Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by Sidehatch:
@I_Need_A_Detox FRAUD. THAT'S WHY. HE WAS BELOW THE MENDOZA LINE IN LAWSUITS, 0/62, BECAUSE HE HAD NO EVIDENCE OTHER THAN HEARSAY, WHICH ISN'T EVIDENCE. THAT IS ALL. THE FRAUD IS CLEAR AS DAY, WHEN FORCED TO PRESENT EVIDENCE OF HIS OUTRIGHT LIES, HE HAS NONE. CASE CLOSED.
@I_Need_A_Detox FRAUD. THAT'S WHY. HE WAS BELOW THE MENDOZA LINE IN LAWSUITS, 0/62, BECAUSE HE HAD NO EVIDENCE OTHER THAN HEARSAY, WHICH ISN'T EVIDENCE. THAT IS ALL. THE FRAUD IS CLEAR AS DAY, WHEN FORCED TO PRESENT EVIDENCE OF HIS OUTRIGHT LIES, HE HAS NONE. CASE CLOSED.
I don’t know what you’re talking about. What fraud? Are you not allowed to lie on Twitter? Nearly every politician would be banned from social media if that’s the case.
0
Hot Forum Topics
