Man ,,,this liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan is so mad ..it looks like hear head is going to exploded..lolShe reminds me of a wannabe Elizabeth Warren..oh,, so much rage and anger toward the President..
What you saw was passion. She had to straighten out Collins for the assumption he made of these professors.
Can't wait to see these Pubes ask her a question later today. I would add that she doesn't like your boy chitting all over the constitution & will repeatedly remind the American public of his attempts to do so.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Man ,,,this liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan is so mad ..it looks like hear head is going to exploded..lolShe reminds me of a wannabe Elizabeth Warren..oh,, so much rage and anger toward the President..
What you saw was passion. She had to straighten out Collins for the assumption he made of these professors.
Can't wait to see these Pubes ask her a question later today. I would add that she doesn't like your boy chitting all over the constitution & will repeatedly remind the American public of his attempts to do so.
I don't nneed the esteemed Prof Turley running a 4.4 40.or perform jumping Jack's in front of Jerry Nadler. Have they put a statue of Prof Turley outside the room where this event is taking place?
1
I don't nneed the esteemed Prof Turley running a 4.4 40.or perform jumping Jack's in front of Jerry Nadler. Have they put a statue of Prof Turley outside the room where this event is taking place?
I know now why liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan reminds me of Elizabeth Warren...Prof. Karlan donated $1000 to the presidential campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) in July, according to to Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
data.
Karlan gave the Warren for President, Inc. campaign committee two separate $500 donations on July 29, 2019, the FEC reports.
You couldn't get a more bias witness than her and Noah Feldman with Michael
Gerhardt not far behind..
Can't believe Arizona is as dry as it is as much as you cry about crap.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
I know now why liberal Stanford Prof. Pamela Karlan reminds me of Elizabeth Warren...Prof. Karlan donated $1000 to the presidential campaign of Sen. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) in July, according to to Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
data.
Karlan gave the Warren for President, Inc. campaign committee two separate $500 donations on July 29, 2019, the FEC reports.
You couldn't get a more bias witness than her and Noah Feldman with Michael
Gerhardt not far behind..
Can't believe Arizona is as dry as it is as much as you cry about crap.
I hope that anybody who has children in any classes of Feldman, Karlan and Gerhardt will pull them out immediately and move them to the classes of the very esteemed Prof Turley. Is the statue of Turley up yet?
0
I hope that anybody who has children in any classes of Feldman, Karlan and Gerhardt will pull them out immediately and move them to the classes of the very esteemed Prof Turley. Is the statue of Turley up yet?
Matt Gaetz destroyed the 3 squishy liberal professors. Not quite Mt Rushmore like. Certainly statue worthy
Please start making a statue of Matt Gaetz and place it next to the statue of the highly esteemed Prof Turley. I want everybody to take notice of the statues of Gaetz and Turley as they leave the room at the conclusion of today's spectacle!
0
Matt Gaetz destroyed the 3 squishy liberal professors. Not quite Mt Rushmore like. Certainly statue worthy
Please start making a statue of Matt Gaetz and place it next to the statue of the highly esteemed Prof Turley. I want everybody to take notice of the statues of Gaetz and Turley as they leave the room at the conclusion of today's spectacle!
Matt Gaetz destroyed the 3 squishy liberal professors. Not quite Mt Rushmore like. Certainly statue worthy
Please start making a statue of Matt Gaetz and place it next to the statue of the highly esteemed Prof Turley. I want everybody to take notice of the statues of Gaetz and Turley as they leave the room at the conclusion of today's spectacle!
Was he sober?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Matt Gaetz destroyed the 3 squishy liberal professors. Not quite Mt Rushmore like. Certainly statue worthy
Please start making a statue of Matt Gaetz and place it next to the statue of the highly esteemed Prof Turley. I want everybody to take notice of the statues of Gaetz and Turley as they leave the room at the conclusion of today's spectacle!
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan
said before the House Judiciary Committee "The
Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the
president can namehissonBarron, he cannot make him a baron".
She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
0
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan
said before the House Judiciary Committee "The
Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the
president can namehissonBarron, he cannot make him a baron".
She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan said before the House Judiciary Committee "The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he cannot make him a baron". She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan said before the House Judiciary Committee "The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he cannot make him a baron". She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
“It has not been explained to me why you want to set the record for the
fastest impeachment,” he said. “Fast is not good on impeachment.” As for
the alleged quid pro quo, Turley said: “There is a difference between
requesting investigations and a quid pro quo. You need to stick the
landing on the quid pro quo.’
0
“It has not been explained to me why you want to set the record for the
fastest impeachment,” he said. “Fast is not good on impeachment.” As for
the alleged quid pro quo, Turley said: “There is a difference between
requesting investigations and a quid pro quo. You need to stick the
landing on the quid pro quo.’
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive
powers and privileges Karlan saying:
"Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him
the power to do anything he wants."
Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive
powers and privileges Karlan saying:
"Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him
the power to do anything he wants."
Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
Prof. Pamela Karlan was appointed by Obama to a Board to review Voting Laws that did not require her to be confirmed,but she was on a list for Supreme Court Appointees.
In Obama's estimation,like Mayor Ted,Prof Karlan has all the qualitys that make her an excellent candidate to acend to the Court as she is Self-described as a Snarky,Bi-Sexual, Jewish Woman.
0
Prof. Pamela Karlan was appointed by Obama to a Board to review Voting Laws that did not require her to be confirmed,but she was on a list for Supreme Court Appointees.
In Obama's estimation,like Mayor Ted,Prof Karlan has all the qualitys that make her an excellent candidate to acend to the Court as she is Self-described as a Snarky,Bi-Sexual, Jewish Woman.
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive powers and privileges Karlan saying: "Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him the power to do anything he wants."Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
OK Spin Doctor.
Your boy is getting impeached.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Amazing how selective your sense of humor is. BTW..she was commenting on Trump & his penchant for nepotism.
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive powers and privileges Karlan saying: "Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him the power to do anything he wants."Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan
said before the House Judiciary Committee "The
Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the
president can namehissonBarron, he cannot make him a baron".
She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
What did she say that was derogatory? Appears gaetz has made a fool of himself again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
This is how low the Democrats have dropped ..their witness Professor Pamela Karlan
said before the House Judiciary Committee "The
Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the
president can namehissonBarron, he cannot make him a baron".
She's a real Constitutional expert the Democrats have here..attacking the Presidents teenage son..pitiful.
What did she say that was derogatory? Appears gaetz has made a fool of himself again.
I'll say this in defense of the unhinged prof. Kalan's defense as an expert legal scholar,,, she doesn't think there is enough evidence to charge President Trump ...of the crimes of obstruction of
Congress or even high crimes and misdemeanors...
So why is she the Democrats Star witness? Just to take a shot at the Presidents youngest son ?“ She went out of her way to mock his son Barron and draw laughs from the room...
The Democratic
counsel, Norman Eisen, asked Karlan if there was enough evidence to
charge Trump with "the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of
Congress.
"Karlan replied that, while she agrees as a citizen, the
question extended outside the bounds of her expertise as a legal
scholar."
0
I'll say this in defense of the unhinged prof. Kalan's defense as an expert legal scholar,,, she doesn't think there is enough evidence to charge President Trump ...of the crimes of obstruction of
Congress or even high crimes and misdemeanors...
So why is she the Democrats Star witness? Just to take a shot at the Presidents youngest son ?“ She went out of her way to mock his son Barron and draw laughs from the room...
The Democratic
counsel, Norman Eisen, asked Karlan if there was enough evidence to
charge Trump with "the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of
Congress.
"Karlan replied that, while she agrees as a citizen, the
question extended outside the bounds of her expertise as a legal
scholar."
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive
powers and privileges Karlan saying:
"Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him
the power to do anything he wants."
Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
Was she correct in her assessment?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Not correct...the topic at the time was when Pamela Karlan raging against the president's assertion of broad executive
powers and privileges Karlan saying:
"Contrary to what President Trump says, Article Two does not give him
the power to do anything he wants."
Followed by her comment about... the president can name his son Barron,etc.
I'll say this in defense of the unhinged prof. Kalan's defense as an expert legal scholar,,, she doesn't think there is enough evidence to charge President Trump ...of the crimes of obstruction of
Congress or even high crimes and misdemeanors...
So why is she the Democrats Star witness? Just to take a shot at the Presidents youngest son ?“ She went out of her way to mock his son Barron and draw laughs from the room...
The Democratic
counsel, Norman Eisen, asked Karlan if there was enough evidence to
charge Trump with "the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of
Congress.
"Karlan replied that, while she agrees as a citizen, the
question extended outside the bounds of her expertise as a legal
scholar."
Well I'll say 1 thing for you slim ,you are an expert on spin in this forum but facts are outside of your area of expertise.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
I'll say this in defense of the unhinged prof. Kalan's defense as an expert legal scholar,,, she doesn't think there is enough evidence to charge President Trump ...of the crimes of obstruction of
Congress or even high crimes and misdemeanors...
So why is she the Democrats Star witness? Just to take a shot at the Presidents youngest son ?“ She went out of her way to mock his son Barron and draw laughs from the room...
The Democratic
counsel, Norman Eisen, asked Karlan if there was enough evidence to
charge Trump with "the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of
Congress.
"Karlan replied that, while she agrees as a citizen, the
question extended outside the bounds of her expertise as a legal
scholar."
Well I'll say 1 thing for you slim ,you are an expert on spin in this forum but facts are outside of your area of expertise.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.