[Conservative media] Fox News, Newsmax and New York Post promote the hoax that homeless veterans are evicted to house migrants.
Mid-Hudson news discover YIT foundation paid homeless men from a local shelter to pose as evicted veterans to create national outrage. Further investigation reveals Crossroad hotel never had veterans as tenants.
How surprised should we really be? LOL
3
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
[Conservative media] Fox News, Newsmax and New York Post promote the hoax that homeless veterans are evicted to house migrants.
Mid-Hudson news discover YIT foundation paid homeless men from a local shelter to pose as evicted veterans to create national outrage. Further investigation reveals Crossroad hotel never had veterans as tenants.
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Trump Calls to Defund the Police After His Own Arrest Yes, he did say that! Strange how that is being ignored though....and instead attack the Dems as the sole party who want to defund the police Even stranger is how trump's declaration to rip up our Constitution is also ignored by the right. Trump promotes the false claim that democrats want to defund the police. During his presidency, he has been trying to defund law enforcement for years. His 2021 budget proposes cutting $400 million. In contrast, Biden has a long history of supporting law enforcement and increased funding after becoming president. Furthermore, he encourages states to use other federal funds to invest in police to fight crimes. It's not a claim, it's fact. The 'defund the police' movement was put on steroids, by the marxists that lead BLM, after the George Floyd death. It's pretty clear who spearheaded the whole thing, and it was BLM marxists. Do you disavow what was done by your party ??
These few on here really are delusional
It's sad...then it's comical
It's comical but WOW how really sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Trump Calls to Defund the Police After His Own Arrest Yes, he did say that! Strange how that is being ignored though....and instead attack the Dems as the sole party who want to defund the police Even stranger is how trump's declaration to rip up our Constitution is also ignored by the right. Trump promotes the false claim that democrats want to defund the police. During his presidency, he has been trying to defund law enforcement for years. His 2021 budget proposes cutting $400 million. In contrast, Biden has a long history of supporting law enforcement and increased funding after becoming president. Furthermore, he encourages states to use other federal funds to invest in police to fight crimes. It's not a claim, it's fact. The 'defund the police' movement was put on steroids, by the marxists that lead BLM, after the George Floyd death. It's pretty clear who spearheaded the whole thing, and it was BLM marxists. Do you disavow what was done by your party ??
@Rush51 Anyone in this country experienced the issues with the police over the last few years and really over our lifetime so this issue isnt new and it isnt really partisan to me in how I see it and how many see it. I dont think THEM are wanting to defund the police in a blanket partisan statement fashion at all, that is not what I have seen and what my conclusion is. To me this "movement" is due to abuses from certain police departments, lack of execution, selective engagement and no accountability. That has been the case since this country was founded, police departments are full of fraud, full of hatred and biases, full of selective engagement and too many times little or no accountability. What I conclude is this BLM defund the police move is because certain groups have been and are abused more by police than others and these groups are fed up with police departments having no control, ineffective accountability and selective enforcement. So if the police wont take action internally then they are saying stop funding them and get rid of all of the leadership, not stop having a police department. There are MANY groups that feel the police does not represent or protect them and I actually agree with this in many ways. Being a policeman is one of the toughest jobs there is, high risk long hours low pay and tons of downside, that is a fact. But you cant make this issue partisan, it is much more about minority abuse, lack of protection and ineffective accountability and that angers the minority groups that have been abused. The media in this case shapes a narrative and makes the GOP side think this issue is something it really is not, that enrages you and motivates you to vote the way THEY want you to...its a nasty ploy and it works.
Do you ever look in the mirror, the media owns you
I would rather deal with the few bad cops than the many bad criminals.
Allowing crimes and freeing criminals is NOT helping
Thinking George Floyd is a hero is worthy of a statue is asinine
Attacking Trump but not Biden is quite partisan
You are completely biased but strangely try to say you're not
If the pieces of shat you support weren't allowed to run rampant...maybe the police wouldn't treat everyone like a deadly threat
I would have loved to see you apprehend a guy like George Floyd. Only then may you speak and probably a different tune
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@Rush51 Anyone in this country experienced the issues with the police over the last few years and really over our lifetime so this issue isnt new and it isnt really partisan to me in how I see it and how many see it. I dont think THEM are wanting to defund the police in a blanket partisan statement fashion at all, that is not what I have seen and what my conclusion is. To me this "movement" is due to abuses from certain police departments, lack of execution, selective engagement and no accountability. That has been the case since this country was founded, police departments are full of fraud, full of hatred and biases, full of selective engagement and too many times little or no accountability. What I conclude is this BLM defund the police move is because certain groups have been and are abused more by police than others and these groups are fed up with police departments having no control, ineffective accountability and selective enforcement. So if the police wont take action internally then they are saying stop funding them and get rid of all of the leadership, not stop having a police department. There are MANY groups that feel the police does not represent or protect them and I actually agree with this in many ways. Being a policeman is one of the toughest jobs there is, high risk long hours low pay and tons of downside, that is a fact. But you cant make this issue partisan, it is much more about minority abuse, lack of protection and ineffective accountability and that angers the minority groups that have been abused. The media in this case shapes a narrative and makes the GOP side think this issue is something it really is not, that enrages you and motivates you to vote the way THEY want you to...its a nasty ploy and it works.
Do you ever look in the mirror, the media owns you
I would rather deal with the few bad cops than the many bad criminals.
Allowing crimes and freeing criminals is NOT helping
Thinking George Floyd is a hero is worthy of a statue is asinine
Attacking Trump but not Biden is quite partisan
You are completely biased but strangely try to say you're not
If the pieces of shat you support weren't allowed to run rampant...maybe the police wouldn't treat everyone like a deadly threat
I would have loved to see you apprehend a guy like George Floyd. Only then may you speak and probably a different tune
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Republican's Durham probe does nosedive into outhouse pit NY TIMES - After Years of Political Hype, the much ballyhooed Durham Inquiry Failed to Deliver At a time when special counsels are proliferating — there have been four since Trump took office in 2017, two of whom are still at work — the much-hyped investigation by Durham, a REPUBLICAN special counsel, into the Russia inquiry ended with a whimper that stood in contrast to the countless hours of political furor that spun off from it. Durham delivered a report that scolded the FBI, yes, but *FAILED* to live up to the expectations of supporters of Donald Trump that he would uncover an alleged politically motivated “deep state” conspiracy. Durham - a republican appointee from trump era -did not charge any high-level FBI or intelligence official with a crime! - and he even acknowledged in a footnote that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign did *NOTHING* prosecutable, either! Hillary vindicated by republican!
If what was done to Trump was done to a democrat, you would be crying a different tune.
What happened to democracy democracy?
Lying by opposing candidate and backed up by many in government is a conspiracy. To deny it makes you a swamp creature too.
Please split this country in 2.
I need to watch democrats destroy each other as they succumb to the dead weight they applaud, and their glorious leaders pawn them to Hell.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Republican's Durham probe does nosedive into outhouse pit NY TIMES - After Years of Political Hype, the much ballyhooed Durham Inquiry Failed to Deliver At a time when special counsels are proliferating — there have been four since Trump took office in 2017, two of whom are still at work — the much-hyped investigation by Durham, a REPUBLICAN special counsel, into the Russia inquiry ended with a whimper that stood in contrast to the countless hours of political furor that spun off from it. Durham delivered a report that scolded the FBI, yes, but *FAILED* to live up to the expectations of supporters of Donald Trump that he would uncover an alleged politically motivated “deep state” conspiracy. Durham - a republican appointee from trump era -did not charge any high-level FBI or intelligence official with a crime! - and he even acknowledged in a footnote that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign did *NOTHING* prosecutable, either! Hillary vindicated by republican!
If what was done to Trump was done to a democrat, you would be crying a different tune.
What happened to democracy democracy?
Lying by opposing candidate and backed up by many in government is a conspiracy. To deny it makes you a swamp creature too.
Please split this country in 2.
I need to watch democrats destroy each other as they succumb to the dead weight they applaud, and their glorious leaders pawn them to Hell.
[Conservative media] Fox News, Newsmax and New York Post promote the hoax that homeless veterans are evicted to house migrants!
Mid-Hudson news discover YIT foundation paid homeless men from a local shelter to pose as evicted veterans to create national outrage. Further investigation reveals Crossroad hotel never had veterans as tenants.
How surprised should we really be? LOL
@fubah2
none zip nada
its fux news afterall the lowest standard on cable tv which only seems to appeal to the deplorables
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
[Conservative media] Fox News, Newsmax and New York Post promote the hoax that homeless veterans are evicted to house migrants!
Mid-Hudson news discover YIT foundation paid homeless men from a local shelter to pose as evicted veterans to create national outrage. Further investigation reveals Crossroad hotel never had veterans as tenants.
How surprised should we really be? LOL
@fubah2
none zip nada
its fux news afterall the lowest standard on cable tv which only seems to appeal to the deplorables
I've watched literally thousands of football games in my 69 years since birth. Pro, college, highschool. All weather conditions. And among them all it has always been the case that one side gets flagged more times than the other in a large majority of the games. In fact from my observation it is an exception to the norm when both teams get flagged an exact equal number of times. I know this too from experience officiating basketball for 15 years. And oftentimes the numbers of penalties are lopsided. We see this in NFL and college football and hoops too.
Indeed we've all witnessed games where the "offending team" with the lopsided calls against themare still committing the majority of fouls, repeatedly, and surely deserve even more, but by then it looks like the refs are giving them a break as the score is getting out of hand!
Do we have a rightful concern that ALL the games do not end with EXACTLY (or near) the same number of calls called equally on each team?
Is any deviation from EXACTLY the same number of calls on each team an implication the game officials are necessarily biased and reffing unfairly?
I remember vividly dreading officiating mens rec league games involving one particular team sponsored by a local moving company.....called themselves "the Packers" ......over time all us league referees came to regard them as "the HACKERS" - the way they played the game - and every call against them - after they tomahawk-chopped a shooter's wrist, or delivered an elbow to his eye (sometimes drawing blood) - was instantly met with massive *OUTRAGE* on the floor and from their bench for my so-called "totally biased officiating" ......the constant hip-checks they delivered to knock over opponents would make them world-class hockey defensemen! I kid you not! But heaven forbid I should blow the whistle...
I prided myself in both my knowledge of the rule books (fastball also) and fairness in calling the games. If one team committed 10 fouls and other only 2, then I called 10 fouls on the one team and only 2 on the other, without any regard to how "upset" one side might become. There was no bias, for or against. And we were always on the lookout for the whiner teams that tried to "work the refs." We were trained about that BS...
3
I've watched literally thousands of football games in my 69 years since birth. Pro, college, highschool. All weather conditions. And among them all it has always been the case that one side gets flagged more times than the other in a large majority of the games. In fact from my observation it is an exception to the norm when both teams get flagged an exact equal number of times. I know this too from experience officiating basketball for 15 years. And oftentimes the numbers of penalties are lopsided. We see this in NFL and college football and hoops too.
Indeed we've all witnessed games where the "offending team" with the lopsided calls against themare still committing the majority of fouls, repeatedly, and surely deserve even more, but by then it looks like the refs are giving them a break as the score is getting out of hand!
Do we have a rightful concern that ALL the games do not end with EXACTLY (or near) the same number of calls called equally on each team?
Is any deviation from EXACTLY the same number of calls on each team an implication the game officials are necessarily biased and reffing unfairly?
I remember vividly dreading officiating mens rec league games involving one particular team sponsored by a local moving company.....called themselves "the Packers" ......over time all us league referees came to regard them as "the HACKERS" - the way they played the game - and every call against them - after they tomahawk-chopped a shooter's wrist, or delivered an elbow to his eye (sometimes drawing blood) - was instantly met with massive *OUTRAGE* on the floor and from their bench for my so-called "totally biased officiating" ......the constant hip-checks they delivered to knock over opponents would make them world-class hockey defensemen! I kid you not! But heaven forbid I should blow the whistle...
I prided myself in both my knowledge of the rule books (fastball also) and fairness in calling the games. If one team committed 10 fouls and other only 2, then I called 10 fouls on the one team and only 2 on the other, without any regard to how "upset" one side might become. There was no bias, for or against. And we were always on the lookout for the whiner teams that tried to "work the refs." We were trained about that BS...
but im placing the odds of u getting attacked or mocked or laughed at or harrassed or ridiculed for that post at somepoint within next 6 months at 5 to 1
so -500
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
3
@fubah2
intresting and good pts
but im placing the odds of u getting attacked or mocked or laughed at or harrassed or ridiculed for that post at somepoint within next 6 months at 5 to 1
Durham - a republican appointee from trump era - did not charge any high-level FBI or intelligence official with a crime! - and he even acknowledged in a footnote that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign did *NOTHING* prosecutable, either!
Hillary vindicated by republican!
By the spring of 2020, according to officials familiar with the inquiry, Durham’s effort to find intelligence abuses in the origins of the Russia investigation had come up EMPTY!
But instead of wrapping up [ed, as they should have] Barr and Durham shifted to a different rationale, hunting for a basis to BLAME the Clinton campaign!
By keeping the investigation going, Barr initially appeased his boss, Trump, who, as Barr recounted in his memoir, was angry about the lack of smear-charges as the 2020 election neared.
3
Durham - a republican appointee from trump era - did not charge any high-level FBI or intelligence official with a crime! - and he even acknowledged in a footnote that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign did *NOTHING* prosecutable, either!
Hillary vindicated by republican!
By the spring of 2020, according to officials familiar with the inquiry, Durham’s effort to find intelligence abuses in the origins of the Russia investigation had come up EMPTY!
But instead of wrapping up [ed, as they should have] Barr and Durham shifted to a different rationale, hunting for a basis to BLAME the Clinton campaign!
By keeping the investigation going, Barr initially appeased his boss, Trump, who, as Barr recounted in his memoir, was angry about the lack of smear-charges as the 2020 election neared.
Rudy Giuliani sued for $10 million by former aide over alleged sexual assault
By Jonathan Stempel, REUTERS -
NEW YORK (Reuters) -A former associate of Rudy Giuliani is suing him for sexual assault, accusing Donald Trump's former personal lawyer of hiring her to fulfill his desire for a sexual relationship.
In a civil complaint filed on Monday and seeking at least $10 million, Noelle Dunphy said Giuliani began abusing her almost immediately after hiring her as an off-the-books employee in January 2019.
She said Giuliani made clear that satisfying his sexual demands was an "absolute requirement" of her job.
Dunphy had first publicly discussed her accusations in January but added many new details in a 69-page complaint filed against Giuliani and three of his namesake companies in a New York state court in Manhattan.
3
Rudy Giuliani sued for $10 million by former aide over alleged sexual assault
By Jonathan Stempel, REUTERS -
NEW YORK (Reuters) -A former associate of Rudy Giuliani is suing him for sexual assault, accusing Donald Trump's former personal lawyer of hiring her to fulfill his desire for a sexual relationship.
In a civil complaint filed on Monday and seeking at least $10 million, Noelle Dunphy said Giuliani began abusing her almost immediately after hiring her as an off-the-books employee in January 2019.
She said Giuliani made clear that satisfying his sexual demands was an "absolute requirement" of her job.
Dunphy had first publicly discussed her accusations in January but added many new details in a 69-page complaint filed against Giuliani and three of his namesake companies in a New York state court in Manhattan.
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
3
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump Organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
Shocker that Facebook would be ranked down at the very bottom close to FTX, FOX News, and the infamous convicts at Trump Org.
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump Organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
Shocker that Facebook would be ranked down at the very bottom close to FTX, FOX News, and the infamous convicts at Trump Org.
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dominated the 9 p.m. hour on Monday night with 2.33 million total viewers and 259,000 viewers in the key 25-54 age demographic!
Maddow beat Fox News’ Sean Hannity with just 1.72 million viewers and 162,000 demo viewers.
Maddow’s strong ratings helped to boost MSNBC prime time over Fox with an average 1.73 million . Fox was second with 1.62 million average prime time viewers.
*NOTE: due to LIBERAL viewers spreading out among multiple different "Liberal-leaning" national alternatives, Fox News by virtue of a virtual monopoly on MAGA/republican viewers/readersshould *ALWAYS* have the highest numbers for any given segment and demographic. Conservatives really have very few options, other than Fox. Liberals have many! So this is big news anytime Fox can't draw more viewers than any Liberal leaning media.
3
Fox News drops
Cable News Ratings Monday May 22:
Maddow Leads MSNBC to Prime Time Win Over Fox!
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dominated the 9 p.m. hour on Monday night with 2.33 million total viewers and 259,000 viewers in the key 25-54 age demographic!
Maddow beat Fox News’ Sean Hannity with just 1.72 million viewers and 162,000 demo viewers.
Maddow’s strong ratings helped to boost MSNBC prime time over Fox with an average 1.73 million . Fox was second with 1.62 million average prime time viewers.
*NOTE: due to LIBERAL viewers spreading out among multiple different "Liberal-leaning" national alternatives, Fox News by virtue of a virtual monopoly on MAGA/republican viewers/readersshould *ALWAYS* have the highest numbers for any given segment and demographic. Conservatives really have very few options, other than Fox. Liberals have many! So this is big news anytime Fox can't draw more viewers than any Liberal leaning media.
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
Fox News drops Cable News Ratings Monday May 22: Maddow Leads MSNBC to Prime Time Win Over Fox! MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dominated the 9 p.m. hour on Monday night
Rachel
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Fox News drops Cable News Ratings Monday May 22: Maddow Leads MSNBC to Prime Time Win Over Fox! MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow dominated the 9 p.m. hour on Monday night
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
No wonder those listed are ranked so damn low! Not too surprising is Trump is at the bottom!!!
2
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.
No wonder those listed are ranked so damn low! Not too surprising is Trump is at the bottom!!!
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
3
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
If it wasn’t for your stats I’d be lost and they’d be misleading me ……
in a vortex of poor information you’re the sauce to my baked ziti we …..
all need to come together , in unity , to make a thread , that says that Third’s the best , and it doesn’t matter that the verbiage I splattered doesn’t service the notion , that First is the most perfect cuz these are just words that are spoken …..
in your honor , cuz you’re a pure scholar , born to be a doctor , but instead performing for this forum and my boredom isn’t bothered …..
in fact it’s destroyed , so thank you third , now don’t act like you’re annoyed …..
take the compliments buddy
cuz you’re one hell of an American
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
If it wasn’t for your stats I’d be lost and they’d be misleading me ……
in a vortex of poor information you’re the sauce to my baked ziti we …..
all need to come together , in unity , to make a thread , that says that Third’s the best , and it doesn’t matter that the verbiage I splattered doesn’t service the notion , that First is the most perfect cuz these are just words that are spoken …..
in your honor , cuz you’re a pure scholar , born to be a doctor , but instead performing for this forum and my boredom isn’t bothered …..
in fact it’s destroyed , so thank you third , now don’t act like you’re annoyed …..
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
Can you do an explanation of why these same cities have the highest crime rate and why their crime rates keep increasing?
1
@thirdperson
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
Can you do an explanation of why these same cities have the highest crime rate and why their crime rates keep increasing?
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.No wonder those listed are ranked so damn low! Not too surprising is Trump is at the bottom!!!
Doesn't surprise me in the least.
2
Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Axios Harris survey of over 16,000 Americans rank 100 most visible companies. Trump organization is last for the second year in a row. FTX, Fox, Twitter and Facebook received the next lowest scores. Rankings are based on trust, character, culture, ethics, citizenship, products, services, vision and trajectory.No wonder those listed are ranked so damn low! Not too surprising is Trump is at the bottom!!!
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study.
Interesting fact. Of course they may have more reason to do so in some cases.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study.
Interesting fact. Of course they may have more reason to do so in some cases.
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
The lawlessness of all this shit sticks in my craw like that crawfish did , to my finger , that one time when I tried to pick it up too quick and it pinched me with it’s pincers
I’m not trying to swim upstream against current here . I’m just putting down the ideas that popped up when I thought about lawlessness for a second , and it reminded me about that one time when I visited my friend Reggie in Louisiana
I am not asking for a rebuttal nor a retort , I’m simply reporting from my cerebral cortex and the force , deeply hidden beneath the fortress of it’s core .
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
0
The lawlessness of all this shit sticks in my craw like that crawfish did , to my finger , that one time when I tried to pick it up too quick and it pinched me with it’s pincers
I’m not trying to swim upstream against current here . I’m just putting down the ideas that popped up when I thought about lawlessness for a second , and it reminded me about that one time when I visited my friend Reggie in Louisiana
I am not asking for a rebuttal nor a retort , I’m simply reporting from my cerebral cortex and the force , deeply hidden beneath the fortress of it’s core .
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
When trump becomes an inmate white collar crime in America will drop 20% instantly.
2
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities.
white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
When trump becomes an inmate white collar crime in America will drop 20% instantly.
@thirdperson Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities. Can you do an explanation of why these same cities have the highest crime rate and why their crime rates keep increasing?
It's been almost a week, and yet no response from "anybody " on the left...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
@thirdperson Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson: Despite accusations that democrats defund the police, democrat cities fund policing at higher levels than republican cities according to Third way study. In 2020, the 25 largest democrat cities spend 38% more on policing per capita than the 25 largest republican cities. Can you do an explanation of why these same cities have the highest crime rate and why their crime rates keep increasing?
It's been almost a week, and yet no response from "anybody " on the left...
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
When trump becomes an inmate white collar crime in America will drop 20% instantly.
but i make it closer to 22.8% drop in white collar crime
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: white collar crime on the rise in many placestoo because the so called repo party of law and order has becomecomplete lawless
When trump becomes an inmate white collar crime in America will drop 20% instantly.
but i make it closer to 22.8% drop in white collar crime
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.