Don't the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. primarily eat fresh fish they catch in the ocean? So, they're O.K. with Kim-Jong-D!ckhead detonating a missle into it every month or so? I'm not a food regulations expert either, but I wouldn't want to eat anything from hundreds of miles from wherever it blows up, especially if I'm not going to cook it.
You would think that would be reason enough for those bordering countries to shut this jack@$$ down, but no. As usual, it will be up to us to save the world from itself, and be universally hated for it.....
Thoughts?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Don't the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. primarily eat fresh fish they catch in the ocean? So, they're O.K. with Kim-Jong-D!ckhead detonating a missle into it every month or so? I'm not a food regulations expert either, but I wouldn't want to eat anything from hundreds of miles from wherever it blows up, especially if I'm not going to cook it.
You would think that would be reason enough for those bordering countries to shut this jack@$$ down, but no. As usual, it will be up to us to save the world from itself, and be universally hated for it.....
It is my understanding (resulting from an extensive two minute google search) these missles do not threaten marine life in the area. The fuel is spent before the missiles drop into the ocean, any fuel that does remain is dilluted to insignificant levels in the ocean. They are unarmed missiles no danger of nuclear contamination.
Apparently environmental groups in south korea have been keeping track of this stuff.
0
It is my understanding (resulting from an extensive two minute google search) these missles do not threaten marine life in the area. The fuel is spent before the missiles drop into the ocean, any fuel that does remain is dilluted to insignificant levels in the ocean. They are unarmed missiles no danger of nuclear contamination.
Apparently environmental groups in south korea have been keeping track of this stuff.
When these missiles splash down in the Pacific the disturbence makes the spot contain LESS radioactive then the surrounding area.The western Pacific maintains a steady level of radioactive ongoing from Fouqashima Reactor,Japan.
0
When these missiles splash down in the Pacific the disturbence makes the spot contain LESS radioactive then the surrounding area.The western Pacific maintains a steady level of radioactive ongoing from Fouqashima Reactor,Japan.
It is my understanding (resulting from an extensive two minute google search) these missles do not threaten marine life in the area. The fuel is spent before the missiles drop into the ocean, any fuel that does remain is dilluted to insignificant levels in the ocean. They are unarmed missiles no danger of nuclear contamination.
Apparently environmental groups in south korea have been keeping track of this stuff.
I find it funny and ironic that literally a few hours after I posted this originally, I flip on the news to see that Kim-Jong-Idiot launched another one that lands a couple hundred miles from Russia.....
You can show me all the "studies", "research", and "theories" you want. I'll still say a friggin' missle launched into the ocean can't possibly be good for the environment.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
It is my understanding (resulting from an extensive two minute google search) these missles do not threaten marine life in the area. The fuel is spent before the missiles drop into the ocean, any fuel that does remain is dilluted to insignificant levels in the ocean. They are unarmed missiles no danger of nuclear contamination.
Apparently environmental groups in south korea have been keeping track of this stuff.
I find it funny and ironic that literally a few hours after I posted this originally, I flip on the news to see that Kim-Jong-Idiot launched another one that lands a couple hundred miles from Russia.....
You can show me all the "studies", "research", and "theories" you want. I'll still say a friggin' missle launched into the ocean can't possibly be good for the environment.....
I find it funny and ironic that literally a few hours after I posted this originally, I flip on the news to see that Kim-Jong-Idiot launched another one that lands a couple hundred miles from Russia.....
You can show me all the "studies", "research", and "theories" you want. I'll still say a friggin' missle launched into the ocean can't possibly be good for the environment.....
As opposed to any if the other f#cked up environmental situations going on in east asia? From Fukushima fallout in Japan to just about everything in China, I don't thing they're worried about empty missiles falling in the ocean. There are villages in China where they have mountains of burning plastic and you're talking about empty missiles falling in the ocean.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:
I find it funny and ironic that literally a few hours after I posted this originally, I flip on the news to see that Kim-Jong-Idiot launched another one that lands a couple hundred miles from Russia.....
You can show me all the "studies", "research", and "theories" you want. I'll still say a friggin' missle launched into the ocean can't possibly be good for the environment.....
As opposed to any if the other f#cked up environmental situations going on in east asia? From Fukushima fallout in Japan to just about everything in China, I don't thing they're worried about empty missiles falling in the ocean. There are villages in China where they have mountains of burning plastic and you're talking about empty missiles falling in the ocean.
As opposed to any if the other f#cked up environmental situations going on in east asia? From Fukushima fallout in Japan to just about everything in China, I don't thing they're worried about empty missiles falling in the ocean. There are villages in China where they have mountains of burning plastic and you're talking about empty missiles falling in the ocean.
The US said it terminated flight just 96 kilometers (60 miles) from the Russian port city of Vladivostock, whereas the Russian Defense Ministry said it landed 500 kilometers (311 miles) from its Pacific coast line.
All I know is that if Mexico fired off a "test" missle and it landed 60 miles from, say, San Pedro, I'm pretty sure we'd do something about it.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
As opposed to any if the other f#cked up environmental situations going on in east asia? From Fukushima fallout in Japan to just about everything in China, I don't thing they're worried about empty missiles falling in the ocean. There are villages in China where they have mountains of burning plastic and you're talking about empty missiles falling in the ocean.
The US said it terminated flight just 96 kilometers (60 miles) from the Russian port city of Vladivostock, whereas the Russian Defense Ministry said it landed 500 kilometers (311 miles) from its Pacific coast line.
All I know is that if Mexico fired off a "test" missle and it landed 60 miles from, say, San Pedro, I'm pretty sure we'd do something about it.....
The US said it terminated flight just 96 kilometers (60 miles) from the Russian port city of Vladivostock, whereas the Russian Defense Ministry said it landed 500 kilometers (311 miles) from its Pacific coast line.
All I know is that if Mexico fired off a "test" missle and it landed 60 miles from, say, San Pedro, I'm pretty sure we'd do something about it.....
Good thing we're supposedly spending billions on a wall so that we'll never have to worry about this scenario....
The US said it terminated flight just 96 kilometers (60 miles) from the Russian port city of Vladivostock, whereas the Russian Defense Ministry said it landed 500 kilometers (311 miles) from its Pacific coast line.
All I know is that if Mexico fired off a "test" missle and it landed 60 miles from, say, San Pedro, I'm pretty sure we'd do something about it.....
Good thing we're supposedly spending billions on a wall so that we'll never have to worry about this scenario....
Good thing we're supposedly spending billions on a wall so that we'll never have to worry about this scenario....
Ha. A wall thst will never be built just like the health care reform that will never happen. Trump never planned on doing any of this. All lies to get the whiny liberals rattled so that they pay less attention to Trumps true intentions. Namely, tax cuts for the rich and bank deregulation.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Good thing we're supposedly spending billions on a wall so that we'll never have to worry about this scenario....
Ha. A wall thst will never be built just like the health care reform that will never happen. Trump never planned on doing any of this. All lies to get the whiny liberals rattled so that they pay less attention to Trumps true intentions. Namely, tax cuts for the rich and bank deregulation.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
