Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings presided over by Jerrold Nadler.. who opposed the Clinton impeachment in 1998 ..
Judiciary will begin
with at least one day of hearings, on December 4, outlining the
constitutional grounds for impeachment, which will aim at explaining
such terms of art as “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
There are 41 members of the Judiciary Committee, compared with
only 23 members of the Intelligence Committee. So the hearings will be
longer even if Nadler sticks to one round of questioning per witness.
The final phase of this hearing would be the consideration of articles
themselves before the panel sends them to the House floor.
Two
of the most combative Intelligence Committee Republicans, Jim Jordan
and John Ratcliffe, are also on Judiciary and will get to keep up their
barrage of questions toward Democrats witnesses..along with the
addition of attorney and former judge.. Texas Senator Louie Gohmert.
Each day of the hearings, then, will be long and exhausting. The overall
timetable is reasonably clear: to consider and report articles of
impeachment with time enough for the full House to debate and enact them
before Christmas. That is a very narrow three-week window..Congress goes on Christmas break on the 13th..
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Judiciary Committee impeachment hearings presided over by Jerrold Nadler.. who opposed the Clinton impeachment in 1998 ..
Judiciary will begin
with at least one day of hearings, on December 4, outlining the
constitutional grounds for impeachment, which will aim at explaining
such terms of art as “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
There are 41 members of the Judiciary Committee, compared with
only 23 members of the Intelligence Committee. So the hearings will be
longer even if Nadler sticks to one round of questioning per witness.
The final phase of this hearing would be the consideration of articles
themselves before the panel sends them to the House floor.
Two
of the most combative Intelligence Committee Republicans, Jim Jordan
and John Ratcliffe, are also on Judiciary and will get to keep up their
barrage of questions toward Democrats witnesses..along with the
addition of attorney and former judge.. Texas Senator Louie Gohmert.
Each day of the hearings, then, will be long and exhausting. The overall
timetable is reasonably clear: to consider and report articles of
impeachment with time enough for the full House to debate and enact them
before Christmas. That is a very narrow three-week window..Congress goes on Christmas break on the 13th..
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
0
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
I'll call your alan dershowitz and raise you a laurence tribe.
And yes the fraud in charge is out of the country screwing our world standing up once again. By the way the trump was invited in person OR through council but declined, imagine that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
I'll call your alan dershowitz and raise you a laurence tribe.
And yes the fraud in charge is out of the country screwing our world standing up once again. By the way the trump was invited in person OR through council but declined, imagine that.
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
0
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
Question, do you think it would be good for trump to participate in these hearings knowing how much he lies?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
The House Judiciary Committee unveiled Monday the witnesses for its first hearing in
the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump for allegedly using
his power to pressure a foreign country to damage a political rival., This will present “the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment,”..
All constitutional law experts: Noah Feldman, Pamela S. Karlan, Michael
Gerhardt and Jonathan Turley -- professors, respectively, at Harvard,
Stanford, North Carolina and George Washington university law schools...where's Alan Dershowitz ?
Democrats timing their hearing this week to occur when the President would be out of the country....
The House Judiciary
Committee schedules its hearing Wednesday at the same time that Trump is
representing the U.S. at this week’s NATO summit in London.. Good show of support for our President while he's abroad discussing international issues..
Question, do you think it would be good for trump to participate in these hearings knowing how much he lies?
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
Isn't it time for you to start tracking Santa's sleigh?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
Isn't it time for you to start tracking Santa's sleigh?
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..
Because,,,the Democrats have nothing on Trump...
0
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..Because,,,the Democrats have nothing on Trump...
OK - so let's hear from Rudy, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Perry, etc. under oath!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..Because,,,the Democrats have nothing on Trump...
OK - so let's hear from Rudy, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Perry, etc. under oath!
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
The dems will have enough votes but he will not be convicted by the party of trump in the senate. Take note that I said the party of trump. There is no republican party anymore. The republicans have abandoned the constitution and the rule of law to be known as the party of trump and support the most corrupt administration in the history of this great country. THE GOP IS DEAD !!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I don't think the Dems have the votes for impeachment. The Dems try Russian collusion, obstruction of justice, 25th amendment, the Mueller Report and now bribery to possibly include quid pro quo. They are a bunch of losers and cry babies over their stunning defeat to President Trump in November of 2016. Jerry Nadler should provide the American public a true identity of the criminal Left beginning Wednesday, 4 December 2019. I would be ashamed to admit to anybody including a pet dog or cat that I am a member of the Democratic party. Good luck taking out President Trump.
The dems will have enough votes but he will not be convicted by the party of trump in the senate. Take note that I said the party of trump. There is no republican party anymore. The republicans have abandoned the constitution and the rule of law to be known as the party of trump and support the most corrupt administration in the history of this great country. THE GOP IS DEAD !!!
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..
Because,,,the Democrats have nothing on Trump...
Correct slim they didn't witness any of his dealings about the Ukraine but then this "phase" is about the charges of impeachment. Testimony was given in the 1st "phase" and the legal witnesses will determine if the testimony warrants any charges of"high crimes and misdemeanors" such as obstruction, campaign finance law violations or emolument violations which are all considered "high crimes and misdemeanors" . . You should really try to follow along .
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Judiciary Committee .. ‘witnesses’ have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand ... but,the four witnesses, that are law professors are expected to offer legal analysis and opinions ..
Because,,,the Democrats have nothing on Trump...
Correct slim they didn't witness any of his dealings about the Ukraine but then this "phase" is about the charges of impeachment. Testimony was given in the 1st "phase" and the legal witnesses will determine if the testimony warrants any charges of"high crimes and misdemeanors" such as obstruction, campaign finance law violations or emolument violations which are all considered "high crimes and misdemeanors" . . You should really try to follow along .
He may,,, however the evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump
pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose
of benefiting the President in the 2020 election....
No crimes were commtited...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Your boy is getting impeached!
He may,,, however the evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump
pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose
of benefiting the President in the 2020 election....
He may,,, however the evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump
pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose
of benefiting the President in the 2020 election....
No crimes were commtited...
If you say so.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
He may,,, however the evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump
pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose
of benefiting the President in the 2020 election....
In a recent
interview with TIME magazine...the person that was supposed to have been shook-down by President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.... once again has denied that
President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to
investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference.
Radical Left in the Democrat party are insane...
0
In a recent
interview with TIME magazine...the person that was supposed to have been shook-down by President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.... once again has denied that
President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to
investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference.
In a recent
interview with TIME magazine...the person that was supposed to have been shook-down by President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.... once again has denied that
President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to
investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference.
I don't believe the Bidens were ever mentioned in the interview .
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
In a recent
interview with TIME magazine...the person that was supposed to have been shook-down by President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.... once again has denied that
President Trump withheld military aid in order to pressure him to
investigate the Bidens or Ukrainian election interference.
By the way slim, Quid Pro Quo in itself isn't a crime . It only became a crime when trump asked Zelensky a favor to investigate the Bidens.
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said in the July 25 call, according to the memo. “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, It sounds horrible to me.”
0
By the way slim, Quid Pro Quo in itself isn't a crime . It only became a crime when trump asked Zelensky a favor to investigate the Bidens.
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that, so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great,” Trump said in the July 25 call, according to the memo. “Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it, It sounds horrible to me.”
The dems will have enough votes but he will not be convicted by the party of trump in the senate. Take note that I said the party of trump. There is no republican party anymore. The republicans have abandoned the constitution and the rule of law to be known as the party of trump and support the most corrupt administration in the history of this great country. THE GOP IS DEAD !!!
This crybaby wailing is typical now, because they realize it is not a bipartisan impeachment process, and the gig is up, DOA, another failed coup. Truth is not on your side, and you completely lack self awareness and hurt yourselves electorally with every false and unmeasureable accusation.
Part of my entertainment.
moron
0
Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor:
The dems will have enough votes but he will not be convicted by the party of trump in the senate. Take note that I said the party of trump. There is no republican party anymore. The republicans have abandoned the constitution and the rule of law to be known as the party of trump and support the most corrupt administration in the history of this great country. THE GOP IS DEAD !!!
This crybaby wailing is typical now, because they realize it is not a bipartisan impeachment process, and the gig is up, DOA, another failed coup. Truth is not on your side, and you completely lack self awareness and hurt yourselves electorally with every false and unmeasureable accusation.
I know now why liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan reminds me of Elizabeth Warren...Prof. Karlan donated $1000 to the presidential campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) in July, according to to Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
data.
Karlan gave the Warren for President, Inc. campaign committee two separate $500 donations on July 29, 2019, the FEC reports.
You couldn't get a more bias witness than her and Noah Feldman with Michael
Gerhardt not far behind..
0
I know now why liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan reminds me of Elizabeth Warren...Prof. Karlan donated $1000 to the presidential campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) in July, according to to Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
data.
Karlan gave the Warren for President, Inc. campaign committee two separate $500 donations on July 29, 2019, the FEC reports.
You couldn't get a more bias witness than her and Noah Feldman with Michael
Gerhardt not far behind..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.