The report reviewed elections that were studied for voter fraud and found incident rates between 0.0003% and 0.0025%, meaning 1 in 33,000 to 40,000.
"It is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls," wrote the report.
Clerical, technical and administrative errors have been shown to be behind a number of alleged cases of voter fraud circulated on social media since Election Day, including allegations of dead voters and temporary inconsistencies in the reporting of voting results.
Lorraine Minnite, author of The Myth of Voter Fraud and a professor of political science at Rutgers University, also found that voter fraud is exceedingly rare and that reports of fraud tended to be associated with false claims and administrative.
The report reviewed elections that were studied for voter fraud and found incident rates between 0.0003% and 0.0025%, meaning 1 in 33,000 to 40,000.
"It is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls," wrote the report.
Clerical, technical and administrative errors have been shown to be behind a number of alleged cases of voter fraud circulated on social media since Election Day, including allegations of dead voters and temporary inconsistencies in the reporting of voting results.
Lorraine Minnite, author of The Myth of Voter Fraud and a professor of political science at Rutgers University, also found that voter fraud is exceedingly rare and that reports of fraud tended to be associated with false claims and administrative.
"It is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls," wrote the report.
Clerical, technical and administrative errors have been shown to be behind a number of alleged cases of voter fraud circulated on social media since Election Day, including allegations of dead voters and temporary inconsistencies in the reporting of voting results.
Lorraine Minnite, author of The Myth of Voter Fraudand a professor of political science at Rutgers University, also found that voter fraud is exceedingly rare and that reports of fraud tended to be associated with false claims and administrative.
of course errors happen all the time in every election even at state and municipal levels
but there is no proof of widespread deliberate and coordinated election fraud let alone on such a massive scale that would actually overturn the results . if there was such verifiable indisputable proof wouldnt we have seen it by now ???
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
"It is more likely that an individual will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls," wrote the report.
Clerical, technical and administrative errors have been shown to be behind a number of alleged cases of voter fraud circulated on social media since Election Day, including allegations of dead voters and temporary inconsistencies in the reporting of voting results.
Lorraine Minnite, author of The Myth of Voter Fraudand a professor of political science at Rutgers University, also found that voter fraud is exceedingly rare and that reports of fraud tended to be associated with false claims and administrative.
of course errors happen all the time in every election even at state and municipal levels
but there is no proof of widespread deliberate and coordinated election fraud let alone on such a massive scale that would actually overturn the results . if there was such verifiable indisputable proof wouldnt we have seen it by now ???
of course errors happen all the time in every election even at state and municipal levels
but there is no proof of widespread deliberate and coordinated election fraud let alone on such a massive scale that would actually overturn the results . if there was such verifiable indisputable proof wouldnt we have seen it by now ???
Still no PROOF presented.
Evidence is NOT proof.
Where's the proof?
AG BARR says there is none. Period.
Because trump is an a$$hole who has always been embroiled in at least one lawsuit and typical several at any given moment of his adult life (tat's well over 50 years of constant lawsuits/litigation) then of course his frivolous "no proof" lawsuits will continue for years. Of course! We all know this. But they are irrelevent without PROOF.
And more importantly he's lost 39 lawsuits in the past 3 weeks and this trend is expected to continue *BECAUSE* there is no proof of widespread, nationwide, overwhelming and undeniable election fraud on a massive scale that would overthrow the election.
AG BARR says it doesn't exist, and he's right.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
of course errors happen all the time in every election even at state and municipal levels
but there is no proof of widespread deliberate and coordinated election fraud let alone on such a massive scale that would actually overturn the results . if there was such verifiable indisputable proof wouldnt we have seen it by now ???
Still no PROOF presented.
Evidence is NOT proof.
Where's the proof?
AG BARR says there is none. Period.
Because trump is an a$$hole who has always been embroiled in at least one lawsuit and typical several at any given moment of his adult life (tat's well over 50 years of constant lawsuits/litigation) then of course his frivolous "no proof" lawsuits will continue for years. Of course! We all know this. But they are irrelevent without PROOF.
And more importantly he's lost 39 lawsuits in the past 3 weeks and this trend is expected to continue *BECAUSE* there is no proof of widespread, nationwide, overwhelming and undeniable election fraud on a massive scale that would overthrow the election.
Florida GOP lawyer resigns in protest after political, armed raid against Rebekah Jones
A Florida Republican attorney has resigned from a state commission in protest after an armed law enforcement raid on the home of a former Department of Health employee who said she was fired after refusing to manipulate coronavirus data for De Santis administration.
In his resignation letter, Filipkowski wrote, “I have been increasingly alarmed by the Governor’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. I believe the policy of this state towards covid is reckless and irresponsible,” he added.
0
Florida GOP lawyer resigns in protest after political, armed raid against Rebekah Jones
A Florida Republican attorney has resigned from a state commission in protest after an armed law enforcement raid on the home of a former Department of Health employee who said she was fired after refusing to manipulate coronavirus data for De Santis administration.
In his resignation letter, Filipkowski wrote, “I have been increasingly alarmed by the Governor’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. I believe the policy of this state towards covid is reckless and irresponsible,” he added.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit.
Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
from what i learned about the socalled merits of this case
* its all rump licker states only becuz they r soreass losers wanting only to hold power to enrich themselves further
* like midnight1 already pointed out first ,this was led by texas becuz the ag there is in very serious criminal cases filed against him with a lot of valid evidence and strong merit which could result in a very long prison sentence and its likely this will happen , and the only way out is a presidential pardon . so being seen as a defiant supporter of rump this is how an indicted criminal texas ag can get rumps favor just like flynn arpaio and stone
* 5 sc justices must agree to hear the case . remember that all 9 unanimously agreed to refuse the stupid pennsylvania case a few days ago becuz there was no proof and not even valid evidence to make it worthy . this texas case has no proof or evidence either . just whining becuz they lost legally
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit.
Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
from what i learned about the socalled merits of this case
* its all rump licker states only becuz they r soreass losers wanting only to hold power to enrich themselves further
* like midnight1 already pointed out first ,this was led by texas becuz the ag there is in very serious criminal cases filed against him with a lot of valid evidence and strong merit which could result in a very long prison sentence and its likely this will happen , and the only way out is a presidential pardon . so being seen as a defiant supporter of rump this is how an indicted criminal texas ag can get rumps favor just like flynn arpaio and stone
* 5 sc justices must agree to hear the case . remember that all 9 unanimously agreed to refuse the stupid pennsylvania case a few days ago becuz there was no proof and not even valid evidence to make it worthy . this texas case has no proof or evidence either . just whining becuz they lost legally
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well. from what i learned about the socalled merits of this case * its all rump licker states only becuz they r soreass losers wanting only to hold power to enrich themselves further * like midnight1 already pointed out first ,this was led by texas becuz the ag there is in very serious criminal cases filed against him with a lot of valid evidence and strong merit which could result in a very long prison sentence and its likely this will happen , and the only way out is a presidential pardon . so being seen as a defiant supporter of rump this is how an indicted criminal texas ag can get rumps favor just like flynn arpaio and stone * 5 sc justices must agree to hear the case . remember that all 9 unanimously agreed to refuse the stupid pennsylvania case a few days ago becuz there was no proof and not even valid evidence to make it worthy . this texas case has no proof or evidence either . just whining becuz they lost legally
Yes. Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard.
It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it.
I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
3
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well. from what i learned about the socalled merits of this case * its all rump licker states only becuz they r soreass losers wanting only to hold power to enrich themselves further * like midnight1 already pointed out first ,this was led by texas becuz the ag there is in very serious criminal cases filed against him with a lot of valid evidence and strong merit which could result in a very long prison sentence and its likely this will happen , and the only way out is a presidential pardon . so being seen as a defiant supporter of rump this is how an indicted criminal texas ag can get rumps favor just like flynn arpaio and stone * 5 sc justices must agree to hear the case . remember that all 9 unanimously agreed to refuse the stupid pennsylvania case a few days ago becuz there was no proof and not even valid evidence to make it worthy . this texas case has no proof or evidence either . just whining becuz they lost legally
Yes. Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard.
It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it.
I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
This will be tossed by SCOTUS.
THEN, the deluded morons on the right will launch ANOTHER lawsuit....
1
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Still no PROOF presented. Evidence is NOT proof. Where's the proof? AG BARR says there is none. Period. no proof None whatsoever. They talk the talk, but it's all hot air
But 18 states have signed onto the frivolous Texas lawsuit. Will be a total let down for GOP when Supreme Court rejects it on no merits as well.
This will be tossed by SCOTUS.
THEN, the deluded morons on the right will launch ANOTHER lawsuit....
Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
no legal basis is right . this lawsuit is a joke a hoax becuz they dont like the way the american people voted by a 7 million vote margin
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
no legal basis is right . this lawsuit is a joke a hoax becuz they dont like the way the american people voted by a 7 million vote margin
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
no legal basis is right . this lawsuit is a joke a hoax becuz they dont like the way the american people voted by a 7 million vote margin
AGREED!
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. I think you are right about the Texas AG too, just looking to suck up to Fat Donnie for a potential pardon.
no legal basis is right . this lawsuit is a joke a hoax becuz they dont like the way the american people voted by a 7 million vote margin
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Yes. Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. Yeah, I agree. In fact I would bet big bucks on it............. and win AGAIN!
well is there such a prop bet being offered ?
if so i would too
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Yes. Legal scholars and analysts state that this Texas case is even weaker than the Pennsylvania case and has no constitutional basis for being heard. It will be rejected rather promptly. I think only 4 justices are needed to hear it, but this case won't get 1 to agree to hear it. Yeah, I agree. In fact I would bet big bucks on it............. and win AGAIN!
These fucking evangelicals continue to spew this nonsense from the pulpits to their nonsensical parishioners. The parishioners share this bullshit with neighbors, co-workers, family and worse of all their kids. What's currently taking place is very, very dangerous for our country & how we will interact with each other in the future.
good point
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
These fucking evangelicals continue to spew this nonsense from the pulpits to their nonsensical parishioners. The parishioners share this bullshit with neighbors, co-workers, family and worse of all their kids. What's currently taking place is very, very dangerous for our country & how we will interact with each other in the future.
These fucking evangelicals continue to spew this nonsense from the pulpits to their nonsensical parishioners. The parishioners share this bullshit with neighbors, co-workers, family and worse of all their kids. What's currently taking place is very, very dangerous for our country & how we will interact with each other in the future.
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
These fucking evangelicals continue to spew this nonsense from the pulpits to their nonsensical parishioners. The parishioners share this bullshit with neighbors, co-workers, family and worse of all their kids. What's currently taking place is very, very dangerous for our country & how we will interact with each other in the future.
Not heard of any case going to supreme court after the court ruled less than a week ago the same case.
Pennsylvania desixion on Tuesday will somehow be overturned Friday....
No evidence and now that the focal point of the argument and that somehow the supreme court which deals in constitutional law is going to delay the electoral college from conveneing...
Unprecedented this is outrageous that any attourney could even phantom they actual have a case that can be heard outside of kangaroo ville....
0
How many flaws can we find in this case.
Not heard of any case going to supreme court after the court ruled less than a week ago the same case.
Pennsylvania desixion on Tuesday will somehow be overturned Friday....
No evidence and now that the focal point of the argument and that somehow the supreme court which deals in constitutional law is going to delay the electoral college from conveneing...
Unprecedented this is outrageous that any attourney could even phantom they actual have a case that can be heard outside of kangaroo ville....
So, while we all hold our breaths waiting for the long-PROMISED *PROOF*of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud *PROVING* beyond any and allreasonable doubt that the entire election from coast to coast was rigged for Biden,we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
Canada’s health regulator on Wednesday approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine,
making it the 3rd country to authorize the use of the shot – behind UK and Bahrain
0
So, while we all hold our breaths waiting for the long-PROMISED *PROOF*of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud *PROVING* beyond any and allreasonable doubt that the entire election from coast to coast was rigged for Biden,we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
Canada’s health regulator on Wednesday approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine,
making it the 3rd country to authorize the use of the shot – behind UK and Bahrain
So, while we all hold our breaths waiting for the long-PROMISED *PROOF*of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud *PROVING* beyond any and allreasonable doubt that the entire election from coast to coast was rigged for Biden,we still have other news of concern in our lives ... Canada’s health regulator on Wednesday approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, making it the 3rd country to authorize the use of the shot – behind UK and Bahrain
so canada the uk and tiny bahrain all beat rump in getting vaccine tested and approved
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
So, while we all hold our breaths waiting for the long-PROMISED *PROOF*of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud *PROVING* beyond any and allreasonable doubt that the entire election from coast to coast was rigged for Biden,we still have other news of concern in our lives ... Canada’s health regulator on Wednesday approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, making it the 3rd country to authorize the use of the shot – behind UK and Bahrain
so canada the uk and tiny bahrain all beat rump in getting vaccine tested and approved
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.