Covers was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol. Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
LOL he is still giving a free pick go check it out. I dont see any scam or touting when its free.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sosana:
Smoke_O,
Covers was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol. Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
LOL he is still giving a free pick go check it out. I dont see any scam or touting when its free.
This has been said by myself and Wall several times but everyone just chooses to ignore those posts and claim conspiracy theory.
These same people also seem to think that the moderators (some of whom...have been doing their jobs for many years) haven't seen this same thing time and time again. And it continues to follow the same path...
1. Poster starts winning. 2. Poster starts getting praised. 3. Poster creates aliases to presumably create more attention for themselves (and for the record, it doesn't matter the intention...aliases are a boxable offense) 4. Poster gets boxed for these aliases. 5. Poster then goes on twitter and claims Covers banned them for posting winners. 6. Poster's followers come and whine that Covers is a crappy site that bans winners.
Number 1-6 have already happened. Here's what may or may not come BUT...the fact that the first 6 things have already occurred, it's not hard to believe that the next will follow:
7. People start following poster on twitter. 8. Poster starts charging for picks. 9. Poster begins to only hit at a 55% or lower clip. 10. Poster's followers bail and come back to Covers (the same site they claimed was crappy) to find another person to follow.
Repeat ad nauseum.
Now...you all can believe what you want to believe but I honestly wouldn't have to make my own bets if someone gave me $50 for every time I've seen this happen just in the last 2 years alone.
To recap....
#7 has now occurred. And now 7b has occurred too (I had left it out in my original post).
7b. Poster starts offering free picks via email for the purpose of email farming to get people in his database.
With his own website on the way, #8 should be just around the corner.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
This has been said by myself and Wall several times but everyone just chooses to ignore those posts and claim conspiracy theory.
These same people also seem to think that the moderators (some of whom...have been doing their jobs for many years) haven't seen this same thing time and time again. And it continues to follow the same path...
1. Poster starts winning. 2. Poster starts getting praised. 3. Poster creates aliases to presumably create more attention for themselves (and for the record, it doesn't matter the intention...aliases are a boxable offense) 4. Poster gets boxed for these aliases. 5. Poster then goes on twitter and claims Covers banned them for posting winners. 6. Poster's followers come and whine that Covers is a crappy site that bans winners.
Number 1-6 have already happened. Here's what may or may not come BUT...the fact that the first 6 things have already occurred, it's not hard to believe that the next will follow:
7. People start following poster on twitter. 8. Poster starts charging for picks. 9. Poster begins to only hit at a 55% or lower clip. 10. Poster's followers bail and come back to Covers (the same site they claimed was crappy) to find another person to follow.
Repeat ad nauseum.
Now...you all can believe what you want to believe but I honestly wouldn't have to make my own bets if someone gave me $50 for every time I've seen this happen just in the last 2 years alone.
To recap....
#7 has now occurred. And now 7b has occurred too (I had left it out in my original post).
7b. Poster starts offering free picks via email for the purpose of email farming to get people in his database.
With his own website on the way, #8 should be just around the corner.
Weeble -- have you ever given thought to the idea to pull some crazy ju-jitsu stuff on these touts? I mean the theory and steps you have above are 100% correct and accurate in my experience in my time here at this board (and I know there are many, many others with longer lengths here that probably agree).
But look at point #9. Law of averages tells us that if dude gets hot and builds up enough of a following to go tout, he's gonna come back to earth at below 55%. Could it perhaps be worth it to find out their picks and just absolutely fade the shit out of them?
I doubt I'm the first person to think of this?
0
Weeble -- have you ever given thought to the idea to pull some crazy ju-jitsu stuff on these touts? I mean the theory and steps you have above are 100% correct and accurate in my experience in my time here at this board (and I know there are many, many others with longer lengths here that probably agree).
But look at point #9. Law of averages tells us that if dude gets hot and builds up enough of a following to go tout, he's gonna come back to earth at below 55%. Could it perhaps be worth it to find out their picks and just absolutely fade the shit out of them?
Covers was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol. Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
My argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sosana:
Smoke_O,
Covers was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol. Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
My argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
Weeble -- have you ever given thought to the idea to pull some crazy ju-jitsu stuff on these touts? I mean the theory and steps you have above are 100% correct and accurate in my experience in my time here at this board (and I know there are many, many others with longer lengths here that probably agree).
But look at point #9. Law of averages tells us that if dude gets hot and builds up enough of a following to go tout, he's gonna come back to earth at below 55%. Could it perhaps be worth it to find out their picks and just absolutely fade the shit out of them?
I doubt I'm the first person to think of this?
Does Weeble pay you for those blowjobs or you give them out free?
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Weeble -- have you ever given thought to the idea to pull some crazy ju-jitsu stuff on these touts? I mean the theory and steps you have above are 100% correct and accurate in my experience in my time here at this board (and I know there are many, many others with longer lengths here that probably agree).
But look at point #9. Law of averages tells us that if dude gets hot and builds up enough of a following to go tout, he's gonna come back to earth at below 55%. Could it perhaps be worth it to find out their picks and just absolutely fade the shit out of them?
I doubt I'm the first person to think of this?
Does Weeble pay you for those blowjobs or you give them out free?
LOL. looks like kermit the frog has stats in check over there.which one of you guys is kermit?
I was just wondering the same thing myself.
Did you read Stats' explanation? Blah blah blah...
But, like I said, it's not like the mods could ever know anything about these things go at least 95% of the time.
It's like if I went into an office building where they have their big network server and argued with the experts that nothing would happen if they just pulled out that big blue wire. I don't claim I know everything in the world but I have no clue why some people think they know more than the people who have obviously been around the block more than a few times.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Slovak:
LOL. looks like kermit the frog has stats in check over there.which one of you guys is kermit?
I was just wondering the same thing myself.
Did you read Stats' explanation? Blah blah blah...
But, like I said, it's not like the mods could ever know anything about these things go at least 95% of the time.
It's like if I went into an office building where they have their big network server and argued with the experts that nothing would happen if they just pulled out that big blue wire. I don't claim I know everything in the world but I have no clue why some people think they know more than the people who have obviously been around the block more than a few times.
My argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
BetOnSports was another criminal enterprise.........luckily I pulled my money out of there after I heard several horror stories, like for instance, when they stiffed Billy Walters for over $500,000 because he was winning too much
I only had $8,500 but I pulled it out back in the fall of 2002.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
My argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
BetOnSports was another criminal enterprise.........luckily I pulled my money out of there after I heard several horror stories, like for instance, when they stiffed Billy Walters for over $500,000 because he was winning too much
I only had $8,500 but I pulled it out back in the fall of 2002.
Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts. They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes people...I have a flight to catch
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
The problem with your post is that you are talking about advertisement. Advertisement of a product correct? You have combined that ideology to the advertisement of a tout service in which I did not mention in my post. You quoted me out of context in the manner of questioning I was answering as well as cut out half of my response.
So what I will do is repost it in its entirety and then then speak to you in context of my post
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
The problem with your post is that you are talking about advertisement. Advertisement of a product correct? You have combined that ideology to the advertisement of a tout service in which I did not mention in my post. You quoted me out of context in the manner of questioning I was answering as well as cut out half of my response.
So what I will do is repost it in its entirety and then then speak to you in context of my post
Covers
was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your
search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol.
Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If
you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for
the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
My response to Sosana on his statement was
"My
argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have
written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with
touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for
tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling
has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their
homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management
habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They
were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from
their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers
doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why
do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its
because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts.
They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes
people...I have a flight to catch "
0
QUOTE Originally Posted by Sosana:
Smoke_O,
Covers
was right bro, Statsational is going tout. Google him right now in your
search bar and look what shows up. Guy is working on a website, lol.
Started a thread at SBR, and its deserted, no plays posted. Nothing. If
you follow him on twitter, the dude is saying "email me at etc etc" for
the pick's....
Mod's, excuse my English, but holy F*ck that mother f*cker had me fooled.....
I too doubted the integrity of covers as I thought this dude was legit ........................weebs and to the gang...keep doing what your doin brothers....
My response to Sosana on his statement was
"My
argument was never about him going tout....if you read anything I have
written in this thread I have consistently said I have no problems with
touts...however I do have a problem scandicappers. Anyone who pays for
tout plays has their own issue...but they better realize that gambling
has no verified winning strategy. The only thing they can do is do their
homework on who they are following and keep strict Money Management
habits. Money Management is the key to success.
You too doubted the integrity of Covers? I ALWAYS HAVE DOUBTED the integrity of Covers.
They
were the #1 advertiser for BetEd....the book that stole millions from
their customers. Pull the wool from over your eyes people! If Covers
doesnt get a cut from the action you wont have any action on their site
Why
do you think this is the main site with the anti tout agenda....its
because the powers that be do not receive any money from these touts.
They get money from the books. Im done speaking on this. Open your eyes
people...I have a flight to catch "
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
So now with my answer in its full capacity...you see that I was speaking on the interigrity of Covers.com. I never mentioned that they should not have advertizements nor did I speak on touts posting on Covers.com. I simply stated that they were in bed with a crooked book. Yet Covers.com IMO has one of the biggest Anti Tout campaign in gambling circles. If you lay with person how can you MORALLY tell someone else not be a person or to not lay with one
I'll dumb that down for those that need it. Covers promotes TOUTS on the very first page and also ran advertizement from a crooked book. How can you do that on page 1 and then on page 2 condemn touts? Makes no sense to me. Just state a rule saying you can not be a tout and be associated with the forum. Thats it case closed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
You're kidding me, right? How do you think Covers can stay a free site? Um...with advertising.
Now, if YOU were one of those advertisers paying Covers to display your ads, etc, and you saw someone advertising for free, wouldn't YOU be pissed off?
What you're saying is not a secret and it's nothing new. People who pay to advertise on a site are allowed...people who don't pay aren't allowed. Find me a site that doesn't do the same.
PS If the powers-that-be over at SBR figure out that he's trying to do personal business over at their forum, he'll be banned all the same. I can name you more than a handful of people who thought they could do the same thing over there that got them banned here. Turns out...they were wrong.
So now with my answer in its full capacity...you see that I was speaking on the interigrity of Covers.com. I never mentioned that they should not have advertizements nor did I speak on touts posting on Covers.com. I simply stated that they were in bed with a crooked book. Yet Covers.com IMO has one of the biggest Anti Tout campaign in gambling circles. If you lay with person how can you MORALLY tell someone else not be a person or to not lay with one
I'll dumb that down for those that need it. Covers promotes TOUTS on the very first page and also ran advertizement from a crooked book. How can you do that on page 1 and then on page 2 condemn touts? Makes no sense to me. Just state a rule saying you can not be a tout and be associated with the forum. Thats it case closed.
So now with my answer in its full capacity...you see that I was speaking on the interigrity of Covers.com. I never mentioned that they should not have advertizements nor did I speak on touts posting on Covers.com. I simply stated that they were in bed with a crooked book. Yet Covers.com IMO has one of the biggest Anti Tout campaign in gambling circles. If you lay with person how can you MORALLY tell someone else not be a person or to not lay with one
I'll dumb that down for those that need it. Covers promotes TOUTS on the very first page and also ran advertizement from a crooked book. How can you do that on page 1 and then on page 2 condemn touts? Makes no sense to me. Just state a rule saying you can not be a tout and be associated with the forum. Thats it case closed.
any site that hires SJP should be investigated
0
Quote Originally Posted by Smoke_O:
So now with my answer in its full capacity...you see that I was speaking on the interigrity of Covers.com. I never mentioned that they should not have advertizements nor did I speak on touts posting on Covers.com. I simply stated that they were in bed with a crooked book. Yet Covers.com IMO has one of the biggest Anti Tout campaign in gambling circles. If you lay with person how can you MORALLY tell someone else not be a person or to not lay with one
I'll dumb that down for those that need it. Covers promotes TOUTS on the very first page and also ran advertizement from a crooked book. How can you do that on page 1 and then on page 2 condemn touts? Makes no sense to me. Just state a rule saying you can not be a tout and be associated with the forum. Thats it case closed.
i have been on this site for years. i dont claim to be a good capper, i actually suck. however, i have learned to follow other cappers streaks on this site and it has led to winning seasons every year. if the people turn tout then they leave this forum and we never hear from them again so who gives a shit??? this guy has been picking winners the last four weeks and i have been on board for the last two. lets cut the bullshit chatter and get on to week five already. i will be checking back tomorrow, hopefully he hasnt either turned tout yet (LOL!!!) or been chased off by the covers police.
0
i have been on this site for years. i dont claim to be a good capper, i actually suck. however, i have learned to follow other cappers streaks on this site and it has led to winning seasons every year. if the people turn tout then they leave this forum and we never hear from them again so who gives a shit??? this guy has been picking winners the last four weeks and i have been on board for the last two. lets cut the bullshit chatter and get on to week five already. i will be checking back tomorrow, hopefully he hasnt either turned tout yet (LOL!!!) or been chased off by the covers police.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.