I am not sure why Hillary supporters are insistent upon making their views on "how Trump could have done better" or "what he needed to do to win the debate was" known. That is sort of like the coaching staff of the NY Jets giving pointers to the Patriots on how to execute on offense properly. You don't think like conservatives....how can you know "what he should have done" to win?
Trump hit a homerun on addressing the abortion issue. He explained that he would be appointing conservative pro-life judges to the Supreme Court, and said that the decision of the court would stand. He also said that after the decision was made, the jurisdiction on abortion would reside with the states. What more do you need? I believe that he actually said that he is pro-life. Pretty cut and dry really.
That entire question, how it was delivered, and subsequent pressing for an off-the-cuff answer by Wallace was a trap designed to get a forced sound bite from Trump that would further alienate women voters. He didn't bite. Kudos to him.
Secondly, his reluctance to unconditionally accept election results speaks to a large number of Americans who are upset at the government, economy, and media. And by the way, he did not say that he would reject the results.....he said he would wait and see. Big difference.
For the record, if the vote tallies are not within a specific margin, then things like recounts and electoral challenges are a no go anyhow. If he loses badly, like you seem to think he will, there will be no recourse. Trump will have to take it. And he will...the money he is likely to make selling books and documentaries on his experience will likely provide him a hefty return on his $100M investment.
While we are talking about not accepting election results, I seem to remember Al Gore throwing a tantrum at how the electoral process panned out in 2000. Again, a nice, smoothed-out liberal view of history.
The Soros bet was a dandy....I wish I would have seen that one....if anyone got in on it at +500 congrats, and well done.