• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    The Joe Biden Diary

    «First Previous 123 ... 949596 Next Last»
    DeezyAZ81
    spockgato
    UNIMAN
    wallstreetcappers
    kcblitzkrieg
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 6523
    Posts: 2390
    «First Previous 123 ... 949596 Next Last»
     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 5:07 AM ET #2326

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives.

    This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol."

    Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason. an_light

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives.

    This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol."

    Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason. an_light

     
    spockgato
    spockgato
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2005
    Posts: 15326
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 7:15 AM ET #2327

    Both men’s words carry meaning . They’re both wrong . But the way people choose to interpret those words is where everything goes wrong . It’s like everybody in here is the Danny DeVito character in Throw Momma from the Train . Criss Cross . There . That’s how how you do it . That’s bipartisan . You’re all welcome . 

    wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
    Reply

    Both men’s words carry meaning . They’re both wrong . But the way people choose to interpret those words is where everything goes wrong . It’s like everybody in here is the Danny DeVito character in Throw Momma from the Train . Criss Cross . There . That’s how how you do it . That’s bipartisan . You’re all welcome . 

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 8:07 AM ET #2328

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    @UNIMAN  It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals and in fact I would suggest the Pelosi attack was by far more impactful and more damaging in the end. If you want to make claims as you do, please do it universally across all political groups and be equal and fair in your assessments. Do not elevate what happened to Trump and blame the left but then minimize or neutralize when he does even worse himself. Trump DID do as I claimed, he is an abusive jerk, he was on mic insulting and making light when it happened to others, MUCH WORSE than Biden saying bullseye in the sense of putting Trump in focus as to voting for him, your example and comparison was pretty lame and no other way to even frame it.

     

    Incredible post. Both events may have caused head damage and that's about it. Trump's words, if any, were post event, Biden pre-event.

    Trump's first reaction to Paul Pelosi attack. He posted on Truth Social; Wow, that's weird, and nasty," Trump's post read. "Not good!"

    And as media headlines painted Trump as this evil villian like Forbes; "TRUMP MOCKS HAMMER ATTACK IN INCENDIARY SPEECH" Trump was quoted as saying; "How’s her husband doing by the way?” and saying a “wall around her house” didn’t do a “good job” . 

     

    CNN; "TRUMP JOINS THE PAUL PELOSI CONSPIRACY CAUCUS"  Trump said; 

    It’s weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks,” Trump said. “You know, probably, you and I are better off not talking about it. The glass, it seems, was broken from the inside to the out and, you know, so, it wasn’t a break in, it was a break out.”

    Trump went on to say that he’s “not a fan of Nancy Pelosi,” but that what happened was “very sad.” He added: “The whole thing is crazy. I mean, if there’s even a little bit of truth to what’s being said, it’s crazy. But the window was broken in and it was strange the cops were standing there practically from the moment it all took place.”

     

    Wow, he was sooo evil and bad to say those words!! sleep2

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

    @UNIMAN  It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals and in fact I would suggest the Pelosi attack was by far more impactful and more damaging in the end. If you want to make claims as you do, please do it universally across all political groups and be equal and fair in your assessments. Do not elevate what happened to Trump and blame the left but then minimize or neutralize when he does even worse himself. Trump DID do as I claimed, he is an abusive jerk, he was on mic insulting and making light when it happened to others, MUCH WORSE than Biden saying bullseye in the sense of putting Trump in focus as to voting for him, your example and comparison was pretty lame and no other way to even frame it.

     

    Incredible post. Both events may have caused head damage and that's about it. Trump's words, if any, were post event, Biden pre-event.

    Trump's first reaction to Paul Pelosi attack. He posted on Truth Social; Wow, that's weird, and nasty," Trump's post read. "Not good!"

    And as media headlines painted Trump as this evil villian like Forbes; "TRUMP MOCKS HAMMER ATTACK IN INCENDIARY SPEECH" Trump was quoted as saying; "How’s her husband doing by the way?” and saying a “wall around her house” didn’t do a “good job” . 

     

    CNN; "TRUMP JOINS THE PAUL PELOSI CONSPIRACY CAUCUS"  Trump said; 

    It’s weird things going on in that household in the last couple of weeks,” Trump said. “You know, probably, you and I are better off not talking about it. The glass, it seems, was broken from the inside to the out and, you know, so, it wasn’t a break in, it was a break out.”

    Trump went on to say that he’s “not a fan of Nancy Pelosi,” but that what happened was “very sad.” He added: “The whole thing is crazy. I mean, if there’s even a little bit of truth to what’s being said, it’s crazy. But the window was broken in and it was strange the cops were standing there practically from the moment it all took place.”

     

    Wow, he was sooo evil and bad to say those words!! sleep2

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 8:14 AM ET #2329

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives. This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol." Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason.

    " I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today."

     

    SNOPES; DID DEMS VIDEO OMIT THESE WORDS; "TRUE"

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives. This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol." Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason.

    " I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today."

     

    SNOPES; DID DEMS VIDEO OMIT THESE WORDS; "TRUE"

     
    spockgato
    spockgato
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2005
    Posts: 15326
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 10:07 AM ET #2330

    Very interesting points that you made . Now let’s hear the counter and where it goes .

    wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
    Reply

    Very interesting points that you made . Now let’s hear the counter and where it goes .

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 10:16 AM ET #2331

    @Barbarossa

     So to you "fairly" means side with you and allow abuses to those you disagree with, box or ban people who disagree with you or with your side. Define fairly for me using the site rules not political nonsense.

    I dont care what side you are on, that means nothing and there are MANY from both groups here that have no issues posting and are capable of existing and interacting just fine. Then there are members who cannot keep the rules and get boxed or banned, on BOTH sides.

    You are a bruiser who likes to attack and belittle the MEMBER here, you cannot control your temper and it has consequences, you do not like consequences so you complain about fairness. If you cant post here and keep the rules at the same time then maybe you are not suited to post in the politics forum? I notice in most any discussion you are involved with it gets personal and you start digging at the member because you lack self control. 

    Fairness is the site rules and only the site rules, I hope you and everyone here can remember that respect and consideration are what is expected anywhere on the site, no personal attacks or abuses to others. If you feel someone else is breaking the rules then send a user report, but be aware that when any member makes a report most of the time if the reporting member is involved in the problem then action might  not be taken so be sure if you submit a report that you are also not breaking the rules yourself.

    Reply

    @Barbarossa

     So to you "fairly" means side with you and allow abuses to those you disagree with, box or ban people who disagree with you or with your side. Define fairly for me using the site rules not political nonsense.

    I dont care what side you are on, that means nothing and there are MANY from both groups here that have no issues posting and are capable of existing and interacting just fine. Then there are members who cannot keep the rules and get boxed or banned, on BOTH sides.

    You are a bruiser who likes to attack and belittle the MEMBER here, you cannot control your temper and it has consequences, you do not like consequences so you complain about fairness. If you cant post here and keep the rules at the same time then maybe you are not suited to post in the politics forum? I notice in most any discussion you are involved with it gets personal and you start digging at the member because you lack self control. 

    Fairness is the site rules and only the site rules, I hope you and everyone here can remember that respect and consideration are what is expected anywhere on the site, no personal attacks or abuses to others. If you feel someone else is breaking the rules then send a user report, but be aware that when any member makes a report most of the time if the reporting member is involved in the problem then action might  not be taken so be sure if you submit a report that you are also not breaking the rules yourself.

     
    spockgato
    spockgato
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2005
    Posts: 15326
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 10:34 AM ET #2332

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals and in fact I would suggest the Pelosi attack was by far more impactful and more damaging in the end. If you want to make claims as you do, please do it universally across all political groups and be equal and fair in your assessments. Do not elevate what happened to Trump and blame the left but then minimize or neutralize when he does even worse himself. Trump DID do as I claimed, he is an abusive jerk, he was on mic insulting and making light when it happened to others, MUCH WORSE than Biden saying bullseye in the sense of putting Trump in focus as to voting for him, your example and comparison was pretty lame and no other way to even frame it.   you cannot be serious. A former President was shot at , and if the shooter's bullet hit him half an inch more to the right he would be dead , headshot, game over. the world was and is in shock.  To compare this to Paul Pelosi , who is not a "political individual" last time i checked , and who got attacked by his lover is ridiculous. i cannot understand how an intelligent individual cannot draw a line in the sand here and see the difference , which are worlds apart given the impact. believe me , i speak several languages fluently and follow the European press daily , the Paul Pelosi story was page 17 material.  and lets not talk about your bias , i stand with what i said repeatedly , you , Sir , are too biased to fairly moderate a political forum , i understand it is a hard job and i  i couldn't do it .

    I do not believe that they were identical . I also respectfully disagree that is was far more impactful and that it will be more damaging in the end . 

    wallstreetcappers craps in his draws and pees fuckin backwards from his vaj with a squirt.
    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa:

    Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals and in fact I would suggest the Pelosi attack was by far more impactful and more damaging in the end. If you want to make claims as you do, please do it universally across all political groups and be equal and fair in your assessments. Do not elevate what happened to Trump and blame the left but then minimize or neutralize when he does even worse himself. Trump DID do as I claimed, he is an abusive jerk, he was on mic insulting and making light when it happened to others, MUCH WORSE than Biden saying bullseye in the sense of putting Trump in focus as to voting for him, your example and comparison was pretty lame and no other way to even frame it.   you cannot be serious. A former President was shot at , and if the shooter's bullet hit him half an inch more to the right he would be dead , headshot, game over. the world was and is in shock.  To compare this to Paul Pelosi , who is not a "political individual" last time i checked , and who got attacked by his lover is ridiculous. i cannot understand how an intelligent individual cannot draw a line in the sand here and see the difference , which are worlds apart given the impact. believe me , i speak several languages fluently and follow the European press daily , the Paul Pelosi story was page 17 material.  and lets not talk about your bias , i stand with what i said repeatedly , you , Sir , are too biased to fairly moderate a political forum , i understand it is a hard job and i  i couldn't do it .

    I do not believe that they were identical . I also respectfully disagree that is was far more impactful and that it will be more damaging in the end . 

     
    DeezyAZ81
    DeezyAZ81
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 8713
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 12:30 PM ET #2333

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives. This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol." Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason. " I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today."   SNOPES; DID DEMS VIDEO OMIT THESE WORDS; "TRUE"

    When were these words spoken? Must of have been a different part of the speech. Not in his quotes when he said fight like hell or you will have not a country and said I'll march with you. Again interesting how you deduce this does not mean violence but Biden's words do. See how you play mental gymnastics to defend Trump's words no matter what? However, the same discretion and logic is not applied to Biden on your side. It's truly astounding. peace_5

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:

    Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN  So words from Biden have meaning, but threatening abusive words from Trump are just humor. Trump minimized and made political humor about Pelosi and others in the exact same scenario...but when Trump says it then it means nothing.  If you are going to be critical of words then do it across the board not just when it serves your partisan objectives. This is a hypocritical bunch for sure. Same group that claims Trump did not really mean to encourage his sheep at the Stop the Steal gathering right outside of Capitol Building, January 6th to fight and attack Democratic lawmakers to stop certification of the election when he stated. "if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore." "We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We are going to the Capitol." Somehow none of these words actually meant fight or incite violence. However, Biden's words are dangerous and mean assassinate or else. Like you said Biden's words carry meaning, but Trump's do not for some odd reason. " I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today."   SNOPES; DID DEMS VIDEO OMIT THESE WORDS; "TRUE"

    When were these words spoken? Must of have been a different part of the speech. Not in his quotes when he said fight like hell or you will have not a country and said I'll march with you. Again interesting how you deduce this does not mean violence but Biden's words do. See how you play mental gymnastics to defend Trump's words no matter what? However, the same discretion and logic is not applied to Biden on your side. It's truly astounding. peace_5

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 7:15 PM ET #2334

    @wallstreetcappers

     It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals 

     

    I've always taken you for a serious person, a thoughtful individual who can balance the fact from fiction in this crazy world.... this comment, and the reasoning provided, has me questioning my previous assessment.  

    Trumps impact on the psyche of some of you is dangerously scary.  There are professionals in the world that can assist with recovery.  Anyone struggling, please seek them out peace_5

     

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     It is identical, two senseless attacks on political individuals 

     

    I've always taken you for a serious person, a thoughtful individual who can balance the fact from fiction in this crazy world.... this comment, and the reasoning provided, has me questioning my previous assessment.  

    Trumps impact on the psyche of some of you is dangerously scary.  There are professionals in the world that can assist with recovery.  Anyone struggling, please seek them out peace_5

     

     
    scooby-doos
    scooby-doos
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 3194
    Posted: Jul. 15, 2024 - 7:47 PM ET #2335

    Blitz... its as if they know joe can't be protected or hidden anymore.  Seems little bit more salty then before.   

    Reply

    Blitz... its as if they know joe can't be protected or hidden anymore.  Seems little bit more salty then before.   

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 8:11 AM ET #2336

    @DeezyAZ81    When were these words spoken?

     

     an_lightThe fact you have to ask says it all. an_light

    Reply

    @DeezyAZ81    When were these words spoken?

     

     an_lightThe fact you have to ask says it all. an_light

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 8:30 AM ET #2337

    "I want to make sure we’re going to fight like hell...................... by investing in America first,” said Biden

     

    Should I get my weapons and prepare for action? 

    This phrase has been used countless times since I was born. Basically meaning give it your all even if it looks impossible.

    You want violent rhetoric? 

    https://x.com/JayMaga47/status/1566121525358501888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1566121525358501888%7Ctwgr%5Eb8ab83817274a07cc51e450e205b42ea84799816%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fnext-day-trump-shooter-had-explosives-secret-service-denies-accusations-msm-blames-victim

    Reply

    "I want to make sure we’re going to fight like hell...................... by investing in America first,” said Biden

     

    Should I get my weapons and prepare for action? 

    This phrase has been used countless times since I was born. Basically meaning give it your all even if it looks impossible.

    You want violent rhetoric? 

    https://x.com/JayMaga47/status/1566121525358501888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1566121525358501888%7Ctwgr%5Eb8ab83817274a07cc51e450e205b42ea84799816%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fnext-day-trump-shooter-had-explosives-secret-service-denies-accusations-msm-blames-victim

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 11:08 AM ET #2338

    @kcblitzkrieg

     Good thing I dont stay awake at night worrying about your opinion of me...whew that is a huge relief.

    The worth of every single life is the same in my book, it might not be in yours but it is in mine. We can disagree on this precept but the need for seeking help might not be aimed at me...

    an_light

    Reply

    @kcblitzkrieg

     Good thing I dont stay awake at night worrying about your opinion of me...whew that is a huge relief.

    The worth of every single life is the same in my book, it might not be in yours but it is in mine. We can disagree on this precept but the need for seeking help might not be aimed at me...

    an_light

     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38234
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 11:23 AM ET #2339

     Biden keeps pouring gas on his own dumpster fire. an_roll_laugh

    Reply

     Biden keeps pouring gas on his own dumpster fire. an_roll_laugh

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 11:24 AM ET #2340

    @wallstreetcappers

     

     I sincerely hope no one on this cess pool sub is losing sleep over said forum.... and no I would not claim to possess knowledge or opinion of you needing professional help.  

    The only thing the in common with your two examples being "identical" is your apt description of them being "senseless violence" peace_5  

    The Pelosi spousal attack with a "hammer" had no more impact on the Country than it's contribution to creating memes and political jokes.  The impact was socially superficial.  Did it effect the outcome of a Presidential race ?  A Congressional race ?  Did the 2022 mids win all the Republicans seats because of its impact ?  

    The full impact from the first Presidential assassination attempt since Reagan, over 30 years ago, is still yet to be determined.  I'm a betting man, and I'm betting it's impact is going to be a little stronger than Mr. Pelosi's incident.... 

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     

     I sincerely hope no one on this cess pool sub is losing sleep over said forum.... and no I would not claim to possess knowledge or opinion of you needing professional help.  

    The only thing the in common with your two examples being "identical" is your apt description of them being "senseless violence" peace_5  

    The Pelosi spousal attack with a "hammer" had no more impact on the Country than it's contribution to creating memes and political jokes.  The impact was socially superficial.  Did it effect the outcome of a Presidential race ?  A Congressional race ?  Did the 2022 mids win all the Republicans seats because of its impact ?  

    The full impact from the first Presidential assassination attempt since Reagan, over 30 years ago, is still yet to be determined.  I'm a betting man, and I'm betting it's impact is going to be a little stronger than Mr. Pelosi's incident.... 

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 11:35 AM ET #2341

    @kcblitzkrieg

     I think I explained my reasoning quite well so what is the purpose of dragging me into a political argument?

    The Pelosi incident happened because SHE is a politician, acts of violence happen every single day but her husband was attacked (and you could say she was the target but not really the point of the example) and if she were not a long term well known controversial politician I kinda think that guy would not have been there to do that act.

    Trump is an ex-politician seeking to be a politician again, he is well known like Pelosi but for his businesses not his politics until recently.

    The impacts are also not the point I was making, I consider the life of every single person on the earth to be the same value. The impacts are depending on the person, I get no more impacted from a squishy hit job on Trump than I did from a very personal home invasion attack on Pelosi's husband. This lame Trump incident was not the work of some foreign government or secret DEEP STATE society, it was a messed up kid with issues. That means zero impact wise to me, so since you lean towards revering Trump more than me the impact obviously seems enormous for you, it was not for me.

    Not all that complicated..

    Reply

    @kcblitzkrieg

     I think I explained my reasoning quite well so what is the purpose of dragging me into a political argument?

    The Pelosi incident happened because SHE is a politician, acts of violence happen every single day but her husband was attacked (and you could say she was the target but not really the point of the example) and if she were not a long term well known controversial politician I kinda think that guy would not have been there to do that act.

    Trump is an ex-politician seeking to be a politician again, he is well known like Pelosi but for his businesses not his politics until recently.

    The impacts are also not the point I was making, I consider the life of every single person on the earth to be the same value. The impacts are depending on the person, I get no more impacted from a squishy hit job on Trump than I did from a very personal home invasion attack on Pelosi's husband. This lame Trump incident was not the work of some foreign government or secret DEEP STATE society, it was a messed up kid with issues. That means zero impact wise to me, so since you lean towards revering Trump more than me the impact obviously seems enormous for you, it was not for me.

    Not all that complicated..

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 11:43 AM ET #2342

    @wallstreetcappers

     Not arguing at all, just sharing my thoughts on the impact.....  hence, I agreed with your "senseless violence" assessment on your "identical" description.  

     No where did I comment on how either event effected you personally, I was clearly talking about the societal impact and future impact of this recent event on our upcoming election....surely you comprehended this.   

    Again, no where did I state my personal feelings on how Saturday's event nor the Pelosi event, affected me so not sure why you are bringing "personal" feelings into play.  

    My feelings, thoughts and distaste on Trump, Biden, our political system in general are well documented here and you and I have had discussion after discussion on this so your "revering Trump" comment to finish off your statement shows a major weakness in your psyche.  

    peace  be with you in this difficult time 

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     Not arguing at all, just sharing my thoughts on the impact.....  hence, I agreed with your "senseless violence" assessment on your "identical" description.  

     No where did I comment on how either event effected you personally, I was clearly talking about the societal impact and future impact of this recent event on our upcoming election....surely you comprehended this.   

    Again, no where did I state my personal feelings on how Saturday's event nor the Pelosi event, affected me so not sure why you are bringing "personal" feelings into play.  

    My feelings, thoughts and distaste on Trump, Biden, our political system in general are well documented here and you and I have had discussion after discussion on this so your "revering Trump" comment to finish off your statement shows a major weakness in your psyche.  

    peace  be with you in this difficult time 

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 12:13 PM ET #2343

    Peace with me during this difficult time? Ok...lol

    Post 2334 was that you who made that or was it me? 

    My reference and comments were based on your words, so that is where I get my reasoning for my replies to your need to address me and say what you did.

    Maybe you need to focus on staying away from the personal jabs you make at me and the unnecessary partisan fights you drag me and others into and work on being respectful and less confrontational.

    My original context from the FIRST reply that got your feathers ruffled was that the two events were identical and then I also stated HOW and WHY they were identical. Now if that hurts your RNC feelings suggesting that a lowly DNC politician hubby is similar to the RNC dictator well I cant help you with that. My perspective hasnt changed as to the comment. 

    Thanks for the laugh on that this is a difficult time and wishing me well..lol what a funny remark from someone who attacks me more than most here.

    Reply

    Peace with me during this difficult time? Ok...lol

    Post 2334 was that you who made that or was it me? 

    My reference and comments were based on your words, so that is where I get my reasoning for my replies to your need to address me and say what you did.

    Maybe you need to focus on staying away from the personal jabs you make at me and the unnecessary partisan fights you drag me and others into and work on being respectful and less confrontational.

    My original context from the FIRST reply that got your feathers ruffled was that the two events were identical and then I also stated HOW and WHY they were identical. Now if that hurts your RNC feelings suggesting that a lowly DNC politician hubby is similar to the RNC dictator well I cant help you with that. My perspective hasnt changed as to the comment. 

    Thanks for the laugh on that this is a difficult time and wishing me well..lol what a funny remark from someone who attacks me more than most here.

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 12:32 PM ET #2344

    @wallstreetcappers

    lol what a funny remark from someone who attacks me more than most here.

     

    "attacks you" lmao an_roll_laugh

    soft as charmin as always.  You really gonna make me explain your confusion of what is going on here ??  OK, twist my arm.... 

    1.  after my initial comment and your response, I AGREED with your assessment of the use of the term "identical".  This is me, now for 2nd time, agreeing with you.  THIS means that there is no longer any further reason to discuss said point.  That is how normal discussion works.  Not "attacking", just conversation.  Are you feeling disrespected because I responded to your comment with a different point?  I acknowledged you then moved on to my point on societal & election impacts.  

    2.  You clarified in response and started talking about how it effected / didn't effect YOU personally then you tried to assume what my personal thoughts / feelings were.  Mistake on you, not me.  I politely addressed this fact.  

    3.  If you think because I called you out for throwing in the "revered Trump" jab, because you know that is not my purview, that is somehow "attacking" or "disrespectful" then what exactly is your role here as moderator?  

    Lastly, your post #2341, the part where you address "foreign governments" and "deep state".  Not sure what that has to do with anything I said.  I never once in this thread or any other thread, brought up or insinuated either of those topics.  

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

    lol what a funny remark from someone who attacks me more than most here.

     

    "attacks you" lmao an_roll_laugh

    soft as charmin as always.  You really gonna make me explain your confusion of what is going on here ??  OK, twist my arm.... 

    1.  after my initial comment and your response, I AGREED with your assessment of the use of the term "identical".  This is me, now for 2nd time, agreeing with you.  THIS means that there is no longer any further reason to discuss said point.  That is how normal discussion works.  Not "attacking", just conversation.  Are you feeling disrespected because I responded to your comment with a different point?  I acknowledged you then moved on to my point on societal & election impacts.  

    2.  You clarified in response and started talking about how it effected / didn't effect YOU personally then you tried to assume what my personal thoughts / feelings were.  Mistake on you, not me.  I politely addressed this fact.  

    3.  If you think because I called you out for throwing in the "revered Trump" jab, because you know that is not my purview, that is somehow "attacking" or "disrespectful" then what exactly is your role here as moderator?  

    Lastly, your post #2341, the part where you address "foreign governments" and "deep state".  Not sure what that has to do with anything I said.  I never once in this thread or any other thread, brought up or insinuated either of those topics.  

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 16, 2024 - 1:00 PM ET #2345

    @kcblitzkrieg

     Ok post 2334 was that you or was that me? You addressed me then you do this fake sincere I wish you well garbage when the last thing you wish me is well so why say that at all? Its disingenuous and actually proves the point you take jabs regularly...that was a jab. 

    If you do not want me to reply to something you post, the best way to accomplish that is to not post it in the first place. When you say garbage like in 2334 what kind of response do you think I will make? 

    Then you follow up with difficult time stuff constantly riding Trump's swimsuit as you do, then you get upset when I say this impacted you more than me...your posts and threads speak your truth not anything I say or do. You revere Trump more than I do, but the original point was that the two events were identical to ME and I said the reasons why...that I do not revere ANYONE more than another, so since this was not some 9-11 terrorist attack from an organization intending to do harm to the large general public, the impact is no different to me than the Pelosi event and in fact the impact of a home invasion and attack is more personal and cringing to me because a home invasion IS personal so a poor shot attempt by a messed up kid doesnt impact me or politics at all...now it does cause social media to go into full wack mode as we are seeing but the impact on society and politics is a zero here. So my comment was not about how it impacted ME specifically, my comment was more that it really does not impact society outside of shock value...super low low odds that anyone is harmed going forward and the government is not at risk. 

    You would come off more straight if you just admitted you like trying to provoke me with any tool you can find, that is obvious and that we know..so why hide behind fake peace signs and platitudes that we all know you really dont mean?

    Its ok that we disagree and it is ok you prefer Trump, I dont care actually...good for you and glad you like talking about RNC stuff, go for it knock yourself out. All I care is you keep the rules and do not be antagonistic to others, try to engage in respectful discussion and make things better not worse.

    Soft as Charmin as always, nice jab there too...believe me that you are not even in the universe of garbage Ive dealt with over the years, you are fodder compared to what some other members have done, so if you think I am being soft it is because I call out your fake crap and wont back down to bullying attempts from you or anyone.

    Reply

    @kcblitzkrieg

     Ok post 2334 was that you or was that me? You addressed me then you do this fake sincere I wish you well garbage when the last thing you wish me is well so why say that at all? Its disingenuous and actually proves the point you take jabs regularly...that was a jab. 

    If you do not want me to reply to something you post, the best way to accomplish that is to not post it in the first place. When you say garbage like in 2334 what kind of response do you think I will make? 

    Then you follow up with difficult time stuff constantly riding Trump's swimsuit as you do, then you get upset when I say this impacted you more than me...your posts and threads speak your truth not anything I say or do. You revere Trump more than I do, but the original point was that the two events were identical to ME and I said the reasons why...that I do not revere ANYONE more than another, so since this was not some 9-11 terrorist attack from an organization intending to do harm to the large general public, the impact is no different to me than the Pelosi event and in fact the impact of a home invasion and attack is more personal and cringing to me because a home invasion IS personal so a poor shot attempt by a messed up kid doesnt impact me or politics at all...now it does cause social media to go into full wack mode as we are seeing but the impact on society and politics is a zero here. So my comment was not about how it impacted ME specifically, my comment was more that it really does not impact society outside of shock value...super low low odds that anyone is harmed going forward and the government is not at risk. 

    You would come off more straight if you just admitted you like trying to provoke me with any tool you can find, that is obvious and that we know..so why hide behind fake peace signs and platitudes that we all know you really dont mean?

    Its ok that we disagree and it is ok you prefer Trump, I dont care actually...good for you and glad you like talking about RNC stuff, go for it knock yourself out. All I care is you keep the rules and do not be antagonistic to others, try to engage in respectful discussion and make things better not worse.

    Soft as Charmin as always, nice jab there too...believe me that you are not even in the universe of garbage Ive dealt with over the years, you are fodder compared to what some other members have done, so if you think I am being soft it is because I call out your fake crap and wont back down to bullying attempts from you or anyone.

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2024 - 2:00 PM ET #2346

    @wallstreetcappers

     You need a well deserved vacation from this place..... 

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     You need a well deserved vacation from this place..... 

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58424
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2024 - 2:22 PM ET #2347

    @kcblitzkrieg

     As usual instead of addressing a reply you resort to petty put downs. Instead of posting stupid stuff like that, just dont reply.

    an_light

    Reply

    @kcblitzkrieg

     As usual instead of addressing a reply you resort to petty put downs. Instead of posting stupid stuff like that, just dont reply.

    an_light

     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38234
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2024 - 2:51 PM ET #2348

    Biden calls to "lower the temp" on political rhetoric, then does it himself. The POS couldn't even wait two days before he started in with the "maga extremist" nonsense.

    Reply

    Biden calls to "lower the temp" on political rhetoric, then does it himself. The POS couldn't even wait two days before he started in with the "maga extremist" nonsense.

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2024 - 2:55 PM ET #2349

    @wallstreetcappers

     It's not a put down, it is a clear observation.  This forum is getting to your psyche.  It is clear as day for anyone who sees your responses on a daily basis over the relative past in this cess pool sub.  You are letting things get personal and it is showing, very poorly might I add.  I could go round and round with you on these couple previous posts, you aren't getting it so why waste my time.  You are compromised at this time though so no use in going further.  

    As a friendly reminder, something I've done here time to time, is to remind everyone that the topics at hand are part of the theatre of politics.  It is two parties under one umbrella, the UNI-Party as I've described it.  You are acting exactly like your elites want you too..... 

    As we ONLY have two Presidential Candidates we are realistically given a choice between, please take a few seconds to listen to this phone call to help show the light on what perspective you may have versus the reality of how things are...  Take a look at how your "divisive" political theatre is behind the scenes. 

    https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1813205933125759219

    If some of you out there HATE the "other side".....or perhaps feel like you are getting your feelings hurt because someone may not agree with you 100% on something.....or you may just be having a bad day, because you think Biden or Trump or RFK or whoever, you might want to rethink your position.  And yes, the solution to this may be as simple as taking a little vacation from "WHY" this is happening to you.   

     

     

     

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     It's not a put down, it is a clear observation.  This forum is getting to your psyche.  It is clear as day for anyone who sees your responses on a daily basis over the relative past in this cess pool sub.  You are letting things get personal and it is showing, very poorly might I add.  I could go round and round with you on these couple previous posts, you aren't getting it so why waste my time.  You are compromised at this time though so no use in going further.  

    As a friendly reminder, something I've done here time to time, is to remind everyone that the topics at hand are part of the theatre of politics.  It is two parties under one umbrella, the UNI-Party as I've described it.  You are acting exactly like your elites want you too..... 

    As we ONLY have two Presidential Candidates we are realistically given a choice between, please take a few seconds to listen to this phone call to help show the light on what perspective you may have versus the reality of how things are...  Take a look at how your "divisive" political theatre is behind the scenes. 

    https://x.com/EdKrassen/status/1813205933125759219

    If some of you out there HATE the "other side".....or perhaps feel like you are getting your feelings hurt because someone may not agree with you 100% on something.....or you may just be having a bad day, because you think Biden or Trump or RFK or whoever, you might want to rethink your position.  And yes, the solution to this may be as simple as taking a little vacation from "WHY" this is happening to you.   

     

     

     

     
     
    fubah2
    fubah2
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 53354
    Posted: Jul. 17, 2024 - 2:57 PM ET #2350

    Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

    Biden calls to "lower the temp" on political rhetoric, then does it himself. The POS couldn't even wait two days before he started in with the "maga extremist" nonsense.

    Well the MAGAs (not all republicans!)  are extremists and they are led by

    a twice-impeached CONVICTED FELON

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

    Biden calls to "lower the temp" on political rhetoric, then does it himself. The POS couldn't even wait two days before he started in with the "maga extremist" nonsense.

    Well the MAGAs (not all republicans!)  are extremists and they are led by

    a twice-impeached CONVICTED FELON

    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123 ... 949596 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,608
    • Monday 09/28/2026 804
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,214
    • Rams vs Broncos in game live SNF 2,739
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 102,132
    • Eagles@Bears discussion 2,758
    • Another BS PI 998
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,546
    • NCAA WEEK 4 *** Parlay Picasso *** 9,343
    • HELP PLEASE 1,624

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.