Enough with the "it's cruel" nonsense. Until criminals know this country is serious about punishing crime, criminals will continue to abuse us. The BS of having convicted murderers languishing for decades on our dime needs to end. Libs have no problem terminating unborn children.....it should be easy, & natural, for such a law to pass.
Enough with the "it's cruel" nonsense. Until criminals know this country is serious about punishing crime, criminals will continue to abuse us. The BS of having convicted murderers languishing for decades on our dime needs to end. Libs have no problem terminating unborn children.....it should be easy, & natural, for such a law to pass.
It was an easy law that did get passed.Until that little problem came to light that about 200 people on death row were exonerated by evidence that they didn't commit the crimes that got them on death row.You know that little problem where the state would of killed a person,who was actually innocent of the crimes he was convicted of.And that some (see the case of Rolando Cruz) were actually convicted because investigators had lied,and prosecutors had withheld evidence that they knew exonerated the convicted person.You know that little discrepancy of killing an innocent person probably swayed their thoughts on the death penalty,evidently not yours though.So you could kinda turn around what you stated and say "Conservative's must have no problem terminating innocent people",let's fry them all.Let's kill people,to teach people,that killing people is wrong.
It was an easy law that did get passed.Until that little problem came to light that about 200 people on death row were exonerated by evidence that they didn't commit the crimes that got them on death row.You know that little problem where the state would of killed a person,who was actually innocent of the crimes he was convicted of.And that some (see the case of Rolando Cruz) were actually convicted because investigators had lied,and prosecutors had withheld evidence that they knew exonerated the convicted person.You know that little discrepancy of killing an innocent person probably swayed their thoughts on the death penalty,evidently not yours though.So you could kinda turn around what you stated and say "Conservative's must have no problem terminating innocent people",let's fry them all.Let's kill people,to teach people,that killing people is wrong.
Your conclusions are at the heart of the issue for why it has been rescinded in many states. The thought that killing ONE person makes the entire enterprise not worth supporting is the reason, and I do not know how we can rationalize the death penalty even with just ONE "mistake" let alone likely hundreds and more over the years.
Your conclusions are at the heart of the issue for why it has been rescinded in many states. The thought that killing ONE person makes the entire enterprise not worth supporting is the reason, and I do not know how we can rationalize the death penalty even with just ONE "mistake" let alone likely hundreds and more over the years.
The privatization of the prison system is big big $ business. America is a corporatocracy and doesn't look to be changing anytime soon which means no laws will be passed to change what is now status quo.
The privatization of the prison system is big big $ business. America is a corporatocracy and doesn't look to be changing anytime soon which means no laws will be passed to change what is now status quo.
Can someone please explain to me in layman’s terms the argument for killing life after it’s commencement and conception but not after it's , let’s say 30 years old , with 8 killings and 4 rapes under it’s belt .
one of those two has not even done anything wrong yet .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
Can someone please explain to me in layman’s terms the argument for killing life after it’s commencement and conception but not after it's , let’s say 30 years old , with 8 killings and 4 rapes under it’s belt .
one of those two has not even done anything wrong yet .
Can someone please explain to me in layman’s terms the argument for killing life after it’s commencement and conception but not after it's , let’s say 30 years old , with 8 killings and 4 rapes under it’s belt . one of those two has not even done anything wrong yet .
Well there's conceptually and then there is the practical application of America and the rights we're afforded.
Can someone please explain to me in layman’s terms the argument for killing life after it’s commencement and conception but not after it's , let’s say 30 years old , with 8 killings and 4 rapes under it’s belt . one of those two has not even done anything wrong yet .
Well there's conceptually and then there is the practical application of America and the rights we're afforded.
America could certainly learn from others countries on how to apply laws and punishments for certain crimes....we are way to lenient on our criminals and the punishment so it does not deter those from committing them like it does in other parts of the world....
I agree with Whatsit, the exoneration of convicted rulings of those who were later deemed to be innocent puts a kibosh on the whole capital punishment theme...what this tells you is that our judicial system is flawed, which a jury of your peers can be, in getting it right...sometimes cases take on a de facto and the law just needs a conviction to show that someone was caught for such act....that puts a lot of pressure on the prosecution to convict someone even if there may be some doubt as to the crime being committed...DNA really has changed quite a bit as a lot of those cases were older and the means to analyze DNA was not as certain, whereas today it is much better and a lot of the reasons these incarcerated death row inmates are exonerated years later because of DNA testing..
COVERS allows you to tell others they r sexually confused so long as your hands are clean
America could certainly learn from others countries on how to apply laws and punishments for certain crimes....we are way to lenient on our criminals and the punishment so it does not deter those from committing them like it does in other parts of the world....
I agree with Whatsit, the exoneration of convicted rulings of those who were later deemed to be innocent puts a kibosh on the whole capital punishment theme...what this tells you is that our judicial system is flawed, which a jury of your peers can be, in getting it right...sometimes cases take on a de facto and the law just needs a conviction to show that someone was caught for such act....that puts a lot of pressure on the prosecution to convict someone even if there may be some doubt as to the crime being committed...DNA really has changed quite a bit as a lot of those cases were older and the means to analyze DNA was not as certain, whereas today it is much better and a lot of the reasons these incarcerated death row inmates are exonerated years later because of DNA testing..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.