Death rate way down
Right now as we speak,
Yahoo news has an online poll going with nearly 44,500 votes cast, asking:
Should there be a nationwide mask mandate in the U.S.?
79% YES!
21% no
Right now as we speak,
Yahoo news has an online poll going with nearly 44,500 votes cast, asking:
Should there be a nationwide mask mandate in the U.S.?
79% YES!
21% no
Death rate Canada: 5.1%
Death rate UK: 6.0%
Death rate Italy: 8.6%
Death rate China: 5.2%
Death rate US: 2.7%
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country
Death rate Canada: 5.1%
Death rate UK: 6.0%
Death rate Italy: 8.6%
Death rate China: 5.2%
Death rate US: 2.7%
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_death_rates_by_country
Actually, the current level of new cases is eclipsing the July levels,
according to the latest NBC News analysis, and that means the death rate will rise in 2-3 weeks.
Nearly 74,000 cases were reported on Tuesday.
And the U.S. has been averaging 71,000 new cases per day over the past week,
which is the most in any seven-day stretch since the crisis started in March.
Actually, the current level of new cases is eclipsing the July levels,
according to the latest NBC News analysis, and that means the death rate will rise in 2-3 weeks.
Nearly 74,000 cases were reported on Tuesday.
And the U.S. has been averaging 71,000 new cases per day over the past week,
which is the most in any seven-day stretch since the crisis started in March.
When people just parrot talking points it’s obvious — because they can’t answer questions.
They have no real understanding of what they’re talking about.
Crying, blocking, ignoring or dodging the question by calling you a racist are some of the more common tactics used.
When people just parrot talking points it’s obvious — because they can’t answer questions.
They have no real understanding of what they’re talking about.
Crying, blocking, ignoring or dodging the question by calling you a racist are some of the more common tactics used.
October 28:
Top 15 governments which have FAILED to protect their citizens.
Covid death rates per million population:
1036 Peru
951 Belgium
< big gap >
758 Spain
744 Brazil
740 Bolivia
732 Chile
711 Ecuador
703 trump's-denialist regime <--- 8th worst death rate per million pop!
694 Mexico
672 UK
663 Argentina
627 Italy
614 Panama
599 Columbia
586 Sweden
Stat source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
October 28:
Top 15 governments which have FAILED to protect their citizens.
Covid death rates per million population:
1036 Peru
951 Belgium
< big gap >
758 Spain
744 Brazil
740 Bolivia
732 Chile
711 Ecuador
703 trump's-denialist regime <--- 8th worst death rate per million pop!
694 Mexico
672 UK
663 Argentina
627 Italy
614 Panama
599 Columbia
586 Sweden
Stat source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Oct 28:
And here are 4 countries - located in very close proximity to CHINA -
who have acted responsibly and kept their death rates extremely LOW:
Taiwan death toll = 0.3 per million
Hong Kong death toll = 14 per million
S. Korean death toll = 9 per million
Japan death toll = 14 per million
trump's REPUBLICAN regime = 703 per million
Stat source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
While some dummies will lament that there are 7 countries (of at least 4 million pop.) with death rates worse than ours, there are actually 129 countries with at least 4 million pop. and 121 are doing far better than the trump-regime!! 7 doing worse than trump 121 doing BETTER than trump Bottom line.
Oct 28:
And here are 4 countries - located in very close proximity to CHINA -
who have acted responsibly and kept their death rates extremely LOW:
Taiwan death toll = 0.3 per million
Hong Kong death toll = 14 per million
S. Korean death toll = 9 per million
Japan death toll = 14 per million
trump's REPUBLICAN regime = 703 per million
Stat source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
While some dummies will lament that there are 7 countries (of at least 4 million pop.) with death rates worse than ours, there are actually 129 countries with at least 4 million pop. and 121 are doing far better than the trump-regime!! 7 doing worse than trump 121 doing BETTER than trump Bottom line.
There are many more than 7 countries with a higher death rate than the United States
51 to be exact
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105914/coronavirus-death-rates-worldwide/
There are many more than 7 countries with a higher death rate than the United States
51 to be exact
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105914/coronavirus-death-rates-worldwide/
In its October report on cloth masks, CDC reports that the only RCT on cloth masks does “not favor use of cloth masks.”
The cited RCT specifically cautioned against use of cloth masks.
Science does not support cloth masks... only political leanings do.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/10/20-0948_article
In its October report on cloth masks, CDC reports that the only RCT on cloth masks does “not favor use of cloth masks.”
The cited RCT specifically cautioned against use of cloth masks.
Science does not support cloth masks... only political leanings do.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/10/20-0948_article
“To our knowledge, only 1 randomized controlled trial (4) has been conducted to examine the efficacy of cloth masks in healthcare settings, and the results do not favor use of cloth masks.”
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/10/20-0948_article
“This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
“To our knowledge, only 1 randomized controlled trial (4) has been conducted to examine the efficacy of cloth masks in healthcare settings, and the results do not favor use of cloth masks.”
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/10/20-0948_article
“This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
False, there are 7 countries with pop. more than 4 million that are worse than US.
And 12 countries with pop more than 4 million that are doing waaaaaaaaaaay better than trump.
Do masks help slow spread of COVID-19 in Kansas?
One study says 'Yes,' by as much as 50%
The Kansas City Star
A University of Kansas study released this week backs up what health officials
have been telling us for months: Masks do work by significantly slowing
the spread of COVID-19.
“We found a 50% reduction in the spread of COVID-19 in counties
that had a mask mandate compared to those without,” Donna K. Ginther,
director of the Institute for Policy and Social Research at KU, said.
“Masks, it is important to note, do not eliminate COVID,
but they significantly slow the spread of the disease ” she said.
False, there are 7 countries with pop. more than 4 million that are worse than US.
And 12 countries with pop more than 4 million that are doing waaaaaaaaaaay better than trump.
Do masks help slow spread of COVID-19 in Kansas?
One study says 'Yes,' by as much as 50%
The Kansas City Star
A University of Kansas study released this week backs up what health officials
have been telling us for months: Masks do work by significantly slowing
the spread of COVID-19.
“We found a 50% reduction in the spread of COVID-19 in counties
that had a mask mandate compared to those without,” Donna K. Ginther,
director of the Institute for Policy and Social Research at KU, said.
“Masks, it is important to note, do not eliminate COVID,
but they significantly slow the spread of the disease ” she said.
That’s false. Sounds like you don’t know how to calculate the death rate. It’s totally understandable. This stuff can be confusing for people like yourself, that’s why I’m here to help guide you.
That’s false. Sounds like you don’t know how to calculate the death rate. It’s totally understandable. This stuff can be confusing for people like yourself, that’s why I’m here to help guide you.
This is a quote from the CDC
“To our knowledge, only 1 randomized controlled trial (4) has been conducted to examine the efficacy of cloth masks in healthcare settings, and the results do not favor use of cloth masks.”
This is a quote from the study the CDC is referencing
"This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection."
What part of this are you having a hard time understanding?
This is a quote from the CDC
“To our knowledge, only 1 randomized controlled trial (4) has been conducted to examine the efficacy of cloth masks in healthcare settings, and the results do not favor use of cloth masks.”
This is a quote from the study the CDC is referencing
"This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection."
What part of this are you having a hard time understanding?
In epidemiology, a case fatality rate (CFR) — sometimes called case-fatality-risk
or case-fatality-ratio — is the proportion of deaths from a certain disease compared
to the total number of people diagnosed with the disease for a particular period.
This not "death rate"
Death rate is commonly used term to describe "deaths per million population"
Hypothetical example that proves case-fatality rate (which is NOT "Death rate") is definitely NOT the best measure for the performance of a government in combating a pandemic...
Country A has 330 million people
they conduct 8,154,594 test - many repeated on the same UNafflicted people
- and find 219,674 confirmed deaths for a ratio of deaths to TEST CASES of 2.7%
Using this dumbass measure to judge performance
we get 2.7 deaths to the number of tests performed,
and as I stated --- many on the same UNaffected person
Country B, with the same 330 million population,
only tests 10 people and 5 died.
By this measure, they have a 50% case-fatality rate.
So, bottom line, which government is PERFORMING better at protecting their citizens?
Country A with a 2.7% case-fatality-rate -- but 219,674 DEAD
or
Country B with a 50% case-fatality-rate -- but only 3 DEAD
Some dummies here don’t know how to calculate the "death rate" so the substitute a useless stat for judging PERFORMANCE OF A GOVERNMENT and use the "case-fatality-rate" instead -- which can make a bad performance look much better through statistical sleight of hand.
It’s totally understandable when supporting a fascist/racist/rapist/tax-fraud.
This stuff can be confusing for people like them, that’s why I’m here to help guide those who are much more intelligent...
NOTE: the death rate is often misapplied to the "case-fatality-rate" or "case-fatality-ratio" and sometimes used interchangably, but falsely.
In epidemiology, a case fatality rate (CFR) — sometimes called case-fatality-risk
or case-fatality-ratio — is the proportion of deaths from a certain disease compared
to the total number of people diagnosed with the disease for a particular period.
This not "death rate"
Death rate is commonly used term to describe "deaths per million population"
Hypothetical example that proves case-fatality rate (which is NOT "Death rate") is definitely NOT the best measure for the performance of a government in combating a pandemic...
Country A has 330 million people
they conduct 8,154,594 test - many repeated on the same UNafflicted people
- and find 219,674 confirmed deaths for a ratio of deaths to TEST CASES of 2.7%
Using this dumbass measure to judge performance
we get 2.7 deaths to the number of tests performed,
and as I stated --- many on the same UNaffected person
Country B, with the same 330 million population,
only tests 10 people and 5 died.
By this measure, they have a 50% case-fatality rate.
So, bottom line, which government is PERFORMING better at protecting their citizens?
Country A with a 2.7% case-fatality-rate -- but 219,674 DEAD
or
Country B with a 50% case-fatality-rate -- but only 3 DEAD
Some dummies here don’t know how to calculate the "death rate" so the substitute a useless stat for judging PERFORMANCE OF A GOVERNMENT and use the "case-fatality-rate" instead -- which can make a bad performance look much better through statistical sleight of hand.
It’s totally understandable when supporting a fascist/racist/rapist/tax-fraud.
This stuff can be confusing for people like them, that’s why I’m here to help guide those who are much more intelligent...
NOTE: the death rate is often misapplied to the "case-fatality-rate" or "case-fatality-ratio" and sometimes used interchangably, but falsely.
Do masks help slow spread of COVID-19 in Kansas?
One study says 'Yes,' by as much as 50%
Do masks help slow spread of COVID-19 in Kansas?
One study says 'Yes,' by as much as 50%
The whole issue on masks has been discussed verbatim in over 30 posts earlier in the summer .
That's stated in the first paragraph of this thread
It will not be repeated here just because YOU demand it...
The whole issue on masks has been discussed verbatim in over 30 posts earlier in the summer .
That's stated in the first paragraph of this thread
It will not be repeated here just because YOU demand it...
Anyway my fellow intelligent NON-adolf lovers
I too volunteer like Midnight1 (but UNlike anyone on the right)
and my shift is today so I must leave until football time
Anyway my fellow intelligent NON-adolf lovers
I too volunteer like Midnight1 (but UNlike anyone on the right)
and my shift is today so I must leave until football time
It is not 2.7 deaths to the number of tests performed.
It isn’t even 2.7% of the number of tests performed.
It is 2.7 deaths for every 100 positive tests.
You sound clueless.
It is not 2.7 deaths to the number of tests performed.
It isn’t even 2.7% of the number of tests performed.
It is 2.7 deaths for every 100 positive tests.
You sound clueless.
Good job!
Good job!
Wearing a mask social distancing good hygiene practices reduce the spread of germs
Not really a grey area there disinfecting surfaces sterilizing dishes. This isnt. A new concept does the mask stop dry spore no. No it doesn't. But within the humidity and moisture releasing from the lungs the filter will trap moisture in breath hence stopping the spread of infected molecules will a mask and gloves do it alone. No proper sanitaziation is also needed . 20 seconds of hand washing after using toilet facilities. Hand sanitizer after touching dirty surface avoid eye nose and mouth contact with hands.....
Wearing a mask social distancing good hygiene practices reduce the spread of germs
Not really a grey area there disinfecting surfaces sterilizing dishes. This isnt. A new concept does the mask stop dry spore no. No it doesn't. But within the humidity and moisture releasing from the lungs the filter will trap moisture in breath hence stopping the spread of infected molecules will a mask and gloves do it alone. No proper sanitaziation is also needed . 20 seconds of hand washing after using toilet facilities. Hand sanitizer after touching dirty surface avoid eye nose and mouth contact with hands.....
Social distancing.
WHO has developed guidelines in dealing with vaccine distribution. Taking into thr consideration of infection transmission due to mass gatherings.
Some natiins ate adopting door to door lottery vaccination process. Our nation is utilizing the drug store drive through chains. But this is real and is becoming an uncontrollable monster....
Social distancing.
WHO has developed guidelines in dealing with vaccine distribution. Taking into thr consideration of infection transmission due to mass gatherings.
Some natiins ate adopting door to door lottery vaccination process. Our nation is utilizing the drug store drive through chains. But this is real and is becoming an uncontrollable monster....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.