https://www.nationalreview.com/article/354867/me-and-my-obamaphones-jillian-kay-melchior
another example of why democrats are taunted as being fiscally irresponsible
https://www.nationalreview.com/article/354867/me-and-my-obamaphones-jillian-kay-melchior
another example of why democrats are taunted as being fiscally irresponsible
https://www.nationalreview.com/article/354867/me-and-my-obamaphones-jillian-kay-melchior
another example of why democrats are taunted as being fiscally irresponsible
no, not all ills. but this was just another example. hence, the title of the thread: more evidence...
I didn't write: THE CASE guy!, or THE BIGGEST PROBLEM. no. just simply, more evidence.
and when a real life example is plainly laid out in front of you of blatant fraud, that's your response!
that is why your attitude is such a joke. you can't even respond with 'yeah that's not good', or 'yeah that should be cleaned up'. instead, you don't even address the content of the message, but you make a snide remark about the thread. thanks for exposing your complete lack of common sense, and your immaturity.
great response
no, not all ills. but this was just another example. hence, the title of the thread: more evidence...
I didn't write: THE CASE guy!, or THE BIGGEST PROBLEM. no. just simply, more evidence.
and when a real life example is plainly laid out in front of you of blatant fraud, that's your response!
that is why your attitude is such a joke. you can't even respond with 'yeah that's not good', or 'yeah that should be cleaned up'. instead, you don't even address the content of the message, but you make a snide remark about the thread. thanks for exposing your complete lack of common sense, and your immaturity.
great response
it is politically motivated!!! welfare applicants get sent voter registrations forms. who do you think that benefits? these wireless companies get an incentive for every phone they give out. now, the goal is to no longer give a means of communicating to those who can't afford it, but to give out as many phones. this leads to an abuse in tax payer money.
lets not play dumb. these handouts are all for the poor, who happen to be democratic supporters. they're buying the vote with the handout. maybe you don't care because all these votes go to the party you support.
thanks for the new info of the government being made up of a collection of parties. yes you are right: to lay blame for tax dollar misuse on one party is absurd. but in this case, this obamaphone handout fraud is at the hands of the democrats. ultimately, there's a democrat in office, and these entitlement programs benefit him. so the accountability ends with him.
way to deflect from the topic of the thread- again. two responses, two times you avoid the subject. don't bother chiming in a third time to give me some political lesson unless you want to address the problem.
it is politically motivated!!! welfare applicants get sent voter registrations forms. who do you think that benefits? these wireless companies get an incentive for every phone they give out. now, the goal is to no longer give a means of communicating to those who can't afford it, but to give out as many phones. this leads to an abuse in tax payer money.
lets not play dumb. these handouts are all for the poor, who happen to be democratic supporters. they're buying the vote with the handout. maybe you don't care because all these votes go to the party you support.
thanks for the new info of the government being made up of a collection of parties. yes you are right: to lay blame for tax dollar misuse on one party is absurd. but in this case, this obamaphone handout fraud is at the hands of the democrats. ultimately, there's a democrat in office, and these entitlement programs benefit him. so the accountability ends with him.
way to deflect from the topic of the thread- again. two responses, two times you avoid the subject. don't bother chiming in a third time to give me some political lesson unless you want to address the problem.
my goodness... it's no secret dems are the party of 'giving to the poor' and the republicans are the ones that want to instill some fiscal discipline on entitlements. that point is not even debatable. yet when one of those entitlement programs displays any notion of fiscal irresponsibility all the libs jump in with the 'well democrats aren't the only party in the government' comments in order to spread some of the blame around.
thanks for the entertainment libtards
my goodness... it's no secret dems are the party of 'giving to the poor' and the republicans are the ones that want to instill some fiscal discipline on entitlements. that point is not even debatable. yet when one of those entitlement programs displays any notion of fiscal irresponsibility all the libs jump in with the 'well democrats aren't the only party in the government' comments in order to spread some of the blame around.
thanks for the entertainment libtards
darkhorse-
paid for out of the usf fund... well where do you think they get that money? from people like me who pay for their cell phone and incur excess taxes to enable this program to exist
and today, there's rampant fraud involving these cell phones. people apply and receive multiple phones (illegal, and verified in my link in post #1) and trade their excess phones for other goods. https://headlinedigest.com/2013/06/obama-phones-given-to-to-people-who-sell-them-for-drugs-cash-video/
just like the food stamp purchases that the recipients send overseas
https://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/it_on_y22owkLpsldSAjDVC9isjM
the fraud is rampant. the taxpayer is paying for it. the dems promote the entitlements to secure votes. that is their M.O.
darkhorse-
paid for out of the usf fund... well where do you think they get that money? from people like me who pay for their cell phone and incur excess taxes to enable this program to exist
and today, there's rampant fraud involving these cell phones. people apply and receive multiple phones (illegal, and verified in my link in post #1) and trade their excess phones for other goods. https://headlinedigest.com/2013/06/obama-phones-given-to-to-people-who-sell-them-for-drugs-cash-video/
just like the food stamp purchases that the recipients send overseas
https://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/it_on_y22owkLpsldSAjDVC9isjM
the fraud is rampant. the taxpayer is paying for it. the dems promote the entitlements to secure votes. that is their M.O.
yeah just like you can't even chime in with- yeah the fraud is repulsive and I don't agree with it. 3 posts now in this thread, yet, you can't even address the topic with neutrality. instead, throwing the one group that is trying to get control of the entitlement issue, under the bus.
"blinders in your eyes"
yeah just like you can't even chime in with- yeah the fraud is repulsive and I don't agree with it. 3 posts now in this thread, yet, you can't even address the topic with neutrality. instead, throwing the one group that is trying to get control of the entitlement issue, under the bus.
"blinders in your eyes"
yeah just like you can't even chime in with- yeah the fraud is repulsive and I don't agree with it. 3 posts now in this thread, yet, you can't even address the topic with neutrality. instead, throwing the one group that is trying to get control of the entitlement issue, under the bus.
"blinders in your eyes"
yeah just like you can't even chime in with- yeah the fraud is repulsive and I don't agree with it. 3 posts now in this thread, yet, you can't even address the topic with neutrality. instead, throwing the one group that is trying to get control of the entitlement issue, under the bus.
"blinders in your eyes"
the entitlement industry that the democrats champion in order to secure votes is what perpetuates the fraud. ebt and obamaphone (yes, cell phones started under bush) fraud is what I gave concrete examples of. just like a coach or gm is ultimately accountable for a teams' wins and losses (and not always the players), if you got a democratic president that won the election due to the amount of supporters that receive entitlements, he should be held accountable.
do you not agree with the generalization that democrats endorse the entitlement programs while republicans are seen as the meanies that are trying to take them away? (which I believe they don't, they just want it under control).
the entitlement industry that the democrats champion in order to secure votes is what perpetuates the fraud. ebt and obamaphone (yes, cell phones started under bush) fraud is what I gave concrete examples of. just like a coach or gm is ultimately accountable for a teams' wins and losses (and not always the players), if you got a democratic president that won the election due to the amount of supporters that receive entitlements, he should be held accountable.
do you not agree with the generalization that democrats endorse the entitlement programs while republicans are seen as the meanies that are trying to take them away? (which I believe they don't, they just want it under control).
moronic thread? so your saying this abuse of the obamaphone is not a fiscal problem? the obamphone abuse is an entitlement promoted by liberals. thus, if there is fraud with obamaphones, the libs are accountable.
that is not to say there isn't a republican with a pet project that wastes tax payer money. but that's not what the thread was about. the thread was about obamaphones.
moronic thread? so your saying this abuse of the obamaphone is not a fiscal problem? the obamphone abuse is an entitlement promoted by liberals. thus, if there is fraud with obamaphones, the libs are accountable.
that is not to say there isn't a republican with a pet project that wastes tax payer money. but that's not what the thread was about. the thread was about obamaphones.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.