Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: KEY FACT: In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost. There are obvious reasons why this makes perfect sense! *In mid-October, this unique indicator has been a near 100% predictive model !Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l trump's job approval numbers,as of AUGUST 14: -11.5 (seems to be steady in the 10 to 12 range) Even the new FOX NEWS poll has trump -9 However, among *MODERATES* trump is -22
trump cant win if his approval stays so low
True.
Ten of the last 10 *INCUMBENT* re-elections have shown that it depends on net approval ratings.
Trump is the ONLY president in modern times who has NEVER achieved a 50% approval rating from among an average of several polls in the same period
Likewise he has NEVER achieved a net positive approval/disapproval rating among an average of several polls in the same period.
Another first. Can't win unless those numbers flip.
5
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: KEY FACT: In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost. There are obvious reasons why this makes perfect sense! *In mid-October, this unique indicator has been a near 100% predictive model !Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l trump's job approval numbers,as of AUGUST 14: -11.5 (seems to be steady in the 10 to 12 range) Even the new FOX NEWS poll has trump -9 However, among *MODERATES* trump is -22
trump cant win if his approval stays so low
True.
Ten of the last 10 *INCUMBENT* re-elections have shown that it depends on net approval ratings.
Trump is the ONLY president in modern times who has NEVER achieved a 50% approval rating from among an average of several polls in the same period
Likewise he has NEVER achieved a net positive approval/disapproval rating among an average of several polls in the same period.
Another first. Can't win unless those numbers flip.
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president hadpositive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
There are obvious reasons why this makes perfect sense!
*In mid-October, this unique indicator has been a near 100% predictive model ! Read source:https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l
trump's job approval numbers, as of AUGUST 25: -11.2
(holding fairly steady in the negative 10 to 12 range)
7
KEY FACT:
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president hadpositive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
There are obvious reasons why this makes perfect sense!
*In mid-October, this unique indicator has been a near 100% predictive model ! Read source:https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l
trump's job approval numbers, as of AUGUST 25: -11.2
(holding fairly steady in the negative 10 to 12 range)
Washington (CNN) The Democratic National Convention took over the conversation surrounding the presidential race this week, and more Americans had positive things to say about the party's nominee -- former Vice President Joe Biden -- than at any point in the last eight weeks.
These findings come from The Breakthrough, a project from CNN, SSRS and researchers from Georgetown University and the University of Michigan asking Americans what they have heard, read or seen about each of the presidential candidates lately. The survey was in the field beginning the second day of the convention and continued through Sunday night.
The number of people who spoke positively about Biden jumped sharply, and outpaced negative responses: there were about 1.6 positive responses for every negative response, the highest ratio so far.
At the same time, President Donald Trump's ratio of positive to negative sentiment dipped to its lowest point since early July when the project began tracking - - fewer than one positive response was recorded for each negative response.
6
Positivity on Biden hits high
Washington (CNN) The Democratic National Convention took over the conversation surrounding the presidential race this week, and more Americans had positive things to say about the party's nominee -- former Vice President Joe Biden -- than at any point in the last eight weeks.
These findings come from The Breakthrough, a project from CNN, SSRS and researchers from Georgetown University and the University of Michigan asking Americans what they have heard, read or seen about each of the presidential candidates lately. The survey was in the field beginning the second day of the convention and continued through Sunday night.
The number of people who spoke positively about Biden jumped sharply, and outpaced negative responses: there were about 1.6 positive responses for every negative response, the highest ratio so far.
At the same time, President Donald Trump's ratio of positive to negative sentiment dipped to its lowest point since early July when the project began tracking - - fewer than one positive response was recorded for each negative response.
Positivity on Biden hits high Washington (CNN) The Democratic National Convention took over the conversation surrounding the presidential race this week, and more Americans had positive things to say about the party's nominee -- former Vice President Joe Biden -- than at any point in the last eight weeks. These findings come from The Breakthrough, a project from CNN, SSRS and researchers from Georgetown University and the University of Michigan asking Americans what they have heard, read or seen about each of the presidential candidates lately. The survey was in the field beginning the second day of the convention and continued through Sunday night. The number of people who spoke positively about Biden jumped sharply, and outpaced negative responses: there were about 1.6 positive responses for every negative response, the highest ratio so far. At the same time, President Donald Trump's ratio of positive to negative sentiment dipped to its lowest point since early July when the project began tracking -- fewer than one positive response was recorded for each negative response.
so biden's ratings goes up, but trumps falls
what happened to all the winning trump claimed
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Positivity on Biden hits high Washington (CNN) The Democratic National Convention took over the conversation surrounding the presidential race this week, and more Americans had positive things to say about the party's nominee -- former Vice President Joe Biden -- than at any point in the last eight weeks. These findings come from The Breakthrough, a project from CNN, SSRS and researchers from Georgetown University and the University of Michigan asking Americans what they have heard, read or seen about each of the presidential candidates lately. The survey was in the field beginning the second day of the convention and continued through Sunday night. The number of people who spoke positively about Biden jumped sharply, and outpaced negative responses: there were about 1.6 positive responses for every negative response, the highest ratio so far. At the same time, President Donald Trump's ratio of positive to negative sentiment dipped to its lowest point since early July when the project began tracking -- fewer than one positive response was recorded for each negative response.
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l
6
trump's approval still circling the toilet
Why this matters ...
KEY FACT:
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
The '60-day rule' for elections Barr may be willing to bend for Trump
Opinion by Elie Honig Wed September 2, 2020
(CNN)If there was any question before about whether William Barr could be willing to use his power as attorney general to tilt the scales in the upcoming presidential election, there shouldn't be anymore. Barr appeared to confirm as much on CNN Wednesday: that he would be willing to breach longstanding Justice Department norms -- that is, the unwritten "60-day rule" -- to advantage the re-election campaign of President Donald Trump.
Barr also continued to claim "Elections that have been held with mail have found substantial fraud and coercion," he said. When asked by Wolf Blitzer whether he could cite any prosecutions relating to this purportedly widespread criminal phenomenon, Barr responded by citing one case -- yes, just one.
contrary to Justice Department practice under both political parties, Barr is keeping the door wedged open to deliver Trump a September or October surprise. Barr had already signaled that he will not respect the 60-day rule as it relates to any potential indictments resulting from the ongoing investigation by John Durham into the origins of the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. https://tinyurl.com/yyphyplm
6
The '60-day rule' for elections Barr may be willing to bend for Trump
Opinion by Elie Honig Wed September 2, 2020
(CNN)If there was any question before about whether William Barr could be willing to use his power as attorney general to tilt the scales in the upcoming presidential election, there shouldn't be anymore. Barr appeared to confirm as much on CNN Wednesday: that he would be willing to breach longstanding Justice Department norms -- that is, the unwritten "60-day rule" -- to advantage the re-election campaign of President Donald Trump.
Barr also continued to claim "Elections that have been held with mail have found substantial fraud and coercion," he said. When asked by Wolf Blitzer whether he could cite any prosecutions relating to this purportedly widespread criminal phenomenon, Barr responded by citing one case -- yes, just one.
contrary to Justice Department practice under both political parties, Barr is keeping the door wedged open to deliver Trump a September or October surprise. Barr had already signaled that he will not respect the 60-day rule as it relates to any potential indictments resulting from the ongoing investigation by John Durham into the origins of the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. https://tinyurl.com/yyphyplm
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
Trump's numbers have improved just slightly over the summer but are still dreadfully bad: mean avg range -8 to -9
In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost.
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
Trump's numbers have improved just slightly over the summer but are still dreadfully bad: mean avg range -8 to -9
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: KEY FACT: In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost. Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. Trump's numbers have improved just slightly over the summerbut are still dreadfully bad: mean avg range -8 to -9 Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l
The two week rolling average at RCP now has trump at -8.7
despite two outlier polls in his favor.
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: KEY FACT: In the last 10 presidential elections with an INCUMBENT president, if the president had positive approval to disapproval poll numbers, he won re-election. If he had net negative approval numbers, he lost. Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. Trump's numbers have improved just slightly over the summerbut are still dreadfully bad: mean avg range -8 to -9 Read source: https://tinyurl.com/ycmcbc6l
The two week rolling average at RCP now has trump at -8.7
The two week rolling average at RCP now has trump at -8.7despite two outlier polls in his favor.
That was Tuesday.
On Wednesday, with the usual mountain of new polls released,
that 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now well above -9 points
-14 YouGov -3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier - 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP -13 CNN
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
6
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
The two week rolling average at RCP now has trump at -8.7despite two outlier polls in his favor.
That was Tuesday.
On Wednesday, with the usual mountain of new polls released,
that 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now well above -9 points
-14 YouGov -3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier - 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP -13 CNN
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.3
-14 YouGov -3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier - 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP -13 CNN
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
7
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.3
-14 YouGov -3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier - 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP -13 CNN
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.3 -14 YouGov-3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier- 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP-13 CNN It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
bottom line
must get higher positive to negative approval like biden has
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.3 -14 YouGov-3.....Rasmussen *consistent outlier- 6 The Hill -13 Monmouth -17 Reuters -10 CNBC - 8 Harris -16 TIPP-13 CNN It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
bottom line
must get higher positive to negative approval like biden has
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.1
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
8
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.1
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!!
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind. Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
6
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind. Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.1 It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent.Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
3
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
The 2 week rolling average at RCP poll monitoring site is now trump -9.1 It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendumon the incumbent. Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no validreason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out. And the leading indicator are the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected.10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate!!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
It is worth noting that a presidential campaign is always a referendum on the incumbent.Meaning, if he did well then there is little or no valid reason to remove him from office. And if he performed poorly - in whatever fashion the electorate believes - then they vote him out.
And the leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind.
Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
Interesting.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind.
Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind. Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
anyone but rump
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
5
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
For nonbiased forecasts of US elections, check out statistical projections by non-US sources with no axe to grind. Currently, the Economist gives Biden 86% probabiility of winning. Whereas Financial times has Biden with solid 280 from states when only 270 is needed to win electoral college.
On Sept 12 trump's 2 week rolling average of polls for job approval was -9.3
Today (about 2 weeks later; using same site) it has moved down to -7.5
And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6
The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Well.....things may be getting interesting.
On Sept 12 trump's 2 week rolling average of polls for job approval was -9.3
Today (about 2 weeks later; using same site) it has moved down to -7.5
And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6
The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6
The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
And -8.3 today .....up and down rollercoaster as the rolling average drops 2 week old polls and adds the newest.
Will be interesting to see the polls taken *AFTER* the first debate, on trump's job approval.
Likely coming late this week
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6
The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decided based on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!!
Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
And -8.3 today .....up and down rollercoaster as the rolling average drops 2 week old polls and adds the newest.
Will be interesting to see the polls taken *AFTER* the first debate, on trump's job approval.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6 The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!!10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. And -8.3 today .....up and down rollercoaster as the rolling average drops 2 week old polls and adds the newest. Will be interesting to see the polls taken *AFTER* the first debate, on trump's job approval. Likely coming late this week
deep in the negatives .
to win he has to get poitive numbers . no way this will happen
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: And on Sept 28 that RealClearPolitics number is back up to -8.6 The leading indicator is the polling results for "job approval"In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!!10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. And -8.3 today .....up and down rollercoaster as the rolling average drops 2 week old polls and adds the newest. Will be interesting to see the polls taken *AFTER* the first debate, on trump's job approval. Likely coming late this week
deep in the negatives .
to win he has to get poitive numbers . no way this will happen
The leading indicator for winning the presidency is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
GALLUP: Bottom Line
While Trump's approval rating has improved, it remains below the 50% threshold f or an incumbent that has historically been associated with presidents winning a second term. In addition, Americans' satisfaction with the way things are going is near its historical low point, and while economic confidence has recovered from its record drop in the spring, it remains negative.
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
The leading indicator for winning the presidency is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line.
GALLUP: Bottom Line
While Trump's approval rating has improved, it remains below the 50% threshold f or an incumbent that has historically been associated with presidents winning a second term. In addition, Americans' satisfaction with the way things are going is near its historical low point, and while economic confidence has recovered from its record drop in the spring, it remains negative.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The leading indicator for winning the presidency is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. what is his job approval now ?
-7.4 at RCP
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The leading indicator for winning the presidency is the polling results for "job approval" In effect, if those numbers are net positive, he will be re-elected. If not, he LOSES!!! 10 of the 10 modern history *INCUMBENT* elections have been decidedbased on this view by the public. 100% accurate !!! Simple fact -- Bottom Line. what is his job approval now ?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.