Even though it's
preseason, you know the team wants to get out of the losing column.
Also, with a new coach, he'll want to start off right and build
confidence with a win.
Surely the Lions win this one?
0
How do you not like the Lions -1 here?
Even though it's
preseason, you know the team wants to get out of the losing column.
Also, with a new coach, he'll want to start off right and build
confidence with a win.
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
0
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
You should discard that comment right there. The Lions beat the Giants last year in the preseason So I dont know if you can look at quality of team when capping preseason
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
You should discard that comment right there. The Lions beat the Giants last year in the preseason So I dont know if you can look at quality of team when capping preseason
I think I'm throwing money out the window here but I just can't bring myself to take the Lions giving points. I'll lose my money on the Falcons.
Earth to Coloneljim! It's the pre-season!!! Can't beat a quality team like the Falcons? In the regular season, yeah, but it's not the regular season!
Lions giving away points. Doesn't that ring any bells for you? Wouldn't that make everyone jump on the Falcons?!
Culpepper and Stafford fighting for a job and will look to light it up all game. Schwartz wants a win to shake the 0-16, even if it's just preseason. Plus, first-time head coaches love the first pre-season game and trying to get a victory.
Falcons may win, but odds are against it, the books know it and you are betting against a lot of solid trends and notions takin gthe Falcons here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coloneljim:
Atlanta - 17 Detroit - 14
Falcons +2 under 35
I think I'm throwing money out the window here but I just can't bring myself to take the Lions giving points. I'll lose my money on the Falcons.
Earth to Coloneljim! It's the pre-season!!! Can't beat a quality team like the Falcons? In the regular season, yeah, but it's not the regular season!
Lions giving away points. Doesn't that ring any bells for you? Wouldn't that make everyone jump on the Falcons?!
Culpepper and Stafford fighting for a job and will look to light it up all game. Schwartz wants a win to shake the 0-16, even if it's just preseason. Plus, first-time head coaches love the first pre-season game and trying to get a victory.
Falcons may win, but odds are against it, the books know it and you are betting against a lot of solid trends and notions takin gthe Falcons here.
Even though it's
preseason, you know the team wants to get out of the losing column.
Also, with a new coach, he'll want to start off right and build
confidence with a win.
Surely the Lions win this one?
My thoughts exactly - didn't the Lions go 4-0 last pre-season, before running the table in reverse?!?!?! Lions & Raiders play at the highest level, when the games don't count!!! I now see that the line is up to +3 - Lions for me, thank you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HeadOverHeart:
How do you not like the Lions -1 here?
Even though it's
preseason, you know the team wants to get out of the losing column.
Also, with a new coach, he'll want to start off right and build
confidence with a win.
Surely the Lions win this one?
My thoughts exactly - didn't the Lions go 4-0 last pre-season, before running the table in reverse?!?!?! Lions & Raiders play at the highest level, when the games don't count!!! I now see that the line is up to +3 - Lions for me, thank you.
like the Over in this game you have to look at the Defenses ofeach team they have not been able to stop anyone for the last how many years. Just like last night with the Jets/Rams historically they play terrible Defense. That is why I chose the under and won the other evening with the Baltimore game they play D
0
like the Over in this game you have to look at the Defenses ofeach team they have not been able to stop anyone for the last how many years. Just like last night with the Jets/Rams historically they play terrible Defense. That is why I chose the under and won the other evening with the Baltimore game they play D
the way i see it,atl knows det will be trying to settle out their qb thing and be ready for some serious passing.stafford is still a rookie even though he has had a "STELLAR" camp so far he has'nt had any real pro game time,big difference there! yes det needs to get things going,and their pre record is very convincing to argue that they'll win/want this more blah,blah,blah.you'll never convince me not to take atl getting pts at det even if it's a no count pre game!going ATL/UNDER here.
0
the way i see it,atl knows det will be trying to settle out their qb thing and be ready for some serious passing.stafford is still a rookie even though he has had a "STELLAR" camp so far he has'nt had any real pro game time,big difference there! yes det needs to get things going,and their pre record is very convincing to argue that they'll win/want this more blah,blah,blah.you'll never convince me not to take atl getting pts at det even if it's a no count pre game!going ATL/UNDER here.
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
I agree. anyone...and I mean anyone...who disagrees...is a MORON. take ATL -3 to cover. I would say over under, but let me get this straight. you are worried about a team that just went 0-16 and still is suspect due to having Dante Culppeper as the starter is going to beat ATL? yeah ******* right.
0
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
I agree. anyone...and I mean anyone...who disagrees...is a MORON. take ATL -3 to cover. I would say over under, but let me get this straight. you are worried about a team that just went 0-16 and still is suspect due to having Dante Culppeper as the starter is going to beat ATL? yeah ******* right.
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
I agree. anyone...and I mean anyone...who disagrees...is a MORON. take ATL -3 to cover. I would say over under, but let me get this straight. you are worried about a team that just went 0-16 and still is suspect due to having Dante Culppeper as the starter is going to beat ATL? yeah ******* right.
How'd that Atlanta -3 work out for you, moron. It's a long season to be putting your foot in your mouth in week one of the preseason...
0
Quote Originally Posted by dddevin69:
I was thinking Atlanta by 3 HOH but I'll hold off and check to see the line-ups and the QB rotations. Just don't know if the Lions can win SU vs a quality team like the Falcs.
I agree. anyone...and I mean anyone...who disagrees...is a MORON. take ATL -3 to cover. I would say over under, but let me get this straight. you are worried about a team that just went 0-16 and still is suspect due to having Dante Culppeper as the starter is going to beat ATL? yeah ******* right.
How'd that Atlanta -3 work out for you, moron. It's a long season to be putting your foot in your mouth in week one of the preseason...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.