Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J - another one bites the duat

@kcblitzkrieg

 Correct and we have gone over this point MANY times, that really isnt the metric of measurement because for sure there is little to no discussion across the aisle its just a group of doobs either finding agreement of their partisan positions, defending their partisan positions or fighting with others who do not agree with their partisan positions.

So with all this as a given, and in reality anywhere on the site we revert to the rules of what is allowed and what isnt. It is interesting how some members follow a partisan narrative about how decisions are made, you do that all the time. People who want to defend their political position will see the world as either FOR or against their partisan group, and you are in error in this conclusion. I do not play the grade school yard yelling games with some of you when you confront decisions made because it serves no purpose. The only factors that matter in how decisions are made are if there is an abuse to the site rules, OR if someone is asked to take certain actions and does not do so. Nothing else exists, any correlation or narrative from EITHER side is due to the lack of full information and the partisan biases held because if what you and some others are suggesting SERIOUSLY existed there would be many many many fewer members in this forum, there would be so many more actions taken that have not been and the communist fist as you say would really show itself and it does not do so at all.

Instead of trying to force a lame agenda and narrative just do what has been suggested so many freaking times...do not retaliate, do not instigate or sink below the level of respect, be BETTER than those you disagree with even if you feel they are not. Seek only to have good discussion and try to reach to the other side in a respectful manner and avoid the partisan attacks and abuses the name calling and pile on that we see here every day. The only way things can improve is if everyone decides to be respectful and that never happens on either side. The actions taken are only subject to the rules of the site and a history of how the member makes posts and threads.

@wallstreetcappers

Instead of trying to force a lame agenda and narrative just do what has been suggested so many freaking times...do not retaliate, do not instigate or sink below the level of respect, be BETTER than those you disagree with even if you feel they are not. Seek only to have good discussion and try to reach to the other side in a respectful manner and avoid the partisan attacks and abuses the name calling and pile on that we see here every day. The only way things can improve is if everyone decides to be respectful and that never happens on either side.

This will never happen in this cesspool sub.  Never.  Which is why it needs to get nuked bye bye.  Wait until June when shit really starts getting ramped up.  June through November 2024 is gonna be an absolute shit show in here (and out there). 

Then what happens beyond the '24 election is a whole other story....popcorn time.  

@wallstreetcappers

 You mean exactly like this "happy" NYE message right ??  One that a certain disgusting racist homophobic cowboy having avatar took it upon himself to repost for what purpose exactly under your rules ?? 

@kcblitzkrieg

Ive been here through Bush and Obama and Trump and Biden, this next election will be the same  as all the previous..members are divided by their partisan biases and will sink to low levels making insults to rationalize their positions and when that happens actions will be taken, threads moved, members boxed/banned. If people cannot follow the site rules then they will eventually be banned.

I dont care if someone is R or D, that means nothing and I cannot control it. The rules are what we follow and that is only about being respectful and following what is allowed to post here. The rest is noise and immature political childishness. 

@kcblitzkrieg

Report it and let us take care of it. I saw that post now and this goes two ways, not just your way. spoc was asked to stop antagonizing that group and he refuses, I have asked him MULTIPLE times and yet he cannot stop himself, what does he think will happen when he fails to follow requests? He is antagonizing them intentionally it happens all the time. The other member was making a thread to say happy new year to members he likes to post to and with, spoc had no place going in and poke as he did, he knows 100% what he is doing. It is a good point and I will box both of them, neither is innocent and both know better.

Good post but how do you know it's a him? Heard once, a few years back, unsubstantiated of course, that you may be referring to a she.

If you want good discussion maybe, just maybe, Happy New Years threads shouldn't be limited to a partisan group.

@UNIMAN

 I stand corrected, thank you good sir   

I will do better to make sure I properly use my pronouns as covers users prefer..... "they" 

@wallstreetcappers

 So someone creates a happy NY thread.  El Gato stops in and all is said is "happy new year's guys".  The other username reposts a non-civil and abusive message from an entirely different person but Spock is the bad guy here??   I recognize the history here between the two but it wasn't like he was harassing or even being passive aggressive.  

Just testing for understanding as I want to make sure I don't color outside the lines and get PB'd again.  

Thanks WSC, really don't know how you do what you do here day in and day out    My mind would explode.  

@kcblitzkrieg

 You look at a single instance and that is the issue, spoc has been baiting that group over and over and over its not about the ONE thread or the ONE post, its a pattern. Ive tried to suggest so many times that he leave them alone but he refuses, so his innocent NY message is not innocent at all.

@UNIMAN

 Looks like Clarence Thomas found Menendez’s playbook on how to travel on the rich and powerful?

@kcblitzkrieg

 This is even better:  Can't want for the excuse.

Former President Bill Clinton was alleged to prefer young girls and to have a close personal relationship with Jeffrey Epstein in documents released Wednesday related to the lawsuit by Virginia Giuffre against former Epstein lover and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

Yes, this is no surprise as we already know from Epstein's flight logs that Clinton accompanied Epstein dozens of times on his private jet.  Epstein Island mostly, the site & host of the infamous honey pot operation.  Why would someone accompanied a well known pedo to his private secluded pedo island so often if they did not prefer young girls, right?  I mean, Epstein had a infamous painting of Clinton wearing a blue dress hanging in his residence, they were tight.   

The released info is really a big nothing burger.  There is little to no "new" evidence or names that were released yesterday that haven't already been known from previously released court docs.  The 2019 FBI raid on Epstein's NYC residence is where all the juicy tapes and hard drive recordings were confiscated by the FEDS.  That is the source of information you really want to see, but of course never will.  

If the majority of this information has been out there for almost 4 years, ask yourself, "why is the media blowing up this story all of a sudden".  I mean, they had a segment on my local news channel this morning....on the morning local news where every story is just a happy fluff piece to get your day started.  But this am they had a piece on the "newly" released Epstein information.  Why is the MSM now taking this story and running with it I wonder..... 

On the flip side, to the uninitiated on the whole Epstein saga, the released docs do at least show some of the "rumored" connections and their proclivities for underage girls to be confirmed.  At the end of the day though, you won't have any global elite power players being outed.  CIA / Mossad assets like Epstein were well protected for far too long and when they are no longer of use to the intelligence community they are disposed of properly.  

@UNIMAN

was among the high profile names revealed in the public release of unredacted court documents from a lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.

"I believe so," Giuffre responded, which prompted the attorney to inquire, "All right, what is the answer to that question?"

"I believe I was with Tom once," Giuffre said.

POLITICAL TIES TO OBAMA (D)

No TRUMP 

@cdog8043

 was among the high profile names revealed in the public release of unredacted court documents from a lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell for her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring.

Pritzker, 73, who has local and national Democrat political ties through family members to the Obama administration, was named in a May 2016 deposition of Virginia Giuffre, who accused Maxwell of abusing her as part of the . In filings reviewed by FOX Business, Giuffre was asked by an attorney during the deposition, "All right, if I were to ask you the question how many times you had sex with Tom Pritzker, do you know what that question means?"

"I believe so," Giuffre responded, which prompted the attorney to inquire, "All right, what is the answer to that question?"

"I believe I was with Tom once," Giuffre said.

First person who finds a single post where wallstreetcapper has an issue in threads directed at trump and republicans please post it. You will not find one. He only does this to threads and posters on the republican side. You can bash the republicans and Trump all you want, but you damn well better not post something bad about the left!!