I mean I only have dozens in the mains doing so and Hugh has his entire circle jerk squad here supporting him. How unusual someone would offer support. Awww, ya feel so sorry for him but you have nothing to say of all the sycophants here supporting every but me. Oh yeah, let’s ignore all them.
What a joke this site is.
God what happened to the capping community.
No more fu***g playing two sides of ONE FU**g game.
And no mimicking picks. Of course with what Hugh just did he disallowed anyone to fade him with the no mimicking pick rule.
Everyone HAD to be off that game.
I can’t believe I have to type this shi* our. What a disgrace. Having to come back to the thread every 5 fu**’g minutes.
Then I have to see Packers with that alone is like a colonoscopy.
0
Yeah sure Stump god forbid someone support me!
I mean I only have dozens in the mains doing so and Hugh has his entire circle jerk squad here supporting him. How unusual someone would offer support. Awww, ya feel so sorry for him but you have nothing to say of all the sycophants here supporting every but me. Oh yeah, let’s ignore all them.
What a joke this site is.
God what happened to the capping community.
No more fu***g playing two sides of ONE FU**g game.
And no mimicking picks. Of course with what Hugh just did he disallowed anyone to fade him with the no mimicking pick rule.
Everyone HAD to be off that game.
I can’t believe I have to type this shi* our. What a disgrace. Having to come back to the thread every 5 fu**’g minutes.
Then I have to see Packers with that alone is like a colonoscopy.
I mean I only have dozens in the mains doing so and Hugh has his entire circle jerk squad here supporting him. How unusual someone would offer support. Awww, ya feel so sorry for him but you have nothing to say of all the sycophants here supporting every but me. Oh yeah, let’s ignore all them.
What a joke this site is.
God what happened to the capping community.
No more fu***g playing two sides of ONE FU**g game.
And no mimicking picks. Of course with what Hugh just did he disallowed anyone to fade him with the no mimicking pick rule.
Everyone HAD to be off that game.
I can’t believe I have to type this shi* our. What a disgrace. Having to come back to the thread every 5 fu**’g minutes.
Then I have to see Packers with that alone is like a colonoscopy.
You know what, Scal? I'll support you. You can be an insane megalomaniac sometimes but you've always seemed pretty pure of heart. And if I say I don't let the racist b*llshit faze me, how would it look if I let your idiosyncrasies upset me. You get a bum rap, Scal. I've been critical about you speaking for black people in the past. And that narrative has been twisted into me saying that you shouldn't be speaking up for black people. And that has never been my stance. The fact is black people would be even more royally f*cked than we already are if not for people of different races who feel like you do. We've let this forum pit us against each other for far too long. That ends now.
Now back to this contest. I've tried to remain impartial and limit my input to sharing in jokes. I seem to be the only one. If this is gonna turn into Scal vs everyone than it isn't really Scal that's partaking in the mean girl b*llshit. It's all of you. And I don't care if it is just the internet, as I always state, if i'm gonna choose sides, it's not gonna be against the guy locked in his own personal crusade against racism. So give 'em hell, Scal. You've got 'em right where you want them.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Yeah sure Stump god forbid someone support me!
I mean I only have dozens in the mains doing so and Hugh has his entire circle jerk squad here supporting him. How unusual someone would offer support. Awww, ya feel so sorry for him but you have nothing to say of all the sycophants here supporting every but me. Oh yeah, let’s ignore all them.
What a joke this site is.
God what happened to the capping community.
No more fu***g playing two sides of ONE FU**g game.
And no mimicking picks. Of course with what Hugh just did he disallowed anyone to fade him with the no mimicking pick rule.
Everyone HAD to be off that game.
I can’t believe I have to type this shi* our. What a disgrace. Having to come back to the thread every 5 fu**’g minutes.
Then I have to see Packers with that alone is like a colonoscopy.
You know what, Scal? I'll support you. You can be an insane megalomaniac sometimes but you've always seemed pretty pure of heart. And if I say I don't let the racist b*llshit faze me, how would it look if I let your idiosyncrasies upset me. You get a bum rap, Scal. I've been critical about you speaking for black people in the past. And that narrative has been twisted into me saying that you shouldn't be speaking up for black people. And that has never been my stance. The fact is black people would be even more royally f*cked than we already are if not for people of different races who feel like you do. We've let this forum pit us against each other for far too long. That ends now.
Now back to this contest. I've tried to remain impartial and limit my input to sharing in jokes. I seem to be the only one. If this is gonna turn into Scal vs everyone than it isn't really Scal that's partaking in the mean girl b*llshit. It's all of you. And I don't care if it is just the internet, as I always state, if i'm gonna choose sides, it's not gonna be against the guy locked in his own personal crusade against racism. So give 'em hell, Scal. You've got 'em right where you want them.
I wouldn't throw them out. I'd make him live with them. Playing two sides of the same game is a little bush league but I believe the spreads were different enough to constitute two seperate wagers.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
I wouldn't throw them out. I'd make him live with them. Playing two sides of the same game is a little bush league but I believe the spreads were different enough to constitute two seperate wagers.
And not only that. It kind of makes me think Scal has them right where he wants them. And now they are in panic mode. Packers can't do any better than 11-9. And I have no idea what Hugh was doing today. He was lucky to get the push that he did. Meanwhile, what is Scal doing? Did he try to force an NFL pick today? He's in his zone. So you all can make jokes about crying and midol all you want. This thing is his to win.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
And not only that. It kind of makes me think Scal has them right where he wants them. And now they are in panic mode. Packers can't do any better than 11-9. And I have no idea what Hugh was doing today. He was lucky to get the push that he did. Meanwhile, what is Scal doing? Did he try to force an NFL pick today? He's in his zone. So you all can make jokes about crying and midol all you want. This thing is his to win.
I wouldn't throw them out. I'd make him live with them. Playing two sides of the same game is a little bush league but I believe the spreads were different enough to constitute two seperate wagers.
Well Scal seems to have a problem with it. So if that's the case Hugh should let him make the decision on whether he keeps em or not. I'm still not seeing the big deal here. Keep em 1-1, throw em out 0-0. Let's not derail this clown show. Most of us sitting back enjoying this. Most of us could care less who wins. It's between them, we are just observers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
I wouldn't throw them out. I'd make him live with them. Playing two sides of the same game is a little bush league but I believe the spreads were different enough to constitute two seperate wagers.
Well Scal seems to have a problem with it. So if that's the case Hugh should let him make the decision on whether he keeps em or not. I'm still not seeing the big deal here. Keep em 1-1, throw em out 0-0. Let's not derail this clown show. Most of us sitting back enjoying this. Most of us could care less who wins. It's between them, we are just observers.
You know what, Scal? I'll support you. You can be an insane megalomaniac sometimes but you've always seemed pretty pure of heart. And if I say I don't let the racist b*llshit faze me, how would it look if I let your idiosyncrasies upset me. You get a bum rap, Scal. I've been critical about you speaking for black people in the past. And that narrative has been twisted into me saying that you shouldn't be speaking up for black people. And that has never been my stance. The fact is black people would be even more royally f*cked than we already are if not for people of different races who feel like you do. We've let this forum pit us against each other for far too long. That ends now.
Now back to this contest. I've tried to remain impartial and limit my input to sharing in jokes. I seem to be the only one. If this is gonna turn into Scal vs everyone than it isn't really Scal that's partaking in the mean girl b*llshit. It's all of you. And I don't care if it is just the internet, as I always state, if i'm gonna choose sides, it's not gonna be against the guy locked in his own personal crusade against racism. So give 'em hell, Scal. You've got 'em right where you want them.
This is pathetic drivel. Absolutely pathetic. Scalabrine whines that taking GB +6 and NO -3 1/2 are NOT two different bets and you make a big deal out of the fact that you'll support his whining. Alert the media ! And then your reasoning on the wagering issue has nothing to do with the merits, but instead, that this whiner is "pretty pure of heart" and probably not a racist. Well now, that is a rational way to judge a difference of opinion on the GB/NO wagering issue. News Flash: No one cares who you "support" when your reasoning is ridiculous, inane and self-aggrandizing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
You know what, Scal? I'll support you. You can be an insane megalomaniac sometimes but you've always seemed pretty pure of heart. And if I say I don't let the racist b*llshit faze me, how would it look if I let your idiosyncrasies upset me. You get a bum rap, Scal. I've been critical about you speaking for black people in the past. And that narrative has been twisted into me saying that you shouldn't be speaking up for black people. And that has never been my stance. The fact is black people would be even more royally f*cked than we already are if not for people of different races who feel like you do. We've let this forum pit us against each other for far too long. That ends now.
Now back to this contest. I've tried to remain impartial and limit my input to sharing in jokes. I seem to be the only one. If this is gonna turn into Scal vs everyone than it isn't really Scal that's partaking in the mean girl b*llshit. It's all of you. And I don't care if it is just the internet, as I always state, if i'm gonna choose sides, it's not gonna be against the guy locked in his own personal crusade against racism. So give 'em hell, Scal. You've got 'em right where you want them.
This is pathetic drivel. Absolutely pathetic. Scalabrine whines that taking GB +6 and NO -3 1/2 are NOT two different bets and you make a big deal out of the fact that you'll support his whining. Alert the media ! And then your reasoning on the wagering issue has nothing to do with the merits, but instead, that this whiner is "pretty pure of heart" and probably not a racist. Well now, that is a rational way to judge a difference of opinion on the GB/NO wagering issue. News Flash: No one cares who you "support" when your reasoning is ridiculous, inane and self-aggrandizing.
This is pathetic drivel. Absolutely pathetic. Scalabrine whines that taking GB +6 and NO -3 1/2 are NOT two different bets and you make a big deal out of the fact that you'll support his whining. Alert the media ! And then your reasoning on the wagering issue has nothing to do with the merits, but instead, that this whiner is "pretty pure of heart" and probably not a racist. Well now, that is a rational way to judge a difference of opinion on the GB/NO wagering issue. News Flash: No one cares who you "support" when your reasoning is ridiculous, inane and self-aggrandizing.
Eat a d*ck, punk. I made my opinion known on the issue of Hugh trying to middle a bet. And the fact is, nobody's opinion on the subject really matters aside from the people in the actual contest. And my support of Scal has nothing to do with said wager. So i'm having a hard time understanding what your issue is.
The way you little fanboys try clique up and start sh*t, and come to each other's aid, yet are so offended that someone says, "You know what? I'm gonna root for Scal." is pretty telling. Yes, Scal can be a j*ckass sometimes but I do think he seems like a righteous dude. As far as I can tell from f*cking covers post, he seems like a righteous dude. And yes, half of you sorry f*cks on this website are, in fact, huge bigots. Or atleast that's the role you all play on covers. And isn't that the root of this contest? I haven't made it my lifes work to rally against you all like Scal. And I have been willing to joke and find common ground with you all but that doesn't make me blind to the opinions expressed on this site. So I make a decision, in response to a bunch of grown men acting like high school cheerleaders, to throw a little support Scal's way and you try to call me out for it?
You're a little late to this party. Maybe you should've just stayed home. Maybe I should have limited this post to it's first sentence: Eat a d*ck, punk.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:
This is pathetic drivel. Absolutely pathetic. Scalabrine whines that taking GB +6 and NO -3 1/2 are NOT two different bets and you make a big deal out of the fact that you'll support his whining. Alert the media ! And then your reasoning on the wagering issue has nothing to do with the merits, but instead, that this whiner is "pretty pure of heart" and probably not a racist. Well now, that is a rational way to judge a difference of opinion on the GB/NO wagering issue. News Flash: No one cares who you "support" when your reasoning is ridiculous, inane and self-aggrandizing.
Eat a d*ck, punk. I made my opinion known on the issue of Hugh trying to middle a bet. And the fact is, nobody's opinion on the subject really matters aside from the people in the actual contest. And my support of Scal has nothing to do with said wager. So i'm having a hard time understanding what your issue is.
The way you little fanboys try clique up and start sh*t, and come to each other's aid, yet are so offended that someone says, "You know what? I'm gonna root for Scal." is pretty telling. Yes, Scal can be a j*ckass sometimes but I do think he seems like a righteous dude. As far as I can tell from f*cking covers post, he seems like a righteous dude. And yes, half of you sorry f*cks on this website are, in fact, huge bigots. Or atleast that's the role you all play on covers. And isn't that the root of this contest? I haven't made it my lifes work to rally against you all like Scal. And I have been willing to joke and find common ground with you all but that doesn't make me blind to the opinions expressed on this site. So I make a decision, in response to a bunch of grown men acting like high school cheerleaders, to throw a little support Scal's way and you try to call me out for it?
You're a little late to this party. Maybe you should've just stayed home. Maybe I should have limited this post to it's first sentence: Eat a d*ck, punk.
Nothing wrong with giving yourself a chance of a middle in real life so there should be nothing wrong with it in a betting contest
In both you have a small chance of going 2-0 or 1-0 zero chance of 0-2 and most likely 1-1. It is a cautious approach or a cunning one depending on your view
And if you favour an aggressive or confident approach then you probably see this as a chance for you to get ahead
Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You’re in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck
0
Nothing wrong with giving yourself a chance of a middle in real life so there should be nothing wrong with it in a betting contest
In both you have a small chance of going 2-0 or 1-0 zero chance of 0-2 and most likely 1-1. It is a cautious approach or a cunning one depending on your view
And if you favour an aggressive or confident approach then you probably see this as a chance for you to get ahead
Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You’re in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck
"Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You're in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck"
Makes sense to me.
Who cares if you take 2 sides of a game - you can do in real life - the line could have moved against - the fact that you predicted line movement is positive E(V) and to capture with lower vol is a strategy used by many professional bettors and syndicates. I realize this is a "contest" so maybe you have different rules - but when an NFL team is up 24-0 in 3rd quarter - they might GO CONSERVATIVE - so why can't someone do that here. But, yes it is BUSH LEAGUE b/c we want a variety of picks to make $.
That's what you guys don't get - this is about making $ - but for you guys it's about swearing and arguing with each other. (When you argue with an IDIOT, from afar, hard to tell who the IDIOT is. So if you think your counter-party is IDIOT, just ignore the dumb comments and do good work).
Good luck to all.
0
Yes Ramanujan said it perfectly:
"Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You're in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck"
Makes sense to me.
Who cares if you take 2 sides of a game - you can do in real life - the line could have moved against - the fact that you predicted line movement is positive E(V) and to capture with lower vol is a strategy used by many professional bettors and syndicates. I realize this is a "contest" so maybe you have different rules - but when an NFL team is up 24-0 in 3rd quarter - they might GO CONSERVATIVE - so why can't someone do that here. But, yes it is BUSH LEAGUE b/c we want a variety of picks to make $.
That's what you guys don't get - this is about making $ - but for you guys it's about swearing and arguing with each other. (When you argue with an IDIOT, from afar, hard to tell who the IDIOT is. So if you think your counter-party is IDIOT, just ignore the dumb comments and do good work).
Wow. Unreal. How can anyone above call themselves a serious capper and you support a way of middling out a win with NO Risk in the example I gave above? THis isn’t about money. A middle only presents the opportunity to win a bet with no juice. There is no risk for him as he was UP in the contest and made the bet.
If we play 20 plays and I start rough at 4-6 and you start 7-3 you can GUARANTEE me having to cap the rest of the contest at 80% by capping both sides of the next 5 games finishing 12-8 as I’d have to go 8-2 JUST TO TIE! Who WOULDNT take that even against the worlds best capper? If my results were hidden of course you’d think twice about doing that but since we see all results it is advantageous. You don’t think Hugh knows this at 7-4 to start the day? Of course he does!
I have been capping my entire life. Hugh doesn’t think I don’t see the edge in trying to play a no risk middle while picking up a guaranteed game in a race to 20?
He went 1-3 on the day with the one win being guaranteed to himself! That’s insane! And don’t even get me started on the gambling gods blessing him with SEVENTEEN POINTS UNANSWERED in the Jet game just to push. One of the riskiest bets on the board. He could have finished 0-4 easily without the guaranteed middle put in later!
He put in tha Green Bay +6 bet and I’m watching the game like he can win or lose it. I think he loses when the gun sounds. Little do I know he came in LATER and took the other side too with a line move!
So had GB scored on a back foot (something Hugh and Packers have perfected in this contest) he not only would have won but won TWICE.
Fu** it!
Everything stands as is and we are moving forward:
1) NO MORE PLAYING BOTH SIDES OF A Game regardless of line moves.
2) no playing the same side of someone else’s game already put in regardless of line moves.
Thank you stump. We will move forward on better terms.
Incredible manipulation! I feel like I’m at the Moose Club with Worm and Mike and the municipal cops and the ace of spades is at the bottom of th deck!!!!!
I’ll post the records later when I calm down. I’ve had enough. I may have a full blown case of asthma after Hugh’s cheating scandal and I need a breather.
0
Wow. Unreal. How can anyone above call themselves a serious capper and you support a way of middling out a win with NO Risk in the example I gave above? THis isn’t about money. A middle only presents the opportunity to win a bet with no juice. There is no risk for him as he was UP in the contest and made the bet.
If we play 20 plays and I start rough at 4-6 and you start 7-3 you can GUARANTEE me having to cap the rest of the contest at 80% by capping both sides of the next 5 games finishing 12-8 as I’d have to go 8-2 JUST TO TIE! Who WOULDNT take that even against the worlds best capper? If my results were hidden of course you’d think twice about doing that but since we see all results it is advantageous. You don’t think Hugh knows this at 7-4 to start the day? Of course he does!
I have been capping my entire life. Hugh doesn’t think I don’t see the edge in trying to play a no risk middle while picking up a guaranteed game in a race to 20?
He went 1-3 on the day with the one win being guaranteed to himself! That’s insane! And don’t even get me started on the gambling gods blessing him with SEVENTEEN POINTS UNANSWERED in the Jet game just to push. One of the riskiest bets on the board. He could have finished 0-4 easily without the guaranteed middle put in later!
He put in tha Green Bay +6 bet and I’m watching the game like he can win or lose it. I think he loses when the gun sounds. Little do I know he came in LATER and took the other side too with a line move!
So had GB scored on a back foot (something Hugh and Packers have perfected in this contest) he not only would have won but won TWICE.
Fu** it!
Everything stands as is and we are moving forward:
1) NO MORE PLAYING BOTH SIDES OF A Game regardless of line moves.
2) no playing the same side of someone else’s game already put in regardless of line moves.
Thank you stump. We will move forward on better terms.
Incredible manipulation! I feel like I’m at the Moose Club with Worm and Mike and the municipal cops and the ace of spades is at the bottom of th deck!!!!!
I’ll post the records later when I calm down. I’ve had enough. I may have a full blown case of asthma after Hugh’s cheating scandal and I need a breather.
And worse in the example I gave about for someone starting at 7-3 and finishing 12-8, you can finish BETTER than 12-8 if you hit a middle! or several middles! The more you think about it the worse it gets!
The duplicity exhibited here is rivaling the Enron scandal for a capping contest in terms of guile!
Hugh Jorgan! Hugh fu**ing Madoff is his new name!
Incredible.
From this day forth everyone will remember him as a cheat! CHEAT!
CHEAT!
CHEAT!
0
And worse in the example I gave about for someone starting at 7-3 and finishing 12-8, you can finish BETTER than 12-8 if you hit a middle! or several middles! The more you think about it the worse it gets!
The duplicity exhibited here is rivaling the Enron scandal for a capping contest in terms of guile!
Hugh Jorgan! Hugh fu**ing Madoff is his new name!
Incredible.
From this day forth everyone will remember him as a cheat! CHEAT!
^^^ pipe down princess....in your next life, you will now know how to cover your sweet assbud when you have another cap off with someone...know how to set the rules accordingly.
And in fact, you are the only gutless competitor here as you are the only one here changing and altering the rules midway thru...classic sign of a cowardly crying vagina
Changing rules...these are rules that should be understood
So...if I had a 1-0/0-1 lead on you you do know I could copy every pick for a guaranteed win. 10,000 picks. 100,000 picks. Wouldn’t matter.
That rule shouldn’t be stated.
You’re ok with that?
Are you ok with me being 10-8 and you 10-10 and me taking both one game for a no risk win without making my final two worth:?
You’re ok with that? Lol! You want someone to gain an advantage without making 20 picks....as long as it’s not me right??? Lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
^^^ pipe down princess....in your next life, you will now know how to cover your sweet assbud when you have another cap off with someone...know how to set the rules accordingly.
And in fact, you are the only gutless competitor here as you are the only one here changing and altering the rules midway thru...classic sign of a cowardly crying vagina
Changing rules...these are rules that should be understood
So...if I had a 1-0/0-1 lead on you you do know I could copy every pick for a guaranteed win. 10,000 picks. 100,000 picks. Wouldn’t matter.
That rule shouldn’t be stated.
You’re ok with that?
Are you ok with me being 10-8 and you 10-10 and me taking both one game for a no risk win without making my final two worth:?
You’re ok with that? Lol! You want someone to gain an advantage without making 20 picks....as long as it’s not me right??? Lol.
When you're done cleaning are you going to come out of there? Or are you gonna look around, and figuring that it's all nice and tidy now, get comfy and stay in?
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
When you're done cleaning are you going to come out of there? Or are you gonna look around, and figuring that it's all nice and tidy now, get comfy and stay in?
This whole subject is stupid. You know almost everyone in here is against you, Scal. So why let yourself get sucked into an argument. Just concentrate on your picks. You've got them right where you want them.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
This whole subject is stupid. You know almost everyone in here is against you, Scal. So why let yourself get sucked into an argument. Just concentrate on your picks. You've got them right where you want them.
Nothing wrong with giving yourself a chance of a middle in real life so there should be nothing wrong with it in a betting contest
In both you have a small chance of going 2-0 or 1-0 zero chance of 0-2 and most likely 1-1. It is a cautious approach or a cunning one depending on your view
And if you favour an aggressive or confident approach then you probably see this as a chance for you to get ahead
Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You’re in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck
this right here. just cap the games and make them count. you should prevail in the end.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ramanujan:
Nothing wrong with giving yourself a chance of a middle in real life so there should be nothing wrong with it in a betting contest
In both you have a small chance of going 2-0 or 1-0 zero chance of 0-2 and most likely 1-1. It is a cautious approach or a cunning one depending on your view
And if you favour an aggressive or confident approach then you probably see this as a chance for you to get ahead
Scal I used to love your genuine rare situational picks. You’re in danger of becoming just noise. So take it for what it is, stop yelling and concentrate on making winning picks. Good luck
this right here. just cap the games and make them count. you should prevail in the end.
Post 1052...If it ever got to that point...i would simply post my picks a minute before it gets taken off the board...you would never be able to copy my plays.
Get a clue bub...stay in the closet...its where you belong
Thanks genius. I said the EXACT SAME THING WELL BEFORE YOU IN apostle #880:
Plus there's an easy out: I could just post a play the second before the opening tip or kick-off and you wouldn't be able to mimic it fast enough.
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Post 1052...If it ever got to that point...i would simply post my picks a minute before it gets taken off the board...you would never be able to copy my plays.
Get a clue bub...stay in the closet...its where you belong
Thanks genius. I said the EXACT SAME THING WELL BEFORE YOU IN apostle #880:
Plus there's an easy out: I could just post a play the second before the opening tip or kick-off and you wouldn't be able to mimic it fast enough.
I’m a bit light-headed at the moment having someone who was on his way to an 0-4 day, only to “pinball wizard” his way to a miracle push and then on top of that, guarantee himself a win with zero effort.
Please keep your eye on Hugh Madoff.
He’s capable of literally anything now. Watch the lines and juice and mimicry and middling.
And god only knows what else he’ll come up with.
Keep your eyes peeled...please. For the love of god please. Nothing can be ruled out at this point is in terms of his 3 Card Monte capping schemes.
0
Jerome,
I’m a bit light-headed at the moment having someone who was on his way to an 0-4 day, only to “pinball wizard” his way to a miracle push and then on top of that, guarantee himself a win with zero effort.
Please keep your eye on Hugh Madoff.
He’s capable of literally anything now. Watch the lines and juice and mimicry and middling.
And god only knows what else he’ll come up with.
Keep your eyes peeled...please. For the love of god please. Nothing can be ruled out at this point is in terms of his 3 Card Monte capping schemes.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
