First time in over 100 years the House has been forced into multiple votes for speaker because of divided republicans. In 1856, determining speaker took almost 2 months. Now after first round, all democrats are united in supporting Jeffries with 212 votes. Whereas, republicans pick McCarthy 203. Biggs 10. Jordan 6. Banks, Donalds and Zeldin 1 each. In contrast, smooth transition in electing Jeffries as speaker by democrats after Pelosi retires. No speaker means House cannot function properly.
3
First time in over 100 years the House has been forced into multiple votes for speaker because of divided republicans. In 1856, determining speaker took almost 2 months. Now after first round, all democrats are united in supporting Jeffries with 212 votes. Whereas, republicans pick McCarthy 203. Biggs 10. Jordan 6. Banks, Donalds and Zeldin 1 each. In contrast, smooth transition in electing Jeffries as speaker by democrats after Pelosi retires. No speaker means House cannot function properly.
First time in over 100 years the House has been forced into multiple votes for speaker because of divided republicans. In 1856, determining speaker took almost 2 months. Now after first round, all democrats are united in supporting Jeffries with 212 votes. Whereas, republicans pick McCarthy 203. Biggs 10. Jordan 6. Banks, Donalds and Zeldin 1 each. In contrast, smooth transition in electing Jeffries as speaker by democrats after Pelosi retires. No speaker means House cannot function properly.
It's both a laugher and a shame.
This humiliating GOP embarrassment would not be happening if they were devoted to governing for all of America, not just their divisive party politics.
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
First time in over 100 years the House has been forced into multiple votes for speaker because of divided republicans. In 1856, determining speaker took almost 2 months. Now after first round, all democrats are united in supporting Jeffries with 212 votes. Whereas, republicans pick McCarthy 203. Biggs 10. Jordan 6. Banks, Donalds and Zeldin 1 each. In contrast, smooth transition in electing Jeffries as speaker by democrats after Pelosi retires. No speaker means House cannot function properly.
It's both a laugher and a shame.
This humiliating GOP embarrassment would not be happening if they were devoted to governing for all of America, not just their divisive party politics.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: but dems are some of the most racist people STILL since they were the party of the KKK. They make everything about race now trying to say see, we Democrats can't be racist, but making everything about race is truly racist. These characters on here don't just pat themselves on the back, they take turns doing it to each other. Covers Democrats jarrett75 = gambleholic63 BANNED Ma'am, I have told you nicely since you are a lady to not defame me. But if you keep it up, I will be forced to take action against you and Covers.com, you for your actions and Covers.com for allowing it. This is the last time.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: but dems are some of the most racist people STILL since they were the party of the KKK. They make everything about race now trying to say see, we Democrats can't be racist, but making everything about race is truly racist. These characters on here don't just pat themselves on the back, they take turns doing it to each other. Covers Democrats jarrett75 = gambleholic63 BANNED Ma'am, I have told you nicely since you are a lady to not defame me. But if you keep it up, I will be forced to take action against you and Covers.com, you for your actions and Covers.com for allowing it. This is the last time.
Hakeem Jeffries to make history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress
Washington CNN —
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries is expected to make history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress as the 118th Congress convenes in Washington.
The New York Democrat will almost certainly lead the minority party, once the prolonged floor fight for House speaker comes to a conclusion. He would succeed Nancy Pelosi, who served as speaker in the prior session of Congress when Democrats were in the majority. In addition to being the first Black lawmaker to attain such a position, he also would be the first person voted to lead House Democrats to be born after the end of World War II.
1
Hakeem Jeffries to make history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress
Washington CNN —
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries is expected to make history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress as the 118th Congress convenes in Washington.
The New York Democrat will almost certainly lead the minority party, once the prolonged floor fight for House speaker comes to a conclusion. He would succeed Nancy Pelosi, who served as speaker in the prior session of Congress when Democrats were in the majority. In addition to being the first Black lawmaker to attain such a position, he also would be the first person voted to lead House Democrats to be born after the end of World War II.
I never understood posts like these. Instead of being a normal person and congratulating Mr Jeffries and being excited for the things you think/expect him to accomplish, you brag about the fact he’s black. Is this not the most counterproductive thing in the world at the moment? A good deed ceases to be a good deed when compensation or attention is the sole purpose behind the good deed. “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” In my opinion the racist in the room is the one who brings up race unprovoked and wants a pat on the back for it Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”)
Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
2
Quote Originally Posted by philschnaars:
I never understood posts like these. Instead of being a normal person and congratulating Mr Jeffries and being excited for the things you think/expect him to accomplish, you brag about the fact he’s black. Is this not the most counterproductive thing in the world at the moment? A good deed ceases to be a good deed when compensation or attention is the sole purpose behind the good deed. “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” In my opinion the racist in the room is the one who brings up race unprovoked and wants a pat on the back for it Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”)
Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
Quote Originally Posted by philschnaars: “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”)
Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
Donald would actually be a fairly good choice on the GOP side.
2
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Quote Originally Posted by philschnaars: “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”)
Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
Donald would actually be a fairly good choice on the GOP side.
Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead.
Jeffries attacked democracy over 100 times in recent years by questioning the integrity of American elections.
Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior.
Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Jeffries is not the only Democrat to deny the legitimacy of American elections. Over 150 examples show that many Democrats have denied the integrity of elections, including Hillary Clinton, President Joe Biden, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Vice President Kamala Harris, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
3
Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead.
Jeffries attacked democracy over 100 times in recent years by questioning the integrity of American elections.
Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior.
Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated two-time failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Jeffries is not the only Democrat to deny the legitimacy of American elections. Over 150 examples show that many Democrats have denied the integrity of elections, including Hillary Clinton, President Joe Biden, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Vice President Kamala Harris, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead. Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior. Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
Misleading to call Jeffries and democrats election deniers. Actually, Jeffries and democrats supported the certification of Trump as president after 2016 election and attended his inauguration. Russian interference found by intelligence community lead democrats to rightly question the election since Trump lost the popular vote. Mueller investigations confirm evidences that Russian interference did help Trump campaign. Election denialism is mainly fueled by Trump promoting big lie about stolen election despite no proof. This lead to his supporters attack on capital. But facts don't matter to republicans.
3
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:
Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead. Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior. Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
Misleading to call Jeffries and democrats election deniers. Actually, Jeffries and democrats supported the certification of Trump as president after 2016 election and attended his inauguration. Russian interference found by intelligence community lead democrats to rightly question the election since Trump lost the popular vote. Mueller investigations confirm evidences that Russian interference did help Trump campaign. Election denialism is mainly fueled by Trump promoting big lie about stolen election despite no proof. This lead to his supporters attack on capital. But facts don't matter to republicans.
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough: Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead. Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior. Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
Misleading to call Jeffries and democrats election deniers. Actually, Jeffries and democrats supported the certification of Trump as president after 2016 election and attended his inauguration. Russian interference found by intelligence community lead democrats to rightly question the election since Trump lost the popular vote. Mueller investigations confirm evidences that Russian interference did help Trump campaign. But facts don't matter to republicans.
Russian official has confirmed his country did in fact interfere in our 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections and will continue.
The article confirming that was posted in this sub but completely ignored by those who supported Trump.
3
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough: Its very weird that the democrats would want an election denier to even be in congress, let alone lead. Democrats frequently attacked a few Republicans for questioning the 2020 presidential election result during the 2022 midterm election. The establishment media also took part in the attacks while ignoring many Democrats who took part in the same election denying rhetoric years prior. Jeffries’ questioning of the legitimacy of American elections goes back as far as 2016 after former President Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.
Misleading to call Jeffries and democrats election deniers. Actually, Jeffries and democrats supported the certification of Trump as president after 2016 election and attended his inauguration. Russian interference found by intelligence community lead democrats to rightly question the election since Trump lost the popular vote. Mueller investigations confirm evidences that Russian interference did help Trump campaign. But facts don't matter to republicans.
Russian official has confirmed his country did in fact interfere in our 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 elections and will continue.
The article confirming that was posted in this sub but completely ignored by those who supported Trump.
The man from NY wins the House vote total for the 8th consecutive time over the MAGA fool endorsed by the criminal tax fraud and leader of the Trump crime family, with the same 21 republicans voting against McCarthy again
3
Round 8
And the GOP CLOWN SHOW continues!
The man from NY wins the House vote total for the 8th consecutive time over the MAGA fool endorsed by the criminal tax fraud and leader of the Trump crime family, with the same 21 republicans voting against McCarthy again
Confirmed, democrats ,big tech colluded... election far from secured
MAGA republicans falsely claim elections aren't secure. However election officials consider 2020 presidential election the most secure in US history. No evidence of widespread voting fraud despite decades of investigations.
Bottom line is that social media businesses can censor anyone they want and government cannot stop them. House investigation would find nothing wrong or important. But GOP want freedom of speech to include misinformation and control what people say.
2
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
Confirmed, democrats ,big tech colluded... election far from secured
MAGA republicans falsely claim elections aren't secure. However election officials consider 2020 presidential election the most secure in US history. No evidence of widespread voting fraud despite decades of investigations.
Bottom line is that social media businesses can censor anyone they want and government cannot stop them. House investigation would find nothing wrong or important. But GOP want freedom of speech to include misinformation and control what people say.
Hakeem Jeffries made history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress, addressing the 118th Congress for the first time in the early hours of Saturday morning.
“This is the United States of America, a land of opportunity. The fact that I’m able to stand up here today is another data point in that narrative.”
3
Hakeem Jeffries made history as the first Black lawmaker to lead a party in Congress, addressing the 118th Congress for the first time in the early hours of Saturday morning.
“This is the United States of America, a land of opportunity. The fact that I’m able to stand up here today is another data point in that narrative.”
Fact democrats used governmental agencies to morph ,shape and mold the minds of millions. They colluded with big tech, media. They admitted to it. End of story.
2
Fact democrats used governmental agencies to morph ,shape and mold the minds of millions. They colluded with big tech, media. They admitted to it. End of story.
Fact democrats used governmental agencies to morph ,shape and mold the minds of millions. They colluded with big tech, media. They admitted to it. End of story.
3
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
Fact democrats used governmental agencies to morph ,shape and mold the minds of millions. They colluded with big tech, media. They admitted to it. End of story.
Quote Originally Posted by philschnaars: I never understood posts like these. Instead of being a normal person and congratulating Mr Jeffries and being excited for the things you think/expect him to accomplish, you brag about the fact he’s black. Is this not the most counterproductive thing in the world at the moment? A good deed ceases to be a good deed when compensation or attention is the sole purpose behind the good deed. “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” In my opinion the racist in the room is the one who brings up race unprovoked and wants a pat on the back for it Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”) Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
did I make a thread about Byron Donald? No this clown made a thread about how diverse democrats are, it ceases to impress me if they elected a black Democrat if they immediately after point and scream and yell “look what we did”
just my opinion
Freedom road was a one-way street
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Quote Originally Posted by philschnaars: I never understood posts like these. Instead of being a normal person and congratulating Mr Jeffries and being excited for the things you think/expect him to accomplish, you brag about the fact he’s black. Is this not the most counterproductive thing in the world at the moment? A good deed ceases to be a good deed when compensation or attention is the sole purpose behind the good deed. “Look at us Democrats letting Women and Blacks and Hispanics into our little club” In my opinion the racist in the room is the one who brings up race unprovoked and wants a pat on the back for it Now please enlighten us as to all the great deeds Ms Pelosi accomplished for our great nation and maybe share your thoughts on how Mr Jeffries was the best choice (apart from the obvious “He’s a democrat, and he’s black”) Did you watch the Republican who nominated Byron Donald’s today? Where is your criticism of him?
did I make a thread about Byron Donald? No this clown made a thread about how diverse democrats are, it ceases to impress me if they elected a black Democrat if they immediately after point and scream and yell “look what we did”
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
And the GOP CLOWN SHOW continues!
Hot Forum Topics
