What is the point of banning these "regulars" in the box? They've been around long enough, they aren't hurting anyone, they just want to chit chat in the box.
The point I'm trying to make is that they will just come back anyways. These people get banned, come back as aliases, eventually get caught and banned again and then they return yet again, it's a cyclical process that is pointless because they will keep coming back. All of them. All of the regulars that have been banned in the last year have been back or are back and will be back again. FE/Sir_H or whatever his real name is will be back again and we all know it so what is the point of banning him in the first place? You Mods think you have power to ban these people and keep them away but they will keep coming back no matter how many times they are banned. You really have no power.
And if they don't create aliases and stay away they are eventually allowed back because of good behavior like dad was.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
What is the point of banning these "regulars" in the box? They've been around long enough, they aren't hurting anyone, they just want to chit chat in the box.
The point I'm trying to make is that they will just come back anyways. These people get banned, come back as aliases, eventually get caught and banned again and then they return yet again, it's a cyclical process that is pointless because they will keep coming back. All of them. All of the regulars that have been banned in the last year have been back or are back and will be back again. FE/Sir_H or whatever his real name is will be back again and we all know it so what is the point of banning him in the first place? You Mods think you have power to ban these people and keep them away but they will keep coming back no matter how many times they are banned. You really have no power.
And if they don't create aliases and stay away they are eventually allowed back because of good behavior like dad was.
Good point. I will put it in my mod handbook. Article 73, section 94 after the section on what to do in case of fire.
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
0
Quote Originally Posted by allbees:
Good point. I will put it in my mod handbook. Article 73, section 94 after the section on what to do in case of fire.
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
Soaps are on the telly Andie.
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
I guess we must have missed sending you the mod evaluation form on the incident. Thanks for kind words.
Covers Linesmen
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
I guess we must have missed sending you the mod evaluation form on the incident. Thanks for kind words.
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
Are Articles 1-72 titled "How not to make mockery of oneself while laying a massive egg in ones handling of the GameHunter situation and essentially being responsible for starting the whole fiasco?" Because if they are then Article 73 has no hope in hell.
What is the point of banning these "regulars" in the box? They've been around long enough, they aren't hurting anyone, they just want to chit chat in the box.
The point I'm trying to make is that they will just come back anyways. These people get banned, come back as aliases, eventually get caught and banned again and then they return yet again, it's a cyclical process that is pointless because they will keep coming back. All of them. All of the regulars that have been banned in the last year have been back or are back and will be back again. FE/Sir_H or whatever his real name is will be back again and we all know it so what is the point of banning him in the first place? You Mods think you have power to ban these people and keep them away but they will keep coming back no matter how many times they are banned. You really have no power.
And if they don't create aliases and stay away they are eventually allowed back becauseof good behavior like dad was.
i think im the only poster in the history of covers to go the non-alias route
i should get a medal or cookie or some shit
0
Quote Originally Posted by andarmac99:
What is the point of banning these "regulars" in the box? They've been around long enough, they aren't hurting anyone, they just want to chit chat in the box.
The point I'm trying to make is that they will just come back anyways. These people get banned, come back as aliases, eventually get caught and banned again and then they return yet again, it's a cyclical process that is pointless because they will keep coming back. All of them. All of the regulars that have been banned in the last year have been back or are back and will be back again. FE/Sir_H or whatever his real name is will be back again and we all know it so what is the point of banning him in the first place? You Mods think you have power to ban these people and keep them away but they will keep coming back no matter how many times they are banned. You really have no power.
And if they don't create aliases and stay away they are eventually allowed back becauseof good behavior like dad was.
i think im the only poster in the history of covers to go the non-alias route
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.