Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @jesron1269 So is the spark going to be legit or is it going to be fabricated like most of the garbage that the RNC peddled at the last Trump-a-thon? Biden Migrant crime is such a spark-lie as is the NYC 42nd avenue fraud push by the RNC. Its funny how people will accept straight out lies from their political party and work themselves into a fervor without doing ANY research or using ANY reason. Sparks are intentional...
Probably not intentionally accepting lies but rather just ignorance and negligence in automatically accepting anything der Fuhrer claims as the gospel truth because he said so. I truly believe that even some MAGAs would balk at some things *IF* they knew for a FACT it was a trumpian LIE. But most don't know one way or the other due to their information bubble, so they accept what he says as fact....... Same does go for Democrats too! - albeit to a much, MUCH SMALLER DEGREE!
there r difference between lies being wilfully ignorant and just being mistaken
wilful ignorance is at a high mark in american politics these past several yrs and not only the magas
mostly but not only
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @jesron1269 So is the spark going to be legit or is it going to be fabricated like most of the garbage that the RNC peddled at the last Trump-a-thon? Biden Migrant crime is such a spark-lie as is the NYC 42nd avenue fraud push by the RNC. Its funny how people will accept straight out lies from their political party and work themselves into a fervor without doing ANY research or using ANY reason. Sparks are intentional...
Probably not intentionally accepting lies but rather just ignorance and negligence in automatically accepting anything der Fuhrer claims as the gospel truth because he said so. I truly believe that even some MAGAs would balk at some things *IF* they knew for a FACT it was a trumpian LIE. But most don't know one way or the other due to their information bubble, so they accept what he says as fact....... Same does go for Democrats too! - albeit to a much, MUCH SMALLER DEGREE!
there r difference between lies being wilfully ignorant and just being mistaken
wilful ignorance is at a high mark in american politics these past several yrs and not only the magas
Fupah, KellyM, ..what happened to the phrase "Joe Biden and the Democrats " , we had to read it here for years.. you just accept that he got eliminated ? within what , like 24-48 hours ?
your loyalty ... means shit , everything for the Party , who cares about the Country ?
Let that Sink in . Afuera ! Elon and Vivek / DOGE ..Afuera !
6
Fupah, KellyM, ..what happened to the phrase "Joe Biden and the Democrats " , we had to read it here for years.. you just accept that he got eliminated ? within what , like 24-48 hours ?
your loyalty ... means shit , everything for the Party , who cares about the Country ?
So the libs are really gonna back Harris? Do they think Americans have suddenly forgotten what a blithering idiot she is? Can you imagine her trying to have discussions with other world leaders unscripted? Do they think none of them have seen her greatest hits?
People, please, try to remember that our POTUS not only represents us here, but around the world as well.
7
So the libs are really gonna back Harris? Do they think Americans have suddenly forgotten what a blithering idiot she is? Can you imagine her trying to have discussions with other world leaders unscripted? Do they think none of them have seen her greatest hits?
People, please, try to remember that our POTUS not only represents us here, but around the world as well.
Those videos of harris are edited, taken out of context and fake, propagated by those evil, devious Republicans, just to make her look like an idiot. You know, just like all the videos of biden's dementia-induced nonsensical babblings that you thought you saw. Thankfully we have an unbiased media to explain to you that you didn't see and hear what you saw and heard with biden then, and kamla now.
You're seeing with your eyes, and thinking with your brain. You have to stop that. Take the thought processing and original thinking out of it, join the group-thinkers (MANY fine examples in this place) and just do and say as you're told.
Don't be gaslighted by the R's, those little tricksters. For example, see how they're pointing out that harris was a DEI hire, and to support their claim they're using the ridiculous reason that biden publicly, proudly, stated he was going to choose a black female only for his VP? Those clips are fake too! What biden really said was . . . well, I'll have to get back to you on that, the talking points I need to parrot have not gone out yet. Until then, let's just say it's because R's are racists. And misogynists. And hilter too, or something like that.
2
Those videos of harris are edited, taken out of context and fake, propagated by those evil, devious Republicans, just to make her look like an idiot. You know, just like all the videos of biden's dementia-induced nonsensical babblings that you thought you saw. Thankfully we have an unbiased media to explain to you that you didn't see and hear what you saw and heard with biden then, and kamla now.
You're seeing with your eyes, and thinking with your brain. You have to stop that. Take the thought processing and original thinking out of it, join the group-thinkers (MANY fine examples in this place) and just do and say as you're told.
Don't be gaslighted by the R's, those little tricksters. For example, see how they're pointing out that harris was a DEI hire, and to support their claim they're using the ridiculous reason that biden publicly, proudly, stated he was going to choose a black female only for his VP? Those clips are fake too! What biden really said was . . . well, I'll have to get back to you on that, the talking points I need to parrot have not gone out yet. Until then, let's just say it's because R's are racists. And misogynists. And hilter too, or something like that.
•Kamala Harris announces campaign with Biden endorsement.
•Kamala Harris says she is going to work hard to earn the nomination.
•Kamala Harris makes calls to party delegates. Monday
•Kamala Harris continues making calls to party delegates.
•Kamala Harris makes two public speeches.
•AP announces Kamala Harris has secured enough delegates to be the Democratic Nominee (Monday night).
•Kamala Harris releases this statement, noting she has worked hard to “go out and earn this nomination” as promised (Monday night).
A 24-hour process of talking to party bosses is not democratic, nor is it a process Democrats should be proud of. We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs.
Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party a party of hypocrites. We call on the DNC to create a process that allows for public participation in the nomination process, not just a nomination by party delegates.
Apparently they did not get the memo to "close up the ranks" prior to this past Sunday....
Thank you America
4
"Black Lives Matter" is NOT happy....
Timeline of Events Sunday
•Joe Biden drops out.
•Kamala Harris announces campaign with Biden endorsement.
•Kamala Harris says she is going to work hard to earn the nomination.
•Kamala Harris makes calls to party delegates. Monday
•Kamala Harris continues making calls to party delegates.
•Kamala Harris makes two public speeches.
•AP announces Kamala Harris has secured enough delegates to be the Democratic Nominee (Monday night).
•Kamala Harris releases this statement, noting she has worked hard to “go out and earn this nomination” as promised (Monday night).
A 24-hour process of talking to party bosses is not democratic, nor is it a process Democrats should be proud of. We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs.
Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party a party of hypocrites. We call on the DNC to create a process that allows for public participation in the nomination process, not just a nomination by party delegates.
I see no problem, nor does I believe the law, with the Dems giving the nod to Kamala or Mickey Mouse if they so choose....it's within their party right to choose who they wish to put in Biden's place....sure, this may upset some of the delegation and donors but the party isn't or hasn't done anything wrong at this point I don't believe...it is a very unique situation that is for sure and so they have to make due with what the party feels best...whatever they do it will upset some and hurt others, which is just life at that point....
Although they may not have originally nominated or selected Harris, it is probably their best option....keep in mind that people will associate Harris with Biden's policies because she is/was tied to him...that may hurt or help her it just depends...what should be of more importance is whether they think she can do the job or is she just a face on the back of a milk carton...can she win them the election? That's the bigger issue here...I mentioned this before, but Harris will only do what she is advised and will not be allowed critical thinking, in my opinion...the Dems cannot afford that and not sure they will allow it...that may be the discussions now with her in that she is just a face or body and that they will guide her through the process every step of the way...I don't think there is any chance they allow her to take on the full role of the President even if she holds the title...not sure how qualified she is or what she will understand....not even 4 years as VP can bring you up to speed on domestic affairs let alone foreign affairs...
Again, I haven't seen anything illegal about putting Harris in Biden's place...there may be a moral or ethics issue within their own party with donors and what not, but I don't think there is any legal concern...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
This is fascinating....
I see no problem, nor does I believe the law, with the Dems giving the nod to Kamala or Mickey Mouse if they so choose....it's within their party right to choose who they wish to put in Biden's place....sure, this may upset some of the delegation and donors but the party isn't or hasn't done anything wrong at this point I don't believe...it is a very unique situation that is for sure and so they have to make due with what the party feels best...whatever they do it will upset some and hurt others, which is just life at that point....
Although they may not have originally nominated or selected Harris, it is probably their best option....keep in mind that people will associate Harris with Biden's policies because she is/was tied to him...that may hurt or help her it just depends...what should be of more importance is whether they think she can do the job or is she just a face on the back of a milk carton...can she win them the election? That's the bigger issue here...I mentioned this before, but Harris will only do what she is advised and will not be allowed critical thinking, in my opinion...the Dems cannot afford that and not sure they will allow it...that may be the discussions now with her in that she is just a face or body and that they will guide her through the process every step of the way...I don't think there is any chance they allow her to take on the full role of the President even if she holds the title...not sure how qualified she is or what she will understand....not even 4 years as VP can bring you up to speed on domestic affairs let alone foreign affairs...
Again, I haven't seen anything illegal about putting Harris in Biden's place...there may be a moral or ethics issue within their own party with donors and what not, but I don't think there is any legal concern...
I tend to agree. I'm not concerned about the legality of it, but more that they think this person would be a good rep for the country. The libs obviously have no concerns about that as long as they can hold onto their power. They can pull the strings with her, just as they did Biden, but who's gonna hold her hand when she has to meet with other world leaders? Are they gonna tell her not to say a word.....just nod agreeably?
They're gonna need new handlers.........Bidens' did a lousy job.
4
@ABooksNightmare
I tend to agree. I'm not concerned about the legality of it, but more that they think this person would be a good rep for the country. The libs obviously have no concerns about that as long as they can hold onto their power. They can pull the strings with her, just as they did Biden, but who's gonna hold her hand when she has to meet with other world leaders? Are they gonna tell her not to say a word.....just nod agreeably?
They're gonna need new handlers.........Bidens' did a lousy job.
@ABooksNightmare I tend to agree. I'm not concerned about the legality of it, but more that they think this person would be a good rep for the country. The libs obviously have no concerns about that as long as they can hold onto their power. They can pull the strings with her, just as they did Biden, but who's gonna hold her hand when she has to meet with other world leaders? Are they gonna tell her not to say a word.....just nod agreeably? They're gonna need new handlers.........Bidens' did a lousy job.
Can it be avoided for 4 years to meet with people of concern or relevance? If not, then prearranged questions may be needed so she can memorize what needs to be said....I might be concerned with press conferences that are not prearranged....she does have a problem publicly speaking, but so do others....I'm not concerned with the fumbling of words so much, as we are human, but dialogue doe need to be coherent and of an educated level for people to understand...can she address the nation publicly in that regard? She is educated enough to do so, but being POTUS is a whole other thing unlike no other....the amount of pressure and scrutiny the position entails is something else...I'd like to see her have an unscripted debate so I can get a feel for how she might handle the world stage...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
@ABooksNightmare I tend to agree. I'm not concerned about the legality of it, but more that they think this person would be a good rep for the country. The libs obviously have no concerns about that as long as they can hold onto their power. They can pull the strings with her, just as they did Biden, but who's gonna hold her hand when she has to meet with other world leaders? Are they gonna tell her not to say a word.....just nod agreeably? They're gonna need new handlers.........Bidens' did a lousy job.
Can it be avoided for 4 years to meet with people of concern or relevance? If not, then prearranged questions may be needed so she can memorize what needs to be said....I might be concerned with press conferences that are not prearranged....she does have a problem publicly speaking, but so do others....I'm not concerned with the fumbling of words so much, as we are human, but dialogue doe need to be coherent and of an educated level for people to understand...can she address the nation publicly in that regard? She is educated enough to do so, but being POTUS is a whole other thing unlike no other....the amount of pressure and scrutiny the position entails is something else...I'd like to see her have an unscripted debate so I can get a feel for how she might handle the world stage...
So the libs are really gonna back Harris? Do they think Americans have suddenly forgotten what a blithering idiot she is? Can you imagine her trying to have discussions with other world leaders unscripted? Do they think none of them have seen her greatest hits? People, please, try to remember that our POTUS not only represents us here, but around the world as well.
Can you imagine her standing up there on the world stage talking about the 'late great Hannibal Lecter' and windmills killing birds and shoving other world leaders aside to get in the front of a photo op? Disgusting isn't it!
3
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
So the libs are really gonna back Harris? Do they think Americans have suddenly forgotten what a blithering idiot she is? Can you imagine her trying to have discussions with other world leaders unscripted? Do they think none of them have seen her greatest hits? People, please, try to remember that our POTUS not only represents us here, but around the world as well.
Can you imagine her standing up there on the world stage talking about the 'late great Hannibal Lecter' and windmills killing birds and shoving other world leaders aside to get in the front of a photo op? Disgusting isn't it!
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Threads where people talk and aren’t just a smorgasbord of bump and thump emojisIt's amazing isn't it....if that's incredible was still a tv show we might make an episode
the guy that wasn’t Fran Tarkenton had a nice head of hair . It was fuckin’ beautiful . Like it was 3D printed or some shit . Kinda like a Lego character has .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Threads where people talk and aren’t just a smorgasbord of bump and thump emojisIt's amazing isn't it....if that's incredible was still a tv show we might make an episode
the guy that wasn’t Fran Tarkenton had a nice head of hair . It was fuckin’ beautiful . Like it was 3D printed or some shit . Kinda like a Lego character has .
So tell me something Mugg, what makes Trump more deserving than Harris? I dont find Harris to be lacking as to qualifications or legal experience or intelligence or being able to cross over party lines to accomplish objectives.
I would be interested in hearing why you think Harris is less qualified than Trump and if using that logic, why Trump was qualified at all in the first place? You cant pull the LIB retort for every reply you make, use some details and constructive conversation instead of limp noodle LIB sucks that you seem stuck on lately.
It seems Harris is quite reasonable, as much as any candidate on either side that was in the mix.
1
@THEMUGG
So tell me something Mugg, what makes Trump more deserving than Harris? I dont find Harris to be lacking as to qualifications or legal experience or intelligence or being able to cross over party lines to accomplish objectives.
I would be interested in hearing why you think Harris is less qualified than Trump and if using that logic, why Trump was qualified at all in the first place? You cant pull the LIB retort for every reply you make, use some details and constructive conversation instead of limp noodle LIB sucks that you seem stuck on lately.
It seems Harris is quite reasonable, as much as any candidate on either side that was in the mix.
@THEMUGG So tell me something Mugg, what makes Trump more deserving than Harris? I dont find Harris to be lacking as to qualifications or legal experience or intelligence or being able to cross over party lines to accomplish objectives. I would be interested in hearing why you think Harris is less qualified than Trump and if using that logic, why Trump was qualified at all in the first place? You cant pull the LIB retort for every reply you make, use some details and constructive conversation instead of limp noodle LIB sucks that you seem stuck on lately. It seems Harris is quite reasonable, as much as any candidate on either side that was in the mix.
It's the only club in his bag. Much like today's Republican party who says everything sucks but they don't have a valid plan to replace the very thing they are bashing. Remember when Health Care was '2 weeks away'? Remember 'Infrastructure Week'?
1
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@THEMUGG So tell me something Mugg, what makes Trump more deserving than Harris? I dont find Harris to be lacking as to qualifications or legal experience or intelligence or being able to cross over party lines to accomplish objectives. I would be interested in hearing why you think Harris is less qualified than Trump and if using that logic, why Trump was qualified at all in the first place? You cant pull the LIB retort for every reply you make, use some details and constructive conversation instead of limp noodle LIB sucks that you seem stuck on lately. It seems Harris is quite reasonable, as much as any candidate on either side that was in the mix.
It's the only club in his bag. Much like today's Republican party who says everything sucks but they don't have a valid plan to replace the very thing they are bashing. Remember when Health Care was '2 weeks away'? Remember 'Infrastructure Week'?
Kamala is a moot point right now, just a place holder. They are running her out as the "natural" choice as successor since she has the title.
Let's see how the poll numbers look in about 3 weeks for the big party in Chicago. The swing States are all that matters. If she is polling within a couple points of the Orange One then she'll have a chance.
I'll laugh my ass off if Killary is put on the ticket, as VP or take the lead and bump Harris back to VP. Obama has always been the darkhorse to watch out for....
Thank you America
0
@wallstreetcappers
Kamala is a moot point right now, just a place holder. They are running her out as the "natural" choice as successor since she has the title.
Let's see how the poll numbers look in about 3 weeks for the big party in Chicago. The swing States are all that matters. If she is polling within a couple points of the Orange One then she'll have a chance.
I'll laugh my ass off if Killary is put on the ticket, as VP or take the lead and bump Harris back to VP. Obama has always been the darkhorse to watch out for....
@wallstreetcappers Kamala is a moot point right now, just a place holder. They are running her out as the "natural" choice as successor since she has the title. Let's see how the poll numbers look in about 3 weeks for the big party in Chicago. The swing States are all that matters. If she is polling within a couple points of the Orange One then she'll have a chance. I'll laugh my ass off if Killary is put on the ticket, as VP or take the lead and bump Harris back to VP. Obama has always been the darkhorse to watch out for....
I give it zero chance that Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton is on the ticket. They're not trotting two chicks out.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@wallstreetcappers Kamala is a moot point right now, just a place holder. They are running her out as the "natural" choice as successor since she has the title. Let's see how the poll numbers look in about 3 weeks for the big party in Chicago. The swing States are all that matters. If she is polling within a couple points of the Orange One then she'll have a chance. I'll laugh my ass off if Killary is put on the ticket, as VP or take the lead and bump Harris back to VP. Obama has always been the darkhorse to watch out for....
I give it zero chance that Michelle Obama or Hillary Clinton is on the ticket. They're not trotting two chicks out.
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Threads where people talk and aren’t just a smorgasbord of bump and thump emojisIt's amazing isn't it....if that's incredible was still a tv show we might make an episode the guy that wasn’t Fran Tarkenton had a nice head of hair . It was fuckin’ beautiful . Like it was 3D printed or some shit . Kinda like a Lego character has .
of all the things incredible you go to the doo
But, exactly like a lego character...phenomenal analogy..
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Quote Originally Posted by spockgato:
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Quote Originally Posted by spockgato: Threads where people talk and aren’t just a smorgasbord of bump and thump emojisIt's amazing isn't it....if that's incredible was still a tv show we might make an episode the guy that wasn’t Fran Tarkenton had a nice head of hair . It was fuckin’ beautiful . Like it was 3D printed or some shit . Kinda like a Lego character has .
of all the things incredible you go to the doo
But, exactly like a lego character...phenomenal analogy..
It's the only club in his bag. Much like today's Republican party who says everything sucks but they don't have a valid plan to replace the very thing they are bashing. Remember when Health Care was '2 weeks away'? Remember 'Infrastructure Week'?
Reminds me of any family get together....someone always is negative but doesn't have any solutions...
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
It's the only club in his bag. Much like today's Republican party who says everything sucks but they don't have a valid plan to replace the very thing they are bashing. Remember when Health Care was '2 weeks away'? Remember 'Infrastructure Week'?
Reminds me of any family get together....someone always is negative but doesn't have any solutions...
Hills is too toxic and would take over the narrative so I cant see that happening. I am a bit surprised at how aggressive and confident Harris has been in just a few days. She is not playing sit back and watch she is going strong on media and fund raising and is going on the offensive AT Trump and I actually think it is a smart move.
She isnt a Vance, she has experience and great intelligence and she is confident and presents herself very well. I think she is a better candidate than Clinton because while Hills has some of the same qualities, Harris is less condescending and overconfident than Hills was/is.
I tend to think that if she sticks they will go with either a swing state that they need for VP or someone that also comes off well in the media, like a Mark Kelly. He is very popular down here and isnt a jerk-off, he and his wife have a strong following and are dedicated real people and that resonates strong plus his background previous to his new political position resonates well.
Its actually a bit refreshing having someone that is campaigning who isnt a zero ego idiot and is a female, lets see where this goes but so far Ive been surprised and impressed.
0
@kcblitzkrieg
Hills is too toxic and would take over the narrative so I cant see that happening. I am a bit surprised at how aggressive and confident Harris has been in just a few days. She is not playing sit back and watch she is going strong on media and fund raising and is going on the offensive AT Trump and I actually think it is a smart move.
She isnt a Vance, she has experience and great intelligence and she is confident and presents herself very well. I think she is a better candidate than Clinton because while Hills has some of the same qualities, Harris is less condescending and overconfident than Hills was/is.
I tend to think that if she sticks they will go with either a swing state that they need for VP or someone that also comes off well in the media, like a Mark Kelly. He is very popular down here and isnt a jerk-off, he and his wife have a strong following and are dedicated real people and that resonates strong plus his background previous to his new political position resonates well.
Its actually a bit refreshing having someone that is campaigning who isnt a zero ego idiot and is a female, lets see where this goes but so far Ive been surprised and impressed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.