So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that?
Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
4
So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that?
Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that? Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
You didn't. Nor was it implicit in any statement you posted.
4
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that? Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
You didn't. Nor was it implicit in any statement you posted.
So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that? Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
Where did I say you said 40 weeks?
I get it, you don’t want to answer the question… Most people on the left don’t.
I think a major problem is nobody wants to get into the specifics. That will be one of the major benefits of Roe V Wade being overturned.
States should list specifically what they want passed and put it to a vote.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
So where did I say 40 weeks? Can you quote where I said 40 weeks since you said I did and were trying to portray me in a negative way by using an absurd number like that? Either quote me where I said 40 weeks or apologize and retract the statement. You cant lie about things I say and just go on your way..
Where did I say you said 40 weeks?
I get it, you don’t want to answer the question… Most people on the left don’t.
I think a major problem is nobody wants to get into the specifics. That will be one of the major benefits of Roe V Wade being overturned.
States should list specifically what they want passed and put it to a vote.
Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated)
Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
4
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated)
Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
Valid point. I concur.
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
as usual our resident 9-11 denier likes to put his own choice of words into other peoples mouths then argue based on the fallacy he created . classic strawman BS!
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others.
as usual our resident 9-11 denier likes to put his own choice of words into other peoples mouths then argue based on the fallacy he created . classic strawman BS!
Please no personal attacks. Let’s keep the discussion going. If you don’t have anything positive to add to the discussion please keep your comments to yourself.
I would really hate to see someone get banned.
0
Please no personal attacks. Let’s keep the discussion going. If you don’t have anything positive to add to the discussion please keep your comments to yourself.
Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
Damn I knew 40 weeks was on the long end of pregnancy, but now 40 months? Don't think any pro-choice are into terminating the lives of 3.5 year old children.
4
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
Damn I knew 40 weeks was on the long end of pregnancy, but now 40 months? Don't think any pro-choice are into terminating the lives of 3.5 year old children.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful. That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others. as usual our resident 9-11 denier likes to put his own choice of words into other peoples mouths then argue based on the fallacy he created . classic strawman BS!
And usually it indicates one is operating from a weaker position.
4
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful. That's WHERE. Directly implied. (we will presume you meant "40 weeks" rather than "40 months" as YOU stated) Your constant use of the strawman fallacy on this forum is old but typical of those who are deliberately argumentative for the sole purpose of annoying others. as usual our resident 9-11 denier likes to put his own choice of words into other peoples mouths then argue based on the fallacy he created . classic strawman BS!
And usually it indicates one is operating from a weaker position.
I live inside the laws of society as to interacting with society and others, I live my own personal life in different terms and that is how I choose to interact with others and co-exist. 40 weeks where are you coming up with 40 weeks anyway? 40 weeks is 10 months, abortion in its general application does not give carte blanche up to 40 weeks, you are very very loosely generalizing based on medical extremes and trying to portray someone using those extremes but that makes perfect sense given how you interact with others here.
Detox is just trolling. He has been doing this for 2 weeks with this 40 weeks abortion nonsense. He knows damn well no woman is having an abortion at 40 weeks unless it is a matter of dying for the mother or the baby having a high likelihood of death at birth.
He knows what he is doing trying to play these games.
6
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I live inside the laws of society as to interacting with society and others, I live my own personal life in different terms and that is how I choose to interact with others and co-exist. 40 weeks where are you coming up with 40 weeks anyway? 40 weeks is 10 months, abortion in its general application does not give carte blanche up to 40 weeks, you are very very loosely generalizing based on medical extremes and trying to portray someone using those extremes but that makes perfect sense given how you interact with others here.
Detox is just trolling. He has been doing this for 2 weeks with this 40 weeks abortion nonsense. He knows damn well no woman is having an abortion at 40 weeks unless it is a matter of dying for the mother or the baby having a high likelihood of death at birth.
He knows what he is doing trying to play these games.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
Damn I knew 40 weeks was on the long end of pregnancy, but now 40 months? Don't think any pro-choice are into terminating the lives of 3.5 year old children.
now if we were to employ the exact same argument fallacy that he routinely uses it might look like this ::
"why is detox suggesting wallstreetcappers and all non-chump-worshippers want to murder every child in usa up to age 3.5 yrs ??? "
silly huh ? of course ! but that is EXACTLY the way he frequently argues to annoy members here
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
4
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: Wallstreet, are you really pro-choice for society up to 40 months? I didn’t know that, that’s awful.
Damn I knew 40 weeks was on the long end of pregnancy, but now 40 months? Don't think any pro-choice are into terminating the lives of 3.5 year old children.
now if we were to employ the exact same argument fallacy that he routinely uses it might look like this ::
"why is detox suggesting wallstreetcappers and all non-chump-worshippers want to murder every child in usa up to age 3.5 yrs ??? "
silly huh ? of course ! but that is EXACTLY the way he frequently argues to annoy members here
Not one person on the left can say what they want specifically. They must be waiting for the left wing forum to tell them. Let me know what they say.
I think the current law varies from state to state. I'm in IL and it's 22 weeks, I believe that's up to end of the second trimester. I don't think people can say what they want specifically because it's really a personal decision. I don't feel comfortable enforcing my own personal beliefs on someone.
2
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Not one person on the left can say what they want specifically. They must be waiting for the left wing forum to tell them. Let me know what they say.
I think the current law varies from state to state. I'm in IL and it's 22 weeks, I believe that's up to end of the second trimester. I don't think people can say what they want specifically because it's really a personal decision. I don't feel comfortable enforcing my own personal beliefs on someone.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.