How many flaws can we find in this case. Not heard of any case going to supreme court after the court ruled less than a week ago the same case. Pennsylvania desixion on Tuesday will somehow be overturned Friday.... No evidence and now that the focal point of the argument and that somehow the supreme court which deals in constitutional law is going to delay the electoral college from conveneing... Unprecedented this is outrageous that any attourney could even phantom they actual have a case that can be heard outside of kangaroo ville....
wont happen
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
How many flaws can we find in this case. Not heard of any case going to supreme court after the court ruled less than a week ago the same case. Pennsylvania desixion on Tuesday will somehow be overturned Friday.... No evidence and now that the focal point of the argument and that somehow the supreme court which deals in constitutional law is going to delay the electoral college from conveneing... Unprecedented this is outrageous that any attourney could even phantom they actual have a case that can be heard outside of kangaroo ville....
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: wont happen Friday, Dec 11, 6:30pm ET Supreme Court - with a 6-3 Conservative majority (3 appointed by adolf trump) *REJECTS* to accept the stupid dumbass lawsuit filed by TEXAS and signed by 17 other red state AGs The court did not provide a vote count, but there were NO dissents among the 9 justices (3 of whom were installed by trump) A day that might live in infamy...
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already?
These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases.
Easily mentally manipulated.
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: wont happen Friday, Dec 11, 6:30pm ET Supreme Court - with a 6-3 Conservative majority (3 appointed by adolf trump) *REJECTS* to accept the stupid dumbass lawsuit filed by TEXAS and signed by 17 other red state AGs The court did not provide a vote count, but there were NO dissents among the 9 justices (3 of whom were installed by trump) A day that might live in infamy...
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already?
These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: wont happen Friday, Dec 11, 6:30pm ET Supreme Court - with a 6-3 Conservative majority (3 appointed by adolf trump) *REJECTS* to accept the stupid dumbass lawsuit filed by TEXAS and signed by 17 other red state AGs The court did not provide a vote count, but there were NO dissents among the 9 justices (3 of whom were installed by trump) A day that might live in infamy...
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already? These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases. Easily mentally manipulated.
yep exactly but only those with a sense of logic and critical thinking ability
the rest r rumplickers
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
4
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: wont happen Friday, Dec 11, 6:30pm ET Supreme Court - with a 6-3 Conservative majority (3 appointed by adolf trump) *REJECTS* to accept the stupid dumbass lawsuit filed by TEXAS and signed by 17 other red state AGs The court did not provide a vote count, but there were NO dissents among the 9 justices (3 of whom were installed by trump) A day that might live in infamy...
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already? These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases. Easily mentally manipulated.
yep exactly but only those with a sense of logic and critical thinking ability
Trump rails against Barr, Kemp, other Republicans over election loss
USA TODAY A day after the Supreme Court refused to take up another election challenge, Trump blamed a string of Republicans – including Attorney General William Barr – for refusing to help him somehow overturn Democrat Joe Biden's victory.
The soon-to-be-ex president also served notice he would continue protesting, vocally if not legally, even as Biden heads toward inauguration on Jan. 20.
2
Trump rails against Barr, Kemp, other Republicans over election loss
USA TODAY A day after the Supreme Court refused to take up another election challenge, Trump blamed a string of Republicans – including Attorney General William Barr – for refusing to help him somehow overturn Democrat Joe Biden's victory.
The soon-to-be-ex president also served notice he would continue protesting, vocally if not legally, even as Biden heads toward inauguration on Jan. 20.
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already? These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases. Easily mentally manipulated.
Agreed!
1
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Isn't that what anyone with any sense of logic and ability to rationally think knew already? These Fat Donnie lovers have no concept of reality or how the SC decides to hear cases. Easily mentally manipulated.
Former Houston police captain arrested & charged for wrongfully holding repairman at gunpoint in attempt to prove suspected voter fraud
A former Houston police captain was charged with assault Tuesday after running a man off the road and holding him at gunpoint in an effort to prove what authorities have called a bogus voter fraud scheme. Mark Aguirre claimed an air conditioner repairman was the mastermind of the fraud scheme and said he believed the man's truck was filled with thousands of fraudulent ballots when he ran his SUV into it on Oct. 19
Police who responded to the incident searched the truck and found only air conditioning parts and tools!
"A lengthy investigation ... determined allegations of election fraud were unfounded and no evidence of illegal ballots was found," Houston police said.
2
Former Houston police captain arrested & charged for wrongfully holding repairman at gunpoint in attempt to prove suspected voter fraud
A former Houston police captain was charged with assault Tuesday after running a man off the road and holding him at gunpoint in an effort to prove what authorities have called a bogus voter fraud scheme. Mark Aguirre claimed an air conditioner repairman was the mastermind of the fraud scheme and said he believed the man's truck was filled with thousands of fraudulent ballots when he ran his SUV into it on Oct. 19
Police who responded to the incident searched the truck and found only air conditioning parts and tools!
"A lengthy investigation ... determined allegations of election fraud were unfounded and no evidence of illegal ballots was found," Houston police said.
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribe of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud <chuckle> as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ... we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
The Russians are at it yet again!
US cybersecurity agency warns suspected Russian hacking campaign broader than previously believed
CNN: https://tinyurl.com/y9zjb2p4
4
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribe of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud <chuckle> as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ... we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
The Russians are at it yet again!
US cybersecurity agency warns suspected Russian hacking campaign broader than previously believed
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribe of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud <chuckle> as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ... we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism
Fri December 18 "Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks.
(NOTE: Health experts have repeatedly stated the primary reason for masks is to protect the public from the wearer, not protect the wearer from the public.)
So as usual Ingraham got it all bass-ackwards.
4
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribe of alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud <chuckle> as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ... we still have other news of concern in our lives ...
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism
Fri December 18 "Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks.
(NOTE: Health experts have repeatedly stated the primary reason for masks is to protect the public from the wearer, not protect the wearer from the public.)
... Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Fri December 18"Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks.
Danish study doesn't prove masks don't work against coronavirus according to factcheck. Even authors of the study say the results shouldn't be misinterpreted to suggest masks shouldn't be worn. This study was conducted early in the pandemic when virus spread was low and testing less reliable. Now most research supports mask wearing.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
... Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Fri December 18"Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks.
Danish study doesn't prove masks don't work against coronavirus according to factcheck. Even authors of the study say the results shouldn't be misinterpreted to suggest masks shouldn't be worn. This study was conducted early in the pandemic when virus spread was low and testing less reliable. Now most research supports mask wearing.
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribeof alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ...we still have other news of concern in our lives ... Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Fri December 18"Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks. (NOTE: Health experts have repeatedly stated the primary reason for masks is to protect the public from the wearer, not protect the wearer from the public.) So as usual Ingraham got it all bass-ackwards.
Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER.
It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials. Ingraham, who mocks public health officials on her prime time program while questioning their recommendations, had also previously cited a study published in February, conducted at the University of Hong Kong in those efforts. But authors from *BOTH* of these studies reject how Ingraham and other mask doubters have portrayed their work.
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
While we all wait for actual *PROOF* to support the latest laughable diatribeof alleged *WIDESPREAD* election fraud as the radical right-wing "bubble" morons still defiantly contend ...we still have other news of concern in our lives ... Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Fri December 18"Told you!" Ingraham exuberantly tweeted that day in November, sharing a link to a Danish study that did not find a statistically significant difference in protection against contracting Covid-19 for those who wear masks. (NOTE: Health experts have repeatedly stated the primary reason for masks is to protect the public from the wearer, not protect the wearer from the public.) So as usual Ingraham got it all bass-ackwards.
Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER.
It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials. Ingraham, who mocks public health officials on her prime time program while questioning their recommendations, had also previously cited a study published in February, conducted at the University of Hong Kong in those efforts. But authors from *BOTH* of these studies reject how Ingraham and other mask doubters have portrayed their work.
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism
Ingraham, who has no background in medicine or virology, is one of the most prominent members in the larger right-wing media chorus that has politicized the pandemic and repeatedly rejected the consensus from the scientific and health community on various ways to curb the spread a virus that has so far killed more than 318,000 people in the US.
3
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism
Ingraham, who has no background in medicine or virology, is one of the most prominent members in the larger right-wing media chorus that has politicized the pandemic and repeatedly rejected the consensus from the scientific and health community on various ways to curb the spread a virus that has so far killed more than 318,000 people in the US.
USA TODAY Departing Attorney General William Barr continued to distance himself from Trump, saying for the record Monday that he saw NO REASON to appoint special counsels to investigate Hunter Biden orthe unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud.
3
USA TODAY Departing Attorney General William Barr continued to distance himself from Trump, saying for the record Monday that he saw NO REASON to appoint special counsels to investigate Hunter Biden orthe unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud.
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Ingraham, who has no background in medicine or virology, is one of the most prominent members in the larger right-wing media chorus that has politicized the pandemic and repeatedly rejected the consensus from the scientific and health community on various ways to curb the spread a virus that has so far killed more than 318,000 people in the US.
She has also criticized stay-at-home orders and other guidelines aimed at slowing the virus's spread. Ingraham has done this while simultaneously promoting unproven treatments such as hydroxychloroquine to combat Covid-19.
On Wednesday, Ingraham ran a segment in which she railed against "liberal" state governors for implementing new restrictions to save their citizens from dying from covid.Then on Twitter she suggested that they are "tyrants."
She also suggested that her viewers should tune out the "medical cartel" and go ahead and gather with family for Christmas.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Researchers reject Fox News host Laura Ingraham's misuse of their studies to support her mask denialism Ingraham, who has no background in medicine or virology, is one of the most prominent members in the larger right-wing media chorus that has politicized the pandemic and repeatedly rejected the consensus from the scientific and health community on various ways to curb the spread a virus that has so far killed more than 318,000 people in the US.
She has also criticized stay-at-home orders and other guidelines aimed at slowing the virus's spread. Ingraham has done this while simultaneously promoting unproven treatments such as hydroxychloroquine to combat Covid-19.
On Wednesday, Ingraham ran a segment in which she railed against "liberal" state governors for implementing new restrictions to save their citizens from dying from covid.Then on Twitter she suggested that they are "tyrants."
She also suggested that her viewers should tune out the "medical cartel" and go ahead and gather with family for Christmas.
Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER.
It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials.
ignorant ingraham
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER.
It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER. It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials.
ignorant ingraham
Dumb as they come.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Bundgaard's study only focused on whether wearing a face mask can offer some protection TO THE WEARER. It wasn't the first time Ingraham had cited a study to suggest face masks are ineffective at reducing the spread of the virus, which runs counter to guidance from top health officials.
FOX and Newsmax shoot down their own aired claims on alleged election fraud
ChicagoSunTimes: “No evidence has been offered that Dominion or Smartmatic used software or reprogrammed software that manipulated votes in the 2020 election,”Newsmax said on air.
2
FOX and Newsmax shoot down their own aired claims on alleged election fraud
ChicagoSunTimes: “No evidence has been offered that Dominion or Smartmatic used software or reprogrammed software that manipulated votes in the 2020 election,”Newsmax said on air.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.