Since you are known for having so much idle time on your hands check out the documentary "outrage". It does a good job talking about this topic.
Like I said, it is one thing for gayy people to promote their own agenda in an honest and obvious fashion. It is a whole other level of psychopathology for a closeted happy person, pedophile or not to promote an agenda against themselves as a form of self loathing, shame and overcompensation.
You often see it when someone is too eager and puts too much effort promoting the GOP as a way of trying to deal with their unwanted homosexxual and/or pedophile urges in a dysfunctional way.
But when you're dealing with sickos like this an overcompensation to be too ultra GOP and anti-liberal seems to be a telling and obvious sign of this dysfunctional profile.
I'm not saying that all GOP are closet cases. But when you see closet case and/or pedophile being very anti-liberal and hiding behind a GOP facade and putting a lot of effort into it, it fits the profile displayed in the movie.
Check it out and tell me what you think
Nature sorry if this was confusing but what I meant to say was.
It is a whole other level of psychopathology for a closeted gayy person, whether they are also a pedophile or not, to promote a moral, theorcratic and politics against themselves as a form of self loathing, shame and overcompensation.
The "outrage" movie profiles this type of sad closet case uber GOP/anti-dem overcompensation pretty well. Would be interested to see your analysis
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Huh? What are you smoking?
Since you are known for having so much idle time on your hands check out the documentary "outrage". It does a good job talking about this topic.
Like I said, it is one thing for gayy people to promote their own agenda in an honest and obvious fashion. It is a whole other level of psychopathology for a closeted happy person, pedophile or not to promote an agenda against themselves as a form of self loathing, shame and overcompensation.
You often see it when someone is too eager and puts too much effort promoting the GOP as a way of trying to deal with their unwanted homosexxual and/or pedophile urges in a dysfunctional way.
But when you're dealing with sickos like this an overcompensation to be too ultra GOP and anti-liberal seems to be a telling and obvious sign of this dysfunctional profile.
I'm not saying that all GOP are closet cases. But when you see closet case and/or pedophile being very anti-liberal and hiding behind a GOP facade and putting a lot of effort into it, it fits the profile displayed in the movie.
Check it out and tell me what you think
Nature sorry if this was confusing but what I meant to say was.
It is a whole other level of psychopathology for a closeted gayy person, whether they are also a pedophile or not, to promote a moral, theorcratic and politics against themselves as a form of self loathing, shame and overcompensation.
The "outrage" movie profiles this type of sad closet case uber GOP/anti-dem overcompensation pretty well. Would be interested to see your analysis
I do understand this pattern. But it isnt early to any race or party. Usually it's a process within the soul or skull where you become the thing you most hate. But to stretch this is some form to isolate the cause and effect. And then say the Republican have it more is a stretch of even a conclusive reality.
Many posts you have lables me a person but I know I am not but I don't react vehemently cause I understand your entertainment is getting under the skin of someone. To fustrate them.
Alot of people who play Texas hold em do the same. .. I done it to rattle an opponent not calling him out as homophobic
but if he takes to long say what's the matter Nancy can't make a decision without the wife here...and things such as that
.... To you though I am not sure of the agenda what's in it for you.. Is it retaliation or is provocation. But I read more than I post. And least you are taking the time to respond with more than usual. One liners.
0
I do understand this pattern. But it isnt early to any race or party. Usually it's a process within the soul or skull where you become the thing you most hate. But to stretch this is some form to isolate the cause and effect. And then say the Republican have it more is a stretch of even a conclusive reality.
Many posts you have lables me a person but I know I am not but I don't react vehemently cause I understand your entertainment is getting under the skin of someone. To fustrate them.
Alot of people who play Texas hold em do the same. .. I done it to rattle an opponent not calling him out as homophobic
but if he takes to long say what's the matter Nancy can't make a decision without the wife here...and things such as that
.... To you though I am not sure of the agenda what's in it for you.. Is it retaliation or is provocation. But I read more than I post. And least you are taking the time to respond with more than usual. One liners.
I'm not sure if you understand the actual phenomenon. Maybe taking the time to watch the actual "outrage" documentary might help you understand what is really going on.
It's is not necesarily just hating something of someone. When we are talking about the pink elephant profile of actively working against oneself in a political manner to over compensate for them knowing being gayy pedophile or just gayy is something that is not accepted.
It's the Shakespeare tho protest too much.
So then you get this ultra conservative persona that is vehemently and passionate against dems. Like their entire being becomes trying to overcompensate and hide who they are a pedophile and homosexxual as displayed on this thread.
And for the record, I have no agenda. As a non-partisan independent I have no alianace or allegiances. I simply make comments about topics and what is posted. How people choose to get frustrated or make the choice to react emotionally to it is up to them. I guess I believe in personal responsibility and accountability and assume that everyone else thinks the same rather than playing the victim.
What do you think specifically about Dennis Hastert? And what do you think about how he chosen to handle the situation.
0
I'm not sure if you understand the actual phenomenon. Maybe taking the time to watch the actual "outrage" documentary might help you understand what is really going on.
It's is not necesarily just hating something of someone. When we are talking about the pink elephant profile of actively working against oneself in a political manner to over compensate for them knowing being gayy pedophile or just gayy is something that is not accepted.
It's the Shakespeare tho protest too much.
So then you get this ultra conservative persona that is vehemently and passionate against dems. Like their entire being becomes trying to overcompensate and hide who they are a pedophile and homosexxual as displayed on this thread.
And for the record, I have no agenda. As a non-partisan independent I have no alianace or allegiances. I simply make comments about topics and what is posted. How people choose to get frustrated or make the choice to react emotionally to it is up to them. I guess I believe in personal responsibility and accountability and assume that everyone else thinks the same rather than playing the victim.
What do you think specifically about Dennis Hastert? And what do you think about how he chosen to handle the situation.
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand w
Where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
0
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand w
Where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
When they finally got him on tax evasion they sentenced him to the max and sent him to die in Alcatraz.
This is not like that at all this is a man who coached a high school wrestling team molested the team members and got caught by paying hush money in a bank structure to the victims.
They have him on the charge and the judge is signally his perjury should lead to a stiffer sentence which will no doubt be challenged in appeals court. The fact it happened when he was 34 further intensified the real charge.
0
They like to compare this to Capone.
Where he skated on so many charges.
When they finally got him on tax evasion they sentenced him to the max and sent him to die in Alcatraz.
This is not like that at all this is a man who coached a high school wrestling team molested the team members and got caught by paying hush money in a bank structure to the victims.
They have him on the charge and the judge is signally his perjury should lead to a stiffer sentence which will no doubt be challenged in appeals court. The fact it happened when he was 34 further intensified the real charge.
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
The banking aspect is interesting. I have a friend in banking that was talking about how Hastert had to have know that how he was structuring payments was illegal.
But then mentioned that legalities didn't seem to be an issue of concern for GOP closet case pedophile Dennis Hastert anyways so what's the difference?
Btw, more or less closet case pedophiles based on party is not of interest to me. As a non-partisan independent I think that the fact that certain partisan lemmings made such a big deal about it. As if some how the topic of the closet case pedophile that puts so much effort into this ultra GOP and conservative facade was something that was personal, resonated with them and true to their heart.
It is scary to think that Hastert was ranked in line for the presidency at one time. But my point that I think you keep missing is not about gayy pedophiles.
But instead the pink elephants, some pedophiles and some not, who overcompensate to use politics and image to channel their selfhatred and psychopahtology that their ingrained and compulsive guy and pedophile urges are wrong. So they become consumed with compulsive and dominating not hardline GOP anti-dem identity.
This phenomenon is well explained in the move "outrage" that I keep reccomending to you.
It is also well displayed in this thread
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
The banking aspect is interesting. I have a friend in banking that was talking about how Hastert had to have know that how he was structuring payments was illegal.
But then mentioned that legalities didn't seem to be an issue of concern for GOP closet case pedophile Dennis Hastert anyways so what's the difference?
Btw, more or less closet case pedophiles based on party is not of interest to me. As a non-partisan independent I think that the fact that certain partisan lemmings made such a big deal about it. As if some how the topic of the closet case pedophile that puts so much effort into this ultra GOP and conservative facade was something that was personal, resonated with them and true to their heart.
It is scary to think that Hastert was ranked in line for the presidency at one time. But my point that I think you keep missing is not about gayy pedophiles.
But instead the pink elephants, some pedophiles and some not, who overcompensate to use politics and image to channel their selfhatred and psychopahtology that their ingrained and compulsive guy and pedophile urges are wrong. So they become consumed with compulsive and dominating not hardline GOP anti-dem identity.
This phenomenon is well explained in the move "outrage" that I keep reccomending to you.
Donald Rumsfeld made the list and he has not been accused of any personal transgressions, but authorizing the rape of children in Iraqi prisons is still heinously evil. I am no legal expert, but that sounds like a war crime to me.
0
Here is a compilation erroneously labeled "List of Republican Pedophiles."
Donald Rumsfeld made the list and he has not been accused of any personal transgressions, but authorizing the rape of children in Iraqi prisons is still heinously evil. I am no legal expert, but that sounds like a war crime to me.
The Hastert allegations, if true, are horrifying and he will not serve one day in prison for those atrocities because of the statute of limitations.
I imagine millions of people are just like me - sickened by the allegations and struck by the monumental hypocrisy. Hastert was one of WJC's chief persecutors, so eager to impeach WJC for mutually consensual behavior between two consenting adults.
His holier-than-thou attitude then rings pretty damn hollow right now. There is NO moral equivalence between an adulterer and a serial child molester.
0
The Hastert allegations, if true, are horrifying and he will not serve one day in prison for those atrocities because of the statute of limitations.
I imagine millions of people are just like me - sickened by the allegations and struck by the monumental hypocrisy. Hastert was one of WJC's chief persecutors, so eager to impeach WJC for mutually consensual behavior between two consenting adults.
His holier-than-thou attitude then rings pretty damn hollow right now. There is NO moral equivalence between an adulterer and a serial child molester.
Donald Rumsfeld made the list and he has not been accused of any personal transgressions, but authorizing the rape of children in Iraqi prisons is still heinously evil. I am no legal expert, but that sounds like a war crime to me.
War criminal maybe but he doesn't seem to fit the pink elephant closet case pedophile that is uber anti-dem and so consumed with proving he is GOP as a means of hiding from everyone including himself his unwanted guy and pedophile urges as displayed so clearly on this thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Here is a compilation erroneously labeled "List of Republican Pedophiles."
Donald Rumsfeld made the list and he has not been accused of any personal transgressions, but authorizing the rape of children in Iraqi prisons is still heinously evil. I am no legal expert, but that sounds like a war crime to me.
War criminal maybe but he doesn't seem to fit the pink elephant closet case pedophile that is uber anti-dem and so consumed with proving he is GOP as a means of hiding from everyone including himself his unwanted guy and pedophile urges as displayed so clearly on this thread.
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand w
Where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
He should be sentence to five year maximum for bank structuring. Even if that would be realistically a life sentence at 74
like I said I have zero tolerance to hurting children confusing them in their formidable years and ruining their lives.
If they got him on the hush money structure of banking system to prove the other molestation charges then I believe he should do the maximum time on the charge at hand w
Where statue of limitations has run out.
Now how does this conclude the GOP has more or less pervs then the Dems...
Interesting GOP closet case pedophile situation. It looks like hypocracy but when you are dealing with the pink elephant homosexuall pedophile or not, so much of it is probably survival.
That the GOP closet case pedophile has to take on this identity and image that they are the opposite of what they are doing behind closed doors. So you end up with this extreme GOP/anti-dem persona where survival to look the opposite of the reality of them being a closer case pedophile dominates their existence as if their life depends upon it.
And on some level as we see with this thread it does. And when ever the topic of guy pedophilia comes up you see such a strong and intense reaction to portray this GOP/anti-dem image.
It is so telling when you see these monsters for what they are
0
Interesting GOP closet case pedophile situation. It looks like hypocracy but when you are dealing with the pink elephant homosexuall pedophile or not, so much of it is probably survival.
That the GOP closet case pedophile has to take on this identity and image that they are the opposite of what they are doing behind closed doors. So you end up with this extreme GOP/anti-dem persona where survival to look the opposite of the reality of them being a closer case pedophile dominates their existence as if their life depends upon it.
And on some level as we see with this thread it does. And when ever the topic of guy pedophilia comes up you see such a strong and intense reaction to portray this GOP/anti-dem image.
It is so telling when you see these monsters for what they are
Interesting GOP closet case pedophile situation. It looks like hypocracy but when you are dealing with the pink elephant homosexuall pedophile or not, so much of it is probably survival.
That the GOP closet case pedophile has to take on this identity and image that they are the opposite of what they are doing behind closed doors. So you end up with this extreme GOP/anti-dem persona where survival to look the opposite of the reality of them being a closer case pedophile dominates their existence as if their life depends upon it.
And on some level as we see with this thread it does. And when ever the topic of guy pedophilia comes up you see such a strong and intense reaction to portray this GOP/anti-dem image.
It is so telling when you see these monsters for what they are
Do you understand what this crime is? Do you understand that it is better for a chain to be wrapped around your neck weighted and thrown into a bay than to hurt a little one. And that it is a unpardonable offense in death. Even the new testitement calls this offense as such and the Christ was very liberal on many things but this and blasphemy. Most civilization and all religions have exact penalties for this exact behavior. Even the black Bible tells a henious penalty it. Is one of the universal truths don't. Hurt children. Ever.
I have no tolerance for the pain and misery it creates in this world...... And those that do this evil in my opinion should be drug puut into the astreet and shot......
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Interesting GOP closet case pedophile situation. It looks like hypocracy but when you are dealing with the pink elephant homosexuall pedophile or not, so much of it is probably survival.
That the GOP closet case pedophile has to take on this identity and image that they are the opposite of what they are doing behind closed doors. So you end up with this extreme GOP/anti-dem persona where survival to look the opposite of the reality of them being a closer case pedophile dominates their existence as if their life depends upon it.
And on some level as we see with this thread it does. And when ever the topic of guy pedophilia comes up you see such a strong and intense reaction to portray this GOP/anti-dem image.
It is so telling when you see these monsters for what they are
Do you understand what this crime is? Do you understand that it is better for a chain to be wrapped around your neck weighted and thrown into a bay than to hurt a little one. And that it is a unpardonable offense in death. Even the new testitement calls this offense as such and the Christ was very liberal on many things but this and blasphemy. Most civilization and all religions have exact penalties for this exact behavior. Even the black Bible tells a henious penalty it. Is one of the universal truths don't. Hurt children. Ever.
I have no tolerance for the pain and misery it creates in this world...... And those that do this evil in my opinion should be drug puut into the astreet and shot......
Yes but you're thinking in terms of how a normal person would think about it. Someone who doesn't need to overcompensate with a strong compulsive anti-dem/GOP supporting identity as a means of trying to deal with homosexuall pedophile urges that they know will result in criminal charges and a negative reaction by normal people like us.
This thread is a great illustration of how desperate the ultra anti-dem/GOP supporter thinks beyond the Normal premise of morality and right or wrong. That desperation and panic as the topic comes up and then pushing the facade trying to push a GOP/anti-dem image to an extreme level to try to hide what their homosexuall pedophile urges have had them thinking and even worse engage in. And regardless of if it's working or make him look worse in the end the shear panic of being exposed after so much energy and effort into pushing an anti-dem/GOP image the reaction just seems so irrational
0
Yes but you're thinking in terms of how a normal person would think about it. Someone who doesn't need to overcompensate with a strong compulsive anti-dem/GOP supporting identity as a means of trying to deal with homosexuall pedophile urges that they know will result in criminal charges and a negative reaction by normal people like us.
This thread is a great illustration of how desperate the ultra anti-dem/GOP supporter thinks beyond the Normal premise of morality and right or wrong. That desperation and panic as the topic comes up and then pushing the facade trying to push a GOP/anti-dem image to an extreme level to try to hide what their homosexuall pedophile urges have had them thinking and even worse engage in. And regardless of if it's working or make him look worse in the end the shear panic of being exposed after so much energy and effort into pushing an anti-dem/GOP image the reaction just seems so irrational
Yes but you're thinking in terms of how a normal person would think about it. Someone who doesn't need to overcompensate with a strong compulsive anti-dem/GOP supporting identity as a means of trying to deal with homosexuall pedophile urges that they know will result in criminal charges and a negative reaction by normal people like us.
This thread is a great illustration of how desperate the ultra anti-dem/GOP supporter thinks beyond the Normal premise of morality and right or wrong. That desperation and panic as the topic comes up and then pushing the facade trying to push a GOP/anti-dem image to an extreme level to try to hide what their homosexuall pedophile urges have had them thinking and even worse engage in. And regardless of if it's working or make him look worse in the end the shear panic of being exposed after so much energy and effort into pushing an anti-dem/GOP image the reaction just seems so irrational
What is your point with this post?
You really liked it a lot or you wouldn't have repeated it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Yes but you're thinking in terms of how a normal person would think about it. Someone who doesn't need to overcompensate with a strong compulsive anti-dem/GOP supporting identity as a means of trying to deal with homosexuall pedophile urges that they know will result in criminal charges and a negative reaction by normal people like us.
This thread is a great illustration of how desperate the ultra anti-dem/GOP supporter thinks beyond the Normal premise of morality and right or wrong. That desperation and panic as the topic comes up and then pushing the facade trying to push a GOP/anti-dem image to an extreme level to try to hide what their homosexuall pedophile urges have had them thinking and even worse engage in. And regardless of if it's working or make him look worse in the end the shear panic of being exposed after so much energy and effort into pushing an anti-dem/GOP image the reaction just seems so irrational
What is your point with this post?
You really liked it a lot or you wouldn't have repeated it.
Was responding on topic to the comments made by another about the topic.
You should try it some time
What's your thoughts about the topic?
Maybe you could do it with out getting all weird and trying to tell a bunch of lies.
You should try it some time
I actually feel as though any sexual deviance involving children is deplorable.
Any person that is found guilty of those things should be held to justice swiftly and extensively.
I don't see it as all the psycho babble that you exhibited. There are going to be people on both sides of the aisle that are sick enough to do those things.
The only difference being that GOP voters are more likely to not give them a second chance for elective office. And liberals are more likely to look the other way.
And stupid liberals are likely to think that the problem doesn't exist on their side of the aisle.
What was the point of all that psycho babble from you above?
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Was responding on topic to the comments made by another about the topic.
You should try it some time
What's your thoughts about the topic?
Maybe you could do it with out getting all weird and trying to tell a bunch of lies.
You should try it some time
I actually feel as though any sexual deviance involving children is deplorable.
Any person that is found guilty of those things should be held to justice swiftly and extensively.
I don't see it as all the psycho babble that you exhibited. There are going to be people on both sides of the aisle that are sick enough to do those things.
The only difference being that GOP voters are more likely to not give them a second chance for elective office. And liberals are more likely to look the other way.
And stupid liberals are likely to think that the problem doesn't exist on their side of the aisle.
What was the point of all that psycho babble from you above?
Ok I see, you lack the ability to understand the premise.
Try and watch the "outrage" documentary and see if that helps in your being able to understand the phenomenon of the pink elephant closet case and sometimes pedophile that lives a strong anti-dem/GOP image and identity.
Maybe that will help you overcome your inability to comprehend the concept.
0
Ok I see, you lack the ability to understand the premise.
Try and watch the "outrage" documentary and see if that helps in your being able to understand the phenomenon of the pink elephant closet case and sometimes pedophile that lives a strong anti-dem/GOP image and identity.
Maybe that will help you overcome your inability to comprehend the concept.
The problem with the hard line stance I give is for the sake of an innocent. As we demonize a group of ppl. Those that be can then make a false accusations. Placing anyone into that I evil group hence giving reason for their destruction. Case study. Hebrews in Germany 1933-1946 these were labeled as pedophiles then it became the lot was less than a human and then sent them to consecration for mass extermination. As most realize not everyone with in that group could possibly be a cho mo but it was sold in nazi propaganda machine. Same as now we villianize Muslims. That the whole lot is some form of pediphile polygamists. Yet these things are untrue. But for the simplistic approach of the fourteen year old mentality of average American adult citizen it makes sense they are bad cause the whole is bad and the they belong to that group....
0
The problem with the hard line stance I give is for the sake of an innocent. As we demonize a group of ppl. Those that be can then make a false accusations. Placing anyone into that I evil group hence giving reason for their destruction. Case study. Hebrews in Germany 1933-1946 these were labeled as pedophiles then it became the lot was less than a human and then sent them to consecration for mass extermination. As most realize not everyone with in that group could possibly be a cho mo but it was sold in nazi propaganda machine. Same as now we villianize Muslims. That the whole lot is some form of pediphile polygamists. Yet these things are untrue. But for the simplistic approach of the fourteen year old mentality of average American adult citizen it makes sense they are bad cause the whole is bad and the they belong to that group....
For in as such my lord stated what you do unto the least you do unto me. And within the logic he was falsely accused of evil and sentenced as if guilty thus if such is actually innocent and gave a barbaric death. To me a bullet to the templ is as merciful as I could imagine in today's day and age.
0
For in as such my lord stated what you do unto the least you do unto me. And within the logic he was falsely accused of evil and sentenced as if guilty thus if such is actually innocent and gave a barbaric death. To me a bullet to the templ is as merciful as I could imagine in today's day and age.
In his time a sword thrusted between the shoulder and neck in a 20 degree angle was a merciful death. The whipping and crusifiction was to appease the masses. It took alot more energy.. But it was for public consideration more than justice.
0
In his time a sword thrusted between the shoulder and neck in a 20 degree angle was a merciful death. The whipping and crusifiction was to appease the masses. It took alot more energy.. But it was for public consideration more than justice.
so now all in the sudden you are an expert on the pink elephant issue?
Is there such a thing as a pink donkey syndrome?
If there is you may be the president and CEO. No?
Once again you display to everyone your utter incompetence and inability to comprehend the topic. Try watching the "outrage" documentary to help you understand the phenomenon of the homosexuall possibly pedophile who puts on a strong anti-dem/GOP stance as a means of over compensating for their fear of their homosexuall and pedophile urges being revealed.
Try and watch the documentary and form a view on facts, history and reality.
You should try it some time
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
so now all in the sudden you are an expert on the pink elephant issue?
Is there such a thing as a pink donkey syndrome?
If there is you may be the president and CEO. No?
Once again you display to everyone your utter incompetence and inability to comprehend the topic. Try watching the "outrage" documentary to help you understand the phenomenon of the homosexuall possibly pedophile who puts on a strong anti-dem/GOP stance as a means of over compensating for their fear of their homosexuall and pedophile urges being revealed.
Try and watch the documentary and form a view on facts, history and reality.
^ Mr. non partisan taking the lib side for the millionth time in a row. At least your're consistent. Sad you would even give merit to this type of ridiculous doc. You aren't fooling anyone.
What are you really hiding?
What scares you so much you continue to put on this pathetic facade in a forum?
I'm sure the neighbors never make eye contact with you.
Feel sorry for you.
0
^ Mr. non partisan taking the lib side for the millionth time in a row. At least your're consistent. Sad you would even give merit to this type of ridiculous doc. You aren't fooling anyone.
What are you really hiding?
What scares you so much you continue to put on this pathetic facade in a forum?
I'm sure the neighbors never make eye contact with you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
