Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings. It's like they can't see that intelligent, reasonable people can disagree. That's just not even a concept that they can fathom.
0
Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings. It's like they can't see that intelligent, reasonable people can disagree. That's just not even a concept that they can fathom.
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
0
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
notice don juan couldn't/wouldn't respond to this, inconvenient fact
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
President Obama on income inequality :"This growing inequality is morally wrong,, and undermines the very essence of America."
But in the Obama recovery, the average income of the top 1% grew 30x's greater than the bottom 99%, in fact their incomes shrunk...
As a result, 121% of the gains in real income during Obama's recovery have gone to the top 1%.
By comparison, the top 1% captured 65% of income gains during the Bush expansion of 2002-07, and 45% of the gains under Clinton's expansion in the 1990s.~ economist Emmanuel Saez
Obama's answer to the problem ?...More of the same snake oil he has been selling.. that's what's morally wrong.~IBD
in fact, don quixote just continues to beat on the liberal drum even louder hoping no one pays attention to reality
0
notice don juan couldn't/wouldn't respond to this, inconvenient fact
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
President Obama on income inequality :"This growing inequality is morally wrong,, and undermines the very essence of America."
But in the Obama recovery, the average income of the top 1% grew 30x's greater than the bottom 99%, in fact their incomes shrunk...
As a result, 121% of the gains in real income during Obama's recovery have gone to the top 1%.
By comparison, the top 1% captured 65% of income gains during the Bush expansion of 2002-07, and 45% of the gains under Clinton's expansion in the 1990s.~ economist Emmanuel Saez
Obama's answer to the problem ?...More of the same snake oil he has been selling.. that's what's morally wrong.~IBD
in fact, don quixote just continues to beat on the liberal drum even louder hoping no one pays attention to reality
@ 30 - Ginsberg is 80 and liberal, Scalia and Kennedy are 77 and conservative. Breyer is just about 75 and Liberal. All others are under 66.
Assuming Obama gets no more and when Hillary wins that means that Scalia and Kennedy would both be around 84 by the end of her first term. I could easily see one of them being replaced.
0
@ 30 - Ginsberg is 80 and liberal, Scalia and Kennedy are 77 and conservative. Breyer is just about 75 and Liberal. All others are under 66.
Assuming Obama gets no more and when Hillary wins that means that Scalia and Kennedy would both be around 84 by the end of her first term. I could easily see one of them being replaced.
Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings. It's like they can't see that intelligent, reasonable people can disagree. That's just not even a concept that they can fathom.
.............President George W. Bush has a Harvard MBA and is the very first President to hold a Masters Degree in Business Administration.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings. It's like they can't see that intelligent, reasonable people can disagree. That's just not even a concept that they can fathom.
.............President George W. Bush has a Harvard MBA and is the very first President to hold a Masters Degree in Business Administration.
Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings.
My belief that Obama is a dimwit comes from his public statements and his silly policy prescriptions.
It actually has nothing to do with politics and has everything to do with facts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
Some of you cats are delusional. Guy graduated from Harvard Law. I don't care what your political beliefs are -- you have to be intelligent to graduate from Harvard Law. Period.
It amazes me that people are completely unwilling to acknowledge the intelligence of another person solely because that person has different political leanings.
My belief that Obama is a dimwit comes from his public statements and his silly policy prescriptions.
It actually has nothing to do with politics and has everything to do with facts.
When Eliot Spitzer unselfishly got his client card at the Emperors Club VIP it wasn't about himself he was thinking about, but the people of NY and his wife and three children,,, Democrats think about everyone..
0
When Eliot Spitzer unselfishly got his client card at the Emperors Club VIP it wasn't about himself he was thinking about, but the people of NY and his wife and three children,,, Democrats think about everyone..
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
Hillary ..ROLF
Hillary is over the Hillary.
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
When is the last time you have spelled republicans correct instead of name calling? True sign of someone who is very uneducated.
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Repuslicans may have stopped Obama's. middle class come back for 4 years, but not for 4 more years and 8 years of Hillary. In 11 more years the Supreme Court will be loaded with Democrats ! You folks will. have nothing left to bellyache about.
When is the last time you have spelled republicans correct instead of name calling? True sign of someone who is very uneducated.
Yes, I would say people who use libtards are less ededucated on whatever topic is being discussed. You have lost the debate when you name call from either side.
What history are you referring to?
0
Yes, I would say people who use libtards are less ededucated on whatever topic is being discussed. You have lost the debate when you name call from either side.
lets just say it was me asking you what to do about the problem of females reacting normally to what looks like a 100% dude in the ladies room with transgendered individuals that looked like males having to use the female bathroom...
I wanted an educated or logical answer and you Failed to do so...
Its funny how you try so hard to paint me as being something other then what I am... a non-partisan independent... that interestingly leans conservatively more then progressive historically..... I voted for GW bush 2x, obama once and ron paul in the last election...
but your prescripted talking points only work if they are against what is defined as the liberal point of view that you hear on rush/beck/hannity/fox"news" or whatever you blindly follow...
in fact don't I defend conservatives and their right to say libtard without it meaning that they have to be uneducated?
I mean read my post...
I am actually siding with conservatives here... do you Fail to see that? Or are you so hell bent on making up a lie to pin on me and then argue against that you cant see reality?
pretty funny that you name call me "adolescent mind"...
Oh Oh the Irony
Also what name are you claiming that I called you? Or did you lie about that too...
your lies are becoming hard to follow and keep up with here
0
im not wasting my time looking for the thread...
lets just say it was me asking you what to do about the problem of females reacting normally to what looks like a 100% dude in the ladies room with transgendered individuals that looked like males having to use the female bathroom...
I wanted an educated or logical answer and you Failed to do so...
Its funny how you try so hard to paint me as being something other then what I am... a non-partisan independent... that interestingly leans conservatively more then progressive historically..... I voted for GW bush 2x, obama once and ron paul in the last election...
but your prescripted talking points only work if they are against what is defined as the liberal point of view that you hear on rush/beck/hannity/fox"news" or whatever you blindly follow...
in fact don't I defend conservatives and their right to say libtard without it meaning that they have to be uneducated?
I mean read my post...
I am actually siding with conservatives here... do you Fail to see that? Or are you so hell bent on making up a lie to pin on me and then argue against that you cant see reality?
pretty funny that you name call me "adolescent mind"...
Oh Oh the Irony
Also what name are you claiming that I called you? Or did you lie about that too...
your lies are becoming hard to follow and keep up with here
“The odds of people dying in a terrorist attack obviously are still a lot lower than in a car accident, unfortunately,” President Obama told NBC’s Jay Leno last night.
Wait, “unfortunately”? Does the president really wish more Americans were killed in terrorist attacks? Indeed, orders of magnitude more, since nationwide traffic fatalities typically run between 30,000 and 50,000 a year?
Of course not. Obviously when he deployed that adverb he was thinking of the unfortunate souls killed in car accidents, not the victims of terrorism. He simply misspoke–just as Todd Akin did last year when he used the unfortunate phrase “legitimate rape.” But for some reason, the World’s Greatest Orator and the most powerful man in the world is held to lower standards of verbal exactitude than a lowly congressman from Missouri.
That wasn’t Obama’s only error last night on “The Tonight Show.” He also got flummoxed by geography: “The Panama [Canal] is being widened so that these big supertankers can come in. Now, that will be finished in 2015. If we don’t deepen our ports all along the Gulf–places like Charleston, South Carolina, or Savannah, Georgia, or Jacksonville, Florida–if we don’t do that, those ships are going to go someplace else.”
There are major ports along the Gulf of Mexico, most notably the Port of South Louisiana and the Port of Houston. But Charleston, Savannah and Jacksonville are all on the Atlantic coast.
0
Gee, why would anyone think Obama is a dimwit?
“The odds of people dying in a terrorist attack obviously are still a lot lower than in a car accident, unfortunately,” President Obama told NBC’s Jay Leno last night.
Wait, “unfortunately”? Does the president really wish more Americans were killed in terrorist attacks? Indeed, orders of magnitude more, since nationwide traffic fatalities typically run between 30,000 and 50,000 a year?
Of course not. Obviously when he deployed that adverb he was thinking of the unfortunate souls killed in car accidents, not the victims of terrorism. He simply misspoke–just as Todd Akin did last year when he used the unfortunate phrase “legitimate rape.” But for some reason, the World’s Greatest Orator and the most powerful man in the world is held to lower standards of verbal exactitude than a lowly congressman from Missouri.
That wasn’t Obama’s only error last night on “The Tonight Show.” He also got flummoxed by geography: “The Panama [Canal] is being widened so that these big supertankers can come in. Now, that will be finished in 2015. If we don’t deepen our ports all along the Gulf–places like Charleston, South Carolina, or Savannah, Georgia, or Jacksonville, Florida–if we don’t do that, those ships are going to go someplace else.”
There are major ports along the Gulf of Mexico, most notably the Port of South Louisiana and the Port of Houston. But Charleston, Savannah and Jacksonville are all on the Atlantic coast.
Bo, the president’s Portuguese Water Dog, arrived separately on one of two MV-22 Ospreys, a hybrid aircraft which takes off like a helicopter but flies like a plane.
It was the first time the Ospreys have been taken on holiday by a US president.
Sequester? What sequester?
0
Bo, the president’s Portuguese Water Dog, arrived separately on one of two MV-22 Ospreys, a hybrid aircraft which takes off like a helicopter but flies like a plane.
It was the first time the Ospreys have been taken on holiday by a US president.
Bo, the president’s Portuguese Water Dog, arrived separately on one of two MV-22 Ospreys, a hybrid aircraft which takes off like a helicopter but flies like a plane.
........Obama's dog gets more air support than our guy's in Benghazi......
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Bo, the president’s Portuguese Water Dog, arrived separately on one of two MV-22 Ospreys, a hybrid aircraft which takes off like a helicopter but flies like a plane.
........Obama's dog gets more air support than our guy's in Benghazi......
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.