I'm just curious......I've seen stuff on the internet.....but just want to see what you think......where are these passengers if these planes didn't hit the Pentagon and Shanksville?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I'm just curious......I've seen stuff on the internet.....but just want to see what you think......where are these passengers if these planes didn't hit the Pentagon and Shanksville?
I'll just copy and paste my response from another thread that the no planes are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING against the government.
People
SAW the plane, just as they saw the planes hit the WTC towers. Just
because you think no one could fly so a missile must have hit the
Pentagon doesn't really fly because we know with Operation Northwoods
from 1962 they talked about remote controlled planes...2001 it could
have been computer controlled. There were renovations on that side of
the Pentagon and the plane could have been guided in by something in
that wing of the Pentagon.
Do
you know about CJCSI 3610.01A (above link) which was dated June 1, 2001
(3 months prior to 9/11) which changed the procedures of how hijacked
aircraft were handled and required contacting Secretary of Defense
(Donald Rumsfeld) for approval.
We know Rumsfeld and Cheney had been involved with PNAC prior to the Bush Admin.
And Minetta's testimony proves there was an order given...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y
Have you ever read PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses"?
https://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf One of their 4 core missions was to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" (PAGE 11)
And on page 63 they state "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
9/11 was their Pearl Harbor to implement all their policies.
So
there is a lot more that you could be talking about and the missile
theory just makes people dismiss all the documented evidence.
Read their documents.
0
I'll just copy and paste my response from another thread that the no planes are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING against the government.
People
SAW the plane, just as they saw the planes hit the WTC towers. Just
because you think no one could fly so a missile must have hit the
Pentagon doesn't really fly because we know with Operation Northwoods
from 1962 they talked about remote controlled planes...2001 it could
have been computer controlled. There were renovations on that side of
the Pentagon and the plane could have been guided in by something in
that wing of the Pentagon.
Do
you know about CJCSI 3610.01A (above link) which was dated June 1, 2001
(3 months prior to 9/11) which changed the procedures of how hijacked
aircraft were handled and required contacting Secretary of Defense
(Donald Rumsfeld) for approval.
We know Rumsfeld and Cheney had been involved with PNAC prior to the Bush Admin.
And Minetta's testimony proves there was an order given...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y
Have you ever read PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses"?
https://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf One of their 4 core missions was to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" (PAGE 11)
And on page 63 they state "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
9/11 was their Pearl Harbor to implement all their policies.
So
there is a lot more that you could be talking about and the missile
theory just makes people dismiss all the documented evidence.
I'll just copy and paste my response from another thread that the no planes are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING against the government.
People SAW the plane, just as they saw the planes hit the WTC towers. Just because you think no one could fly so a missile must have hit the Pentagon doesn't really fly because we know with Operation Northwoods from 1962 they talked about remote controlled planes...2001 it could have been computer controlled. There were renovations on that side of the Pentagon and the plane could have been guided in by something in that wing of the Pentagon.
Do you know about CJCSI 3610.01A (above link) which was dated June 1, 2001 (3 months prior to 9/11) which changed the procedures of how hijacked aircraft were handled and required contacting Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) for approval.
We know Rumsfeld and Cheney had been involved with PNAC prior to the Bush Admin.
And Minetta's testimony proves there was an order given...
One of their 4 core missions was to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" (PAGE 11)
And on page 63 they state "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
9/11 was their Pearl Harbor to implement all their policies.
So there is a lot more that you could be talking about and the missile theory just makes people dismiss all the documented evidence.
Read their documents.
When I started this thread, I asked truthers, where are the passengers off 77 and 93?
0
Quote Originally Posted by moneym8:
I'll just copy and paste my response from another thread that the no planes are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING against the government.
People SAW the plane, just as they saw the planes hit the WTC towers. Just because you think no one could fly so a missile must have hit the Pentagon doesn't really fly because we know with Operation Northwoods from 1962 they talked about remote controlled planes...2001 it could have been computer controlled. There were renovations on that side of the Pentagon and the plane could have been guided in by something in that wing of the Pentagon.
Do you know about CJCSI 3610.01A (above link) which was dated June 1, 2001 (3 months prior to 9/11) which changed the procedures of how hijacked aircraft were handled and required contacting Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) for approval.
We know Rumsfeld and Cheney had been involved with PNAC prior to the Bush Admin.
And Minetta's testimony proves there was an order given...
One of their 4 core missions was to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars" (PAGE 11)
And on page 63 they state "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."
9/11 was their Pearl Harbor to implement all their policies.
So there is a lot more that you could be talking about and the missile theory just makes people dismiss all the documented evidence.
Read their documents.
When I started this thread, I asked truthers, where are the passengers off 77 and 93?
the Mineta testimony being a big point of evidence is a joke....and that goes with the rest of your links
You are wrong, but you obviously think everything is wrong because you don't want to acknowledge anything as real and you have no intention of reading the documents.
So there is really no point in you and me getting into a discussion you mind is set without reading their own documents. That's fine you might as well just move on then.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Iveycheats:
I could be wrong about that
the Mineta testimony being a big point of evidence is a joke....and that goes with the rest of your links
You are wrong, but you obviously think everything is wrong because you don't want to acknowledge anything as real and you have no intention of reading the documents.
So there is really no point in you and me getting into a discussion you mind is set without reading their own documents. That's fine you might as well just move on then.
why even give "truthers" the dignity of bringing it up?
just ignore them, they are scum. i hope something bad happens to each and everyone of em
I completely understand how you dont believe 911 was a inside job but why the hate to someone who does? What does it matter to you what someone else thinks?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coppsguy:
why even give "truthers" the dignity of bringing it up?
just ignore them, they are scum. i hope something bad happens to each and everyone of em
I completely understand how you dont believe 911 was a inside job but why the hate to someone who does? What does it matter to you what someone else thinks?
You are wrong, but you obviously think everything is wrong because you don't want to acknowledge anything as real and you have no intention of reading the documents.
So there is really no point in you and me getting into a discussion you mind is set without reading their own documents. That's fine you might as well just move on then.
I started this thread with a question.....you've posted several times without an answer
show me where your links answered my questions
0
Quote Originally Posted by moneym8:
You are wrong, but you obviously think everything is wrong because you don't want to acknowledge anything as real and you have no intention of reading the documents.
So there is really no point in you and me getting into a discussion you mind is set without reading their own documents. That's fine you might as well just move on then.
I started this thread with a question.....you've posted several times without an answer
I started this thread with a question.....you've posted several times without an answer
show me where your links answered my questions
Go to the very first post of mine, the "no planes" are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING and it obviously worked because you are focusing on the worng thing.
LOOK AT THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS
0
Quote Originally Posted by Iveycheats:
I started this thread with a question.....you've posted several times without an answer
show me where your links answered my questions
Go to the very first post of mine, the "no planes" are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING and it obviously worked because you are focusing on the worng thing.
Go to the very first post of mine, the "no planes" are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING and it obviously worked because you are focusing on the worng thing.
LOOK AT THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS
I'm not focusing on the wrong thing....I started the thread....WHERE ARE THE PASSENGERS?
0
Quote Originally Posted by moneym8:
Go to the very first post of mine, the "no planes" are just red herrings to get people like you to dismiss EVERYTHING and it obviously worked because you are focusing on the worng thing.
LOOK AT THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS
I'm not focusing on the wrong thing....I started the thread....WHERE ARE THE PASSENGERS?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
