Interesting commentary here from an EX republican, now independent.
Link
I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a
position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are
the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see
no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like
the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few
congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake
the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are
predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those
numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also,
Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is
not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections. That’s why
I wrote my Wrong on Race book, which no one read.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Interesting commentary here from an EX republican, now independent.
Link
I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a
position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are
the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see
no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like
the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few
congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake
the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are
predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those
numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also,
Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is
not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections. That’s why
I wrote my Wrong on Race book, which no one read.
The current admin is doing almost exactly what the last did. Some a bit better and some a bit worse. I completely disagree with what he says about the Repubs not being able to take back the big chair, house and senate. At this rate the Dems won't lose the house and senate in the mid-terms, but it will be a razor thin margin and that's just a springboard for 2012.
0
The current admin is doing almost exactly what the last did. Some a bit better and some a bit worse. I completely disagree with what he says about the Repubs not being able to take back the big chair, house and senate. At this rate the Dems won't lose the house and senate in the mid-terms, but it will be a razor thin margin and that's just a springboard for 2012.
Incorrect my friend, dems getting absolutely crushed on the generic congressional ballot. I'm not sure where you got the 20% but 20 certainly beats 10-15%. Your Pelosis, Watsons, and SJ Lees are killing the dems.
0
Incorrect my friend, dems getting absolutely crushed on the generic congressional ballot. I'm not sure where you got the 20% but 20 certainly beats 10-15%. Your Pelosis, Watsons, and SJ Lees are killing the dems.
They have the backing from about 20% of the public. Also bare in mind that the demographics shift is not a friend for the GOP.
What !!!! You gotta' be kidding me !!!! The demographics shift isn't a friend for the GOP.
This country is getting older, not younger. Who do you think the GOP is mainly made up of ??? I know all the lefty publications you read tell you it's just right wing bible thumpers. But it's as much if not more the older population than anything else.
Older people = conservative. Even with the social security scare the Dems put out every election. Like clockwork.....the Repubs have huge numbers of the older population voting for them.
And now this 20% number you just love to clutch. The Democrat lead congress has a lower rating than the Repubs. Obama's rating seems to be sliding by the week and just as the last election, where Obama should of won by at least mid teens to 20% margin, the Dems are fumbling once again. If the Repubs are so hated, why in the world is there so much resistance to this health care plan and why is Obama's ratings starting to tank?
It's because the Repubs are not as hated as you think they are. But with that kind of thinking and if most on the left think this way, there is gonig to be a huge surprise come election cycle. The Dems have let power go to thier head just as the Repubs did in the last 4 years.
That's how I see it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
They have the backing from about 20% of the public. Also bare in mind that the demographics shift is not a friend for the GOP.
What !!!! You gotta' be kidding me !!!! The demographics shift isn't a friend for the GOP.
This country is getting older, not younger. Who do you think the GOP is mainly made up of ??? I know all the lefty publications you read tell you it's just right wing bible thumpers. But it's as much if not more the older population than anything else.
Older people = conservative. Even with the social security scare the Dems put out every election. Like clockwork.....the Repubs have huge numbers of the older population voting for them.
And now this 20% number you just love to clutch. The Democrat lead congress has a lower rating than the Repubs. Obama's rating seems to be sliding by the week and just as the last election, where Obama should of won by at least mid teens to 20% margin, the Dems are fumbling once again. If the Repubs are so hated, why in the world is there so much resistance to this health care plan and why is Obama's ratings starting to tank?
It's because the Repubs are not as hated as you think they are. But with that kind of thinking and if most on the left think this way, there is gonig to be a huge surprise come election cycle. The Dems have let power go to thier head just as the Repubs did in the last 4 years.
Lippsman you forget it is not a national election. Those numbers mean nada. It is the regional demographics shifts in the states that does the difference.
A) The midwest (hispanics) B) Virginia, NC, SC (more young people moving in)
Your argument is without teeth. It just means that the republicans will the electoral college mandates with larger margins from states they more or less already have in the bag.
0
Lippsman you forget it is not a national election. Those numbers mean nada. It is the regional demographics shifts in the states that does the difference.
A) The midwest (hispanics) B) Virginia, NC, SC (more young people moving in)
Your argument is without teeth. It just means that the republicans will the electoral college mandates with larger margins from states they more or less already have in the bag.
Mikael99 - We disagree on most things but I really like your Avatars as of late. Very nice to look at, almost nice enough to keep reading your comments. LOL
Cheers
0
Mikael99 - We disagree on most things but I really like your Avatars as of late. Very nice to look at, almost nice enough to keep reading your comments. LOL
Mikael99 - We disagree on most things but I really like your Avatars as of late. Very nice to look at, almost nice enough to keep reading your comments. LOL
Cheers
Well you could use a little help with your avatars.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SoonerFan54:
Mikael99 - We disagree on most things but I really like your Avatars as of late. Very nice to look at, almost nice enough to keep reading your comments. LOL
Cheers
Well you could use a little help with your avatars.
Mikael: I doubt if 20% of the people in this Forum CARE what you think about anything. It is strange to have someone that purports to be from Denmark having about 30% of the entries on the Politics Forum page. Have a nice life.
0
Mikael: I doubt if 20% of the people in this Forum CARE what you think about anything. It is strange to have someone that purports to be from Denmark having about 30% of the entries on the Politics Forum page. Have a nice life.
I guess I fail to understand your constant postings about american politics.
I do have to ask, have you ever lived here in the US for any length of time? Not as a student, but lived and worked for any amount of time. I get the impression you've not lived here based on a lot of the things you say. My definition of you is you're book smart about the US, but not street smart. That part you don't seem to have any grasp of.
0
I guess I fail to understand your constant postings about american politics.
I do have to ask, have you ever lived here in the US for any length of time? Not as a student, but lived and worked for any amount of time. I get the impression you've not lived here based on a lot of the things you say. My definition of you is you're book smart about the US, but not street smart. That part you don't seem to have any grasp of.
I guess I fail to understand your constant postings about american politics.
I do have to ask, have you ever lived here in the US for any length of time? Not as a student, but lived and worked for any amount of time. I get the impression you've not lived here based on a lot of the things you say. My definition of you is you're book smart about the US, but not street smart. That part you don't seem to have any grasp of.
You are welcome
0
Quote Originally Posted by jackjaffee:
I guess I fail to understand your constant postings about american politics.
I do have to ask, have you ever lived here in the US for any length of time? Not as a student, but lived and worked for any amount of time. I get the impression you've not lived here based on a lot of the things you say. My definition of you is you're book smart about the US, but not street smart. That part you don't seem to have any grasp of.
Interesting commentary here from an EX republican, now independent.
Link
I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a
position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are
the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see
no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like
the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few
congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake
the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are
predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those
numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also,
Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is
not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections. That’s why
I wrote my Wrong on Race book, which no one read.
Forget about real growth. What the American People care most about is ... are they employed or not ?
If history is any indicator of past recessions, we will have an elevated level of unemployment well into 2012.
BHO's success at re-election will depend mostly on where this number is in 2012.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
Interesting commentary here from an EX republican, now independent.
Link
I will know that the party is on the path to recovery when someone in a
position of influence reaches out to former Republicans like me. We are
the most likely group among independents to vote Republican. But I see
no effort to do so. All I see is pandering to the party’s crazies like
the birthers . In the short run that may be enough to pick up a few
congressional seats next year, but I see no way a Republican can retake
the White House for the foreseeable future. Both CBO and OMB are
predicting better than 4% real growth in 2011 and 2012. If those
numbers are even remotely correct Obama will have it in the bag. Also,
Republicans have to find a way to win some minority votes because it is
not viable as a whites-only party in presidential elections. That’s why
I wrote my Wrong on Race book, which no one read.
Forget about real growth. What the American People care most about is ... are they employed or not ?
If history is any indicator of past recessions, we will have an elevated level of unemployment well into 2012.
BHO's success at re-election will depend mostly on where this number is in 2012.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.