VGPOP, if you are over 55% you could cash out. If you only need the amount that 55% will make you in order to continue on the progession, why not cash it out? I would.
I am not telling you guys to do this or anything of that nature. I am simply stating how flat betting a small amount of your bankroll can lead to success. Many people get eaten up by the rush and thrill of putting a big amount of their bankroll on a game and simply go broke in a month, week or even a day. I am trying to prove that the way to win long term in this industry is flat betting small over a long period of time. If you want to follow along with me and give this a try, please go for it, but I am not trying to tell people here what to do or what to bet on, simply give my opinion and do what we all are here for, beat the book at the end of the day.
VGPOP, if you are over 55% you could cash out. If you only need the amount that 55% will make you in order to continue on the progession, why not cash it out? I would.
I am not telling you guys to do this or anything of that nature. I am simply stating how flat betting a small amount of your bankroll can lead to success. Many people get eaten up by the rush and thrill of putting a big amount of their bankroll on a game and simply go broke in a month, week or even a day. I am trying to prove that the way to win long term in this industry is flat betting small over a long period of time. If you want to follow along with me and give this a try, please go for it, but I am not trying to tell people here what to do or what to bet on, simply give my opinion and do what we all are here for, beat the book at the end of the day.
'In week four their misfourtune continues as they go 0-5. Rick loses a total of $1000 while Pat looses $220'
This doesn't look right to me. How can Pat only lose $220 if he is betting $50 a game- wouldn't that be $250? And what happen to the juice?
Rick was doing things right- he just didn't have enough backup money or huevos. He would have won and won more than Pat if he stuck in there. This rule only applies if you don't have enough money to back up your losses. I don't understand what this has to do with flat betting- more like Rick was betting too much of his bankroll.
'In week four their misfourtune continues as they go 0-5. Rick loses a total of $1000 while Pat looses $220'
This doesn't look right to me. How can Pat only lose $220 if he is betting $50 a game- wouldn't that be $250? And what happen to the juice?
Rick was doing things right- he just didn't have enough backup money or huevos. He would have won and won more than Pat if he stuck in there. This rule only applies if you don't have enough money to back up your losses. I don't understand what this has to do with flat betting- more like Rick was betting too much of his bankroll.
Pay attention, he has a net loss last night. 1st quarter bet lost plus juice.
This thread is riddled with why there are so many touts that continue to find customers (suckers). You people are embarrasing. Or shills.
Pay attention, he has a net loss last night. 1st quarter bet lost plus juice.
This thread is riddled with why there are so many touts that continue to find customers (suckers). You people are embarrasing. Or shills.
Pay attention, he has a net loss last night. 1st quarter bet lost plus juice.
This thread is riddled with why there are so many touts that continue to find customers (suckers). You people are embarrasing. Or shills.
Pay attention, he has a net loss last night. 1st quarter bet lost plus juice.
This thread is riddled with why there are so many touts that continue to find customers (suckers). You people are embarrasing. Or shills.
GL BRYCE
Please check out my NFL post and share your play everyone Im not sure if ill do a NCAA post this year or not.
GL ALL LETS MAKE IT A WINNING SEASON!!!
GL BRYCE
Please check out my NFL post and share your play everyone Im not sure if ill do a NCAA post this year or not.
GL ALL LETS MAKE IT A WINNING SEASON!!!
First Week, High Totals? Be wary over players. Teams that come into the season looking to make a big bang in week one lighting up the score board are not usually the teams that are set by the odds makers to do so. A system well known by gamblers is play the under in totals higher then 42 in week one. I will take it a step further. Along my journey I was introduced to the system of playing week one games under the total if in fact the total is higher then 44 points. If we look at this system dating back to the start of the 1999 season the UNDER in Week One Games with a total HIGHER THEN 44 POINTS has gone 37-18. For those of you who like the winning percentage side of things, that’s 67% over the past 10 seasons. Now, to make things even better for you winning percentage junkies, this system has been even better since the boom of online sports betting in the early 2000’s. Since the start of the 2003 season, following this same system, you would of cashed your ticket at the betting window 27 of 36 times! That is a very nice 75% winning percentage that will definitely pad your wallet early in the season. To make things even better, this system is currently on a 17-3 85% run dating back to 2005!
This system is so affective because the book knows that generally speaking the public bettors love playing overs. I won’t lie, I love playing overs as well, but because of this, you must be careful when backing this publically loved bets. Early in the season, bettors have not seen a football game in nearly 6 months and are ready to rear up and fire away. These lines have been hyped up since early in the summer and there have been weeks and weeks of previews on ESPN, Websites and in Magazines. These previews are almost always more offensively focused then defensively focused, because the players the people want to hear about are the star players in the skill positions. This creates a large cloud of “offense-itis” among bettors. Put two seemingly explosive teams in a game set up for a week one shootout...except low scores.
How did this system do last season? Well going into last season the system was on a 12-1 run. If you have done the quick math you can see it went 5-2 just a year ago. However, of those five wins were all by double digits. It’s no secret, defences come together quicker then offenses. Offensive football is all about timing and rhythm. This may take a team a quarter, a game or many weeks in the case of some, forever.
There are a number of games which could qualify for the system this week but it all starts tonight with Minnesota New Orleans. I am locked in at UNDER 49 POINTS.
In recap,
I just read this in Barnes and Noble this last weekend in a handicapping annual that SBG put out this year. This is exactly it word for word. Isn't this copywright infringement Mr. college man??? This is just a trend that happens to be hot right now. If you are paying attention to your own numbers, you'd realize that this "system" was 10-9 from 1999 to 2002. What do you make of that?
First Week, High Totals? Be wary over players. Teams that come into the season looking to make a big bang in week one lighting up the score board are not usually the teams that are set by the odds makers to do so. A system well known by gamblers is play the under in totals higher then 42 in week one. I will take it a step further. Along my journey I was introduced to the system of playing week one games under the total if in fact the total is higher then 44 points. If we look at this system dating back to the start of the 1999 season the UNDER in Week One Games with a total HIGHER THEN 44 POINTS has gone 37-18. For those of you who like the winning percentage side of things, that’s 67% over the past 10 seasons. Now, to make things even better for you winning percentage junkies, this system has been even better since the boom of online sports betting in the early 2000’s. Since the start of the 2003 season, following this same system, you would of cashed your ticket at the betting window 27 of 36 times! That is a very nice 75% winning percentage that will definitely pad your wallet early in the season. To make things even better, this system is currently on a 17-3 85% run dating back to 2005!
This system is so affective because the book knows that generally speaking the public bettors love playing overs. I won’t lie, I love playing overs as well, but because of this, you must be careful when backing this publically loved bets. Early in the season, bettors have not seen a football game in nearly 6 months and are ready to rear up and fire away. These lines have been hyped up since early in the summer and there have been weeks and weeks of previews on ESPN, Websites and in Magazines. These previews are almost always more offensively focused then defensively focused, because the players the people want to hear about are the star players in the skill positions. This creates a large cloud of “offense-itis” among bettors. Put two seemingly explosive teams in a game set up for a week one shootout...except low scores.
How did this system do last season? Well going into last season the system was on a 12-1 run. If you have done the quick math you can see it went 5-2 just a year ago. However, of those five wins were all by double digits. It’s no secret, defences come together quicker then offenses. Offensive football is all about timing and rhythm. This may take a team a quarter, a game or many weeks in the case of some, forever.
There are a number of games which could qualify for the system this week but it all starts tonight with Minnesota New Orleans. I am locked in at UNDER 49 POINTS.
In recap,
I just read this in Barnes and Noble this last weekend in a handicapping annual that SBG put out this year. This is exactly it word for word. Isn't this copywright infringement Mr. college man??? This is just a trend that happens to be hot right now. If you are paying attention to your own numbers, you'd realize that this "system" was 10-9 from 1999 to 2002. What do you make of that?
I just read this in Barnes and Noble this last weekend in a handicapping annual that SBG put out this year. This is exactly it word for word. Isn't this copywright infringement Mr. college man??? This is just a trend that happens to be hot right now. If you are paying attention to your own numbers, you'd realize that this "system" was 10-9 from 1999 to 2002. What do you make of that?
I just read this in Barnes and Noble this last weekend in a handicapping annual that SBG put out this year. This is exactly it word for word. Isn't this copywright infringement Mr. college man??? This is just a trend that happens to be hot right now. If you are paying attention to your own numbers, you'd realize that this "system" was 10-9 from 1999 to 2002. What do you make of that?
ok, it seems like you need a reality check. I am always interested in some ones idea of how to make money, but your math needs a tune up. Did you know there is one day in Vegas every year where a horse doesn't run, and there is no sports to bet on. My wife loves it.
1.91 plays a day, ok let's just say 2 plays a day and $44.00 on each play. I specialize in pro football, so with a six month season, I should play 4 plays a day, but wait, Sunday is probably the only day for me to do that and there are only 17 sundays, but I could feed one off on Monday. I need to make 712 plays a year, and if I bet every game this year, I only have 256 plays. That leaves me 456 plays short.
After 5 years, I am 2280 plays short. So lets say I hit 55% at $50.00 a game, actually $55.00 and I am betting every game. If I win 141 games, the book paid me 14,805.00 (105 x 256), I risked 14,080. (256 x $55.00) My profit is $725.00.
Over five years my profit would be 3,625.00. That's 5.5% of a $1000.00 bankroll.
I agree with your flat bet, it's not something new. I'm not here to cut you down, and I don't care about your Cornell background?, if you think you have something figured out, It never hurts to expose it There are alot of guys on this site that have been doing this for a long time, including myself.
The game changes every year with new rules put in, change in player personell, head coaches, weather, and injuries. To get a winning percentage in any sport, requires work, time to do the work, and money
I don't know too many gamblers that are good all year around and in several different sports. It is not feasable, or smart. My advice is to get good at one sport, make your money and take the rest of the time off. It won't be that much time off either. You have to prep for the following season and good gamblers won't try to cram all the knowledge they need two weeks before the season starts.
If your a true handicapper, you want to remain sharp in what your successful at. Too many other sports will draw your attention away from your bread and butter. October is Vegas's favorite month. You have college football, NFL, Baseball playoffs, Hockey, and Baskets. It's my favorite too.
GL in your book.
ok, it seems like you need a reality check. I am always interested in some ones idea of how to make money, but your math needs a tune up. Did you know there is one day in Vegas every year where a horse doesn't run, and there is no sports to bet on. My wife loves it.
1.91 plays a day, ok let's just say 2 plays a day and $44.00 on each play. I specialize in pro football, so with a six month season, I should play 4 plays a day, but wait, Sunday is probably the only day for me to do that and there are only 17 sundays, but I could feed one off on Monday. I need to make 712 plays a year, and if I bet every game this year, I only have 256 plays. That leaves me 456 plays short.
After 5 years, I am 2280 plays short. So lets say I hit 55% at $50.00 a game, actually $55.00 and I am betting every game. If I win 141 games, the book paid me 14,805.00 (105 x 256), I risked 14,080. (256 x $55.00) My profit is $725.00.
Over five years my profit would be 3,625.00. That's 5.5% of a $1000.00 bankroll.
I agree with your flat bet, it's not something new. I'm not here to cut you down, and I don't care about your Cornell background?, if you think you have something figured out, It never hurts to expose it There are alot of guys on this site that have been doing this for a long time, including myself.
The game changes every year with new rules put in, change in player personell, head coaches, weather, and injuries. To get a winning percentage in any sport, requires work, time to do the work, and money
I don't know too many gamblers that are good all year around and in several different sports. It is not feasable, or smart. My advice is to get good at one sport, make your money and take the rest of the time off. It won't be that much time off either. You have to prep for the following season and good gamblers won't try to cram all the knowledge they need two weeks before the season starts.
If your a true handicapper, you want to remain sharp in what your successful at. Too many other sports will draw your attention away from your bread and butter. October is Vegas's favorite month. You have college football, NFL, Baseball playoffs, Hockey, and Baskets. It's my favorite too.
GL in your book.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.