His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
Holy smokes somebody has a pickle up their a&&! Why do we open up these useless threads to hear whiners constantly bitching. We should have a baby soother thread lmao. You mad bro ?
0
Holy smokes somebody has a pickle up their a&&! Why do we open up these useless threads to hear whiners constantly bitching. We should have a baby soother thread lmao. You mad bro ?
There are typically two kinds of posts on this entire forum
Those who posts views on games
And those who get emotional and personal about someone they have never met
It's such a shame that the balance is not more in favour of the former. If you have a strong angle then post it and we can discuss the game. Making it personal just embarrasses you....
0
There are typically two kinds of posts on this entire forum
Those who posts views on games
And those who get emotional and personal about someone they have never met
It's such a shame that the balance is not more in favour of the former. If you have a strong angle then post it and we can discuss the game. Making it personal just embarrasses you....
You are surelt a rookie to covers. We as an cover account member are not allowed to delete ppl comments even posted negative or bad. Only covers teams are allowed to that!! Get a life man!! when you tell me where the delete comment button is! I will give you a million bucks bro! Grow up. Its 2017! Make money as a team !!
0
You are surelt a rookie to covers. We as an cover account member are not allowed to delete ppl comments even posted negative or bad. Only covers teams are allowed to that!! Get a life man!! when you tell me where the delete comment button is! I will give you a million bucks bro! Grow up. Its 2017! Make money as a team !!
Just as many people detest Scal and wait for his picks to lose so they can talk trash as there are who follow his picks and live by his words. He has followers because he'a been here a while and win or lose he always takes the time to provide a good write-up so you know where he's coming from. You need to do you and stop worrying about the next man.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Just as many people detest Scal and wait for his picks to lose so they can talk trash as there are who follow his picks and live by his words. He has followers because he'a been here a while and win or lose he always takes the time to provide a good write-up so you know where he's coming from. You need to do you and stop worrying about the next man.
You call that a good write up? Lakers aren't tanking it this year so they will come with effort tonight and effort is all they need to cover 10 points? That is what passes for "analysis"
Nothing NADA about why Lakers may or may not be a good enough team. No stats no nothing. Just Effort. Is that how bad this forum is?
Not even bashing this guy. Just bashing the fact that 94 people call that analysis. Now I know why fading this forum works so well. Thank you
0
You call that a good write up? Lakers aren't tanking it this year so they will come with effort tonight and effort is all they need to cover 10 points? That is what passes for "analysis"
Nothing NADA about why Lakers may or may not be a good enough team. No stats no nothing. Just Effort. Is that how bad this forum is?
Not even bashing this guy. Just bashing the fact that 94 people call that analysis. Now I know why fading this forum works so well. Thank you
There are typically two kinds of posts on this entire forum
Those who posts views on games
And those who get emotional and personal about someone they have never met
It's such a shame that the balance is not more in favour of the former. If you have a strong angle then post it and we can discuss the game. Making it personal just embarrasses you....
+1
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ramanujan:
There are typically two kinds of posts on this entire forum
Those who posts views on games
And those who get emotional and personal about someone they have never met
It's such a shame that the balance is not more in favour of the former. If you have a strong angle then post it and we can discuss the game. Making it personal just embarrasses you....
His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
You're such a fuc king coward (likely Hugh Jorgan or one of his lackeys with a fake account) to say the game may cover (after vouching for the -10) but it wasn't because of my angle.
Shut the fu** up you dope.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mfrancesa:
His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
You're such a fuc king coward (likely Hugh Jorgan or one of his lackeys with a fake account) to say the game may cover (after vouching for the -10) but it wasn't because of my angle.
Its up to 106 now. I can't believe that 106 people responded to that "angle". That is ridiculous. 106 thought that was good "analysis" wow just wow. Any real handicapper (not me FYI) would just laugh at that. Covers Forum full of winners apparently haha
0
Its up to 106 now. I can't believe that 106 people responded to that "angle". That is ridiculous. 106 thought that was good "analysis" wow just wow. Any real handicapper (not me FYI) would just laugh at that. Covers Forum full of winners apparently haha
His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes!!!! But those threes have NOTHING to do with the motivation to bounce back after a historic loss!!
You
Fuc**ing
Fool
0
Quote Originally Posted by mfrancesa:
His "historic angle" and huge play for the day based on ONE thing. That the underdog got beat by almost 50 points in their last game and therefore will come back with "effort". WOW! and 94 people reply to this. Really?
How about this for the expected effort "angle". Blazers coming of huge road win at Boston. Back home on 3 days rest, fighting for playoff lives and celebrating their 1977 Championship. Think they'll show some effort? In Prime Time game no less. yeah I do. How about coaching effort. You think Luke wants to ruin dad's big night? Doesn't matter because he doesn't have the team to do it
Lets start with the fact that the Lakers literally DO NOT have a point guard on their roster right now. None. Against one of the best guard tandems in the league in Portland. We need a bigger word than mismatch.
How about the fact that the Lakers have not beat Portland in their last 10 tries. Does that factor into the "analysis"
What about the league's 8th best offense at home against the league's worst defense. Ingram and Young are going to guard Lillard and CJ on the outside?
I am just writing this because I had a post that questioned the great Scalabrine deleted. The only bigger joke than that is that 94 people replied to his junk "analysis". I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing and continue to check into this forum to see what the most popular pick is then fade fade fade. All this is good for. Bunch of clowns here. 94 response. Come'on man!
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes. That's the only way they cover this. If that happens fine. But I'll be rooting extra hard for Portland tonight to not just win but destroy LA and but a certain clown and his picks to sleep
Lakers may get hot and knock down a bunch of threes!!!! But those threes have NOTHING to do with the motivation to bounce back after a historic loss!!
Its up to 106 now. I can't believe that 106 people responded to that "angle". That is ridiculous. 106 thought that was good "analysis" wow just wow. Any real handicapper (not me FYI) would just laugh at that. Covers Forum full of winners apparently haha
I can't believe you Jorgan Porcelain Chaloots BWS GimmeeMoney and the like would have an all-nude orgy-fest to a gambling thread.
Your REAL handicapping analysis is that the Blazers have a better backcourt and a slew of ridiculously public info. Wow!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by mfrancesa:
Its up to 106 now. I can't believe that 106 people responded to that "angle". That is ridiculous. 106 thought that was good "analysis" wow just wow. Any real handicapper (not me FYI) would just laugh at that. Covers Forum full of winners apparently haha
I can't believe you Jorgan Porcelain Chaloots BWS GimmeeMoney and the like would have an all-nude orgy-fest to a gambling thread.
Your REAL handicapping analysis is that the Blazers have a better backcourt and a slew of ridiculously public info. Wow!!!
Of course the game may cover. Its f**cking sports. I said that it may cover if the Lake show shows up and shoots lights out from three. Then they have a shot
Has nothing to do with extra effort they show because they were blown out by Dallas. That ain't analysis buddy. And it ain't a historic angle. Its a regular season NBA game. And if you think the better team, the Blazers won't be at their best tonight as they honor their championship your crazy (I bet you didn't even know that was happening though. did you?). You said the line was gonna move to 6. Ha how's that going for you. 6 please. The worst team in the league over the last 30 games only giving up 6 to a playoff team on the road because they happened to get blown out in their last game. Come'on. If you are so sharp let's see some real analysis.
0
Of course the game may cover. Its f**cking sports. I said that it may cover if the Lake show shows up and shoots lights out from three. Then they have a shot
Has nothing to do with extra effort they show because they were blown out by Dallas. That ain't analysis buddy. And it ain't a historic angle. Its a regular season NBA game. And if you think the better team, the Blazers won't be at their best tonight as they honor their championship your crazy (I bet you didn't even know that was happening though. did you?). You said the line was gonna move to 6. Ha how's that going for you. 6 please. The worst team in the league over the last 30 games only giving up 6 to a playoff team on the road because they happened to get blown out in their last game. Come'on. If you are so sharp let's see some real analysis.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.