All Forums | Politics

Halliburton!!! Halliburton!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 504
Posts: 27
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 66698
Posted: #1
the Hope and Change version

this is ok right?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #2
a no bid contract?

25 Million to a Democrat contributor.


HALIBURTION HALIBURTON HALIBURTON

come on lefties where is your outrage now???

where are you with your war criminal posters with Obama's face on them.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 22212
Posted: #3
$25,000,000

How many times do you think Obama can multiply the national debt in 4 years?!?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2001
Posts: 5545
Posted: #4
Quote Originally Posted by woopdurritis:

$25,000,000

How many times do you think Obama can multiply the national debt in 4 years?!?



What does it matter ? We are going to have new money issued !
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #5
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 1820
Posted: #6
It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 7205
Posted: #7
To the victor (in the Presidential election) belong the spoils.  And to the victor's buddies and to those getting the kickbacks.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #8
Rest assured activities like this will work against Obama if he continues to be involved but just scratching the surface.  However, he already lost support with his increase in troops in Afghanistan from some libs. Not to worry though, the comparisons are very limited when you look closely.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 12821
Posted: #9
same as it ever was...
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by oldtrafford:

It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.

Oh are you being a left wing nut ?Don't wait for the networks to tell you info, go find it yourself !!

Here is a ton of info on them. People on both sides of the isle will be interested in this.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 13129
Posted: #11

somethings never change..

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 662
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by oldtrafford:

It's a Fox News story so it has to be BS!!. When I see the same story on the other networks than i'll believe it.


After you believe it you will then make fun of Cheney and mock Palin's accent. Anything to detract form the facts.

Don't forget the elitist condescension too
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 1365
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

Oh are you being a left wing nut ?Don't wait for the networks to tell you info, go find it yourself !!

Here is a ton of info on them. People on both sides of the isle will be interested in this.

 

Good read Lipps. makes us all look silly for arguing for one side or the other. The jokes on us.

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 66698
Posted: #14
z - i dont think many were arguing sides. just pointing out the hypocrisy in one being more righteous than the other

all crooked
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #15

 

If we later find that Biden was the CEO of this company, we can make the comparison.

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

 

If we later find that Biden was the CEO of this company, we can make the comparison.

So you think it's ok for a no bid contract ?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #17
just watch this DJ BROW 


 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #18

There is a distinction between an issue with no-bid contracts (which I find to be repugnant) and awarding a contract to a company for whom the Vice-President served as the CEO and was in line to receive a pension, post-vice-presidency, a company that was on the verge of internal bankruptcy.

The use of no-bid contracts has been in existence since the days of Hoover. Obama's promises are simply the comments of just another politician either too naive or too optimistic about changing Washington. Obama nor Biden are benefited personally.

Cheney however.....

Are we defending Cheney?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #19
Obama used NO BID contract, and SWEETHEART DEALS in the above link .


I am not defending Cheney,  and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.

I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush,  I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you

you really don't understand why this is a big deal,  Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way. 

which is it?  
 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by rick3117:

Obama used NO BID contract, and SWEETHEART DEALS in the above link .


I am not defending Cheney,  and I don't understand why you are Defending Obama for an obvious breach of trust.

I understand that No-Bids have been in existence for a long time, but I bet Hoover didn't run on a platform of not accepting No-bids, neither did Bush,  I am surprised I really have to spell this out for you

you really don't understand why this is a big deal,  Or you are so in the bag for your guy you are going to look the other way. 

which is it?  

Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

There is a distinction between an issue with no-bid contracts (which I find to be repugnant) and awarding a contract to a company for whom the Vice-President served as the CEO and was in line to receive a pension, post-vice-presidency, a company that was on the verge of internal bankruptcy.

The use of no-bid contracts has been in existence since the days of Hoover. Obama's promises are simply the comments of just another politician either too naive or too optimistic about changing Washington. Obama nor Biden are benefited personally.

Cheney however.....

Are we defending Cheney?

I don't know who the hell we is......but but a no bid contract is just another payoff.  Of course this is the change we were supposed to have.

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?

Maybe you should reread my post and tell me where I even came close to defending Cheney

 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

I don't know who the hell we is......but but a no bid contract is just another payoff.  Of course this is the change we were supposed to have.

Are we defending Obama's change ?

Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?

Too bad that the distinction between no-bid contracts to benefit a party and a secured contract to benefit a sitting vice-president has to be spelled out. One would think the distinction would be more apparent.

 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

Maybe you should reread my post and tell me where I even came close to defending Cheney

If you were talking to me....If not, please ignore

 
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:

Perhaps you should reread my post and tell me where I defended Obama?

Too bad that the distinction between no-bid contracts to benefit a party and a secured contract to benefit a sitting vice-president has to be spelled out. One would think the distinction would be more apparent.

I have a problem with a no bid contract and with someone that was bringing change.  You are stuck on the Cheney stuff.

All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.