Have a nice night of sleep in your usual belief that everything you hold to be true is absolutely correct in its essence and validity. Must be cozy living in such a tidy existence.
0
Have a nice night of sleep in your usual belief that everything you hold to be true is absolutely correct in its essence and validity. Must be cozy living in such a tidy existence.
How can I compromise on whether Romney is a neocon?
I follow your thinking, I just disagree wholeheartedly, Romney's history of governance is exceptionally moderate. We know this.
You are the one taking the word of a leftist article as gospel about Romney's advisers. I'm pointing out the silliness of that. You don't see that?
Only a truly partisan individual would see him as a neocon...sure I guess you could say he has the potential for that,especially considering how vague he has been about FP, but that would be political suicide simply put. I just don't see that happening. At all.
0
How can I compromise on whether Romney is a neocon?
I follow your thinking, I just disagree wholeheartedly, Romney's history of governance is exceptionally moderate. We know this.
You are the one taking the word of a leftist article as gospel about Romney's advisers. I'm pointing out the silliness of that. You don't see that?
Only a truly partisan individual would see him as a neocon...sure I guess you could say he has the potential for that,especially considering how vague he has been about FP, but that would be political suicide simply put. I just don't see that happening. At all.
How can I compromise on whether Romney is a neocon?
I follow your thinking, I just disagree wholeheartedly, Romney's history of governance is exceptionally moderate. We know this.
You are the one taking the word of a leftist article as gospel about Romney's advisers. I'm pointing out the silliness of that. You don't see that?
Only a truly partisan individual would see him as a neocon...sure I guess you could say he has the potential for that,especially considering how vague he has been about FP, but that would be political suicide simply put. I just don't see that happening. At all.
His history of governance and subsequent rhetoric is marked by consistent ambiguity. Clearly. He has no strong positions on anything. Whatever is convenient to get him elected is what he will utter. Pleasant to you, but nauseating to me and many others.
A leftist article? No. You are partisan and misled. Romney is more hawkish about war than Obama. I would be concerned with his stance on Iran, but you seem to think your assertion of the situation is beyond questioning. You can't be wrong, right?
0
Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:
How can I compromise on whether Romney is a neocon?
I follow your thinking, I just disagree wholeheartedly, Romney's history of governance is exceptionally moderate. We know this.
You are the one taking the word of a leftist article as gospel about Romney's advisers. I'm pointing out the silliness of that. You don't see that?
Only a truly partisan individual would see him as a neocon...sure I guess you could say he has the potential for that,especially considering how vague he has been about FP, but that would be political suicide simply put. I just don't see that happening. At all.
His history of governance and subsequent rhetoric is marked by consistent ambiguity. Clearly. He has no strong positions on anything. Whatever is convenient to get him elected is what he will utter. Pleasant to you, but nauseating to me and many others.
A leftist article? No. You are partisan and misled. Romney is more hawkish about war than Obama. I would be concerned with his stance on Iran, but you seem to think your assertion of the situation is beyond questioning. You can't be wrong, right?
You're an idiot. No, you're the idiot. Don't call me an idiot, idiot. Your mother wears army boots. Yeah, but she's not an idiot. But my daddy can beat up your daddy.
0
You're an idiot. No, you're the idiot. Don't call me an idiot, idiot. Your mother wears army boots. Yeah, but she's not an idiot. But my daddy can beat up your daddy.
you not being in touch with the psychology of the American people = you making wrong predictions...
yes, this country is fucked with Obama for the next 4 years... no, this does not mean we will elect Mitt Romney... the people who voted for Obama last time, will almost ALL vote for him again... because to those idiots, this is not about what is best for our country... this is about being right!
they jumped up on mountain tops and proclaimed Obama to be our savior, and no amount of common sense or evidence will force them to admit they were wrong...
understand this, and you will understand the state of the United States of America and it's politics in the year 2012:
Republicans are the most self-serving people in the world (bar none), and they will vote exclusively based on what is good for them as individuals, with complete disregard and ignorance for what is good for us as a whole...
Democrats... are cultists! this is not a statement of hyperbole or metaphor... the people who support the Democratic party in this country exhibit ALL of the behavior that we see from people who belong to a cult... they are fanatical... they will CLUTCH (like a deathgrip) their belief system in the face of any amount of evidence and reason... in fact, they will clutch onto it even harder when confronted by people opposing their views...
the Republicans are scumbags, for sure... but the Democrats are insanely dangerous!
Barrack Obama WILL be President, and it will not be close... he will win by more than 50 electoral votes... bank on it!
if you want to understand politics in this country... stop watching Fox News... stop watching MSNBC... and start listening to ME!!!! you will never meet anyone who understands the state of America better than me... i guarantee it!
0
you not being in touch with the psychology of the American people = you making wrong predictions...
yes, this country is fucked with Obama for the next 4 years... no, this does not mean we will elect Mitt Romney... the people who voted for Obama last time, will almost ALL vote for him again... because to those idiots, this is not about what is best for our country... this is about being right!
they jumped up on mountain tops and proclaimed Obama to be our savior, and no amount of common sense or evidence will force them to admit they were wrong...
understand this, and you will understand the state of the United States of America and it's politics in the year 2012:
Republicans are the most self-serving people in the world (bar none), and they will vote exclusively based on what is good for them as individuals, with complete disregard and ignorance for what is good for us as a whole...
Democrats... are cultists! this is not a statement of hyperbole or metaphor... the people who support the Democratic party in this country exhibit ALL of the behavior that we see from people who belong to a cult... they are fanatical... they will CLUTCH (like a deathgrip) their belief system in the face of any amount of evidence and reason... in fact, they will clutch onto it even harder when confronted by people opposing their views...
the Republicans are scumbags, for sure... but the Democrats are insanely dangerous!
Barrack Obama WILL be President, and it will not be close... he will win by more than 50 electoral votes... bank on it!
if you want to understand politics in this country... stop watching Fox News... stop watching MSNBC... and start listening to ME!!!! you will never meet anyone who understands the state of America better than me... i guarantee it!
His history of governance and subsequent rhetoric is marked by consistent ambiguity. Clearly. He has no strong positions on anything. Redundant Whatever is convenient to get him elected is what he will utter. Pleasant to you, Jumped out of the gym to reach that conclusion but nauseating to me and many others.
A leftist article? No. Liar You are partisan and misled. Irony Romney is more hawkish about war than Obama.Ya think? I would be concerned with his stance on Iran, but you seem to think your assertion of the situation is beyond questioning. You can't be wrong, right? It happens occasionally
0
Quote Originally Posted by mellow_wolf:
His history of governance and subsequent rhetoric is marked by consistent ambiguity. Clearly. He has no strong positions on anything. Redundant Whatever is convenient to get him elected is what he will utter. Pleasant to you, Jumped out of the gym to reach that conclusion but nauseating to me and many others.
A leftist article? No. Liar You are partisan and misled. Irony Romney is more hawkish about war than Obama.Ya think? I would be concerned with his stance on Iran, but you seem to think your assertion of the situation is beyond questioning. You can't be wrong, right? It happens occasionally
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
