24 hours ago you would have thought this market would be at 95 %, but with Corker a definate No vote and Rubio looking like he might be one as well. The Republicans only have one legislative week before Doug Jones is seated and he is certainly a No vote. That means it's game time and this bill comes down to Susan Collins. Someone who is a borderline Democrat and betrayed the President once before when she voted to save ObamaCare. Even though she has been firmly for the bill so far she might see the political winds changing and jump ship. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Tax Cuts
24 hours ago you would have thought this market would be at 95 %, but with Corker a definate No vote and Rubio looking like he might be one as well. The Republicans only have one legislative week before Doug Jones is seated and he is certainly a No vote. That means it's game time and this bill comes down to Susan Collins. Someone who is a borderline Democrat and betrayed the President once before when she voted to save ObamaCare. Even though she has been firmly for the bill so far she might see the political winds changing and jump ship. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
as an aside, has any objective or marginally objective source indicated this bill will do anything other than transfer massive wealth to the ultra rich and explode the deficit even more?
as an aside, has any objective or marginally objective source indicated this bill will do anything other than transfer massive wealth to the ultra rich and explode the deficit even more?
I don't think this bill passes. Too many phony, Senate Republicans with horrible leadership under McConnell. McCain decides to be the 'no' vote to bring down the bill. Great theatre inside the 'Club of 100'.
So aside from the angle of "Trump getting a win" do you really think that this tax bill should be passed? Do you really think it will be good for the country?
I don't think this bill passes. Too many phony, Senate Republicans with horrible leadership under McConnell. McCain decides to be the 'no' vote to bring down the bill. Great theatre inside the 'Club of 100'.
So aside from the angle of "Trump getting a win" do you really think that this tax bill should be passed? Do you really think it will be good for the country?
Well as you know everyone at Trump rallies had one big chant that led Trump to victory. they chanted: "We're Tired of Faxes! Cut the Taxes!"
but the main problem there is that the majority of those people at those rallies and all of us in here will not benefit. By almost all accounts these groups will be hurt at the expense of the uber wealthy. This is out there every where you turn and wherever you look. I am not sure how people do not get this.
Well as you know everyone at Trump rallies had one big chant that led Trump to victory. they chanted: "We're Tired of Faxes! Cut the Taxes!"
but the main problem there is that the majority of those people at those rallies and all of us in here will not benefit. By almost all accounts these groups will be hurt at the expense of the uber wealthy. This is out there every where you turn and wherever you look. I am not sure how people do not get this.
rubio will always do as he's told by his owners. as an aside, has any objective or marginally objective source indicated this bill will do anything other than transfer massive wealth to the ultra rich and explode the deficit even more?
Agreed on Rubio, he is just stalling to get more goodies. The greedy little rat that he is. But read the WSJ report on the bill, it will finally untether the heavyhanded regulations of the Obama regime and give large corporations such a shot in the arm they will begin hiring again. More money for companies means more jobs and more demand for products which means more money for companies.
rubio will always do as he's told by his owners. as an aside, has any objective or marginally objective source indicated this bill will do anything other than transfer massive wealth to the ultra rich and explode the deficit even more?
Agreed on Rubio, he is just stalling to get more goodies. The greedy little rat that he is. But read the WSJ report on the bill, it will finally untether the heavyhanded regulations of the Obama regime and give large corporations such a shot in the arm they will begin hiring again. More money for companies means more jobs and more demand for products which means more money for companies.
the old trickle down effect.
the has never worked. and it certainly won;t start working in the age of automation.
the old trickle down effect.
the has never worked. and it certainly won;t start working in the age of automation.
give large corporations such a shot in the arm they will begin hiring again. More money for companies means more jobs and more demand for products which means more money for companies.the old trickle down effect. the has never worked. and it certainly won;t start working in the age of automation.
the biggest farce known to man.
give large corporations such a shot in the arm they will begin hiring again. More money for companies means more jobs and more demand for products which means more money for companies.the old trickle down effect. the has never worked. and it certainly won;t start working in the age of automation.
the biggest farce known to man.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
but maybe you think they do because it will trickle down.
if corporate profits are so high, why is the income gap also historically high if that wealth is supposed to trickle down.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/07/opinion/leonhardt-income-inequality.html
why is wage growth down from the early 200's and late 1990's and flat the last couple of years?
https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker.aspx?panel=1
with the stock market at historic highs and corporate profit at historic highs and wealth among the top 2% or so at historic highs, what does a new massive transfer of wealth to corporations and the ultra rich do other than give a lot more money to corporations and the ultra rich?
nothing, of course. i know you guys aren't completely naive. there's one thing and one thing only happening here. the ultra rich and corporations paid a lot of money to put these republicans in government and they didn't do it for their health. they expect a fat return on their investment. and it looks like they are getting it.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
but maybe you think they do because it will trickle down.
if corporate profits are so high, why is the income gap also historically high if that wealth is supposed to trickle down.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/07/opinion/leonhardt-income-inequality.html
why is wage growth down from the early 200's and late 1990's and flat the last couple of years?
https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker.aspx?panel=1
with the stock market at historic highs and corporate profit at historic highs and wealth among the top 2% or so at historic highs, what does a new massive transfer of wealth to corporations and the ultra rich do other than give a lot more money to corporations and the ultra rich?
nothing, of course. i know you guys aren't completely naive. there's one thing and one thing only happening here. the ultra rich and corporations paid a lot of money to put these republicans in government and they didn't do it for their health. they expect a fat return on their investment. and it looks like they are getting it.
https://www.ft.com/content/368ef430-1e24-11e6-a7bc-ee846770ec15
so here's another $1.9 trillion with the new tax wealth transfer. any time you're ready to start hiring and paying better wages, just let us know.
https://www.ft.com/content/368ef430-1e24-11e6-a7bc-ee846770ec15
so here's another $1.9 trillion with the new tax wealth transfer. any time you're ready to start hiring and paying better wages, just let us know.
However most Americans feel that the rich don't deserve more tax cuts. Most economists doubt that tax cuts could boost economy and jobs so much that they pay for themselves. Tax cuts are less effective in creating jobs than government spending in infrastructure and social programs. No solid proof that voodoo economics worked for Reagan or other Presidents.
Past tax cuts resulted in greater government deficits and debt. In Kansas, big tax cuts lead to spending cuts to vital programs and higher taxes afterwards. US has the most income inequality in the world. But tax cuts can increase gap between rich and poor.
However most Americans feel that the rich don't deserve more tax cuts. Most economists doubt that tax cuts could boost economy and jobs so much that they pay for themselves. Tax cuts are less effective in creating jobs than government spending in infrastructure and social programs. No solid proof that voodoo economics worked for Reagan or other Presidents.
Past tax cuts resulted in greater government deficits and debt. In Kansas, big tax cuts lead to spending cuts to vital programs and higher taxes afterwards. US has the most income inequality in the world. But tax cuts can increase gap between rich and poor.
If they want McCain's vote they better hurry up........... Doctors found a second tumor in his brain, in the same place as the surgically-removed original growth..................
If they want McCain's vote they better hurry up........... Doctors found a second tumor in his brain, in the same place as the surgically-removed original growth..................
Very unfortunate! Once they cut you open cancer spreads regardless of what it said! I will never give a dime to Cancer research b/c the winners are those who fundraise for a cure. My Uncle, exactly as McCain showed great progress after his surgery then suddenly became bedridden.
As far as the topic..... interested to see my Febuary paystub!
If they want McCain's vote they better hurry up........... Doctors found a second tumor in his brain, in the same place as the surgically-removed original growth..................
If they want McCain's vote they better hurry up........... Doctors found a second tumor in his brain, in the same place as the surgically-removed original growth..................
Very unfortunate! Once they cut you open cancer spreads regardless of what it said! I will never give a dime to Cancer research b/c the winners are those who fundraise for a cure. My Uncle, exactly as McCain showed great progress after his surgery then suddenly became bedridden.
As far as the topic..... interested to see my Febuary paystub!
it's not that complicated. here is a chart of after tax corporate profits. as you can see, they are at historic highs. so, one, why do the corporations and the ultra rich need a massive transfer of wealth at the expense of the poor/middle class and the deficit?
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
but maybe you think they do because it will trickle down.
if corporate profits are so high, why is the income gap also historically high if that wealth is supposed to trickle down.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/07/opinion/leonhardt-income-inequality.html
why is wage growth down from the early 200's and late 1990's and flat the last couple of years?
https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker.aspx?panel=1
with the stock market at historic highs and corporate profit at historic highs and wealth among the top 2% or so at historic highs, what does a new massive transfer of wealth to corporations and the ultra rich do other than give a lot more money to corporations and the ultra rich?
nothing, of course. i know you guys aren't completely naive. there's one thing and one thing only happening here. the ultra rich and corporations paid a lot of money to put these republicans in government and they didn't do it for their health. they expect a fat return on their investment. and it looks like they are getting it.
it's not that complicated. here is a chart of after tax corporate profits. as you can see, they are at historic highs. so, one, why do the corporations and the ultra rich need a massive transfer of wealth at the expense of the poor/middle class and the deficit?
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CP
but maybe you think they do because it will trickle down.
if corporate profits are so high, why is the income gap also historically high if that wealth is supposed to trickle down.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/07/opinion/leonhardt-income-inequality.html
why is wage growth down from the early 200's and late 1990's and flat the last couple of years?
https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker.aspx?panel=1
with the stock market at historic highs and corporate profit at historic highs and wealth among the top 2% or so at historic highs, what does a new massive transfer of wealth to corporations and the ultra rich do other than give a lot more money to corporations and the ultra rich?
nothing, of course. i know you guys aren't completely naive. there's one thing and one thing only happening here. the ultra rich and corporations paid a lot of money to put these republicans in government and they didn't do it for their health. they expect a fat return on their investment. and it looks like they are getting it.
I haven't always agreed with McCain but to me he's always been an American hero.I heard a story about him when he was captured in Viet Nam. When asked to name his superiors, he supposedly named the Pittsburgh Pirates starting lineup. Stargell, Clemente etc . I added a link that recaps his time as a POW. It says a lot about the times, the war & the man. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/01/28/john-mccain-prisoner-of-war-a-first-person-account
You mean Fake War hero
I haven't always agreed with McCain but to me he's always been an American hero.I heard a story about him when he was captured in Viet Nam. When asked to name his superiors, he supposedly named the Pittsburgh Pirates starting lineup. Stargell, Clemente etc . I added a link that recaps his time as a POW. It says a lot about the times, the war & the man. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/01/28/john-mccain-prisoner-of-war-a-first-person-account
You mean Fake War hero
I'm willing to call Rubio's bluff, there's no way he will go down in infamy as the deciding vote that killed tax reform. Republicans need a win here and there is nothing else on the horizon. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to get permanent tax reform passed and I think it gets done next week.
I'm willing to call Rubio's bluff, there's no way he will go down in infamy as the deciding vote that killed tax reform. Republicans need a win here and there is nothing else on the horizon. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to get permanent tax reform passed and I think it gets done next week.
QUOTE Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: As far as the topic..... interested to see my Febuary paystub!
QUOTE Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim: As far as the topic..... interested to see my Febuary paystub!
I'm willing to call Rubio's bluff, there's no way he will go down in infamy as the deciding vote that killed tax reform. Republicans need a win here and there is nothing else on the horizon. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to get permanent tax reform passed and I think it gets done next week.
I'm willing to call Rubio's bluff, there's no way he will go down in infamy as the deciding vote that killed tax reform. Republicans need a win here and there is nothing else on the horizon. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to get permanent tax reform passed and I think it gets done next week.
Historically, tax cuts occur often in the US. Not hard for Bush, Obama and probably Trump too. Since republicans are desperate for any legislative victory, tax bill is likely to pass even if it is flawed.However most Americans feel that the rich don't deserve more tax cuts. Most economists doubt that tax cuts could boost economy and jobs so much that they pay for themselves. Tax cuts are less effective in creating jobs than government spending in infrastructure and social programs. No solid proof that voodoo economics worked for Reagan or other Presidents. Past tax cuts resulted in greater government deficits and debt. In Kansas, big tax cuts lead to spending cuts to vital programs and higher taxes afterwards. US has the most income inequality in the world. But tax cuts can increase gap between rich and poor.
Keep spouting the liberal fake news slogans. What do you want Socialism? Why not give freebies to everyone and no one will ever have to work again? America stands for Capitalism and we must do everything we can to make sure it prospers.
Historically, tax cuts occur often in the US. Not hard for Bush, Obama and probably Trump too. Since republicans are desperate for any legislative victory, tax bill is likely to pass even if it is flawed.However most Americans feel that the rich don't deserve more tax cuts. Most economists doubt that tax cuts could boost economy and jobs so much that they pay for themselves. Tax cuts are less effective in creating jobs than government spending in infrastructure and social programs. No solid proof that voodoo economics worked for Reagan or other Presidents. Past tax cuts resulted in greater government deficits and debt. In Kansas, big tax cuts lead to spending cuts to vital programs and higher taxes afterwards. US has the most income inequality in the world. But tax cuts can increase gap between rich and poor.
Keep spouting the liberal fake news slogans. What do you want Socialism? Why not give freebies to everyone and no one will ever have to work again? America stands for Capitalism and we must do everything we can to make sure it prospers.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
