@wmi799
Go post my numbers, im still waiting! I know you already did it and are scared to post the facts hahahaha fucking dork
First off you have only created 11 NFL threads including this one and brag about a record of wins not posted.
You posted this in the first thread
"My Locks of the week are 26-6 over the last 2 years! Check out all my posts, I've lost only two games since posting my locks of the week on this forum and bunch of guys have been asking for more than just one pick so here are my picks for this week!"
You got mad because I pointed out that in your previous thread to this one, you claimed to be 23-6 and posted your lock of Detroit. It lost. But someone you went from 23-6 to 26-6
Then you claim you have only lost TWO games on your locks of the week since posting here. Not true. You lost (all of these are posted here)
Week 3 Lock TB -1 (they lost 14-12 to Green Bay)
Week 12 Lock Baltimore - 3 (they lost 28-27 to Jacksonville)
Week 13 Lock Kansas City -1 (they lost 27-24 to Cincy)
Week 16 Lock Detroit -2.5 (they 37-23 to Carolina)
That's FOUR locks of the weeks that were losers as you claim above you have only lost two! ALL OF THESE ARE POSTED HERE! With these four losses and only 11 threads, you tell us all how your 26-6! Your posted LOCK record at covers is 8-4 (which is a great job, congrats on that part)
You asked me in post 54, to post your record. I just did.
First off you have only created 11 NFL threads including this one and brag about a record of wins not posted.
You posted this in the first thread
"My Locks of the week are 26-6 over the last 2 years! Check out all my posts, I've lost only two games since posting my locks of the week on this forum and bunch of guys have been asking for more than just one pick so here are my picks for this week!"
You got mad because I pointed out that in your previous thread to this one, you claimed to be 23-6 and posted your lock of Detroit. It lost. But someone you went from 23-6 to 26-6
Then you claim you have only lost TWO games on your locks of the week since posting here. Not true. You lost (all of these are posted here)
Week 3 Lock TB -1 (they lost 14-12 to Green Bay)
Week 12 Lock Baltimore - 3 (they lost 28-27 to Jacksonville)
Week 13 Lock Kansas City -1 (they lost 27-24 to Cincy)
Week 16 Lock Detroit -2.5 (they 37-23 to Carolina)
That's FOUR locks of the weeks that were losers as you claim above you have only lost two! ALL OF THESE ARE POSTED HERE! With these four losses and only 11 threads, you tell us all how your 26-6! Your posted LOCK record at covers is 8-4 (which is a great job, congrats on that part)
You asked me in post 54, to post your record. I just did.
Will the real Puckett please stand up? Just want verification and move on. WMI is Cover's keyboard warrior. He likes to troll everyone threads and mall security. Can we all get along? Just post winners and time will tell moving forward .
Will the real Puckett please stand up? Just want verification and move on. WMI is Cover's keyboard warrior. He likes to troll everyone threads and mall security. Can we all get along? Just post winners and time will tell moving forward .
@WhatThePho
LOL! So, what you are saying is, if people lie, you are good with it? Correct? So telling the truth in your mind is "trolling'
Gotcha buddy! We wouldn't want users to know the truth about what someone post
BTW - I pointed out his 8-4 posted locks record at covers is good AND he is the one who point blank asked for me to post his record
@WhatThePho
LOL! So, what you are saying is, if people lie, you are good with it? Correct? So telling the truth in your mind is "trolling'
Gotcha buddy! We wouldn't want users to know the truth about what someone post
BTW - I pointed out his 8-4 posted locks record at covers is good AND he is the one who point blank asked for me to post his record
@Shortporch
I do like his indy pick. Especially at 7 1/2 dogs. Even with Richardson possibly out. I watched the condensed film. The backup seems to be under rated (imo) by the odds makers.
@Shortporch
I do like his indy pick. Especially at 7 1/2 dogs. Even with Richardson possibly out. I watched the condensed film. The backup seems to be under rated (imo) by the odds makers.
Nope after you said that I have to call BS. Why you here wasting time, posting your picks, if you are making money selling picks elsewhere.
Good luck "Mr. Nice Guy" but I am not buying what your selling.
Nope after you said that I have to call BS. Why you here wasting time, posting your picks, if you are making money selling picks elsewhere.
Good luck "Mr. Nice Guy" but I am not buying what your selling.
OMG! HailFlutie said to someone else to "stop lying". Now that really made me laugh. The kind of belly hurting laugh.
OMG! HailFlutie said to someone else to "stop lying". Now that really made me laugh. The kind of belly hurting laugh.
@Puckett8791
Why? For calling you out? For posting your record like you asked?
You're a liar. Take the high road
8-4 posted is pretty good The rest is BS
@Puckett8791
Why? For calling you out? For posting your record like you asked?
You're a liar. Take the high road
8-4 posted is pretty good The rest is BS
@wmi799
Did you jump on Mafioso's Virginia Cavs you Trollinator ??? LFG and lets cash this! Next, UNLOAD on their NFL Houston Texans+9.5 for Sunday for the 2-0 sweep!!
@wmi799
Did you jump on Mafioso's Virginia Cavs you Trollinator ??? LFG and lets cash this! Next, UNLOAD on their NFL Houston Texans+9.5 for Sunday for the 2-0 sweep!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.