Tennessee -5 and to win all bets placed on them such as -1.5 1st 10 min's..haha....
GL....
There is one thing I don't like and that is somone that lies about their record. I think moneyman knows a lot for only having 4 posts. Take it from Tarheel7703 and post your correct record. Tarheel7703 us having a terrible year but he don't lie about it. You are not having that bad of a year and I would suspect before the year is out you it will be profitable for you but it hasn't been yet. I am talking CBB only because I know you are doing well in other sports. You are a good capper or at least you know where to get good picks so post your true record. Here is a recap of your large and larger than normal picks. Care to dispute it? Now I am bashing.
quotePosted: 11/21/2007 11:14:59 AMLarge Play
Rhode Island +2
LGL FELLAS
SportFanatic71 quotePosted: 11/21/2007 11:42:19 AMSorry meant to say LTNW
Posted: 12/15/2007 8:39:43 AM
Final Saturday Card
****Larger Than Normal Wagers****
Charlotte -4
LXavier -1.5
L
Posted: 12/20/2007 10:26:26 AM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Pittsburgh Panthers +6 W
Posted: 12/22/2007 2:42:33 AM
***Larger Than Normal Wager****
Georgetown Hoyas +5
LThis will be one of my largest plays of the year.
quotePosted: 12/29/2007 6:11:31 AMno time fellas
witchita state -2 large L
quotePosted: 1/7/2008 11:26:58 AM****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Colorado Buffs -2.5 :L
Posted: 1/9/2008 4:31:19 AM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
George Mason –5 L
quotePosted: 1/9/2008 4:34:42 AMForgot one..
**Large Play**
Ole Miss +10 w
quotePosted: 1/12/2008 5:53:26 AM
miami -5.5 large W
Posted: 1/14/2008 2:24:00 PM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
San Jose State +6.5
W****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Georgetown Hoyas –1 L
quotePosted: 1/16/2008 10:12:12 AM****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Virginia Cavaliers -2.5 First Half
W***Large Play***
US Northridge -9.5 L
Posted: 1/19/2008 8:23:40 AM
***Larger Than Normal Wager***
Utah Utes -2.5
L***Larger Than Normal Wager***
Arizona State +8.5...they win su L
Correct Record
LTN 3-9
Large 2-2
Season 58-59
There is one thing I don't like and that is somone that lies about their record. I think moneyman knows a lot for only having 4 posts. Take it from Tarheel7703 and post your correct record. Tarheel7703 us having a terrible year but he don't lie about it. You are not having that bad of a year and I would suspect before the year is out you it will be profitable for you but it hasn't been yet. I am talking CBB only because I know you are doing well in other sports. You are a good capper or at least you know where to get good picks so post your true record. Here is a recap of your large and larger than normal picks. Care to dispute it? Now I am bashing.
quotePosted: 11/21/2007 11:14:59 AMLarge Play
Rhode Island +2
LGL FELLAS
SportFanatic71 quotePosted: 11/21/2007 11:42:19 AMSorry meant to say LTNW
Posted: 12/15/2007 8:39:43 AM
Final Saturday Card
****Larger Than Normal Wagers****
Charlotte -4
LXavier -1.5
L
Posted: 12/20/2007 10:26:26 AM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Pittsburgh Panthers +6 W
Posted: 12/22/2007 2:42:33 AM
***Larger Than Normal Wager****
Georgetown Hoyas +5
LThis will be one of my largest plays of the year.
quotePosted: 12/29/2007 6:11:31 AMno time fellas
witchita state -2 large L
quotePosted: 1/7/2008 11:26:58 AM****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Colorado Buffs -2.5 :L
Posted: 1/9/2008 4:31:19 AM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
George Mason –5 L
quotePosted: 1/9/2008 4:34:42 AMForgot one..
**Large Play**
Ole Miss +10 w
quotePosted: 1/12/2008 5:53:26 AM
miami -5.5 large W
Posted: 1/14/2008 2:24:00 PM
****Larger Than Normal Wager****
San Jose State +6.5
W****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Georgetown Hoyas –1 L
quotePosted: 1/16/2008 10:12:12 AM****Larger Than Normal Wager****
Virginia Cavaliers -2.5 First Half
W***Large Play***
US Northridge -9.5 L
Posted: 1/19/2008 8:23:40 AM
***Larger Than Normal Wager***
Utah Utes -2.5
L***Larger Than Normal Wager***
Arizona State +8.5...they win su L
Correct Record
LTN 3-9
Large 2-2
Season 58-59
I totally agree with moneyman about it being a disservice to your follower to post a false record and you have followers. Just think if someone only followed your larger than normal CBB plays. You are good and respected here...I don't care if all the plays aren't yours...you post good plays. It doesn't get much better than a 7-1 night in NHL, NBA, and CBB. Congrats for the outstanding night. Now clean up the act. I liked it when you called Matrixx out because I totally agreed with you but now I am calling you out to post an accurate record.
I totally agree with moneyman about it being a disservice to your follower to post a false record and you have followers. Just think if someone only followed your larger than normal CBB plays. You are good and respected here...I don't care if all the plays aren't yours...you post good plays. It doesn't get much better than a 7-1 night in NHL, NBA, and CBB. Congrats for the outstanding night. Now clean up the act. I liked it when you called Matrixx out because I totally agreed with you but now I am calling you out to post an accurate record.
Fucked up my record my ass. I can see if you were off one or even two games but there is a big difference between 4-4 and 3-9 on larger than normal plays. I am happy you went 3-1 and 7-1 in all sports. I like to see everybody beat the bookies. I even congratulated you for it but you want to resort to putting people down and calling them names when you have been called out. Pretty childish. You want to talk about pathetic...pathetic is posting Indian Cowboy's plays and lying about your record. Not saying all your plays are Indian Cowboys but a lot of them are and if you want to dispute that I will go back for the last 4 or 5 days and post Indian Cowboy's write up and show where at least 10 of your NBA and CBB plays were the same as Indian Cowboys. Coincidence...I think not. Why don't you be a man and just admit it. No need to curse and call me names for telling the truth. That is your defense mechanism. Come on...just man up and admit it. I know the truth and I could care less if you ever post again. You are not hurting me one bit. I just want everbody else to know what a fraud you are.
Fucked up my record my ass. I can see if you were off one or even two games but there is a big difference between 4-4 and 3-9 on larger than normal plays. I am happy you went 3-1 and 7-1 in all sports. I like to see everybody beat the bookies. I even congratulated you for it but you want to resort to putting people down and calling them names when you have been called out. Pretty childish. You want to talk about pathetic...pathetic is posting Indian Cowboy's plays and lying about your record. Not saying all your plays are Indian Cowboys but a lot of them are and if you want to dispute that I will go back for the last 4 or 5 days and post Indian Cowboy's write up and show where at least 10 of your NBA and CBB plays were the same as Indian Cowboys. Coincidence...I think not. Why don't you be a man and just admit it. No need to curse and call me names for telling the truth. That is your defense mechanism. Come on...just man up and admit it. I know the truth and I could care less if you ever post again. You are not hurting me one bit. I just want everbody else to know what a fraud you are.
Who the hell is Indian Cowboy..........
Not sure where you get off calling people pathetic when none of this was directed at you but if you must know Indian Cowboy is a tout that now sells picks and he use to post on Covers for free. He is a pretty good handicapper and SportFanatic71 has been posting a lot of his plays. It is not coincidence. Coincedence might be when a couple of picks are the same. When 10 or more picks are the same in the last 4 or 5 days considering all the games there have been each day then that is not coincedence. SF is someone good to follow because he does post good plays but they are not all his and he does lie about his record so don't jump in and start calling people pathetic when you don't even know the tout I am talking about. If you follow SF you won't go wrong but it won't be as good as his record indicates. Best of luck to you. Hell everyone is just trying to beat the bookie but no need to lie about your record. As far as posting Indian Cowboys plays goes that is not a bad thing because Indian Cowboy is good so it helps anybody that follows SF on the forum and it is all about beating the bookie. What it isn't about is name calling and deceivng people. If someone new comes on board and are looking for someone to follow then they should be able to see a handicappers true record without being decieved.
Who the hell is Indian Cowboy..........
Not sure where you get off calling people pathetic when none of this was directed at you but if you must know Indian Cowboy is a tout that now sells picks and he use to post on Covers for free. He is a pretty good handicapper and SportFanatic71 has been posting a lot of his plays. It is not coincidence. Coincedence might be when a couple of picks are the same. When 10 or more picks are the same in the last 4 or 5 days considering all the games there have been each day then that is not coincedence. SF is someone good to follow because he does post good plays but they are not all his and he does lie about his record so don't jump in and start calling people pathetic when you don't even know the tout I am talking about. If you follow SF you won't go wrong but it won't be as good as his record indicates. Best of luck to you. Hell everyone is just trying to beat the bookie but no need to lie about your record. As far as posting Indian Cowboys plays goes that is not a bad thing because Indian Cowboy is good so it helps anybody that follows SF on the forum and it is all about beating the bookie. What it isn't about is name calling and deceivng people. If someone new comes on board and are looking for someone to follow then they should be able to see a handicappers true record without being decieved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.