Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
In the past 50 some years, if one party holds the White House for eight years, more than likely that party won't win four more years. The only exception was George HW Bush after eight
years of the Reagan presidency. ..
0
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
In the past 50 some years, if one party holds the White House for eight years, more than likely that party won't win four more years. The only exception was George HW Bush after eight
years of the Reagan presidency. ..
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
In the past 50 some years, if one party holds the White House for eight years, more than likely that party won't win four more years. The only exception was George HW Bush after eight
years of the Reagan presidency. ..
HRC is unpopular. If she wins, the desire for change could be even stronger after 12 years of Democratic presidencies, no matter how badly Trump may end up losing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
In the past 50 some years, if one party holds the White House for eight years, more than likely that party won't win four more years. The only exception was George HW Bush after eight
years of the Reagan presidency. ..
HRC is unpopular. If she wins, the desire for change could be even stronger after 12 years of Democratic presidencies, no matter how badly Trump may end up losing.
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
Jobs created:
Babushka -338,000
Obama +7,765,000
The average amount of private sector jobs created during Democratic Presidential terms is 1,536,560 and the average amount during Republican Presidential terms is 650,330.
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
Jobs created:
Babushka -338,000
Obama +7,765,000
The average amount of private sector jobs created during Democratic Presidential terms is 1,536,560 and the average amount during Republican Presidential terms is 650,330.
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
If you are talking/complaining about American troops stationed in more than 150 countries - Obama, like all of his predecessors for decades, is acting as if it is 1946 - than I share your criticism.
However, both HRC and Trump have bellicose records. Neither is a peacenik who will ratchet down the terrible tension.
Liberals >>> vote Green.
Conservatives >>> vote Libertarian.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Forget the odds look at history..... why would Hillary Clinton want to run on the Obama record?
If you are talking/complaining about American troops stationed in more than 150 countries - Obama, like all of his predecessors for decades, is acting as if it is 1946 - than I share your criticism.
However, both HRC and Trump have bellicose records. Neither is a peacenik who will ratchet down the terrible tension.
Still growing - the current ratio is HRC -3.43 (75.2/22.0).
I'd say it's more than a convention bounce; with so many self-inflicted wounds, Trump is his own worst enemy. If he refuses to STFU, he will make certain that the election is about him and he is doomed.
0
Still growing - the current ratio is HRC -3.43 (75.2/22.0).
I'd say it's more than a convention bounce; with so many self-inflicted wounds, Trump is his own worst enemy. If he refuses to STFU, he will make certain that the election is about him and he is doomed.
Too many of them pass laws deliberately intended to disenfranchise minority voters to change the electoral composition and make white voters more powerful.
Really...You say some states pass laws to intentionally disenfranchise some voters....Exactly what do these laws say...and how do they work...Does't seem fair to me if red states do this kind of practice...
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Too many of them pass laws deliberately intended to disenfranchise minority voters to change the electoral composition and make white voters more powerful.
Really...You say some states pass laws to intentionally disenfranchise some voters....Exactly what do these laws say...and how do they work...Does't seem fair to me if red states do this kind of practice...
Really...You say some states pass laws to intentionally disenfranchise some voters....Exactly what do these laws say...and how do they work...Does't seem fair to me if red states do this kind of practice...
The Wisconsin voting restrictions were overturned:
In 2012, an uncommonly frank GOP politician admitted that voter ID laws were intended to suppress Democratic turnout:
This weekend, Pennsylvania Republican House Leader Mike Turzai (R-PA) finally admitted what so many have speculated: Voter identification efforts are meant to suppress Democratic votes in this year’s election.
At the Republican State Committee meeting, Turzai took the stage and let slip the truth about why Republicans are so insistent on voter identification efforts — it will win Romney the election, he said:
The Rhode Island law was fairly broad and accepted a wide range of ID's.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JimmyDrizzl:
Really...You say some states pass laws to intentionally disenfranchise some voters....Exactly what do these laws say...and how do they work...Does't seem fair to me if red states do this kind of practice...
The Wisconsin voting restrictions were overturned:
In 2012, an uncommonly frank GOP politician admitted that voter ID laws were intended to suppress Democratic turnout:
This weekend, Pennsylvania Republican House Leader Mike Turzai (R-PA) finally admitted what so many have speculated: Voter identification efforts are meant to suppress Democratic votes in this year’s election.
At the Republican State Committee meeting, Turzai took the stage and let slip the truth about why Republicans are so insistent on voter identification efforts — it will win Romney the election, he said:
Third party in debates? Probably not - it is likely that the public will be force-fed those two unpopular candidates and have to search the Internet for information about Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and other minor party candidates.
Third party in debates? Probably not - it is likely that the public will be force-fed those two unpopular candidates and have to search the Internet for information about Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and other minor party candidates.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.