pool- Let me start by saying I dont follow SF's picks. I had my drake play posted before this guy did. I defended him because he has ben on here solid the last few months..... just like I have.
If this dude is pawning off some touts picks Im not cool with that. If he gave credit or "works cited" if you will then fine...... I dont know who this Indian is but I agree if that many picks are matching then yes its much more than coincidence.
As for the record I dont know why anyone keeps one..... But if it is false and blatanly false then ya thats wrong also......
I gave this dude the benefit of the doubt. I figured hes on here so much that he is a credible person.
I apoligize...... just didnt know any better.
Devil- Im definitely interested if there are other sites like this. Ive learned alot the last few months. Im not a good capper but Im trying. I have put alot of time in recently. I do know knowledge is power.... Im trying to be a sponge and soak everything up learning how to handicap a sports game. Ill send you my email.
0
pool- Let me start by saying I dont follow SF's picks. I had my drake play posted before this guy did. I defended him because he has ben on here solid the last few months..... just like I have.
If this dude is pawning off some touts picks Im not cool with that. If he gave credit or "works cited" if you will then fine...... I dont know who this Indian is but I agree if that many picks are matching then yes its much more than coincidence.
As for the record I dont know why anyone keeps one..... But if it is false and blatanly false then ya thats wrong also......
I gave this dude the benefit of the doubt. I figured hes on here so much that he is a credible person.
I apoligize...... just didnt know any better.
Devil- Im definitely interested if there are other sites like this. Ive learned alot the last few months. Im not a good capper but Im trying. I have put alot of time in recently. I do know knowledge is power.... Im trying to be a sponge and soak everything up learning how to handicap a sports game. Ill send you my email.
Dont worry about it man, I know you copy and paste your record and some number could got mixed, dont worry about it, just correct your record (if you want) so we could keep this place man, congrats in your hell of a day yesterday man GL in tonights picks man !!!
0
SportFan:
Dont worry about it man, I know you copy and paste your record and some number could got mixed, dont worry about it, just correct your record (if you want) so we could keep this place man, congrats in your hell of a day yesterday man GL in tonights picks man !!!
THIS GUY HAS BEEN POSTING PICKS FOR THE LAST 40 DAYS - 10 MINUTES AFTER IC HAS BEEN POSTING HIS PICKS! HE IS A FRAUD! HE STARTS A THREAD EACH MORNING CLAIMING HIS RECORDS, AND THAN WAITS 5 HOURS UNTIL IC POSTS HIS PICKS TO POST HIS OWN! HAHA!
0
THIS GUY HAS BEEN POSTING PICKS FOR THE LAST 40 DAYS - 10 MINUTES AFTER IC HAS BEEN POSTING HIS PICKS! HE IS A FRAUD! HE STARTS A THREAD EACH MORNING CLAIMING HIS RECORDS, AND THAN WAITS 5 HOURS UNTIL IC POSTS HIS PICKS TO POST HIS OWN! HAHA!
Tarheelz - one of the longest members of covers since 2001 broke the news this morning:
Sports fanatic for the 40th day in a row had 3 of ic's picks in his total of 5 to 7 picks: This is what what was on his blog and sure enough SF was on his picks. I don't care if you win dog, but just give other people the credit for their work rather than touting them as your own and getting credit on covers. LAME! You are great at capping other sports, why copy a tout - to increase you're winning %?
Winning 16 of 22 Days in January (73%)
Winning 17 of 23 Days (74%)
20 of 26 POD Winners. (77%)
January POD Run: 16-6 (73%) - Doing 1 POD per Day.
110-67 POD Run (61% since June 23rd - 1 POD per Day)
Best POD Run in the Nation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Basketball 2007: 96-66 (59%)
52-29 (62%) NBA Run &
NBA 2007: 64-41 (60%)
18-11 College Basketball Run (63%)(Last 17 Days) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IC's Plays Yesterday:
Yesterday's Analysis 2-1
Nets/Kings Over 201.5 (POD)
I have said time and time again for roughly 4 weeks that when indeed
the Kings get healthy, they will go on an ATS run similar to what the
Warriors did. I explained this in detail in the blog today in detail:
If you read this blog every day, there should be little to no surprise
given how much I love the Kings given the return of their starters and
the likelihood of an ATS run. I have commented relentlessly on the fact
that if indeed the Kings get healthy, similar to when Stephen Jackson
came back for the Warriors, I stated that this team will go on a
ridiculous ATS run. When Jackson came back, I believe the Warriors went
on to cover nearly 10 games in a row as they desperately were looking
to get back into the Western Conference playoff picture after losing
around 6 to 8 ballgames in a row. Well, the Kings are the same way
looking to get back into the playoff mix. Having said that, the Nets do
have revenge as the Kings won outright on the road at New Jersey
earlier this year, a game that I called outright for the Kings
successfully. The Nets however have lost their last 5 ballgames and
consequently their last 5 covers as well. I typically do not favor the
over in Nets ballgames but after their terrible performance on the road
against the Suns, I wouldn't be surprised if the Nets have a better
showing today and this game goes over - after all, the Kings dropped
100 at Detroit and typically they score about 8 points better at home.
I have this game pegged more for the over and wouldn't be surprised if
the Nets ATS slide continues.
The bottom line here is I do expect the Nets to have a better showing
today as after all, they have revenge and come off 5 straight losses
and a terrible road game in Phoenix. Thus, they should do better
against Sac and likely top a 100 points and considering that scored 100
and 110 in Detroit and Indiana, I certainly expect them to score over a
100 points today in ARCO - a stadium where they were scoring a 100
points a game when they didn't have Bibby, Artest and even Kevin
Martin. I wouldn't be surprised if the Kings cover as well, but I do
like the over as well. The over is 6-1 between these 2 teams in
Sacramento and the over is 5-0 in Sac's last 5 home ballgames.
Drake +5.5 (Outright Winner)
As I said on the research thread today, if I ever find a team that I
believe can win a game outright by above 30% and they are catching 5
points or more, I will take the dog without a doubt. This is the basis
of my handicapping and what I firmly stand on and frankly, has led to
the success that I have had for 4 years in handicapping college
basketball. If I believe an underdog can win outright, such as Weber
State the other day, I will take that dog as well as the points. I have
Drake as a top 20 team in the power rankings and I they have revenge
from last year's tight loss to conference foe and rival Creighton.
Drake has proven their worth on the road so far as they have lost just
1 game this year - their first game - which was a road game against St.
Mary's who is a top 20 power ranking team and have won against the
likes of Iowa, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Bradley and Wichita State on the
road this year. Now, they face a Creighton team that is very good, but
a top 50 team that has yet to beat a top 50 team all year. Granted,
they could lose this cover by free throws late, but I will take my
chances here with Drake as they are 6-0 ATS against teams that have a
winning % better than 60% meaning that they are undervalued and show up
against the "better" teams in the nation and 11-2 ATS in their last 13
ballgames overall.
Tennessee -4.5 (Loss)
Folks, Tennessee is getting no respect with this line. Irrelevant if
they cover this spread or not, they should be getting far more respect
given their splits and results thus far this year. Make no mistake
about it, the Vols are good this year and frankly, I think good enough
to win it all. I have said this repeatedly, I think Wildcats are
terrible this year and it will take some time for this team to get
better under Billy, they will be decent eventually, but once again, it
will take some time. I can't explain this play better than I did today
in my research blog:
I love the SEC and am looking forward to this game but was surprised to
see the line - is Kentucky really getting this much respect because
they beat Vandy at home? They sure are. If they had not beaten Vandy at
home, make no mistake about it, this team would have been dogged by 8
points for this game but because their last home game was a success and
the fact they come off 2 road losses in conference play, the line is
where it is today. Regardless, what do the Vols need to do get some
respect? I personally have them winning by roughly 9 points in this
game as I love Bruce Pearl in an ATS standpoint as he is not afraid to
lay the wood on teams in conference. [Here me closely, Bruce Pearl is
your Steve Spurrier of College Basketball. I'll say it again, Bruce
Pearl is your Steve Spurrier of college basketball[/b]. This man took
his team into South Carolina and pounded them by a score of 80-56 (24
points). This team beat a top 25 Xavier team by a greater margin than
the spread today and Kentucky is no top 25 team. Kentucky could play
spirited basketball today but I wouldn't be surprised if the Vols pull
away in the second half and hit the cover today. I do dislike the fact
that 2/3rds of the public is on the Vols.
I'll take public fav here as the numbers are far too appealing as the
Vols were a public fav at South Carolina and won by essentially 30
points and I think they do well here on the road today again. The Vols
are 6-1-1 ATS in their last 8 road games and the Wildcats are 2-8 ATS
in their last 10 ballgames against teams that have a winning % of over
60% - meaning that they do not step up to the plate against the better
teams in the league and they have inflated lines typically because of
the name "Kentucky" - as compared to what their true performance has
been this year.
0
Tarheelz - one of the longest members of covers since 2001 broke the news this morning:
Sports fanatic for the 40th day in a row had 3 of ic's picks in his total of 5 to 7 picks: This is what what was on his blog and sure enough SF was on his picks. I don't care if you win dog, but just give other people the credit for their work rather than touting them as your own and getting credit on covers. LAME! You are great at capping other sports, why copy a tout - to increase you're winning %?
Winning 16 of 22 Days in January (73%)
Winning 17 of 23 Days (74%)
20 of 26 POD Winners. (77%)
January POD Run: 16-6 (73%) - Doing 1 POD per Day.
110-67 POD Run (61% since June 23rd - 1 POD per Day)
Best POD Run in the Nation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Basketball 2007: 96-66 (59%)
52-29 (62%) NBA Run &
NBA 2007: 64-41 (60%)
18-11 College Basketball Run (63%)(Last 17 Days) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IC's Plays Yesterday:
Yesterday's Analysis 2-1
Nets/Kings Over 201.5 (POD)
I have said time and time again for roughly 4 weeks that when indeed
the Kings get healthy, they will go on an ATS run similar to what the
Warriors did. I explained this in detail in the blog today in detail:
If you read this blog every day, there should be little to no surprise
given how much I love the Kings given the return of their starters and
the likelihood of an ATS run. I have commented relentlessly on the fact
that if indeed the Kings get healthy, similar to when Stephen Jackson
came back for the Warriors, I stated that this team will go on a
ridiculous ATS run. When Jackson came back, I believe the Warriors went
on to cover nearly 10 games in a row as they desperately were looking
to get back into the Western Conference playoff picture after losing
around 6 to 8 ballgames in a row. Well, the Kings are the same way
looking to get back into the playoff mix. Having said that, the Nets do
have revenge as the Kings won outright on the road at New Jersey
earlier this year, a game that I called outright for the Kings
successfully. The Nets however have lost their last 5 ballgames and
consequently their last 5 covers as well. I typically do not favor the
over in Nets ballgames but after their terrible performance on the road
against the Suns, I wouldn't be surprised if the Nets have a better
showing today and this game goes over - after all, the Kings dropped
100 at Detroit and typically they score about 8 points better at home.
I have this game pegged more for the over and wouldn't be surprised if
the Nets ATS slide continues.
The bottom line here is I do expect the Nets to have a better showing
today as after all, they have revenge and come off 5 straight losses
and a terrible road game in Phoenix. Thus, they should do better
against Sac and likely top a 100 points and considering that scored 100
and 110 in Detroit and Indiana, I certainly expect them to score over a
100 points today in ARCO - a stadium where they were scoring a 100
points a game when they didn't have Bibby, Artest and even Kevin
Martin. I wouldn't be surprised if the Kings cover as well, but I do
like the over as well. The over is 6-1 between these 2 teams in
Sacramento and the over is 5-0 in Sac's last 5 home ballgames.
Drake +5.5 (Outright Winner)
As I said on the research thread today, if I ever find a team that I
believe can win a game outright by above 30% and they are catching 5
points or more, I will take the dog without a doubt. This is the basis
of my handicapping and what I firmly stand on and frankly, has led to
the success that I have had for 4 years in handicapping college
basketball. If I believe an underdog can win outright, such as Weber
State the other day, I will take that dog as well as the points. I have
Drake as a top 20 team in the power rankings and I they have revenge
from last year's tight loss to conference foe and rival Creighton.
Drake has proven their worth on the road so far as they have lost just
1 game this year - their first game - which was a road game against St.
Mary's who is a top 20 power ranking team and have won against the
likes of Iowa, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Bradley and Wichita State on the
road this year. Now, they face a Creighton team that is very good, but
a top 50 team that has yet to beat a top 50 team all year. Granted,
they could lose this cover by free throws late, but I will take my
chances here with Drake as they are 6-0 ATS against teams that have a
winning % better than 60% meaning that they are undervalued and show up
against the "better" teams in the nation and 11-2 ATS in their last 13
ballgames overall.
Tennessee -4.5 (Loss)
Folks, Tennessee is getting no respect with this line. Irrelevant if
they cover this spread or not, they should be getting far more respect
given their splits and results thus far this year. Make no mistake
about it, the Vols are good this year and frankly, I think good enough
to win it all. I have said this repeatedly, I think Wildcats are
terrible this year and it will take some time for this team to get
better under Billy, they will be decent eventually, but once again, it
will take some time. I can't explain this play better than I did today
in my research blog:
I love the SEC and am looking forward to this game but was surprised to
see the line - is Kentucky really getting this much respect because
they beat Vandy at home? They sure are. If they had not beaten Vandy at
home, make no mistake about it, this team would have been dogged by 8
points for this game but because their last home game was a success and
the fact they come off 2 road losses in conference play, the line is
where it is today. Regardless, what do the Vols need to do get some
respect? I personally have them winning by roughly 9 points in this
game as I love Bruce Pearl in an ATS standpoint as he is not afraid to
lay the wood on teams in conference. [Here me closely, Bruce Pearl is
your Steve Spurrier of College Basketball. I'll say it again, Bruce
Pearl is your Steve Spurrier of college basketball[/b]. This man took
his team into South Carolina and pounded them by a score of 80-56 (24
points). This team beat a top 25 Xavier team by a greater margin than
the spread today and Kentucky is no top 25 team. Kentucky could play
spirited basketball today but I wouldn't be surprised if the Vols pull
away in the second half and hit the cover today. I do dislike the fact
that 2/3rds of the public is on the Vols.
I'll take public fav here as the numbers are far too appealing as the
Vols were a public fav at South Carolina and won by essentially 30
points and I think they do well here on the road today again. The Vols
are 6-1-1 ATS in their last 8 road games and the Wildcats are 2-8 ATS
in their last 10 ballgames against teams that have a winning % of over
60% - meaning that they do not step up to the plate against the better
teams in the league and they have inflated lines typically because of
the name "Kentucky" - as compared to what their true performance has
been this year.
All of these guys are long-term members of covers that have called this
out. So, now I am not an alias, or else all of them else are. They all
attest to the 40 day trend.
All of these guys are long-term members of covers that have called this
out. So, now I am not an alias, or else all of them else are. They all
attest to the 40 day trend.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.