BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Yes but the same problem. Proof. I believe trump leveraged Ukraine with arms to begin an investigation on his political opponent and again Proof. I believe Trump or the Secretary of defense is liable of cowardice delaying the response for back up to Capitol police.... But again where the beef... Where is the proof.... I believe their was serious problems with election results going back to Gore Bush florida fiasco.... But again... We have laws that deem 1 the burden of proof is on the prosecutor not the defendant. House wanted to call trump as a witness in his trial. I can clearly see amendment 5 and read that you can not be made to self incremenate... Everything else is not admissible. Simply another political ploy to further divide America. All this does at the end is even more polarized a growing division in the two main parties in America. And the only one winning here is our enemies Russia China Iran.... While we are divided then we are weakened. Nancy seems to preoccupied Congress with her vendetta she has had with trump for over a year now... So far 100s of Trumpers admitting that they stormed the capitol because Trump told them to isn't proof? Sounds like pretty compelling proof to me.
1000 traitors said trump told them to....
That's your proof....
Okay did someone get an executive order in writing. A tape recording of the man said do this.
A video recording message that specifically stated go in there and hang the vice president.... Something tangible undeniable irrefutable evidence.
Cause all I can see is trump saying what he had been saying for 4 years... And that interpretation of what he ment not what he ordered. The only thing that is going to get him impeached is actual proof. Everything else is subject to interpretation .
And Trump states this.
This a document. The only angle to convict him is the defense delayed its response . Secretary of defense did not back the capital police for 3 hours.
In context him march outside the white house they were their in minutes with national guard reinforcements.
Out side of that nothing more than the gruesome two some Kelly and fubah rant what is it now I drink is latest deflection of reality....
Proof.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Yes but the same problem. Proof. I believe trump leveraged Ukraine with arms to begin an investigation on his political opponent and again Proof. I believe Trump or the Secretary of defense is liable of cowardice delaying the response for back up to Capitol police.... But again where the beef... Where is the proof.... I believe their was serious problems with election results going back to Gore Bush florida fiasco.... But again... We have laws that deem 1 the burden of proof is on the prosecutor not the defendant. House wanted to call trump as a witness in his trial. I can clearly see amendment 5 and read that you can not be made to self incremenate... Everything else is not admissible. Simply another political ploy to further divide America. All this does at the end is even more polarized a growing division in the two main parties in America. And the only one winning here is our enemies Russia China Iran.... While we are divided then we are weakened. Nancy seems to preoccupied Congress with her vendetta she has had with trump for over a year now... So far 100s of Trumpers admitting that they stormed the capitol because Trump told them to isn't proof? Sounds like pretty compelling proof to me.
1000 traitors said trump told them to....
That's your proof....
Okay did someone get an executive order in writing. A tape recording of the man said do this.
A video recording message that specifically stated go in there and hang the vice president.... Something tangible undeniable irrefutable evidence.
Cause all I can see is trump saying what he had been saying for 4 years... And that interpretation of what he ment not what he ordered. The only thing that is going to get him impeached is actual proof. Everything else is subject to interpretation .
And Trump states this.
This a document. The only angle to convict him is the defense delayed its response . Secretary of defense did not back the capital police for 3 hours.
In context him march outside the white house they were their in minutes with national guard reinforcements.
Out side of that nothing more than the gruesome two some Kelly and fubah rant what is it now I drink is latest deflection of reality....
Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders
Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back.
0
Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders
Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back.
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
@deezy. Real. Tangible proof not tear up the national state of the Union speech queen Nancy feelings... Real actual ordered to this by the man in writing PROOF. Like any else who has a written or recorded order from the president to do something.
0
@deezy. Real. Tangible proof not tear up the national state of the Union speech queen Nancy feelings... Real actual ordered to this by the man in writing PROOF. Like any else who has a written or recorded order from the president to do something.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true . we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at - 200 now to february 28 +100 march 1 or shortly thereafter I'll take -200 on the before Feb28. ok i'll put u down for that im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
awe..
you need to feel heard... Adorable.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true . we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at - 200 now to february 28 +100 march 1 or shortly thereafter I'll take -200 on the before Feb28. ok i'll put u down for that im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
I'll take -200 on the before Feb28.
ok i'll put u down for that
im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
@deezy. Real. Tangible proof not tear up the national state of the Union speech queen Nancy feelings... Real actual ordered to this by the man in writing PROOF. Like any else who has a written or recorded order from the president to do something.
Your not trying to win over democrats or moderates or independents you need to turn the minds of 11 real hard core Republicans.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
@deezy. Real. Tangible proof not tear up the national state of the Union speech queen Nancy feelings... Real actual ordered to this by the man in writing PROOF. Like any else who has a written or recorded order from the president to do something.
Your not trying to win over democrats or moderates or independents you need to turn the minds of 11 real hard core Republicans.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true . we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at - 200 now to february 28 +100 march 1 or shortly thereafter I'll take -200 on the before Feb28. ok i'll put u down for that im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then. ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
your ignorant
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true . we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at - 200 now to february 28 +100 march 1 or shortly thereafter I'll take -200 on the before Feb28. ok i'll put u down for that im going to wait a couple days becuz freak-of-nature1970 drinks a lot more jim beam on weekends and thats when he usually explodes with dozens of useless threads that nobody reads or replies to ,except himself . can get a better guage of timing then Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then. ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
We got it you and Kelly made a bet you reposted 15 times
It still makes you ignorant. You have no issue and nothing more then left leaning zelo... Why don't you beg midnight to pm you in 15 mire threads... Doesn't make less ignorant... It's ok you went to public school and know of nothing...
0
We got it you and Kelly made a bet you reposted 15 times
It still makes you ignorant. You have no issue and nothing more then left leaning zelo... Why don't you beg midnight to pm you in 15 mire threads... Doesn't make less ignorant... It's ok you went to public school and know of nothing...
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
true
ok how about this wager
freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with)
- 700 now to february 28
+300 march 1 or shortly thereafter
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
true
ok how about this wager
freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with)
Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back.
This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof.
3
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back.
This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof.
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
true
ok how about this wager
freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with)
- 700 now to february 28
+300 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL
But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow.
There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration:
6 by KellyM_1964
9 by Fubah2
9 by sundance
16by trumpinator
53by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable
**Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads
but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch
true .
we will set the odds for when freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads that nobody reads at
- 200 now to february 28
+100 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Well I assumed you meant immature1970 would reach at least 70 new threads by Feb 28 to mean the total since Inauguration Day.....ie, adding to the existing 53 new threads he already started since then.
ya thats what i meant adding to the 53 useless threads he already started since jan 21
OK but the odds should be set a lot higher.
He could exceed that total by this weekend, easily! He's done it before..... LOL
true
ok how about this wager
freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with)
- 700 now to february 28
+300 march 1 or shortly thereafter
Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL
But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow.
There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
0
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
And testified to this fact it then goes to the Secretary of defense to authorize the national guard.
Get the Secretary of defense under oath to testify why he denied the request and if he throws the president under the bus it would be a conviction of sedition.
0
If you got him sworn under oath.
And testified to this fact it then goes to the Secretary of defense to authorize the national guard.
Get the Secretary of defense under oath to testify why he denied the request and if he throws the president under the bus it would be a conviction of sedition.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again
this is spam.
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back. This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof.
it can allow witnesses that is up to the senators and a vote will be called to address such as the allowance of witnesses.
It isn't a trial in terms you need 100 percent of the jury to reach a conclusion merely 2/3 but the penalties become very real and can lead to an actual trial now that Mr trump is No longer The President.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back. This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof.
it can allow witnesses that is up to the senators and a vote will be called to address such as the allowance of witnesses.
It isn't a trial in terms you need 100 percent of the jury to reach a conclusion merely 2/3 but the penalties become very real and can lead to an actual trial now that Mr trump is No longer The President.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY
ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again
Could happen I suppose.
Did you see his 2 word response to one of your posts ?!
He tried to insult you and pointed to your post and wrote [quote] "your ignorant" LOL
"your"
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY
ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again
Could happen I suppose.
Did you see his 2 word response to one of your posts ?!
He tried to insult you and pointed to your post and wrote [quote] "your ignorant" LOL
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again Could happen I suppose. Did you see his 2 word response to one of your posts ?! He tried to insult you and pointed to your post and wrote [quote] "your ignorant" LOL "your"
You are ignorant. And what you doing is spam.
You have nothing meaningful to add to the dialogue.
I'm not saying it's abusive because obviously a man who has had 5 heart surgeries and five stints can take a 15 mile stroll and use a nitro in his 50s is a freak of nature and completely unnatural. You two have hard time taking trash out.
But stating your bet over and over to do nothing more than repeat is ignorant and amounts to spamming a thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: BRAND NEW THREADS *started* since Joe Biden inauguration: 6 by KellyM_1964 9 by Fubah2 9 by sundance 16 by trumpinator 53 by nature1970 < ---- all easily verifiable **Note: I may have missed one because nature1970 posted sooooooooooo many new threads but soon that 53 will climb rapidly.........watch true ok how about this wager freak-of-nature1970 spams the forum with at least 70 new and useless threads (total since jan 21 adding to the 53 he already spammed the forum with) - 700 now to february 28 +300 march 1 or shortly thereafter Ok, that's better. Now it makes it challenging! The sure thing is a much higher risk now LOL But I would probably still lay $700 for the winner. Will be interesting to follow. There's only 17 days left in the month, and he has been averaging almost 3 spam threads PER DAY ya im leaning toward the under myself of course there is always the chance he will back off now cuz he wont want to make u right again Could happen I suppose. Did you see his 2 word response to one of your posts ?! He tried to insult you and pointed to your post and wrote [quote] "your ignorant" LOL "your"
You are ignorant. And what you doing is spam.
You have nothing meaningful to add to the dialogue.
I'm not saying it's abusive because obviously a man who has had 5 heart surgeries and five stints can take a 15 mile stroll and use a nitro in his 50s is a freak of nature and completely unnatural. You two have hard time taking trash out.
But stating your bet over and over to do nothing more than repeat is ignorant and amounts to spamming a thread.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back. This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof. it can allow witnesses that is up to the senators and a vote will be called to address such as the allowance of witnesses. It isn't a trial in terms you need 100 percent of the jury to reach a conclusion merely 2/3 but the penalties become very real and can lead to an actual trial now that Mr trump is No longer The President.
That vote comes up Thursday or Friday of whether the Senate will allow witnesses.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Real EVIDENCE... Not conjecture not what someelse believes he meant.... But proof. Written or recorded orders Saying I don't back the Capitol police cause I got Trump on 50 clips saying he loves the police he is the friend of law and order he has the cops back. This is not a criminal trial, and not how an impeachment works. Even in criminal trials you do not need written proof or a documented order to show someone committed a crime. If that was the case, no one would ever get convicted of anything. Witnesses, testimony, evidence will suffice. I wish this impeachment trial actually allowed witnesses, then there would be even more proof. it can allow witnesses that is up to the senators and a vote will be called to address such as the allowance of witnesses. It isn't a trial in terms you need 100 percent of the jury to reach a conclusion merely 2/3 but the penalties become very real and can lead to an actual trial now that Mr trump is No longer The President.
That vote comes up Thursday or Friday of whether the Senate will allow witnesses.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
you need to feel heard... Adorable. 
Hot Forum Topics
