All Forums | Penalty Box

The NFL Fixed Games Tracker Thread

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4438
Posts: 68
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #1
With all the crowing about tonight's game, and all the trolling that has turned this into a place where 1 actual capper is outnumbered by 15 rigtards, it's high time we put this BS to the test.

No more bumping threads when 'fixes' come through, and running away from every other thread when it doesn't. 

No more making it up as you go along and selective hindsight records.

If games get fixed, and it's so obvious to wolfs of wall street here, then it can tracked and proven. A fix is a fix, right? It's absolute.

So here we go. Post your 'fixed' picks in here each week, and we'll see what sort of long-term advantage the NFL script is giving you guys.

Realistically, you should go 100%. A fix is a fix, right? But we'll just pretend that's not a problem of logic for now.

"But I'm not a numbers nerd, I just know I win more than I lose" -Prove it.

"Trust me, I know a bookie, if you bet against public, you almost never lose". - Prove it.

"I'm up heaps fading you sheeples all year, easy $$$" -Prove it.

"We can't do this. The NFL or Vegas will catch on" - Bullshit, You''re posting these 'obvious fixes' every week already. 

I'll even give you the Vikings and Under tonight. Now let's track you tinfoil hat guys to prove this absolute truth exists. It's a bit late in the year but we'll let this thread run into next year, as well, if anyone has the balls to actually start proving their theory. 

Hardcore conspiracy nuts still wont give up their belief no matte what happens. That's the beauty of irrational belief. But this might help out any otherwise rational people who've been lured into this ridiculous church of smug trolls.

So..

Rigtards: 2-0
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #2
What's the terms?  And why are we opening this up to the entire board?  Why not just you and I, friendly wager?  I've posted my terms.

(1) either I track the "fix" and end up with a winning record/profitable (I'll flat bet if I do it)

(2) or I find someone who already is profitable and has a winning record that is in tune with the "fix".

If I can do either of the above successfully, what am I winning (or losing if I can't)? 


Whatever you decide, I have some questions:

1.  How long?  Rest of this season?  Next season?  Both?
2.  As long as I have a winning/profitable record, no doubt right?  No weaseling out "cause I can actually cap games also"?  No welching right?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #3
Try reading. Again.

This thread was coming before you started mouthing off in the other one (that's why it wasn't ready yet for your impatient behind)

If fixes exist then a year-long record should remove all doubt. It's public and open to all. Secret and between a couple of people is exactly how make-it-up-as-you-go theories thrive.

You invented that wager all on your own, thinking that I wasn't aware that many cappers on here believe in fixes. You also keep saying you don't stand one way or other, but keep jumping back into tough guy 'fixes are real I'll prove it and win your monies'.

That's what public thread is for. Consistency above bullshit. Notice how your first reply was already an attempt to cloud the purpose of this thread.

No more misdirection and changes of subject. NFL scripted fix picks in here or keep talking to yourself. Your choice.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #4
Oh, and since you seem confused, this thread ISN'T for you. It was half-written when you took up the cause of the rigtards. 

You know, the one you keep changing what position you're on.

This isn't a bet. This a public tracking to see whether NFL fixes are so obvious, so profitable, and completely true. This time next season we'll see.

It should be 100%, if games are scripted. But I'll settle for anything higher than what an actual, solid capper would post.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #5
And in case anyone else is confused, this isn't a thread trackin naesiy's picks. He's just an eager little troll that attached himself to an ongoing conversation.

This is to track the plays of all so-called fix experts on here. The ones who troll the cappers who don't believe in fixes. The ones who call the rest of us suckers. The ones who keep bumping threads about wins and disappearing on losses.

This is your chance, all of you, to show us sheep the truth.

Have at it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 454
Posted: #6
Jesus christ you guys sould like a couple of 10 years olds arguing over some chocolate. Grow up.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:


By the way, I like how you are already hedging on your claims.  So let me guess, if I prove it to you, then it wouldn't be because of spotting the fix, it'd be because I could "actually cap games"?    Got ya, I see your out.  Nice weasel.

I love how this is all about you. You mentioned a wager that no one else agreed you to and now you're arguing the terms and accusing me of bad faith... in a wager I never accepted.

Or that the picks thread is all about you, even though you said you never made any claims and are apparently an innocent bystander.

But yeah, it's all about you. That's exactly the sort of ego that leads people to believe they were cheated by fixes rather than bad luck or bad reads.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by vancity143:

Jesus christ you guys sould like a couple of 10 years olds arguing over some chocolate. Grow up.

Would a 10 year old arguing over chocolate tell you to go fuk yourself? Like I just did now?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #9
Now, fixed-games predictions or GTFO
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #10
hehe,interesting.

so wat qualifies the pick as an official "fixed" play??who gets to decide??....wat if 2 guys roll up with alternating "scripts" for a game and are equally adamant that their scenarion will play out??

dear jesus lord above,i hope against all hope that spastic "fade-or-die" comes in here and has to give approval on every play....the picks may not hit 5%....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #11
Okay, on second thoughts, big guy, if you really want to wager?

I got a simple one.

I will pay you actual money if you can explain to me why the popular capper 'in tune with the fix' that you reference has a worst winning % than the cappers who publicly say all fixed and rigged theories are bullshit.

I don't want to name people, because this isn't about attacking anyone who isn't being a fukwit like you. But Add me as a friend and we can get more detailed if you want.

I'd like to know how you explain that a guy 'in tune with the fix' isn't 90%-100% lifetime. How can he NOT be?

And how can guys who AREN'T 'in tune with the fix' have better records?

If you can explain that, then I'll line up to say games are rigged, I'll give you actual folding money, and I'll even polish your person if that's your preference.

Because how the darn can any of it be true while those are the real-world facts? I'd love to know. Friend me and explain that, magic man.

Or here. Inquiring minds wanna know.

And don't jump back on the 'oh I never said I believed it' train.. because just a minute ago you were tryna call me out in a wager that you could prove the fixes over a year.

No need. Just explain why the above is happening.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #12
LOL, I see, bet not accepted.  You're very eager to run your mouth but not at all eager to back your mouth up with $$$.  

Thanks, that's what I figured.  No problem, I expected it.  I made a challenge and I knew you wouldn't accept.  You just like to run your mouth and condescendingly sling vulgarities at people in the safety of your living room without realizing that the things you profess as truth is as much conjecture as the argument you vehemently try to debunk.

"Let's open it up EVERYONE"  i.e let's skew the results

Smart move.    You know as well as I know that half the people on here are rookies that either don't know what they are doing or are SAFs.  There is only ONE reason to open this thread up to the "public" and that is to muddy the results.  I'm done, have fun.  I can nearly guarantee you this "thread" of yours will end up right where you started.  No proof either way....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

 

wat if 2 guys roll up with alternating "scripts" for a game and are equally adamant that their scenarion will play out??



That happens already, and that's for those idiots to work out. If there is a script, there shouldn't be so many versions of it. That's one of many things that constantly prove it's not real.

But forget that.

Explain the post above and you can money. PM me.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #14
I wanna know why the best cappers who aren't hip to the fix win more than the most prominent one who 'is'.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:

Okay, on second thoughts, big guy, if you really want to wager?

I got a simple one.

I will pay you actual money if you can explain to me why the popular capper 'in tune with the fix' that you reference has a worst winning % than the cappers who publicly say all fixed and rigged theories are bullshit.

I don't want to name people, because this isn't about attacking anyone who isn't being a fukwit like you. But Add me as a friend and we can get more detailed if you want.



What are you talking about?  I haven't even named the capper.  But I accept your challenge.  Using your logic and terms, I will provide a capper here on covers that has his picks documented this season (not phixer, who you seem to think I am referring to) and show you how his winning percentage and profit is HIGHER than one of the much respected cappers on this board that strongly argues there is no fix.  Deal?  How much?  PM me.  Or like I said, I'll do it myself.  The challenge has been issued.    
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

hehe,interesting.

so wat qualifies the pick as an official "fixed" play??who gets to decide??....wat if 2 guys roll up with alternating "scripts" for a game and are equally adamant that their scenarion will play out??

dear jesus lord above,i hope against all hope that spastic "fade-or-die" comes in here and has to give approval on every play....the picks may not hit 5%....

This is EXACTLY why you CAN'T open this thread up to the public, which is why I'm almost begging him to let him and I do it ourselves for sheets and giggles...and some dinero...but he'll never agree cause he's not as confident as he portrays while I am supremely confident.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:



That happens already, and that's for those idiots to work out. If there is a script, there shouldn't be so many versions of it. That's one of many things that constantly prove it's not real.

But forget that.

Explain the post above and you can money. PM me.

That's proves it's not real?  LOL.  Didn't you just say "proof" is beyond a reasonable doubt?  Aren't two conflicting arguments the very definition of reasonable doubt?  Yet somehow it's proof all of a sudden?

Do you understand the concept of trying to prove a negative?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #18
TO THE BOARD:

Sorry, I know, I should know better.  I won't contribute to this rubbish thread cluttering up the board anymore.

To BetFriends:  when you are ready to put money where your mouth is, PM me.  I'll be here.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4455
Posted: #19
I think this is actually a very good idea and I would love to see guys who always talk about rigged/fixed stuff posting their scripted picks here with tracking their records starting at 0-0.

These gentlemen like fadeORdie are definitely reading this thread so let's see whether they stand up for their talk or not.

And if you say "I won't contribute to this childish thread", it's a lame excuse, because you guys spend so much time defending your theories with long comments in other threads with the same intention. So posting your "fixed" picks on here just takes a minute of time and you can prove us wrong.

@naesiy: You know a capper on covers who posts a winning percentage "HIGHER" than most but you don't want to post his name? WTF?! That's way more "rubbish" than this thread.

The rules can be so simple: You just post your picks on games you think are rigged/fixed, give a short information (just a sentence) of why you think it will be fixed and that's it.

Here you go guys, stand to your big talk and prove your theory
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 3812
Posted: #20
@suuma

I'm a firm believer that all American sports are rigged from college level up. That includes college football/basketball, minor leagues, NBA, NFL, MLB heck even NHL (although I've never watched a second of ice hockey in my life).

Sports fixing in football (yes, I'll call it football) is rampant in Europe - you should know.

However I will not participate in this childish back-and-forth cursing/abusing discussion. It is obvious from this thread that BetFriends is a 15 year old child.

You either believe in your theory or you don't.

Peace.

fadeORdie

12/11/15
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #21
*scenario
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:

@suuma

I'm a firm believer that all American sports are rigged from college level up. That includes college football/basketball, minor leagues, NBA, NFL, MLB heck even NHL (although I've never watched a second of ice hockey in my life).

Sports fixing in football (yes, I'll call it football) is rampant in Europe - you should know.

However I will not participate in this childish back-and-forth cursing/abusing discussion. It is obvious from this thread that BetFriends is a 15 year old child.

You either believe in your theory or you don't.

Peace.

fadeORdie

12/11/15


uuuuuummmm,youre constantly in threads such as suuma's and many others telling them theyre gonna get buried cos of public support on their picks and the fact that their picks arent supported by the story-lines and scenario's that you feel are pre-ordained to play out by mysterious men with suitcases of cash..

so wat gives??you know the script,right???....or at least thats the impression youve been tryna give for past several months...so just post up your plays and watch the wins roll in,no problem surely??

once you hit at an alarming winning rate there will be no childish back and forth...the results will speak for themselves.

so really you have zero to lose,right??....unless of course you wanna admit rite here and now that you havent got even the faintest idea wat the "fix" or "script" is and have just been bull-shiiting all along.....


im not saying wat i believe regarding this topic,but i do object profusely to negative folk such as fade-or-die bagging the crap out of others givng their time and effort to the forum in an attempt to help and inform others..and then will not do a thing to back up their salty words of criticism.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:


What are you talking about?  I haven't even named the capper.  But I accept your challenge.  Using your logic and terms, I will provide a capper here on covers that has his picks documented this season (not phixer, who you seem to think I am referring to) and show you how his winning percentage and profit is HIGHER than one of the much respected cappers on this board that strongly argues there is no fix.  Deal?  How much?  PM me.  Or like I said, I'll do it myself.  The challenge has been issued.    


is this dude youre talking about in a witness protection programme or a secret undercover handicapper or wat??....why cant he be named??he's already freely posting picks on a public forum so wats the big deal??

in any case one solitary season is obviously a tiny,tiny sample that doesnt go to show much either way so theres that...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 3812
Posted: #24
@melossinglet

Please return when you have learned how to write proper English.
Do you not realize your choice of language only makes you look foolish but likely confirms you are also not more than 15 years old?


 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 336
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:

With all the crowing about tonight's game, and all the trolling that has turned this into a place where 1 actual capper is outnumbered by 15 rigtards, it's high time we put this BS to the test.

No more bumping threads when 'fixes' come through, and running away from every other thread when it doesn't. 

No more making it up as you go along and selective hindsight records.

If games get fixed, and it's so obvious to wolfs of wall street here, then it can tracked and proven. A fix is a fix, right? It's absolute.

So here we go. Post your 'fixed' picks in here each week, and we'll see what sort of long-term advantage the NFL script is giving you guys.

Realistically, you should go 100%. A fix is a fix, right? But we'll just pretend that's not a problem of logic for now.

"But I'm not a numbers nerd, I just know I win more than I lose" -Prove it.

"Trust me, I know a bookie, if you bet against public, you almost never lose". - Prove it.

"I'm up heaps fading you sheeples all year, easy $$$" -Prove it.

"We can't do this. The NFL or Vegas will catch on" - Bullshit, You''re posting these 'obvious fixes' every week already. 

I'll even give you the Vikings and Under tonight. Now let's track you tinfoil hat guys to prove this absolute truth exists. It's a bit late in the year but we'll let this thread run into next year, as well, if anyone has the balls to actually start proving their theory. 

Hardcore conspiracy nuts still wont give up their belief no matte what happens. That's the beauty of irrational belief. But this might help out any otherwise rational people who've been lured into this ridiculous church of smug trolls.

So..

Rigtards: 2-0
Well said and amen brother.stu
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.