All Forums | Penalty Box

WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5338
Posts: 246
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #126
Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

Yep. Scal, YOU are the reason he won! Thanks!

Uh no. I'm not. Had I lived in a swing state, you could say that. I don't. My state is as blue as Alabama is red. Florida on he other hand...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #127
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:

One thing for certain, it will now be important to pass a MASSIVE infrastructure bill, just as it was when B.O. proposed his. I wonder if the dems will do their best to under fund it as the republicans did.My guess is they wont because they know it is the right thing to do.
he said loud and clear he's putting a hiring freeze on all govnemernt employees.

Who would do the work???
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

he said loud and clear he's putting a hiring freeze on all govnemernt employees.

Who would do the work???

This might be the dumbest comment this site has ever seen, and that is among a field of some of the dumbest comments the internet has ever seen.

Scal, get some help ... or some meds.
You break down has rendered you a simpleton 


bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #129
Scal, I just perused through your thread in the CF forum on Marshall.
For obvious reasons, I can not comment in there.

You tout the "deceased" angle as being the #1 factor, and then use UCONN playing for the Sandy Hook victims as an example.
Really?

Sandy Hook was a devastating tragedy that had just recently happened when UCONN honored the victims.

Marshall honoring victims from 45 years ago is not nearly the same.
There are many PARENTS of players on Marshall's roster who were not born yet when the Marshall plane crashed.

Suggesting that Marshall has extra incentive due to something that happened 45 years ago is like saying that you threw an extra strike in your bowling league on Veterans Day to honor those who lost their lives in WW11.

Also, I see you are misrepresenting your record now.
Whatever makes you feel good about yourself, pal 
bigreds daddy
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #130
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

I like to be the center of attention from unwashed males like yourself, in their jointly unwashed boxer shorts with their back, chest, and armpit hair flowing out from under their wife beater, half drunken bottle of Schlitz Malt Liquor on their desktop and a bag of cheese doodlez in their lap. And their obese cat, Francis, doing figure 8's on their hamhock calves as they type.Yes, give me the attention of these men. I need this to live and breath. How will I ever survive without these anonymous men responding to my posts!!!


Scal, I pictured you more of wanting a "Felix" than an "Oscar". Who knew you liked 'em durrty!!! And such specific and graphic detail at that! How many times did you have to clean the drool off your chin as you were typing?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #131
bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Scal, I just perused through your thread in the CF forum on Marshall.
For obvious reasons, I can not comment in there.

You tout the "deceased" angle as being the #1 factor, and then use UCONN playing for the Sandy Hook victims as an example.
Really?

Sandy Hook was a devastating tragedy that had just recently happened when UCONN honored the victims.

Marshall honoring victims from 45 years ago is not nearly the same.
There are many PARENTS of players on Marshall's roster who were not born yet when the Marshall plane crashed.

Suggesting that Marshall has extra incentive due to something that happened 45 years ago is like saying that you threw an extra strike in your bowling league on Veterans Day to honor those who lost their lives in WW11.

Also, I see you are misrepresenting your record now.
Whatever makes you feel good about yourself, pal 



Deceased player angle...     

Nebraska 2016  
Cincinnati 2013  
UCLA 2013  



Those were examples of an active player on the team passing away during the season.....  not 20+ years before they were born.  Most of these kids were 8 years old when "We Are Marshall" came to theaters.   Talk about a reach.....     He must have parlayed West Virginia with Hillary, that's why he's looking for another pick.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by 165yds:

I'd agree with you until Wisconsin was lost.  Your thnking showed why this state went Red for the first time in 8 elections.  Nobody ever thought it could turn Red except Trump supporters.  Not even the Trump team thought they had a chance.  You never know.


The only reason it went Red is because Democrats didn't show up. All this garbage about Trump supporters firing back. Laughable. FEWER voters for Trump than Romney in 2012. What a revolution! LOL

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Scal, I just perused through your thread in the CF forum on Marshall.
For obvious reasons, I can not comment in there.

You tout the "deceased" angle as being the #1 factor, and then use UCONN playing for the Sandy Hook victims as an example.
Really?

Sandy Hook was a devastating tragedy that had just recently happened when UCONN honored the victims.

Marshall honoring victims from 45 years ago is not nearly the same.
There are many PARENTS of players on Marshall's roster who were not born yet when the Marshall plane crashed.

Suggesting that Marshall has extra incentive due to something that happened 45 years ago is like saying that you threw an extra strike in your bowling league on Veterans Day to honor those who lost their lives in WW11.

Also, I see you are misrepresenting your record now.
Whatever makes you feel good about yourself, pal 


LOL

He's not back to announce the final score is he.


Marshall 45

MTSU 17

Of course, this had NOTHING to do with the Marshall honoring of the 75 right? Come back and say that.

Please tell me you believe a Marshall team struggling through one of its worst seasons in its history that just BLOWS out an MTSU team that is damn impressive in several offensive categories and against a team like Marshall should hold it's own, wasn't motivated by the honoring of the 75. Please say that. Make yourself look worse. Of course, I also had the starting QB angle you completely ignored.

Whatever floats your boat. We all won while you looked on and likely faded the play.


Folks, if I ever left THIS is what you'd be left with for capping advice. Good luck with that!


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #135
Look at scal, banging on his chest as if the final score proves he was correct.

The fact is you were wrong, jackass, and I detailed why you were wrong in post #132.

You are the same unflushed turd who writes novels about how you capped a game correctly after that game lost.
Yet, here you are trying to say that your asinine angle of playing for deceased players from 45 years ago has merit because your team won.

You lose and that is not proof that you capped it incorrectly.
You win and that is proof that you capped it correctly. 

That makes as much sense as putting Hillary in "more parlays than you can count", and "in literally every parlay" 


bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #136
scal's bank roll is 

Burn baby burn, disco inferno, burn baby burn, burn that mother down 


                                                 

The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire!!!

Come back and play with me some more, jackass!!!!!!  
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #137
Before the election;

"Folks, this is free money"
"Show me the person who will bet on Trump. I want him in here now"
"I have Hillary in more parlays than I can count"
"I have Hillary in literally every parlay"
"Hillary at -300 is loan shark returns on your investment"

After the election:

"It was only a prop bet"            

Nice try, jackass!!!

                 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #138
Are you sorry you ventured back in here, jackass?

You're way too arrogant to admit it, but you and I both know that you regret entering this thread again.

Not me, similar to when you take your fat azz to McDonald's ... I'm lovin' it 

Scal's cash, scal's cash, scal's cash is on fire, we don't need no water let that mother fukker burnnnnnnn

bigreds daddy
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 46864
Posted: #139
Hey look: it's the hugh at his favourite pastime, kicking Scal's corpse. 
You getting comfy in the Box bud? Yeah, you better. Hey, feels like I'm missing a few of your classic threads? Must be the liberal conspiracy muzzling the bringer of truth.  
I heard the line move, wonder who's next? 
Well, gotta run, busy day and all, you keep crawling around in here alright? Toodles. 
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Look at scal, banging on his chest as if the final score proves he was correct.

The fact is you were wrong, jackass, and I detailed why you were wrong in post #132.

You are the same unflushed turd who writes novels about how you capped a game correctly after that game lost.
Yet, here you are trying to say that your asinine angle of playing for deceased players from 45 years ago has merit because your team won.

You lose and that is not proof that you capped it incorrectly.
You win and that is proof that you capped it correctly. 

That makes as much sense as putting Hillary in "more parlays than you can count", and "in literally every parlay" 



Ah, you still believe it had nothing to do with the outcome.

Folks this is why we are winners with my capping at 70% and hugh, well he is not a winner.

I want a SINGLE covers members to back Hugh over me. Just one. Come forward now. One member who will takes Hugh's opinion and capping over mine.

A 45-17 blowout from a team that couldn't generate any offense and then on the night they honor the Marshall deceased they explode for 42 and their defense shuts them out in the second half... and this had nothing to do with the honoring of the deceased. One member come forward and back him.

One member take his caps over mine. One. Just one. Double down on your point Hugh. Please.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #141
He bashes the play before the game.

The play wins 46-17 as a 9 point DOG.

He bashes the play in the same way after the game.

One person stand with him on this. One person stand with his bashing. Just one.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #142
*42-17 one person please. Just one.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

Before the election;

"Folks, this is free money"
"Show me the person who will bet on Trump. I want him in here now"
"I have Hillary in more parlays than I can count"
"I have Hillary in literally every parlay"
"Hillary at -300 is loan shark returns on your investment"

After the election:

"It was only a prop bet"            

Nice try, jackass!!!

                 

Scal, do you remember the thread you made in the politics forum, saying that the Dems would be dancing in November???

Just in case you had forgotten, let me refresh your memory ...


bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #144
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

He bashes the play before the game.

The play wins 46-17 as a 9 point DOG.

He bashes the play in the same way after the game.

One person stand with him on this. One person stand with his bashing. Just one.



You are too stupid to recognize that your "angle" of motivation coming from players who died 45 years prior was complete bulls!t.

The game could have won or lost. It happened to win.
This does not change the fact that your argument was absurd. 

Now back to doing the macarena with Hillary 
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #145
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


You are too stupid to recognize that your "angle" of motivation coming from players who died 45 years prior was complete bulls!t.

The game could have won or lost. It happened to win.
This does not change the fact that your argument was absurd. 

Now back to doing the macarena with Hillary 

Yup, a guy hitting 70% over two years with unique angles is the stupid one.

Let that guy be told, from someone who doesn't even post games, that he just 'happened' to win a game, where the other team got its doors blown off from a previously nonexistent offense or defense team, on a night where the dead where honored. 

It's all just a coincidence folks! Because Hugh said so! I mean they just happened to pu up their seaosn high in points because of a good game plan! Lol!


Still waiting for that ONE poster to back hugh! Where is he? Step right up! 

Hugh, you are embarrassing yourself here. Don't continue. Really. And one political exotic that I lost? I'm not perfect. It took the greatest election upset in HISTORY to take me down. Quite a force to lose a bet. He didn't win in a landslide. She won the popular vote. Get your head straight. It's sad.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 46864
Posted: #146
Howdy Scal, I don't really know you, but I can't believe the guy that posts in NCAAF and the guy that used to post in the General Discussion is the same person. 
Anyway, you got a great record going and you put great effort in your write ups.
The hugh here, not so much, he's not really into sports.
As for one person standing up for him in your argument here, no doubt one of the aryan brotherhood will jump in, just because. (That's your cue Gimme. )
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


And one political exotic that I lost? I'm not perfect. It took the greatest election upset in HISTORY to take me down. Quite a force to lose a bet. He didn't win in a landslide. She won the popular vote.

BEFORE ...

"I have Hillary in too many parlays to count"
"I put Hillary in every parlay, literally every parlay"
"free money"

AFTER ...

"one political exotic that I lost"

And saying that "she won the popular vote" voided how many of your losing parlays??? 
  

Scal's cash, scal's cash, scal's cash is on fire, we don't need no water let that mother fukker burnnnnnnn



bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:

Howdy Scal, I don't really know you, but I can't believe the guy that posts in NCAAF and the guy that used to post in the General Discussion is the same person. 
Anyway, you got a great record going and you put great effort in your write ups.
The hugh here, not so much, he's not really into sports.
As for one person standing up for him in your argument here, no doubt one of the aryan brotherhood will jump in, just because. (That's your cue Gimme. )

Yes, it's the same guy believe it or not.

And Hugh has been on my back since, do you have a guess when? 2007. At least NINE years I've been dealing with him.

Well back in the day General Discussion used to be ruled by several guys no longer on the site. One guy was definitely named "Giant", that I remember.

The biggest offender? I only remember his avatar. It was Christopher McDonald from Happy Gilmore: Maybe his name was "Mike" something. MikeC MikeG. Something like that.

Well anyhow, that guy in particular and the rest, along with Hugh used to just rip on blacks in GD free of consequence.

Of course, they will deny this and say they are the 'least racist people you'll ever meet' which is always the retreat line (and they actually believe it), but I was here and I remember.

And that is when I started my war on GD.

Anyhow, how this guy is going to tell anyone about any angle or game is beyond me? He doesn't have a single cap of worth here.

And he keeps harping on this Hillary parlay business. How does that affect the readers here? What do I gain by saying that? Nothing. No one would care if I hit Hillary winning but I take a major hit if it loses. It wasn't even a posted play and if it was, it's a loss and you move on.

And his ignorance with regard to the MTSU and Marshall game is the most astounding of all.

I mean, he doesn't understand anything about motivation or even the most benign of unique capping angles, yet he'll tell you why a team won or lost and is WASN'T because of what YOU said because well, he hates you. LOL. He's child.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2015
Posts: 2874
Posted: #149
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

And that is when I started my war on GD.




Been about as effective as Reagan's war on drugs, or Bush/Obama's war against terror. Too funny Scal, too funny.....
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #150
Gimme, what's even funnier was when Scal got so mad that his "war on the GD" was not working that he stomped his feet and left, saying he would never come back 
bigreds daddy
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.