All Forums | Politics

The GOP the party that keeps on giving

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3251
Posts: 156
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #126
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

First sentence of my last post is your answer mr donkey.

Are you as much of a boosh dag in real life as you are here?

Don't answer. I already know.

The first post was not an answer,  it was a deflection.

You still can't articulate the topic of thread, just insults and name calling.  Even 165yds thought you are proving unable to produce and needed to bail you out. 

If he didn't think you needed to bailed out he wouldn't have come in bashing.

Funny how reality works.


Please friend,  try and articulate the topic of the outraged documentary since you watched it and how it relates with Hastert and the closet case pedophile that protrays a strong GOP politics view as a means of overcompensating to hide his what his guy and pedophile urges make him think and act on.

Can you do it?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #127
He can't come out of the closet and still expect to hold his political office.

Simple.

G
S
M

https://youtu.be/xqsirbOJ9lw

I named this dog derryl.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #128
Lol that's neither the topic nor is it the answer to my question

It's very telling that you have to resort to infantile games and insults now that you have displayed to everyone that you are incapable of comprehending the topic even after watching the outrage documentary.  

Because if you could comprehend the topic and have a civil dialog you would.  But instead you display to everyone that you Fail to get it by instead engaging in you odd infantile attempts at humor.   I'm thinking you're gonna need to be bailed out again.  Perhaps others would agree. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #129
Okay. Let me put it like this...if he comes out of the closet he wouldn't be reelected.

Simple. Self preservation?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #130
I read an interview with Bruce Bartlett on the net and I must say I share his views on the Party.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

Okay. Let me put it like this...if he comes out of the closet he wouldn't be reelected.

Simple. Self preservation?

Once again you Fail to comprehend the topic.  The whole strong GOP/anti-dem image and identity is the self preservation in the first place. The fact that these GOP politicians use this facade as a means of hiding their guy and pedophile urges and what those urges make them do.  Reelection is not the issue with these GOP closet case pedophiles.  I honestly think that you did not watch the documentary and that is why you can neither articulate the topic of this thread and the documentary nor can you even answer my question.

I think you've proven yourself incapable of having the ability to do
So and should just stop now that you have proven yourself completely stumped on what should be such a simple topic  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

I read an interview with Bruce Bartlett on the net and I must say I share his views on the Party.

As a non-partisan independent that calls out all posters regardless of side I am asking you to be specific on what you are talking about here. What interview and what views were shared?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:


As a non-partisan independent that calls out all posters regardless of side I am asking you to be specific on what you are talking about here. What interview and what views were shared?

Well, I don't remember exactly the source but I read it today and it's on the first page of Yahoo.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #134
Btw, there is no need to "call someone out". In addition, if Cruz is your guy, it's as partisan as it gets.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #135
Wow this is weird to not have a response that is a total meltdown full of insults, name calling and emotional ranting. 

First off I need to take a look at the article you referenced to have a response I am not one to has prescribed views and talking points that I cannot deviate from and look unable to comprehend an indepdent view point, so I will search for it, read and be able to give a coherent and logica response before commenting.

Second I think my choice in Cruz is not Partisan. I guess as a non-partisan independent that is critical of both sides equally I am going to be seen as being for either side at times. My voting record is that I have voted for gw bush before but I have also voted for Obama and then turned right around and not voted for Obama.

My logic for Cruz is that he is most presidential.  He knows the constitution, he knows how the govt actually works and he has experience.   

anyone but Hillary for me and not because of the desperate smear campaign launched against her, but I think while she looks centrist like obama,  I do not like the undertones of a feministic agenda that she carries. 

Anyone but trump.  This guy is literally all talk and making the GOP base look like fools.  I just refused to be fooled. 

Anyone but sanders.  Sander is all theory and proves to everyone what a real socialist might look like rather than mislabeling politicians as true socialists.  No thank you. 

So I'm left with cruz.

Perhaps your ability to give me a response with out going Absolutely bananas is because the topic of the thread of the closet case guy pedophile that uses a anti-dem/GOP identity and image isn't something that resonates with you on such a personal level that it looks like it is speaking specifically about you. 

At last that's what it looks like because you're acting normal and flipping out. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #136
Sorry I mean not flipping out like the topic is about you on a personal and specific level
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:


Once again you Fail to comprehend the topic.  The whole strong GOP/anti-dem image and identity is the self preservation in the first place. The fact that these GOP politicians use this facade as a means of hiding their guy and pedophile urges and what those urges make them do.  Reelection is not the issue with these GOP closet case pedophiles.  I honestly think that you did not watch the documentary and that is why you can neither articulate the topic of this thread and the documentary nor can you even answer my question.

I think you've proven yourself incapable of having the ability to do
So and should just stop now that you have proven yourself completely stumped on what should be such a simple topic  

What makes you think he has his whole diabolical plan drawn out on a white board?

Sometimes people just act as their impulses direct them to.

I know you want them to act to fit to your prescribed agenda, but simply isn't realistic and you should know better.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #138
You still don't get it.  It's not a diabolical plan it's pure survival.  Just like it's not about election.  The only thing a closet case homosexuall pedophile with a strong anti-dem/GOP image and identity like him needs to win is protesting too much in a fashion that makes him look like the last person to be gayy and/or a pedophile.

I am now convinced that you did not watch the documentary. You can't possibly be that clueless to the topic after doing so 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #139
I never said I watched the documentary, I said I watched the trailer for the documentary. 

The trailer was enough to sow me that the documentary would be boring unless you're a far left liberal hack waiting to pounce on any potential right wing story to pander to like minded mental midgets.

I think there is no such official term 'pink elephant' for the subject you are talking about.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #140
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

Wow this is weird to not have a response that is a total meltdown full of insults, name calling and emotional ranting. 

First off I need to take a look at the article you referenced to have a response I am not one to has prescribed views and talking points that I cannot deviate from and look unable to comprehend an indepdent view point, so I will search for it, read and be able to give a coherent and logica response before commenting.

Second I think my choice in Cruz is not Partisan. I guess as a non-partisan independent that is critical of both sides equally I am going to be seen as being for either side at times. My voting record is that I have voted for gw bush before but I have also voted for Obama and then turned right around and not voted for Obama.

My logic for Cruz is that he is most presidential.  He knows the constitution, he knows how the govt actually works and he has experience.   

anyone but Hillary for me and not because of the desperate smear campaign launched against her, but I think while she looks centrist like obama,  I do not like the undertones of a feministic agenda that she carries. 

Anyone but trump.  This guy is literally all talk and making the GOP base look like fools.  I just refused to be fooled. 

Anyone but sanders.  Sander is all theory and proves to everyone what a real socialist might look like rather than mislabeling politicians as true socialists.  No thank you. 

So I'm left with cruz.

Perhaps your ability to give me a response with out going Absolutely bananas is because the topic of the thread of the closet case guy pedophile that uses a anti-dem/GOP identity and image isn't something that resonates with you on such a personal level that it looks like it is speaking specifically about you. 

At last that's what it looks like because you're acting normal and flipping out. 

Huh? Unless you are talking to someone else or it's just your routine, I certainly do not see any name-calling, insult or meltdown from me.

Not unlike what you ask Bowl to do(watch the documentary), I simply want you to read it yourself first without injecting my personal opinion on the subject.

Maybe I should be more clear, but when I said partisan, I was referring to Mr. Cruz.

Cruz is most presidential out of the remaining five? I respectfully disagree. He might know the Constitution but he certainly doesn't respect it nearly as much as he claims. In his OWN words, he's "Christian first, American second...." and that hardly qualifies him as  a Constitutionalist.

Knowing how the government works is different from making it work. In his brief Senate career so far, he's nothing but an obstructionist. Everything he's said or done is only towards his own political ambition. I see him as the most divisive candidate of all.

Yes, Trump is all talk but at least I know he doesn't even believe everything he said. Cruz is much more dangerous in that aspect and he WILL go as low as he can as long as he thinks it will earn him a few more votes.

As far as sticking to the topic, I sure don't see a few of you doing that at all time(ok, it's always the other side's fault). For the former Speaker, he deserves what is coming for him and I sincerely hope the Court would not show any leniency.

Lastly, your "personal and specific about you" game doesn't work on me and I just want to save you some time.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 18777
Posted: #141
^ He won't respond to you because he has no clue why he attacked you in the first and last two sentences. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 20652
Posted: #142
You still seeing pink elephant s have adrink man....... Good of you to try añd stop though but your bar stool misses you .....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

Huh? Unless you are talking to someone else or it's just your routine, I certainly do not see any name-calling, insult or meltdown from me.

Not unlike what you ask Bowl to do(watch the documentary), I simply want you to read it yourself first without injecting my personal opinion on the subject.

Maybe I should be more clear, but when I said partisan, I was referring to Mr. Cruz.

Cruz is most presidential out of the remaining five? I respectfully disagree. He might know the Constitution but he certainly doesn't respect it nearly as much as he claims. In his OWN words, he's "Christian first, American second...." and that hardly qualifies him as  a Constitutionalist.

Knowing how the government works is different from making it work. In his brief Senate career so far, he's nothing but an obstructionist. Everything he's said or done is only towards his own political ambition. I see him as the most divisive candidate of all.

Yes, Trump is all talk but at least I know he doesn't even believe everything he said. Cruz is much more dangerous in that aspect and he WILL go as low as he can as long as he thinks it will earn him a few more votes.

As far as sticking to the topic, I sure don't see a few of you doing that at all time(ok, it's always the other side's fault). For the former Speaker, he deserves what is coming for him and I sincerely hope the Court would not show any leniency.

Lastly, your "personal and specific about you" game doesn't work on me and I just want to save you some time.


Sorry if you feel I was accusing you of that behavior, it was just refreshing to not have all those childish games. 

I agree with you that someone that believes in putting his own religious agenda ahead of his country doesn't sound like a constitutionalist. I probably can't argue that.

I think that I get what you're saying about Cruz being a mindless anti-Obama obstructionist and I think this is a reason why the GOP is so weak in that for 8 years they had no identity other than being against anything and everything Obama did and said. But I feel at least he knows and understands how govt works with all the time he spent being teabagger vs trump who is pandering to the GOP base with talking points but no experience or first hand knowledge of govt.

I agree with you also that personal and specific doesn't work on you because you didn't flip and go bananas.  So I guess you "fail" the closet case guy pedophile test because you're not posting like a madman like the topic  resonates with you on a personal level.

As a non-partisan independent that is critical of all sides this thread is showing that people of all sides disagree with me and that I'm willing to engage in civil dialog when it is presented like this.

You give some good points about Cruz,  but maybe not enough for me to change my support for him.  Still time tho.  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #144
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:

  

I think there is no such official term 'pink elephant' for the subject you are talking about.

+1
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #145
Enough.  We get it.  You lack the mental capability to understand the topic of the thread or the documentary. 

You have proven that over And over and over in thread 

I would ask you again to answer my question or articulate the topic in a coherent manner but history has shown that you can't.  No sense in grilling someone that is so inept
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10738
Posted: #146

“The defendant is a serial child molester,” said Judge Thomas M. Durkin, of Federal District Court, in a tough rebuke of the former speaker before issuing his sentence. He added, “Nothing is more stunning than having ‘serial child molester’ and ‘Speaker of the House’ in the same sentence.”

Pointing out the vulnerability of Mr. Hastert’s young victims, he said they were damaged for years.

“If there’s a public shaming of the defendant because of the conduct he’s engaged in, so be it,” Judge Durkin said.

 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:


Sorry if you feel I was accusing you of that behavior, it was just refreshing to not have all those childish games. 

I agree with you that someone that believes in putting his own religious agenda ahead of his country doesn't sound like a constitutionalist. I probably can't argue that.

I think that I get what you're saying about Cruz being a mindless anti-Obama obstructionist and I think this is a reason why the GOP is so weak in that for 8 years they had no identity other than being against anything and everything Obama did and said. But I feel at least he knows and understands how govt works with all the time he spent being teabagger vs trump who is pandering to the GOP base with talking points but no experience or first hand knowledge of govt.

I agree with you also that personal and specific doesn't work on you because you didn't flip and go bananas.  So I guess you "fail" the closet case guy pedophile test because you're not posting like a madman like the topic  resonates with you on a personal level.

As a non-partisan independent that is critical of all sides this thread is showing that people of all sides disagree with me and that I'm willing to engage in civil dialog when it is presented like this.

You give some good points about Cruz,  but maybe not enough for me to change my support for him.  Still time tho.  

O'Reilly? C'mon DL. I get the non-partisan independent stuff but no one believes you support Cruz. You cannot name one position of his that you support. He's anti-abortion, anti-happy rights, pro-Israel, non-environmentalist, anti- any form of gun control, etc. 

 
Covers Referee
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 15596
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

You still don't get it.  It's not a diabolical plan it's pure survival.  Just like it's not about election.  The only thing a closet case homosexuall pedophile with a strong anti-dem/GOP image and identity like him needs to win is protesting too much in a fashion that makes him look like the last person to be gayy and/or a pedophile.

I am now convinced that you did not watch the documentary. You can't possibly be that clueless to the topic after doing so 


I'm just trying to understand the argument here. Are you using the example of a guy like the father in American Beauty? The one who shot Kevin Spacey as an example of that mentality? 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 20652
Posted: #149
Well Dennis hazert has been sentenced. Six months with 6 year probationary period and fined 250,000 for the bank structuring......
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #150
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:


O'Reilly? C'mon DL. I get the non-partisan independent stuff but no one believes you support Cruz. You cannot name one position of his that you support. He's anti-abortion, anti-happy rights, pro-Israel, non-environmentalist, anti- any form of gun control, etc. 


Cruz won't make America a laughing stock. Trump will.  I'm not saying Cruz embodies everything I believe in but considering the choices he is the most presidential and we at least know what we are getting in Cruz.

For the record I am anti-abortion.  I think personally it's wrong and it is killing.  Therefore I support contraception and birth control. I am also against the govt getting involved in abortion because the right to choose to have an abortion is coupled with the right not to choose to have an abortion.  If you look at eugenics it is scary to me that govt could have that level of power and perhaps dictate who should be aborted/killed. 

I am not for gayy rights but for equal rights for all.  I'm not gayy so it's hard for me to back them,  but to systematically utilize govt and policy to go against s specific group seems wrong.  Especially if it is a means of hiding personal urges as shown by the topic of this thread 

Israel is one that I don't feel strongly about mainly because I'm
Not jewish.  I think American support should be there but to what extent is debatable. 

Non-environmentalist is one that I have an opinion on in that the problem lies with the people destroying the earth.  But govts role in that is debatable.  I think there should be huge punishments for violations and more importantly outcomes.  Companies should have their internal polcies on minimizing pollution and follow their own polciies to avoid errors.  But I'm not sure if the govt should mandate how a company does business. 

Gun control to me is a lost cause. 

These are my non-partisan independent views.  I don't trust anything trump says. Hillary is to me is not likable and while she looks like a centrist I worry about a social feministic agenda.   So Cruz I think will be a good one term president that won't screw things up because he's going to be so obssesed with undoing Obamas work from the executive office 
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.