

on that thread I clearly pointed out how much of your numbers are smoke and mirrors.  Though I don’t deny that you are a solid handicapper, I would be lying if I said I thought we were in the same category, but you are solid.  You specialize in negative lines, and have to play for large amounts (posting $1500 a game?  Comon man)  in order to make a decent profit due to your only playing minimal games—very hard to avoid being vulnerable during downswings. 

Anyway, I would like to pose a challenge to you should you accept—and I do strongly suggest you not accept.  Once more, just being honest, thanks. 

Here is what I propose:

3 plays a day (you play 2 a day normally, and I play 8, so the comfort is in your corner, and totally fair for you)

We use 5 Dimes lines—that is the most popular site among Covers subscribers.

We alternate stating plays, and the second person that day cannot duplicate a play the 1^st person played.

We play ONLY +120 lines or better (better meaning +119 is not allowed)

14 consistent days of this competition

No play denominations necessary, whoever cashed the most plays of 28 wins

I do hope you accept, but completely expect you won’t (or you’ll lose the smoke and mirrors). 

Either way, BOL to you

By the way, this is the most ridiculous rule I've ever seen. You're not going to keep picking the same picks every single day, so this rule 'corrects' nothing. Secondly, if you want to truly measure who has the best accuracy, who finds the BEST plays each day, you should be measuring that on the basis of what a guy would pick in his normal run of business.

Oh, and a true test of merit would be to track % and Return on Investment per 100 plays, or 500 plays. Money amounts mean nothing, because what a guy bets per game means nothing and how many plays he makes per day means nothing. His rate of accuracy vs playable lines does. So you would simply compare at certain pick amounts... 100 vs 100, 500 vs 500, whatever... with who cares how quickly either of you reached it.

Because Return on Risk is the only true measure of which guy is beating the lines and who isn't. Whether a guy plays 1 game a week or 10 a day, it doesn't matter. It's how your rate looks when you hit 500 picks, 1000 picks, etc