What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
Sweeping statements without really any substance. Not that I am surprised really.
ObamaCare is a great example. Pure corporatism. My guess is you will recite the Faux News habit of calling it socialist when it is actually much the antithesis.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tinklebell:
What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
Sweeping statements without really any substance. Not that I am surprised really.
ObamaCare is a great example. Pure corporatism. My guess is you will recite the Faux News habit of calling it socialist when it is actually much the antithesis.
What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
If you think the Republicans don't do the same exact thing, you are sadly mistaken. Both parties engaged in "income redistribution", just in different forms. You can still believe in the ideology but it's 2013 and the political climate is quite different than what's it used to be.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tinklebell:
What is a corporatist policy? Obama only supports corporations that donate heavily to him and other Democrats, like alternate energy companies going bankrupt. These companies give to Obama and Obama pays them off with bailouts, subsidies, contracts, and tax breaks.
Obama is the biggest income re-distributor the country has ever seen, and any income redistribution (including awarding government unions big salaries and benefits) is a Marxist policy. Only when rewards are earned through work and profit, without an intervening source of entitlement, is this capitalism with no Marxism.
If you think the Republicans don't do the same exact thing, you are sadly mistaken. Both parties engaged in "income redistribution", just in different forms. You can still believe in the ideology but it's 2013 and the political climate is quite different than what's it used to be.
WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE. WE JUST WANT THE MAN TO TELL THE TRUTH AND START WORKING ON THE ECONOMY INSTEAD OF TAKING A VACATION EVERY MONTH OF HIS LIFE. [/Quote
Obama needs to make more speeches.
He just repeats himself. He is giving speeches he gave before he was elected. It's the same stuff, over and over and over. He needs a new speech writer. Maybe there's an unemployed Democrat out there that needs a job..
]
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tinklebell:
Quote Originally Posted by BAMA62:
WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE. WE JUST WANT THE MAN TO TELL THE TRUTH AND START WORKING ON THE ECONOMY INSTEAD OF TAKING A VACATION EVERY MONTH OF HIS LIFE. [/Quote
Obama needs to make more speeches.
He just repeats himself. He is giving speeches he gave before he was elected. It's the same stuff, over and over and over. He needs a new speech writer. Maybe there's an unemployed Democrat out there that needs a job..
What a joke. This last repub admin left this country in a total shambles. And ever since their only goal & contribution to this nation has been to thwart Obama & his agenda in every possible way regardless if it might be good, bad or in between. The GOP has become beyond sad...but sick & twisted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cashin:
What a joke. This last repub admin left this country in a total shambles. And ever since their only goal & contribution to this nation has been to thwart Obama & his agenda in every possible way regardless if it might be good, bad or in between. The GOP has become beyond sad...but sick & twisted.
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
0
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
+1
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by lordspoint:
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
In addition, we need to stop letting them to pitch us against each other for their own benefits. Instead of magnifying by 100 times on our differences, shouldn't we all focus on our agreements and work from there?
0
Quote Originally Posted by lordspoint:
I could give 2 shits what letter a man or woman have beside their name as long as they put country 1st. I don't see this in many elected officials. Time for term limits in congress and kick all corp money out of politics. Then and only then will there be any progress in restoring this once great nation. While we are at it, maybe we can get our noses out of everyone else's business around the globe
In addition, we need to stop letting them to pitch us against each other for their own benefits. Instead of magnifying by 100 times on our differences, shouldn't we all focus on our agreements and work from there?
Have you ever noticed that a repusican think about themselves, but a Democrat thinks about everyone ? Just read through this thread.
Repusilcan = Me, Mine. Greed, Selfishness.
That's why they lose every election.
Go Hillary
The world would be a better place if everyone was selfish. When I say that I mean if everyone just worried about themselves and not worry about what anyone else does.
I'm in the 99% but I don't deserve once cent of a one percenter's money. Neither does anyone else. If that 1 percenter is caught doing something illegal like Madoff or Lay then they will be punished. Someone not wanting to pay more taxes than they are already paying is not illegal.
We are a charitable nation and we recognize when people need help. If I had it my way everyone's taxes would be cut in half (everyone, no matter if you make $50K or $50million) and the half that was cut I would leave it up to the individual to give that second half to their favorite charity or spread it out over numerous charities.
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Have you ever noticed that a repusican think about themselves, but a Democrat thinks about everyone ? Just read through this thread.
Repusilcan = Me, Mine. Greed, Selfishness.
That's why they lose every election.
Go Hillary
The world would be a better place if everyone was selfish. When I say that I mean if everyone just worried about themselves and not worry about what anyone else does.
I'm in the 99% but I don't deserve once cent of a one percenter's money. Neither does anyone else. If that 1 percenter is caught doing something illegal like Madoff or Lay then they will be punished. Someone not wanting to pay more taxes than they are already paying is not illegal.
We are a charitable nation and we recognize when people need help. If I had it my way everyone's taxes would be cut in half (everyone, no matter if you make $50K or $50million) and the half that was cut I would leave it up to the individual to give that second half to their favorite charity or spread it out over numerous charities.
The world would be a better place if everyone was selfish. When I say that I mean if everyone just worried about themselves and not worry about what anyone else does.
I'm in the 99% but I don't deserve once cent of a one percenter's money. Neither does anyone else. If that 1 percenter is caught doing something illegal like Madoff or Lay then they will be punished. Someone not wanting to pay more taxes than they are already paying is not illegal.
We are a charitable nation and we recognize when people need help. If I had it my way everyone's taxes would be cut in half (everyone, no matter if you make $50K or $50million) and the half that was cut I would leave it up to the individual to give that second half to their favorite charity or spread it out over numerous charities.
That's what we are doing, cutting people's taxes in half. Wealthy people, like Phil Mickelson. and giving it to those that can't get a job because Robney shipped the jobs to China !
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
The world would be a better place if everyone was selfish. When I say that I mean if everyone just worried about themselves and not worry about what anyone else does.
I'm in the 99% but I don't deserve once cent of a one percenter's money. Neither does anyone else. If that 1 percenter is caught doing something illegal like Madoff or Lay then they will be punished. Someone not wanting to pay more taxes than they are already paying is not illegal.
We are a charitable nation and we recognize when people need help. If I had it my way everyone's taxes would be cut in half (everyone, no matter if you make $50K or $50million) and the half that was cut I would leave it up to the individual to give that second half to their favorite charity or spread it out over numerous charities.
That's what we are doing, cutting people's taxes in half. Wealthy people, like Phil Mickelson. and giving it to those that can't get a job because Robney shipped the jobs to China !
President Obama on income inequality :"This growing inequality is morally wrong,, and undermines the very essence of America."
But in the Obama recovery, the average income of the top 1% grew 30x's greater than the bottom 99%, in fact their incomes shrunk...
As a result, 121% of the gains in real income during Obama's recovery have gone to the top 1%.
By comparison, the top 1% captured 65% of income gains during the Bush expansion of 2002-07, and 45% of the gains under Clinton's expansion in the 1990s.~ economist Emmanuel Saez
Obama's answer to the problem ?...More of the same snake oil he has been selling.. that's what's morally wrong.~IBD
0
President Obama on income inequality :"This growing inequality is morally wrong,, and undermines the very essence of America."
But in the Obama recovery, the average income of the top 1% grew 30x's greater than the bottom 99%, in fact their incomes shrunk...
As a result, 121% of the gains in real income during Obama's recovery have gone to the top 1%.
By comparison, the top 1% captured 65% of income gains during the Bush expansion of 2002-07, and 45% of the gains under Clinton's expansion in the 1990s.~ economist Emmanuel Saez
Obama's answer to the problem ?...More of the same snake oil he has been selling.. that's what's morally wrong.~IBD
Have you ever noticed that a repusican think about themselves, but a Democrat thinks about everyone ? Just read through this thread.
Repusilcan = Me, Mine. Greed, Selfishness.
That's why they lose every election.
Go Hillary
Only Democrats like you and the 47%er's in this this country who not only voted for, but voted to re-elect someone who's policy's have widened the income equality in America... for some convoluted reason.. proudly trumpet Obama's elections as some sort of an election victory..
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Have you ever noticed that a repusican think about themselves, but a Democrat thinks about everyone ? Just read through this thread.
Repusilcan = Me, Mine. Greed, Selfishness.
That's why they lose every election.
Go Hillary
Only Democrats like you and the 47%er's in this this country who not only voted for, but voted to re-elect someone who's policy's have widened the income equality in America... for some convoluted reason.. proudly trumpet Obama's elections as some sort of an election victory..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.