San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, Brussels, Egypt Air, Bangladesh, Nice, and now Munich...
Is Brasil next?
Munich attack was repulsive. Facts are reported through Wash DC distortions (calling the 18 yr old a "German--Iranian teen" and a "loner"
Yet this is a very UNDERMAN act so he is not German. According to the UK press, there was a Facebook ad posted BEFORE the attack advertising a free food giveaway at that McDonalds, in an apparent attempt to maximize attendance and carnage. An eyewitness to the shootings heard him shout "Allah Akbar" and he found "easy targets in the children because they didn't know what to do...they didn't know how to run or hide..."
NONE OF THESE ACTS ARE ISOLATED EVENTS.
THERE ARE NO ISOLATED EVENTS IN LIFE OR IN THIS UNIVERSE EVER.
EVERY ACT LIKE THIS IS CONNECTED to POLITICAL DECISIONS, TO OUR MILITARY INVOLVEMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST, TO OUR LACK OF RESOLVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
THESE SUICIDAL TERROR ATROCITIES OF BUTCHERING CHILDREN AND RUNNING THEM OVER WITH TRUCKS WILL CONTINUE AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK FOR YEARS TO COME.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, Brussels, Egypt Air, Bangladesh, Nice, and now Munich...
Is Brasil next?
Munich attack was repulsive. Facts are reported through Wash DC distortions (calling the 18 yr old a "German--Iranian teen" and a "loner"
Yet this is a very UNDERMAN act so he is not German. According to the UK press, there was a Facebook ad posted BEFORE the attack advertising a free food giveaway at that McDonalds, in an apparent attempt to maximize attendance and carnage. An eyewitness to the shootings heard him shout "Allah Akbar" and he found "easy targets in the children because they didn't know what to do...they didn't know how to run or hide..."
NONE OF THESE ACTS ARE ISOLATED EVENTS.
THERE ARE NO ISOLATED EVENTS IN LIFE OR IN THIS UNIVERSE EVER.
EVERY ACT LIKE THIS IS CONNECTED to POLITICAL DECISIONS, TO OUR MILITARY INVOLVEMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST, TO OUR LACK OF RESOLVE IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
THESE SUICIDAL TERROR ATROCITIES OF BUTCHERING CHILDREN AND RUNNING THEM OVER WITH TRUCKS WILL CONTINUE AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK FOR YEARS TO COME.
You cannot convince someone the world is a sphere because he looks out his window and sees that it is flat. The fool needs to persist in his folly until he sees the truth for himself--if he gets there.
You cannot convince politicians and their peeps and sheeps that multiculturalism is failing in France, Germany, the UK and the US, and that military adventurism in the Midldle East is oneway going to have a backlash of angry and extremist Muslims in our own homelands....and that oneway is RIGHT NOW....No, the fools need to elect Hillary and continue Obama's globalist multicultural hegemony "because slavery is freedom, ignorance is bliss ..."(G. Orwell)
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
0
You cannot convince someone the world is a sphere because he looks out his window and sees that it is flat. The fool needs to persist in his folly until he sees the truth for himself--if he gets there.
You cannot convince politicians and their peeps and sheeps that multiculturalism is failing in France, Germany, the UK and the US, and that military adventurism in the Midldle East is oneway going to have a backlash of angry and extremist Muslims in our own homelands....and that oneway is RIGHT NOW....No, the fools need to elect Hillary and continue Obama's globalist multicultural hegemony "because slavery is freedom, ignorance is bliss ..."(G. Orwell)
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The quest for security and feelings of insecurity are the same thing.
The terrorist atrocities and murdered children of infidels will continue, since ISIS knows Obama is a cloaked Muslim and in his last year in office and will not link these attacks and will allow us to continue to enter as refugees so our planned takeover will continue as strong as ever. Death to infidels! Moderate Muslims are secretly glad the extremists are taking it to us.
0
The terrorist atrocities and murdered children of infidels will continue, since ISIS knows Obama is a cloaked Muslim and in his last year in office and will not link these attacks and will allow us to continue to enter as refugees so our planned takeover will continue as strong as ever. Death to infidels! Moderate Muslims are secretly glad the extremists are taking it to us.
American "Nation of Islam" and "Black LivesMatter" are fighting for African Americans. Obama is letting them talk and protest and the very name black lives matter implicates there actually is racism-- which is why the name was chosen. Group was founded by black Muslim student groups, and current president pulls in six figures. Obama is inspiring them
0
American "Nation of Islam" and "Black LivesMatter" are fighting for African Americans. Obama is letting them talk and protest and the very name black lives matter implicates there actually is racism-- which is why the name was chosen. Group was founded by black Muslim student groups, and current president pulls in six figures. Obama is inspiring them
"pigs in a blanket" is what Dallas protesters were shouting out. Most protesters organized via social media. Killer was linked to BLM and other extremist racist hate groups. The crowd got their wish. Five white officers killed.
0
"pigs in a blanket" is what Dallas protesters were shouting out. Most protesters organized via social media. Killer was linked to BLM and other extremist racist hate groups. The crowd got their wish. Five white officers killed.
"pigs in a blanket" is what Dallas protesters were shouting out. Most protesters organized via social media. Killer was linked to BLM and other extremist racist hate groups. The crowd got their wish. Five white officers killed.
0
"pigs in a blanket" is what Dallas protesters were shouting out. Most protesters organized via social media. Killer was linked to BLM and other extremist racist hate groups. The crowd got their wish. Five white officers killed.
I Lived more than six years in Germany. It is nearly impossible to get any gun in Germany let alone a rifle. Plus they are expensive, likely thousands. And he's an 18 yt old. Very very connected ....
0
I Lived more than six years in Germany. It is nearly impossible to get any gun in Germany let alone a rifle. Plus they are expensive, likely thousands. And he's an 18 yt old. Very very connected ....
"It is better to suffer terrorism now and then, and to respond with love and forgiveness, than to have the perception we are intolerant of other religions, or that we are racist --God forbid! Let's see where all this multiculturalism leads us! No more white wonder worlds of privilege! one world because we are all equal!!!" LIBERALISM IS TRULY A MENTAL DISORDER
0
"It is better to suffer terrorism now and then, and to respond with love and forgiveness, than to have the perception we are intolerant of other religions, or that we are racist --God forbid! Let's see where all this multiculturalism leads us! No more white wonder worlds of privilege! one world because we are all equal!!!" LIBERALISM IS TRULY A MENTAL DISORDER
That costs a lot of money and makes plenty of enemies. I know I would not be happy if I saw some other country's armed military personnel in my day-to-day travels throughout the city.
0
The Middle East was MUCH more peaceful before Babushka attacked Iraq and replaced stability with chaos.
Obama has done little to scale back the presence of America's military - the U.S. currently has its military deployed in more than 150 countries.
That costs a lot of money and makes plenty of enemies. I know I would not be happy if I saw some other country's armed military personnel in my day-to-day travels throughout the city.
That costs a lot of money and makes plenty of enemies. I know I would not be happy if I saw some other country's armed military personnel in my day-to-day travels throughout the city.
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
That costs a lot of money and makes plenty of enemies. I know I would not be happy if I saw some other country's armed military personnel in my day-to-day travels throughout the city.
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
The neo-con intervention in the Middle East has led to chaos. This began after 09-11. Decades will pass now, and there will be no peace in that region for decades more. No-one knows which side to back. The "democratic" rulers turn in to despots and control with an iron fist by necessity. The people are historically TRIBAL, and voting for laws and regulations is not culturally appropriate for them. They copy western style administrating because it appears to be a functioning model that is pragmatic, and they hire western companies and personnel to be in charge of just about everything. Assad should have been overthrown but the Russians drew a line in the sand. They have always supported Assad, and they did not want to see an American disaster in Syria like what was seen in IRAQ--the Russians blame the US for the disaster that was once IRAQ. Assad and his military are butchers with no control. Everyone in SYRIA knows someone who has been killed. They live with fear everyday they could be killed. The Russian air force was sloppy in its bombing (much worse than US airstrikes) and killed scores of people in open air markets. We are paying the price for IRAQ a thousand times. But it isn't a clean win or loss situation. This is a SLOW drawn out LOSS. Our military is still there. We are in a battle now that is being brought to our homelands, and no-one in the US is addicting it. We have no leadership. It truly is as grim as this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
The neo-con intervention in the Middle East has led to chaos. This began after 09-11. Decades will pass now, and there will be no peace in that region for decades more. No-one knows which side to back. The "democratic" rulers turn in to despots and control with an iron fist by necessity. The people are historically TRIBAL, and voting for laws and regulations is not culturally appropriate for them. They copy western style administrating because it appears to be a functioning model that is pragmatic, and they hire western companies and personnel to be in charge of just about everything. Assad should have been overthrown but the Russians drew a line in the sand. They have always supported Assad, and they did not want to see an American disaster in Syria like what was seen in IRAQ--the Russians blame the US for the disaster that was once IRAQ. Assad and his military are butchers with no control. Everyone in SYRIA knows someone who has been killed. They live with fear everyday they could be killed. The Russian air force was sloppy in its bombing (much worse than US airstrikes) and killed scores of people in open air markets. We are paying the price for IRAQ a thousand times. But it isn't a clean win or loss situation. This is a SLOW drawn out LOSS. Our military is still there. We are in a battle now that is being brought to our homelands, and no-one in the US is addicting it. We have no leadership. It truly is as grim as this.
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
Exactly. They are our military's welfare load.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Other countries rely on the U.S. military to intervene in controversial situations on behalf of them and welcome us there as a bitter sweet necessity..without our presence they would go broke funding their own military protection.
8 years later it's still all Bush's fault. I promise you after Trump is elected in 3 years it will not be Obama's fault. It will be Trump using common sense and American values to cure the country of 8 years of this Islamic sympathizer if not outright supporter. Didn't the Obama Administration trumpet the Arab Spring? President Rainbow was thrilled with the Muslim Brotherhood taking over, he even armed them! How about Libya? Him and the witch overthrew Quadaffi (he was no angel) but where'd it get Libya? Keep blaming Bush...
0
8 years later it's still all Bush's fault. I promise you after Trump is elected in 3 years it will not be Obama's fault. It will be Trump using common sense and American values to cure the country of 8 years of this Islamic sympathizer if not outright supporter. Didn't the Obama Administration trumpet the Arab Spring? President Rainbow was thrilled with the Muslim Brotherhood taking over, he even armed them! How about Libya? Him and the witch overthrew Quadaffi (he was no angel) but where'd it get Libya? Keep blaming Bush...
The neo-con intervention in the Middle East has led to chaos. This began after 09-11. Decades will pass now, and there will be no peace in that region for decades more. No-one knows which side to back. The "democratic" rulers turn in to despots and control with an iron fist by necessity. The people are historically TRIBAL, and voting for laws and regulations is not culturally appropriate for them. They copy western style administrating because it appears to be a functioning model that is pragmatic, and they hire western companies and personnel to be in charge of just about everything. Assad should have been overthrown but the Russians drew a line in the sand. They have always supported Assad, and they did not want to see an American disaster in Syria like what was seen in IRAQ--the Russians blame the US for the disaster that was once IRAQ. Assad and his military are butchers with no control. Everyone in SYRIA knows someone who has been killed. They live with fear everyday they could be killed. The Russian air force was sloppy in its bombing (much worse than US airstrikes) and killed scores of people in open air markets. We are paying the price for IRAQ a thousand times. But it isn't a clean win or loss situation. This is a SLOW drawn out LOSS. Our military is still there. We are in a battle now that is being brought to our homelands, and no-one in the US is addicting it. We have no leadership. It truly is as grim as this.
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
The neo-con intervention in the Middle East has led to chaos. This began after 09-11. Decades will pass now, and there will be no peace in that region for decades more. No-one knows which side to back. The "democratic" rulers turn in to despots and control with an iron fist by necessity. The people are historically TRIBAL, and voting for laws and regulations is not culturally appropriate for them. They copy western style administrating because it appears to be a functioning model that is pragmatic, and they hire western companies and personnel to be in charge of just about everything. Assad should have been overthrown but the Russians drew a line in the sand. They have always supported Assad, and they did not want to see an American disaster in Syria like what was seen in IRAQ--the Russians blame the US for the disaster that was once IRAQ. Assad and his military are butchers with no control. Everyone in SYRIA knows someone who has been killed. They live with fear everyday they could be killed. The Russian air force was sloppy in its bombing (much worse than US airstrikes) and killed scores of people in open air markets. We are paying the price for IRAQ a thousand times. But it isn't a clean win or loss situation. This is a SLOW drawn out LOSS. Our military is still there. We are in a battle now that is being brought to our homelands, and no-one in the US is addicting it. We have no leadership. It truly is as grim as this.
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
Who is the 2009 Fort Hood Shooting by a "US soldier" Hidal Nassan who became a jihadist and traitor and killed 11, and there is proof there were emails to Yemeni and Al quad terrorists, and there were WARNING SIGNS he was becoming "radicalized"....WHY IS THIS NEVER CALLED TERRORISM BY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS EVEN TO THIS DAY?????????
ASK YOURSELF, if all the victims are asking for this to be admitted by OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS and they refuse to call it terorism, and from DAY ONE they called it "workplace violence "
ASK YOURSELF WHY.
Don't let me, or any "right winger" (and I am not right of a left, I am choosing a side of an issue that is UP, rather than down, and opposite of left.
To spell it out for you, Trump is right, that Obama has never called out Muslim terrorists, and there is a conspiracy of globalism, multiculturalism and political correctness, and connections to Saudi Arabia that are pulling decisions to be made. Read up on the case, which has been made a documentary on HBO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
Who is the 2009 Fort Hood Shooting by a "US soldier" Hidal Nassan who became a jihadist and traitor and killed 11, and there is proof there were emails to Yemeni and Al quad terrorists, and there were WARNING SIGNS he was becoming "radicalized"....WHY IS THIS NEVER CALLED TERRORISM BY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS EVEN TO THIS DAY?????????
ASK YOURSELF, if all the victims are asking for this to be admitted by OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS and they refuse to call it terorism, and from DAY ONE they called it "workplace violence "
ASK YOURSELF WHY.
Don't let me, or any "right winger" (and I am not right of a left, I am choosing a side of an issue that is UP, rather than down, and opposite of left.
To spell it out for you, Trump is right, that Obama has never called out Muslim terrorists, and there is a conspiracy of globalism, multiculturalism and political correctness, and connections to Saudi Arabia that are pulling decisions to be made. Read up on the case, which has been made a documentary on HBO.
The Nassan case is relevant because he is facing the death penalty. He is still a tenacious muslim and was wearing a beard in court the other day. Muslims wear beards. He is being tried in military court. Why is he allowed to wear a beard if he is still in the military?
Why is this still considered by Obama as "domestic workplace violence"?
WHY?
If a right winger cares about security and protecting his and your way of life, why is this considered EXCLUSIONARY and RACIST?
Obama is a muslim, is not a crazy allegation anymore.
He does not want Hassan to be labeled a muslim terrrorist for obvious reasons. You tell me why, or explain this away for me. I am listening, seriously. I think and hope we BOTH care about terrorism and protecting our soldiers, our children from violence like Nassan committed.
0
The Nassan case is relevant because he is facing the death penalty. He is still a tenacious muslim and was wearing a beard in court the other day. Muslims wear beards. He is being tried in military court. Why is he allowed to wear a beard if he is still in the military?
Why is this still considered by Obama as "domestic workplace violence"?
WHY?
If a right winger cares about security and protecting his and your way of life, why is this considered EXCLUSIONARY and RACIST?
Obama is a muslim, is not a crazy allegation anymore.
He does not want Hassan to be labeled a muslim terrrorist for obvious reasons. You tell me why, or explain this away for me. I am listening, seriously. I think and hope we BOTH care about terrorism and protecting our soldiers, our children from violence like Nassan committed.
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
The action I espouse is not military action of taking out Sadam Hussein. It would involve stopping the flow of money to terrorists by Saudi Arabian "welfare and charity organization" that are not mosques helping peoplee, but terrorist training cells. I espouse keeping people out of our country who are involved with terrorists, and firing people who have evidence and DO NOT ACT on the evidence, as happened in the Nassan Fort Hood case.
That is action!!!!
I do not believe in allowing Syrian refugees in to this country.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
The action I espouse is not military action of taking out Sadam Hussein. It would involve stopping the flow of money to terrorists by Saudi Arabian "welfare and charity organization" that are not mosques helping peoplee, but terrorist training cells. I espouse keeping people out of our country who are involved with terrorists, and firing people who have evidence and DO NOT ACT on the evidence, as happened in the Nassan Fort Hood case.
That is action!!!!
I do not believe in allowing Syrian refugees in to this country.
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
I have nothing in common religiously with the moral majority, Jerry Falwell bible fundamentalists--NOTHING. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe in defense for our Defense Department, and security (it's needed), but I detest bomb droppings that killed 350,000 in Vietnam and destroyed their environment and altered millions of lives including our veterans FOREVER; and I knew the Iraq war would lead to killing of nearly one million and lead to Muslims hating America--and also vets would commit suicide and Wednesday there for decades---all pointless. (So I'm a right winger?)
I do not believe the state should kill people (death penalty), because they make mistakes, and the state should do policing, not killing. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe in protecting the environment and planet as a priority. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe students should learn at least two languages in elementary school and practice real multiculturalism. (So I'm a right winger?)
The label made me depressed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Let's presume for a moment that you are actually making a point. You criticize Obama for inaction, you acknowledge that instability is inherent regardless of action, and you are critical of involvement.
In other words, no solutions. You sound very much like a typical right winger.
I have nothing in common religiously with the moral majority, Jerry Falwell bible fundamentalists--NOTHING. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe in defense for our Defense Department, and security (it's needed), but I detest bomb droppings that killed 350,000 in Vietnam and destroyed their environment and altered millions of lives including our veterans FOREVER; and I knew the Iraq war would lead to killing of nearly one million and lead to Muslims hating America--and also vets would commit suicide and Wednesday there for decades---all pointless. (So I'm a right winger?)
I do not believe the state should kill people (death penalty), because they make mistakes, and the state should do policing, not killing. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe in protecting the environment and planet as a priority. (So I'm a right winger?)
I believe students should learn at least two languages in elementary school and practice real multiculturalism. (So I'm a right winger?)
There is nothing about you that screams moderate or even handed. (your opinion--and you are NOT aware of current events and you do not read very carefully I can tell, but ok)
You espouse every right wing talking a point when it comes to Obama. (Did you answer my question to you? No. Asked you what YOU think about Obama putting pressure on the Fort Hood investigation to NOT call it terrorism by islam extremist, but call it domestic workplace violence--do you agree with Obama?)
Your plan of action is to limit funds to Saudi ((No, you do not appear to understand how saudi government and culture function; Saudi Royal Family writes checks to the who ask for money and the government has zero accountability who they fund; they funded ll of the 9-11 terrorists. STOP allowing the SAUDIS to fund terrorists by allowing the 9-11 families of victims to SUE the Saudi government; OBAMA did NOT allow the families to sue the Saudi government because he is PROTECTING the Saudis))and ban Syria refugees (This sends a message that arabs will listen to because they all dream of getting out of their filthy deplorable living conditions and have freedom to go to Europe or America; showing resolve by limiting visas and SCRUTINIZING refugees is PARAMOUNT; Obama is disallowing background checks out of "economic and emergency" reasons)?
And that is going to stop ISIS attacks in other countries? How exactly? (Israel knows how to deal with Muslim mindset and terrorists, they hurt them where it counts, and they do not soften their stance. Being soft will NOT WORK ever; terrorists will be under pressure to stop by their own kind when visas are being limited--absolutely!!!)
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
There is nothing about you that screams moderate or even handed. (your opinion--and you are NOT aware of current events and you do not read very carefully I can tell, but ok)
You espouse every right wing talking a point when it comes to Obama. (Did you answer my question to you? No. Asked you what YOU think about Obama putting pressure on the Fort Hood investigation to NOT call it terrorism by islam extremist, but call it domestic workplace violence--do you agree with Obama?)
Your plan of action is to limit funds to Saudi ((No, you do not appear to understand how saudi government and culture function; Saudi Royal Family writes checks to the who ask for money and the government has zero accountability who they fund; they funded ll of the 9-11 terrorists. STOP allowing the SAUDIS to fund terrorists by allowing the 9-11 families of victims to SUE the Saudi government; OBAMA did NOT allow the families to sue the Saudi government because he is PROTECTING the Saudis))and ban Syria refugees (This sends a message that arabs will listen to because they all dream of getting out of their filthy deplorable living conditions and have freedom to go to Europe or America; showing resolve by limiting visas and SCRUTINIZING refugees is PARAMOUNT; Obama is disallowing background checks out of "economic and emergency" reasons)?
And that is going to stop ISIS attacks in other countries? How exactly? (Israel knows how to deal with Muslim mindset and terrorists, they hurt them where it counts, and they do not soften their stance. Being soft will NOT WORK ever; terrorists will be under pressure to stop by their own kind when visas are being limited--absolutely!!!)
This is almost comical. The problem with someone like you is you attempt to make up for your lack of intellect by reading breibart and its progeny and attempting to articulate a position. The problem with that, among others, is that you are debating a live human so you cannot fall back on talking points.
You repeatedly bring up Saudi. You realize that ISIS is not Al Qaeda (AQ) right? So its the talking points thing again. In fact, Saudi is fighting ISIS. The reason is difficult for simply minds to process but goes back to understanding the ongoing battle between Sunni and Shiites (which has been a thousand year war, but most typified by the Iraq/Iran War). It is also why Saudi was a financier of AQ.
Look, I get it. You see Obama as evil and the Republicans as good (you realize almost all Republicans supported the Iraq War right).
Here's a little antidote for you. Only a sith and extremist speaks in absolutes. You disagree with Obama. I get it. It does not mean he's evil. Bush started the domino in the middle east. He's not evil either.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
This is almost comical. The problem with someone like you is you attempt to make up for your lack of intellect by reading breibart and its progeny and attempting to articulate a position. The problem with that, among others, is that you are debating a live human so you cannot fall back on talking points.
You repeatedly bring up Saudi. You realize that ISIS is not Al Qaeda (AQ) right? So its the talking points thing again. In fact, Saudi is fighting ISIS. The reason is difficult for simply minds to process but goes back to understanding the ongoing battle between Sunni and Shiites (which has been a thousand year war, but most typified by the Iraq/Iran War). It is also why Saudi was a financier of AQ.
Look, I get it. You see Obama as evil and the Republicans as good (you realize almost all Republicans supported the Iraq War right).
Here's a little antidote for you. Only a sith and extremist speaks in absolutes. You disagree with Obama. I get it. It does not mean he's evil. Bush started the domino in the middle east. He's not evil either.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
