Now that 4 years have passed since joe and jill biden were placed inside the White House. Will historians begin to use the * next to 'joe and jill biden *, POTUS 2021-2025? Reports are coming out that joe was not in charge of anything during the previously mentioned 4 years! Therefore the use of the asterisk next to the biden name! So. From here on out inside Covers joe biden should be referred to as the asterisk President! Good riddance joe and jill *! Next up is the illegitimate governor of Arizona named Katie Hobbs! MAGA!
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Now that 4 years have passed since joe and jill biden were placed inside the White House. Will historians begin to use the * next to 'joe and jill biden *, POTUS 2021-2025? Reports are coming out that joe was not in charge of anything during the previously mentioned 4 years! Therefore the use of the asterisk next to the biden name! So. From here on out inside Covers joe biden should be referred to as the asterisk President! Good riddance joe and jill *! Next up is the illegitimate governor of Arizona named Katie Hobbs! MAGA!
[Quote: Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers]Kinda similar to Reagan part II and likely Bush Lite part I and II Quality thread, really adding top notch value discussion wise.[/Quote
I thought you took a hiatus from Covers for the Holiday's! Anyway. Truth has value even when a person does not agree with the premise. The man that you proudly voted for was not in charge of anything for the last 4 years! Aren't you tired of the same, tired, lame, untruthful threads that habitually stay in the top 10 of the Politics forum inside Covers? If not. You should be! ****
1
[Quote: Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers]Kinda similar to Reagan part II and likely Bush Lite part I and II Quality thread, really adding top notch value discussion wise.[/Quote
I thought you took a hiatus from Covers for the Holiday's! Anyway. Truth has value even when a person does not agree with the premise. The man that you proudly voted for was not in charge of anything for the last 4 years! Aren't you tired of the same, tired, lame, untruthful threads that habitually stay in the top 10 of the Politics forum inside Covers? If not. You should be! ****
Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead?
You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
1
@sundance
Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead?
You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
Amazingly posters inside Covers truly believe from the bottom of their heart that the asterisk defeated President Trump in November of 2020! Thankfully the United States survived a brain dead President for the last 4 years! Probably the 1st time in human history a country had a so called leader that by any honest metric was truly non functional. Let's hope for the good of the country the Left inside America does not use a False Flag to prevent President Trump from taking office on 20 January 2025. MAGA!
2
Amazingly posters inside Covers truly believe from the bottom of their heart that the asterisk defeated President Trump in November of 2020! Thankfully the United States survived a brain dead President for the last 4 years! Probably the 1st time in human history a country had a so called leader that by any honest metric was truly non functional. Let's hope for the good of the country the Left inside America does not use a False Flag to prevent President Trump from taking office on 20 January 2025. MAGA!
@sundance Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead? You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
How come I never see you post these sentiments in any of the Conservative/Trump-bash threads?
6
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@sundance Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead? You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
How come I never see you post these sentiments in any of the Conservative/Trump-bash threads?
Read two very good articles that were referring to this. But from two different angles.
The first was a study/question by the guy that questioned where did Biden's votes go. He did a good job breaking it down state by state with Trump/Biden Trump/Harris and Trump/Clinton. He looked at the improvement Trump made and the loss of votes that Harris had and questioned where the 'missing' votes went.
The second article was explaining that after the WSJ report and other things, it appears that the Biden decline was well known very early on and covered up.
So, he was questioning why there were so many aides filling in during times and spots where Biden should have been. Like, with the wars and the Afghanistan debacle, etc. The way he worded it is that hearings should be held to get to the bottom of who provided Biden cover and left the country rudderless from threats both foreign and domestic.
This, to me, points out why a country cannot be run very well by committee. You need a good, strong leader -- especially during tough times.
So, I agree it can be called a term with an asterisk beside it; but, in more than one way.
1
@sundance
Read two very good articles that were referring to this. But from two different angles.
The first was a study/question by the guy that questioned where did Biden's votes go. He did a good job breaking it down state by state with Trump/Biden Trump/Harris and Trump/Clinton. He looked at the improvement Trump made and the loss of votes that Harris had and questioned where the 'missing' votes went.
The second article was explaining that after the WSJ report and other things, it appears that the Biden decline was well known very early on and covered up.
So, he was questioning why there were so many aides filling in during times and spots where Biden should have been. Like, with the wars and the Afghanistan debacle, etc. The way he worded it is that hearings should be held to get to the bottom of who provided Biden cover and left the country rudderless from threats both foreign and domestic.
This, to me, points out why a country cannot be run very well by committee. You need a good, strong leader -- especially during tough times.
So, I agree it can be called a term with an asterisk beside it; but, in more than one way.
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
1
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
@sundance Read two very good articles that were referring to this. But from two different angles. The first was a study/question by the guy that questioned where did Biden's votes go. He did a good job breaking it down state by state with Trump/Biden Trump/Harris and Trump/Clinton. He looked at the improvement Trump made and the loss of votes that Harris had and questioned where the 'missing' votes went. The second article was explaining that after the WSJ report and other things, it appears that the Biden decline was well known very early on and covered up. So, he was questioning why there were so many aides filling in during times and spots where Biden should have been. Like, with the wars and the Afghanistan debacle, etc. The way he worded it is that hearings should be held to get to the bottom of who provided Biden cover and left the country rudderless from threats both foreign and domestic. This, to me, points out why a country cannot be run very well by committee. You need a good, strong leader -- especially during tough times. So, I agree it can be called a term with an asterisk beside it; but, in more than one way.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@sundance Read two very good articles that were referring to this. But from two different angles. The first was a study/question by the guy that questioned where did Biden's votes go. He did a good job breaking it down state by state with Trump/Biden Trump/Harris and Trump/Clinton. He looked at the improvement Trump made and the loss of votes that Harris had and questioned where the 'missing' votes went. The second article was explaining that after the WSJ report and other things, it appears that the Biden decline was well known very early on and covered up. So, he was questioning why there were so many aides filling in during times and spots where Biden should have been. Like, with the wars and the Afghanistan debacle, etc. The way he worded it is that hearings should be held to get to the bottom of who provided Biden cover and left the country rudderless from threats both foreign and domestic. This, to me, points out why a country cannot be run very well by committee. You need a good, strong leader -- especially during tough times. So, I agree it can be called a term with an asterisk beside it; but, in more than one way.
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
LOL, what a knee slapper!!! "Trump left him a mess" that's a good one. If only Walt Disney had your imagination
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Presidency has always been a team effort. History will remember Biden as among the most legislatively successful presidents in decades. Despite inheriting a mess from Trump, his administration has accomplished more in one term than some presidents in two terms. Survey of historians already rank Biden as above average when compared to all other presidents.
LOL, what a knee slapper!!! "Trump left him a mess" that's a good one. If only Walt Disney had your imagination
@sundance Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead? You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
Why make so many Trump whining threads when you can just bump one instead?
2
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@sundance Nah those guys are not harming you, I am more tired of stealth whining and antagonistic threads like this one. What is the purpose of making another Biden complaining thread when you have so many others to just bump instead? You might also try to stop rationalizing lousy content because someone else in your mind does the same thing, be better than those you obviously dislike not worse.
Why make so many Trump whining threads when you can just bump one instead?
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking."
"It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
3
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking."
"It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking." "It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
and........CRICKETS
0
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking." "It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking." "It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
The Pastor of Disaster
0
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
CNN's Scott Jennings; This is the biggest scandal in America". "And the level and volume of people who dedicated themselves to lying to everyone at home about this man’s condition for four-straight years up through this summer is breathtaking." "It‘s a scandal of epic proportions and it’s a fair question to ask, who is running the country?" Jennings said. "Who has been running the country?"
She ain't no rising star. She has been a nutcase for a while.
She supported knucklehead Pete wanting to make sure female crush dummies were used because of gender inequity in car crashes.
She was also housing Rahm free for years and making sure her husband's firm got all sorts of polling contracts.
Even the Catholics question her crazy way of justifying her stance on abortion, etc.
I do not fault her for being on vacation during the hurricane years ago. But she could have handled it better instead of refusing to 'apologize'. She could have worded the whole deal better.
But anyone that decides to have purple hair and get a tattoo in their 80s needs to have their judgement questioned. Now her judgement has been used on the Appropriations Committee.
She needs to retire along with so many of the other lifelong aged folks in Congress.
0
@Barbarossa
She ain't no rising star. She has been a nutcase for a while.
She supported knucklehead Pete wanting to make sure female crush dummies were used because of gender inequity in car crashes.
She was also housing Rahm free for years and making sure her husband's firm got all sorts of polling contracts.
Even the Catholics question her crazy way of justifying her stance on abortion, etc.
I do not fault her for being on vacation during the hurricane years ago. But she could have handled it better instead of refusing to 'apologize'. She could have worded the whole deal better.
But anyone that decides to have purple hair and get a tattoo in their 80s needs to have their judgement questioned. Now her judgement has been used on the Appropriations Committee.
She needs to retire along with so many of the other lifelong aged folks in Congress.
Hot Forum Topics
