So there's a debate tonight and thers's a prop that...

I am not sure why Hillary supporters are insistent upon making their views on "how Trump could have done better" or "what he needed to do to win the debate was" known. That is sort of like the coaching staff of the NY Jets giving pointers to the Patriots on how to execute on offense properly. You don't think like conservatives....how can you know "what he should have done" to win?

Trump hit a homerun on addressing the abortion issue. He explained that he would be appointing conservative pro-life judges to the Supreme Court, and said that the decision of the court would stand. He also said that after the decision was made, the jurisdiction on abortion would reside with the states. What more do you need? I believe that he actually said that he is pro-life. Pretty cut and dry really.

That entire question, how it was delivered, and subsequent pressing for an off-the-cuff answer by Wallace was a trap designed to get a forced sound bite from Trump that would further alienate women voters. He didn't bite. Kudos to him.

Secondly, his reluctance to unconditionally accept election results speaks to a large number of Americans who are upset at the government, economy, and media. And by the way, he did not say that he would reject the results.....he said he would wait and see. Big difference.  

For the record, if the vote tallies are not within a specific margin, then things like recounts and electoral challenges are a no go anyhow. If he loses badly, like you seem to think he will, there will be no recourse. Trump will have to take it. And he will...the money he is likely to make selling books and documentaries on his experience will likely provide him a hefty return on his $100M investment.

While we are talking about not accepting election results, I seem to remember Al Gore throwing a tantrum at how the electoral process panned out in 2000. Again, a nice, smoothed-out liberal view of history.

The Soros bet was a dandy....I wish I would have seen that one....if anyone got in on it at +500 congrats, and well done.

First off, I'm not a Hillary supporter.  So you're already starting off wrong. 

Thanks Inyourlife...  you don't know how much I appreciate all your guidance...however speaking of ships...Hillary Clinton reminds me of the ship RMS Titanic and like the Titanic,, who's crew members proclaimed  "Not even god himself could sink this ship ...but while crossing the Atlantic Ocean carrying some of the wealthiest people in the world, collided head on with an underwater iceberg..and sunk..

Like with the Titanic..Hillary's supporters acting like not even god  can sink her campaign..but her ship will be hitting an underwater iceberg called Hillary's enthusiasm gap...as noticed in her rally's. she only attracts small crowds .Many supporters that say on the phone to pollsters they would vote for her ...won't have enough enthusiasm to actually leave the house and go out and physically vote for her...and like the Titantic she will hit an iceberg on Nov 8th and sink..

 Not hoping,,, going  by what Bernie Sanders himself said "some of my supporters "will not vote" for Hillary.. 25% of Sanders backers said they would not support Clinton in November. Sanders got 43% of the total Democrat primary votes that represents 5.6 Million votes Hillary will not get ..

In 2012 Obama beat Romney by less than 5 million popular votes...if in fact those Bernie supporter really are feeling the burn esp.after wikileaks exposed that the DNC colluded with the Hillary campaign to rig the primary's and steal the election..that along could sink the SS Clinton,.

"Best Of Luck" to you Inourlife16 and I mean that ...I consider you a true gentleman..

....

I see KellyanneSlim is back......    

You read me wrong ..I wasn't trying to be sarcastic..and no, I said I don't bet Presidential elections ..anymore.

Nevertheless,I also look forward to when we are on the same side  ..maybe it will be during the revolution.

Again BOL  ...

Sara, perhaps you could give us some actual plays that we could profit from and be a legit contributing member of this forum?

This really won't be that interesting to you. Debate #3, Trump states he is pro-life in the first 45 seconds of the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNomXA8ts78

Well, dl, I think that about covers it. I choose my words carefully, because you are a Hall-of-Famer since 2003, and at a base level I do respect the thousands of hours that you have spent on Covers typing away without pay. However, I  do not think you are capable of recognizing the possibility that you may have this election all wrong.

Bigvern, trying to reason with the individual to whom you are talking to is akin to riding the carousel of wasted words.

I agree Hugh.

It would have been more productive to have spent the time preparing for tomorrow's slate of CFB.

Why the heck I am I debating politics on a gambling website anyhow? I think some personal reflection is needed before revisiting the political or general discussion forums. Going to have to chalk that one up to a character flaw. 

IYL,

That sounds fun Hugh. I accept