All Forums | Pro Football

Arizona at Green Bay (11/04/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6348
Posts: 36
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 86
Posted: #26
Cardinals +10.5
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #27
Green Bay
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 551
Posted: #28
Man, as much as I like GB in this contest -10 is too much chalk for them to be giving.  GB's defense is slightly above average and is more prone to air attacks anyway being ranked 20th.  Even with Skelton, it's clear that they like to air the ball rather than keep it on the ground.  Last week it looked ugly on MNF but then again you're going up against one of the best defenses in the league and GB is no top tier defense.  Slightly above average at best.  

Can't see weather being a factor here even in early November.  

GB wins this contest, but it'll be closer than most people think.  That'll be in part due to Arizona's stiff defense.  The only thing they're weak in is run defense which we all know GB sucks at running the ball.  

I'm not sure what happened with GB last week at home against the Jags but man that team sucks ass on both sides of the ball and statistically GB should've dominated Jacksonville but just barely squeezed out a W in that one winning only by 10 points when it should've been more like 14-17.  

Sad that Arizona's offense stinks just as bad as Jacksonville's except switch their rankings for running and passing.  These 2 teams are literally the bottom in offensive rankings in the league.

Being all that said, I'd take the Under in this game.  Shitty ass offense from Arizona attached to one of the best defenses spells low scoring game in this matchup.  Arizona held the #1 offense NE to only 20 points and they only scored 18 points themselves in that game.  Keep in mind that was with Kolb and not Skelton.  Arizona won't be able to score enough to help GB make this over.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 21783
Posted: #29
Simply too many if's and's or but's here when it comes down to injuries. GB has a lot of key players still in limbo especially,Jordy Nelson. If he does go he will prolly be limited . Plus they have a bye coming up and i think the coach will not push him hard in this game with a hammy.

If i were to pick here i would take the Cards to cover.Not sure yet,still on the fence on this.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by jonfon:



what does obstaining mean?

He's not having sex, I think? 

Packers didn't cover last week, they cover this week?  I don't know?  

Packers -10 Under the total  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 9375
Posted: #31
i like the GB -10 here.

Predict : GB 31-17


taking the OVER also.

glta

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 940
Posted: #32
I would WATCH OUT on this one...Maybe GB only plays hard enough to win the game..Hard to stay motivated to play harder when you're already up by 10 points...(-10.5 ? HMMM)..
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 775
Posted: #33
Will the Cardinals coach "Play to win the game"?. Does he even know how? Will he run the ball at least twice in a row on many occasions to get first downs and keep the Packers O off the field? Can he get his guys NOT to turn the ball over in 40 degree temperatures? Will he take a couple shots(like 5 or 6) down the field against the Packers press defense to open it up a little? I am probably giving him more credit than he deserves, but just maybe he will "play to win the game", if so I'd take the under on the total and watch the Pack win 31-10!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 1730
Posted: #34
Greenbay
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 11877
Posted: #35
Cardinals +10.5

 Good luck  
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 551
Posted: #36
Damn, went over by 1 score.  Stupid Skelton threw a pick on Arizona's red zone that got the extra GB score that would've kept it under and GB from covering the -10.  Oh well, can't complain about being 3-1 for the day!  
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.